
I'm gay – I don't want to be surrounded by children on holiday
Quelle horreur. France 's high commissioner for childhood, Sarah El Haïry, said that the hospitality industry was showing signs of a 'no-kids trend', and that, she said, was ' violence against children'.
She particularly took aim at adults like me, who object to being disturbed by other people's kids when on holiday. 'A child shouts, laughs and moves,' she said. 'We're institutionalising the idea that silence is a luxury and the absence of children is a luxury.'
Damn right we are – and it's a luxury I won't give up without a fight. Because such a ban on 'adult-only' establishments would be inadvertently homophobic.
It's an overlooked and under-discussed topic, and potentially taboo to say, but whoever proposed this ban hasn't faced the microaggressions that gay people like me face daily – from children.
They can't help it – they're kids. But kids don't have the same filter that fully socialised adults do. And that lack of filter can spoil my holiday, cherished time I take out away from the microaggressions of the everyday straight world.
They're not things like outright hostility or violence; it's the small things that add up to make you feel like you're not welcome. They catapult you back to when you were treated as an outsider, a freak, a 'queer', just for being you.
When I'm affectionate in public with a partner, as everyone should be able to be on holiday – and the French, of all people, should get this – children who haven't witnessed much same-sex affection will often stare. They sometimes point, whisper or giggle.
This is what I mean by a microaggression – and it's one I can do without. You get tired of being someone else's learning curve. That includes staring kids. I don't blame them for doing it. But so many times, in places where kids are allowed, me and my boyfriend (who am I kidding? Holiday romance…) often end up self-censoring to the point we'll refrain from even holding hands.
Recently, I got sick of reigning it in that this year, for the first time, I stayed in a gay-friendly resort in Mexico, the Spartacus Hostel for Men in Puerto Vallarta. It was a revelation. Surrounded only by other gay men, I… exhaled.
I was no longer in a minority. We could be as gay as we liked, without fear of upsetting or confusing conservative families with children. It was hugely liberating.
Under French plans, such places of freedom would be prosecuted. I would avoid France if it instigated such a ban. And we must raise our voices before an idea like this spreads.
It's not just for people like me who want to be gay in peace. My female best friend is happily childless by choice. We both adore adult-only establishments. We live on opposite sides of the world so our quality quiet time together, without the interruption of kids, is important to us. She would resist such a mindless ban, given she gets judged enough for a choice she sees as empowering, when others see it, infuriatingly, as sympathy-inducing.
We love our friends' children, but we need spaces where our own behaviour isn't policed. Where we can swear, flirt, drink cocktails, tell sordid stories without having to live up to 'child friendly' behaviour standards.
There are just a handful of magical 'men-only' hostels and hotels in the world, catering to gay men like me who want to truly relax without worrying, for once, about upsetting anyone's 'innocent' sensibilities.
In addition, there's only a relatively small cohort of adult-only venues worldwide, designed for people who don't hate kids, but simply desire a week or two without them.
According to most recent statistics, France is still the world's most visited country. But it risks kissing goodbye to that top spot if it proceeds with this ill-considered and stigmatising ban. Well… mwah!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former Salmond staffer rejects Sturgeon claims in book as ‘obviously false'
Nicola Sturgeon's new book contains 'falsehoods at worst, fabrications at best' about her predecessor, Alex Salmond's former chief of staff has claimed. Geoff Aberdein, who worked for Mr Salmond when he was first minister, hit out at Ms Sturgeon, saying: 'I was brought up that you didn't speak ill of the dead. 'But I think if you're going to speak ill of the dead, at least make your claims accurate.' He told the Holyrood Sources podcast that Mr Salmond's widow Moira was 'particularly upset and frustrated at a lot of what has been said' about her late husband, who died suddenly in October 2024. Mr Aberdein continued: 'I think it was important to set out and correct the record not just because Alex is not in position to defend himself, but for myself as well and the series of other officials and civil servants that have contacted me.' Claims that Mr Salmond was the person who leaked the story of the sexual harassment allegations against him are 'obviously false', Mr Aberdein insisted. He said that when his former boss took the phone call to say the story about the allegations was being published by the Daily Record he was actually meeting lawyers to 'draft a legal summons to prevent Nicola Sturgeon's Government from making the allegations public'. Mr Aberdeen said: 'To suggest Alex was simultaneously leaking documents deeply damaging to his reputation whilst at the same time paying lawyers a lot of money to get a court order to prevent publication of the same material is just utterly absurd.' Mr Salmond went on to be acquitted of all the charges against him in a court case in 2020. Mr Aberdein also dismissed claims by Ms Sturgeon that Mr Salmond 'didn't read' the white paper on independence which had been produced by the Scottish government in the run up to the 2014 referendum. In her recently published memoir, Frankly, Ms Sturgeon spoke out about her 'cold fury' with her former leader over his 'abdication of responsibility' on the key document. Mr Aberdein – who said he would not be reading the book – accepted that his former boss 'delegated the responsibility for drafting the white paper to Nicola Sturgeon'. However he insisted: 'To suggest, as I think was the purpose of this story, that he wasn't engaged in the process of a prospectus for independence is utterly nonsense. The former Salmond chief of staff also rejected claims that Mr Salmond was 'apparently against same-sex marriage' – saying that this was 'demonstrably false'. Mr Aberdein told the podcast Mr Salmond had 'declared his personal support for gay marriage for the first time' in a newspaper article in April 2011. And he added that while the SNP election manifesto that year had pledged to consult on the issue Mr Salmond 'chose to come out… excuse the pun, the turn of phrase, ahead of that result, to say that he personally supported it.' With the SNP having won the 2011 Holyrood election, Mr Aberdein recalled 'being in the room with advisors, civil servants and indeed ministers about how we would go about reassuring different sections of our society about that legislation, particularly religious leaders and other civic leaders'. He also made the 'obvious point' that 'if Alex Salmond didn't want legislation to be progressed, he was the first minister of a majority SNP government, it wouldn't have been progressed'. Mr Aberdeen said: 'The point falls down on that alone.'


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
States members to vote on suspension of deputy
The committee which oversees the conduct of States members, is set to bring forward proposals to suspend Deputy Philip Ozouf for 28 days for breaching the code of announcement has been made after an investigation by the commissioner of standards into whether he had brought public office into disrepute after speeding offences in November upheld complaints that Deputy Ozouf's offence and his failure to attend three parish hall enquiries, breached several codes of conduct for States Ozouf has yet to respond to the BBC to provide a comment. Standards and conduct The breaches identified included not fulfilling his public duty by breaking the commissioner said the fact Deputy Ozouf did not engage with the investigation in a timely manner undermined public panel of politicians which oversees the standards and conduct of States members have now put forward a proposal to suspend Deputy Ozouf from the States Assembly for 28 will vote on that on 9 September and if they support the suspension, then it will take place with immediate effect.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Rape Crisis Scotland urged to abide with UK Supreme Court ruling amid vacancy for 'woman-only' role
Rape Crisis Scotland is being urged to abide with a landmark legal ruling as it advertises for a new "woman-only" advocacy worker. Campaigners are calling on the charity to ensure that the person hired is a "biological woman", as defined by the UK Supreme Court in a judgment earlier this year. Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the charity Sex Matters, said the ruling "leaves no doubt that 'women' must mean those who are female, as observed and recorded at birth". She added: "Rape Crisis Scotland says it is 'trans inclusive' and that's fine as long as it operates according to the law, which means this job is only for women, not men who identify as such." It comes after Rape Crisis Scotland (RCS) came under scrutiny last year following failures at Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC). An independent review commissioned by RCS found that ERCC - an autonomous member centre - failed to provide women-only spaces for 16 months. Mridul Wadhwa - a transgender woman - stepped down as ERCC chief executive after the report concluded she failed to act professionally and did not understand the limits of her authority. The investigation was triggered after an employment tribunal found former ERCC employee Roz Adams had been constructively dismissed over her "gender critical beliefs". ERCC apologised to Ms Adams, while RCS said the subsequent review "presented challenging findings" as it vowed to act on the proposed recommendations. Amid the controversy, Glasgow and Clyde Rape Crisis (GCRC) centre cut ties with RCS's network of branches following concerns over single-sex spaces. Since then, For Women Scotland's (FWS) long-running legal battle with Scottish ministers ended with the UK Supreme Court ruling in April that the definition of a "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refers to "a biological woman and biological sex". The ruling has prompted organisations across the country to re-evaluate their policies on single-sex spaces and services. In the RCS advertisement for the new part-time advocacy worker, the application notes state: "Only women need apply under Schedule 9, Part 1 of the Equality Act 2010." The genuine occupational requirement clause allows employers to specify that a job can only be held by someone with a particular protected characteristic in specific circumstances. Ms McAnena said the role of a rape crisis support worker would easily meet the conditions for the occupational requirement clause. In light of the Supreme Court ruling, FWS and Sex Matters are calling on RCS to ensure the role goes to a biological woman. The campaign groups are seeking clarification amid claims the reference to Schedule 9 of the Equality Act was also the same wording used in ERCC's 2021 job advert that led to the recruitment of Ms Wadhwa. Trina Budge, director of FWS, called on RCS to confirm it would comply with the 2025 ruling so it can "start to rebuild trust with service users". Interviews for the advocacy role are expected to begin next month. The advert says: "We are committed to a diverse and inclusive workplace and especially welcome applications from women of colour and those under-represented in the workforce." The winning applicant will become part of a team that provides support and advocacy to survivors who are engaged, or considering engaging, with the criminal justice system following an experience of sexual violence.