NBA star Tyler Herro claims he doesn't believe in ‘history': 'How do we know?'
Don't know much about history.
Miami Heat star Tyler Herro said he 'doesn't believe in history' before 1950 and some events after — including the moon landing and NBA legend Wilt Chamberlain's 100-point game.
Herro, 25, was livestreaming with popular Twitch streamers Adin Ross and N3on last week when, about halfway through, a fan asked the 2019 first-round pick if he believed 'Wilt [Chamberlain] would be top five in today's league?'
Advertisement
4 Tyler Herro during a game against the Cleveland Cavaliers during the third quarter in Game Four of the Eastern Conference First Round NBA Playoffs at Kaseya Center on April 28, 2025 in Miami, Florida.
Getty Images
'I don't even know what Wilt looked like, played like,' Herro admitted.
Ross then asked Herro if he thought Chamberlain 'dropped 100' while playing for the Philadelphia Warriors in a game against the New York Knicks in March 1962.
Advertisement
'Yeah,' the Kentucky alumni muttered, before questioning the popular streamer if he believed in history.
'You think history is a real thing?' Herro asked, to which Ross replied with a confident 'yeah.'
'Nah, I don't believe in history,' the NBA star said, shaking his head and leaning back in his chair. 'No, I'm deadass.'
Advertisement
The shocking admission had both streamers stunned, with Ross asking Herro if he doesn't believe things that happened 200 years ago.
'Hell no,' he replied.
'What about the moon landing?' N3on asked.
'Nah, I don't believe in that. I don't believe in anything that happened before 1950,' Herro doubled down, leaving the streamers briefly speechless.
Advertisement
Herro's commitment to believing history was fake led to N3on questioning if society had been lied to.
4 Herro said he 'doesn't believe in history' before 1950 and some events after — including the moon landing and NBA legend Wilt Chamberlain's 100-point game.
NBAE via Getty Images
'Have we been f–king bamboozled?' the streamer joked.
The Miami Heat point guard then likely questioned when Christopher Columbus discovered America.
'For real, like, how do we know? When did he come to the land or whatever?' Herro asked. 'They said 1492?'
N3on then pointed out that there's 'no way of really knowing,' to which Herro shrugged his shoulders in agreement.
4 Astronaut Buzz Aldrin Jr. poses for a photograph beside the US flag on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission in July 1969.
AP
4 Wilt Chamberlain holds a sign reading '100' in the locker room after he scored a record 100 points as the Warriors defeated the New York Knicks 169-147, on March 2, 1962.
AP
Advertisement
Ross then pointed out that fans in the chat were calling Herro 'based.'
Herro then read a comment from a fan in the chat saying he 'never read a book,' and another saying historians 'documented it' throughout time.
'See, y'all believe that sh-t,' the point guard said of the people in the chat. 'I don't believe that sh-t! I never read that sh-t in school.'
Advertisement
The conversation then moved forward, but left fans wondering if Herro was serious about not believing in historical events or was messing around.
Chamberlain's 100-point game — which still stands alone as the NBA record for most points ever scored by a player in a single game — was not televised but the record is well-documented and was verified that night by the Philadelphia Warriors' game statistician, Harvey Pollack.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Prince William's billionaire pal Sunjay Kapur's final words revealed moments before fatal heart attack on polo field after swallowing bee
Billionaire businessman Sanjay Kapur's final words have been revealed moments before he swallowed a bee, triggering a fatal heart attack. Prince William's longtime friend, who was the chairman of global car parts giant Sona Comstar, collapsed during a polo match in Windsor, England, on June 12. He was 53. Witnesses told the Telegraph that the keen polo player shouted, 'I've swallowed something!' moments before he was reportedly stung by a bee on the mouth. Advertisement 5 Billionaire businessman Sanjay Kapur's final words have been revealed moments before he swallowed a bee, triggering a fatal heart attack. Hindustan Times via Getty Images The sting subsequently triggered anaphylactic shock that caused his heart to stop. Experts say internal stings can be deadly as they can cause immediate swelling, blockage of the airways and a sudden drop in blood pressure, resulting in cardiac arrest. Advertisement At the time of his death, Kapur's polo team was playing Sujan Indian Tigers in the subsidiary final of the Queen's Cup. He had been playing at the prestigious Guards Polo Club in Windsor, which is often frequented by members of the royal family. 5 Prince William's longtime friend collapsed during a polo match in Windsor, England, on June 12. He was 53. Hindustan Times via Getty Images 5 At the time of his death, Kapur's polo team was playing Sujan Indian Tigers in the subsidiary final of the Queen's Cup. Hindustan Times via Getty Images Advertisement 'He will be greatly missed not only by his family and friends but the local community around his club as he employed so many people and made so many friends — he was fun, kind and generous,' his friend told the outlet. 'He didn't distinguish between his grooms or high net worth friends — when he had a party, everyone was invited and everyone was equal.' According to Forbes, Kapur — who also boasted US citizenship — had an estimated net worth of $1.2 billion. 5 Kapur, who also boasted US citizenship, had an estimated net worth of $1.2 billion. @priyasachdevkapur/Instagram Advertisement Kapur was a regular on the polo circuit and frequently rubbed elbows with the royal circle. He often took part in exclusive matches across the UK and was invited to play with members of the royal fold, including the Prince of Wales, 42. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters As for his personal life, Kapur had been previously married to Bollywood superstar Karisma Kapoor, with whom he had two children, Samaira and Kiaan. The pair had endured a contentious divorce in 2016 after 13 years of marriage. 5 Kapur tied the knot with former model Priya Sachdev in 2017. @priyasachdevkapur/Instagram During their split, Kapoor filed a domestic violence plea, claiming he once went off to play polo with Prince William while their son was sick. The businessman went on to marry former model Priya Sachdev in 2017. The pair welcomed their son, Azarias, the following year.
Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Nothing Looks Beautiful Anymore—and We Did This to Ourselves
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The concept of beauty is being redefined—not by genetics or societal consensus, but by algorithms, filters, and the cold precision of artificial intelligence. For many, the perfect face is no longer born; it is built—designed by AI, refined by cosmetic surgery, retouched on photo-editing apps, and approved by dating algorithms. In this landscape, even global beauty icons of the past—Marilyn Monroe, Grace Kelly, Cleopatra—are suddenly being called "mid," a Generation Z insult that translates to plain or average. That startling change came into focus in a viral TikTok video posted on May 2 by Faye Oakley, a full-time student and musician based in the U.K., whose commentary struck a cultural nerve with viewers online. Overlaid with text that read, "if Cleopatra, Helen of Troy, and Marilyn Monroe were alive today people would call them 'mid,'" Oakley's video called into question how AI, porn and dating apps have "rotted" people's perceptions of attractiveness. "In that clip, I had mentioned another video that I had seen on TikTok of a woman talking positively about her appearance and how the comments on that video seemed to take offense at her self-confidence," Oakley, 26, told Newsweek. "They tried to humble her and convince her she, in fact, was not good looking." The phenomenon Oakley highlighted—public mockery of attractive women who express confidence—has sparked a deeper reckoning with how digital culture and technology are reshaping our ideas of attractiveness. Oakley's post, which has since drawn more than 645,000 likes, is just one example of a widespread concern: beauty standards are now being set by algorithms, AI and altered reality. From left: American actress and model Marilyn Monroe poses for a portrait wearing a red dress in Los Angeles, California, circa 1960; and an AI-generated image of a "beautiful woman" by TikTok creator @wizawoza. From left: American actress and model Marilyn Monroe poses for a portrait wearing a red dress in Los Angeles, California, circa 1960; and an AI-generated image of a "beautiful woman" by TikTok creator @wizawoza. Getty Images / @wizawoza The short clip went on to trigger a wave of agreement—and backlash—that revealed just how deeply this issue runs. Beauty Icons Deemed 'Mid' The notion that historically revered beauties would now be dismissed as average and plain struck many as jarring, but Oakley said it is not hyperbole. Her post referenced an earlier video of a young woman who had described herself as having a "timeless face." She was subsequently bombarded with comments aimed at undermining her confidence. "At one point or another, these women have all been portrayed as beauty icons," she said. "However, I believe a large amount of people today would not find these women attractive, for many reasons." In Oakley's view, it is not just changing tastes—it is a systemic shift. "With the rapid advancements in AI we are currently seeing, it is become easier than ever for people to create realistic images and videos of flawless women," Oakley said. "They can customize everything … And if those ideals change, so can she." And while most consumers know these images are fictional, she added that, for many, the psychological impact remains. "It alters the way we see ourselves and others," Oakley said. "When you become accustomed to seeing 'perfect' women, features of 'real' women such as wrinkles, acne, stretch marks, and body hair become unacceptable. "We create a culture in which women are held to a beauty and aesthetic standard that is impossible to meet." The Rise of "Algorbeauty" Dr. Benjamin Caughlin, a board-certified facial plastic surgeon, has coined the term "algorbeauty" to describe the fusion of algorithm-driven aesthetics and modern beauty standards. Caughlin, who is preparing a book on the topic, said that digitally driven ideals are not just shaping physical features—they are influencing identity and self-worth. In his clinical work, Caughlin has noted an uptick in patients requesting surgeries to emulate AI-generated or heavily altered images. The implications, he added, are concerning. From Filters to Fillers Celebrity makeup artist Amanda Gabbard said she sees the same trend from her makeup chair. Clients frequently present her with AI-generated faces or airbrushed photos of celebrities as their Pinterest board to create a makeup look from. "They are chasing a version of beauty that is not real, yet they believe it is attainable," Gabbard told Newsweek. "It is heartbreaking to watch people become dissatisfied with their own faces simply because they do not match something that was never real to begin with." Gabbard said these expectations also bleed into the dating world. "Clients tell me how nerve-wracking it is to meet someone in person after presenting a completely filtered version of themselves online," she said. "Some even say they have become unrecognizable to their dates." Gabbard added: "In trying to meet these impossible standards, people are losing touch with who they are—and it is affecting their confidence, their relationships, and their happiness." Oakley said she feels similarly, bringing pornography and the sexual representation of women online into the mix. "Many of the scenarios displayed in pornography show women in submissive positions compared to men … And the women in these videos are often focused on looking as attractive as possible, at the cost of their own comfort," Oakley said. "I feel like this leads many people to expect this from women in real life. She agreed that the unattainable expectations created by AI have only exacerbated by the use of social media and dating apps, which are "algorithmically designed to keep people gambling for that potential perfect match." "This creates a mentality that, no matter how beautiful a woman is, the next one might be even more beautiful," Oakley said. "Before they know it, people develop a mindset of devaluing the looks of women based on the belief that there is always something 'better' just around the corner. "People feel entitled to perfect women," Oakley added. Confidence as a Target Oakley said that her viral video was intended to critique the culture of "humbling" women for expressing self-assurance and happiness with their looks, amid increasingly unrealistic beauty standards set by others. But the responses, she said, mostly "reinforced" the very standards she had aimed to challenge. "Most of the comments were debating whether the famous women I referred to are actually attractive," Oakley said. Whether viewers agreed or disagreed with her, she added, the conversation still revolved around a singular, narrow question: is a woman's confidence acceptable or valid only if she is "truly attractive"? That notion, she said, is part of the problem. "The main issue I wanted to highlight is that it is not anyone's responsibility to tell a woman how she should feel about her own appearance," Oakley said. "A lot of people are uncomfortable with women expressing confidence in themselves, and this needs to change." Algorithms and Cultural Confusion Dr. Anastasia Kārkliņa Gabriel, a cultural theorist and author of Cultural Intelligence for Marketers, told Newsweek that the effect of AI and social media on beauty standards is nothing short of revolutionary. "Hyper-optimization is the name of the game in modern-day beautification rituals and practices, resulting in further homogenization of beauty ideals," Gabriel said. "On social media, we see the flawless outcome, not the complex process of engineering this new reality. "Whether through advanced surgical interventions or artificially generated imagery, the line between reality and fiction has been fundamentally blurred." The question, then, is why people who are conventionally attractive within Western beauty standards—such as Grace Kelly or Marilyn Monroe—now seem "average" to so many. "Because the convention—that which is considered to be the standard in our culture—has been disrupted and altered in a way that has skewed our perceptions of attraction, desirability, and perceived flawlessness," Gabriel said. "Digital users are increasingly bombarded with this type of imagery through social media at a rate not seen in the history of humanity. "Our brains are, therefore, being rewired to see hyper-optimization in beauty forms as the new normal." Gabriel also connected these shifting standards to broader social dynamics. "Humans have always striven to attain the unattainable in pursuit of greater social standing," she said. "And beauty is no exception: it has historically been how we express who we are or, rather, who we aspire to be." Gen Z and the 'Mid' Culture Part of the shift may also be generational. Gen Z—raised on a steady diet of social media—has grown comfortable rating and ridiculing people's appearances in ways that feel normal within their digital communities and how they communicate online. Oakley noted that it is easier to be critical over a screen and that this drive to "humble" people online may facilitated by the detachment of social-media platforms. In this environment, even confident women become targets. Margot Robbie, best known for Barbie and The Wolf of Wall Street, became the subject of many similarly critical comments on social media in 2023, when she was labeled "mid" after being announced as the lead in Barbie. "Nowadays, people feel emboldened enough to tell confident women that they have no right to be as secure as they are," she said. Once down to the eye of the beholder, between AI-enhanced images, cosmetic procedures, dating apps gamifying attraction, and a culture increasingly obsessed with perfection, the definition of beauty has become markedly less anchored to reality. "People are not able to appreciate natural features of women," Oakley said. "They have every tool at their disposal to erase or 'fix' these features." And so the paradox persists: in a world overflowing with filtered, sculpted, and synthetically perfected beauty, even the icons of the past and present are no longer good enough.
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why committing fouls is a necessary evil for Thunder's league-best defense
This moment was created for Lu Dort. Protecting a one-point lead with under two and a half minutes remaining in what amounted to a do-or-die Game 4, the Oklahoma City Thunder's brawny firecracker stayed on brand, picking up Indiana Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton full-court. Such is Dort's forte. Haliburton proceeded with caution, avoiding the breakneck pace that Indiana tormented opposing defenses with all year. Before getting to half court, he pitched the ball ahead to Pascal Siakam, but getting rid of the rock did not get rid of Dort. Advertisement Dort watched the ball traverse over his noggin but did not divert his focus from Haliburton. Like an NFL cornerback in press coverage at the line of scrimmage, he jammed Haliburton at half court, extending two hands into the All-NBA guard's chest. The contact halted any forward progress and forced Haliburton to run east or west to get the ball. Haliburton still hoped to go north-south. But Dort, per usual, slid himself in the way. The press coverage at the half-court line allowed the Thunder's All-Defensive First Team guard to get between Haliburton and Siakam as they tried a dribble handoff. The purpose of the action was to slingshot the Pacers' offensive engine downhill toward the rim. But Dort plowed through the 6-foot-8 forward like he wasn't even there. He crowded Haliburton as he received the ball. Haliburton could not turn the corner, so he kicked it back to Siakam and let his teammate probe Oklahoma City's defense on the other side of the floor. As the Pacers worked their pass-heavy offense from side to side, Dort denied Haliburton from getting the ball back in his hands, which encouraged Haliburton to retreat out to the half-court line. And there, Haliburton and Dort stood and waited as the Pacers looked for a shot with just over two minutes remaining in Friday's match, an eventual Thunder victory that tied the NBA Finals at two games apiece. With 10 seconds remaining on the shot clock, Haliburton made his break for the ball. Naturally, Dort was ready. As Haliburton tried to grab it, Dort gave him a bump with his left hand and once again forced himself between the passer and receiver of the dribble handoff. In this instance, Dort got his left hand on the ball and tipped it into the backcourt for what turned into a clutch-time steal that added a point to Oklahoma City's lead. After the game, when referee talk dominated the public discourse, this play drew an awful lot of attention on social media. — Young Simba (@the2kmessiah) June 14, 2025 From the opposite baseline, it appeared as though Dort's physicality crossed the line. But the Thunder had already dictated the terms of the game with their relentless physicality. If it crossed the line, so be it. After all, this isn't just Dort's brand. It's also the Thunder's. Dort may not have picked up a foul on this particular play, part of a special second-half suffocation of Haliburton, but there are other moments like this when an official blows the whistle. The Thunder will take the fouls, whether from him, from fellow perimeter pests Alex Caruso, Jalen Williams and Cason Wallace, or from rim protectors Isaiah Hartenstein and Chet Holmgren. Advertisement In Oklahoma City, where the Thunder will bash offenses into submission, fouls are baked into the recipe, a necessary evil inside the league's top defense. 'It's kind of the cost of doing business with physicality. … A lot of it for us is learning which ones we don't give,' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. 'Like, a guy gathers the ball, is about to take a tough shot — (Pacers guard Andrew) Nembhard is good at that. You get caught with your hands in there. He knows how to sell those calls or get those calls. He deserves the calls. If you're reaching in late, he's about to shoot a long 2, those are the ones you wanna lay off of. But some of them is just the cost of physicality.' The Thunder are in exclusive company, not just because of their success but also because of their style. Historically, the best defenses can get stops without fouling. But Oklahoma City engulfs basketball's gaudiest attacks not in spite of its hacking but because of it. 'You gotta look at the other stuff,' Caruso told The Athletic. 'The turnover creation, the rebound rate, transition, those are the things that we win. We might give up something with fouls, but we are OK being aggressive and setting the tone that way when we don't give up the other stuff.' The Thunder are kleptomaniacs. After leading the league in takeaways during the regular season, their defensive turnover rate has somehow increased during the playoffs. Elite competition, whether it's Haliburton or Anthony Edwards or Nikola Jokić on the other side, has not hindered what has been the NBA's top defense all year. Oklahoma City allowed the fewest points per possession of any team during the regular season and has stayed atop the league during the playoffs, as well. It makes the Thunder one of only two defenses since the NBA began tracking per-possession data in 1996 to lead the league in defensive efficiency, but also finish bottom five in free-throw rate (free-throw attempts per 100 possessions) allowed. The other is the 2008 Boston Celtics, who famously smashed their way to a title during Year 1 of a big three that included Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen. Advertisement In other words, the Thunder foul a ton but don't give up many points. And the last squad that pulled off this strategy to the same extreme got a championship out of it. 'We're going to play the way that we do,' Dort said. 'We're going to be aggressive.' The first possession of an OKC game often includes some player swiping at another. Early, hard fouls or the patented swarming of the paint that's become the team's staple set a Thunder-friendly baseline from the jump, since refs can't send players to the line each possession. They aren't the only team deploying this strategy. In fact, never before has what's normally been a staple among the best defensive teams — guarding without fouling — been flipped on its head so aggressively. Other teams around the league are adopting similar identities, including the only other one that's still alive. The Pacers have played their best defense of the season during a playoff run that has included victories over the Milwaukee Bucks, Cleveland Cavaliers and New York Knicks. Add in a matchup with the Thunder, and that's four opponents that finished inside the top 10 in points per possession during the regular season. Indiana has humbled each of those top-notch offenses. It stifles ball movement. Its perimeter defenders, led by Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith, provide the Dort treatment. It limits efficient shot selection. Even in a Game 4 victory, the Thunder couldn't get into their offense against the Pacers, when OKC dished out only 10 assists and attempted just 17 3-pointers. Meanwhile, one trend stands out: As the Pacers' defense has ramped up, so has its foul rate. The Pacers have fouled significantly more during the playoffs than they did during the regular season, when fouling is supposed to decrease. They now own the highest free-throw rate allowed out of all 16 playoff teams. Advertisement 'I think it's because of the way they are pressuring the way they are,' Daigneault said. 'They're incredibly physical on the perimeter. They're getting the ball up the floor. They're pursuing over screens. And it's disrupted the plays, but the trade-off of that is you end up getting whistles.' If anyone knows, it's Daigneault. But he and Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle aren't the only ones. The first defensive possession of every Orlando Magic game this season was indistinguishable from a brawl. Orlando would strategically come out swinging, similar to Oklahoma City, in the hopes of setting that baseline. The Magic ended the season second in points allowed per possession and 30th in free-throw rate allowed. They are the only team since 1996 to finish dead last in that stat and still own a top-five defense. They are willing to concede the free throws, just like the Thunder. Midway through the first quarter of Game 4, Siakam sprang on a fast break. Two OKC wings, Williams and Aaron Wiggins, stood in front of him, blocking the lane to the hoop. Siakam lofted the ball behind him to microwave scorer Bennedict Mathurin, who was in a position to attack. That's when the Thunder did what they do best. Williams angled in front of Mathurin as Caruso throttled the length of the court to catch the dribbler from behind. Both defenders reached for the ball. In their best moments, which come often, the Thunder look like an angry colony of bees. But in this case, Mathurin got stung. Williams swiped him on the arm while going for the ball. Two free throws. The Thunder bets that a turnover will occur just often enough to justify a foul like this one. It's a mathematical equation. The Thunder's defensive rating would have been 3.3 points per 100 possessions worse had they turned over opponents at a league-average rate instead of a league-best one (assuming their opponent scores at a league-average rate), a gap that doesn't even take into account all the misses that OKC's freneticism causes. Advertisement It might not sound like much, but 3.3 points per 100 was the difference between the second-ranked Magic's defense and the 10th-ranked Detroit Pistons. It was the difference between the Pistons' defense and the 24th-ranked Charlotte Hornets. So the Thunder live with the fouls, not because they are impossible to fix, but because they are a product of their success. 'A lot of times, they just let us rock,' Williams said. 'If we have fouls that we can learn from or we're trying to do the right thing and we foul, we try to learn from those, but they try not to get too involved because it's part of our identity a little bit.' — The Athletic's Sam Amick contributed to this story.
