Missouri lawmakers still challenging two voter-approved laws
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Some people are saying the will of the people or the vote of the people isn't being followed in Missouri.
'From the time that we decided to move forward with the ballot initiative, through the implementation of Amendment 3, every single piece has been met with some sort of dramatic barrier,' Emily Wales, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, says.
'And now, we are in the fourth month of implementation, and we are still fighting with the attorney general about what 'strict scrutiny' means, about whether or not Missourians should have access to medication abortion, which is the most common type of abortion access in the United States.'
Abortion facility licensing requirement lifted by Missouri judge
Wales says that Missouri voters were clear on what they wanted.
'And still, we are fighting out every single piece of this conversation about abortion access.'
Procedural abortion access has been restored, but medication abortion is still not allowed.
'Kansas City was the first to restore access. We started the day after we got an injunction in February. We were able to restore access in Columbia in March. St. Louis had its first day of procedural care just last week,' Wales shared.
'What we want is for patients to make that choice. Not for the State of Missouri. Not for politicians to make that choice, and right now, it's not up to Missourians and it's not up to the medical providers who offer care. Currently, it is in the state's hands because they have provided so many barriers and roadblocks.'
Wales says there's no answer for what's happening beyond politics.
'It's about undermining the will of the people. It's about believing that politicians know better than Missourians and we are seeing that reflected in the legislature as well. Missourians have a constitutional right right now in this state that they cannot realize in large numbers because of politics. That never should have happened. It is happening not only in this context, but we are seeing this play out for sick leave. We are seeing the legislature make plans to undermine Amendment 3 or directly contradict and send something else back to the voters.'
Tuesday, a Missouri judge ruled that Platte County Commissioners will not have to implement a child services tax, even though voters approved it.
In December, county commissioners referred to the way state law is worded in their decision not to implement the tax.
'I understand the frustration from the people that worked hard to get the signatures (and) to get the measure on the ballot,' Presiding Commissioner Scott Fricker of Platte County says.
'The state statute says that, once the ballot measure is approved, the commission 'may' authorize the tax,' Presiding Platte County Commissioner Scott Fricker said.
'The case is very simple.'
This is in regards to the Platte County Child Services tax; an incentive to help child mental health services.
Missouri lawmakers are going after voter-approved abortion rights. Voters will likely reelect them
Fricker says enough money from the taxpayers is already going to mental health services.
'Platte County didn't need another six million dollars of mental health money. The commission, made up of myself and two others, were unanimous in our view, that the Platte County taxpayers are already spending enough in mental health in Platte County,' Fricker shared.
'Very few people will benefit from six million dollars every year. It's too much money.'
Fricker says three million is already spent yearly for mental health services in Platte County.
'There is absolutely no correlation between more tax dollars and improved mental health; that's a connection that they were never able to make. They didn't even try to negotiate with us. They knew that we were not in favor of a tax without a sunset,' he added.
'They should have known because they knew all along that we didn't support this.'
FOX4 reached out to a party in favor of the tax, they declined to comment on the story.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Miscarriages of justice more likely due to forensic science crisis, report finds
The forensic science sector is in a 'graveyard spiral', according to a parliamentary inquiry that has warned of biased criminal investigations, a rising risk of wrongful convictions, and murder and sexual offence cases collapsing due to missing evidence. The three-year inquiry set up by the all-party parliamentary group on miscarriages of justice has outlined how a series of 'reckless policy decisions' over the past decade have brought forensic science to a point of crisis. A near-monopoly in the commercial sector means there is now a dangerous single point of failure and the increasing reliance on in-house police laboratories risks compromising scientific impartiality, the inquiry found. 'Forensic science in England and Wales as currently configured isn't working for anyone – not for the police, not for the lawyers or for the courts, not for the scientists themselves, and not for the general public who get caught up in the criminal justice system,' said Prof Angela Gallop, co-chair of the Westminster Commission on Forensic Science. 'Like a plane hurtling downwards in what has become known as a 'graveyard spiral', with the pilot in desperation making increasingly erratic decisions, it can only be a short time now before it impacts the ground.' Since the closure of the Forensic Science Service in 2012, work has been divided between commercial providers and, increasingly, in-house police laboratories. However, the inquiry said there were now real concerns about bias due to the expanding types of investigations the police conduct, paired with inadequate legal aid funding for defence experts. The report recommends an immediate halt to the expansion of police in-house forensic provision and, in the long term, removing forensic science provision from police oversight. 'The increased risk of miscarriages of justice is self-evident and the potential for investigative failures leading to further injustices is continuing to grow,' said Gallop. The report also highlights the imminent collapse of the forensics market, which is heading toward a 'last man standing' monopoly after the UK's largest forensics provider, Eurofins, acquired the second largest provider, Cellmark, which was on the brink of insolvency last year. Eurofins now delivers more than 85% of external science provision, the report estimates, a proportion that could rise further, creating the risk of a single point of failure. Another concern raised is the police handling of crucial evidence used to prosecute the most serious crimes, with a growing number of cases dropped due to 'disappearing material' including DNA samples, CCTV footage, weapons, drugs and mobile phone data. Missing evidence was recorded as the reason for 30,552 prosecutions being dropped between October 2020 and September 2024, the report reveals. This included 70 homicides and 554 sexual offences, and represented just over 2% of all prosecutions nationally. The Metropolitan police had 4.6% of cases dropped because of missing evidence. Prof Carole McCartney, a criminologist at the University of Leicester, who helped compile the figures, said: 'The most obvious cause for alarm is that each of these cases is potentially a victim who will never see their perpetrator in court or see their case brought to justice. 'And if we're not retaining evidence, people who are victims of miscarriages of justice can't get out of prison and cold cases will stay unsolved if you lose the evidence. It's a fundamental part of the criminal justice process.' The inquiry adds to continuing criticism of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), after the cases of Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in jail for a rape he did not commit, and Peter Sullivan, whose murder conviction was overturned last month after 38 years. The report describes a culture of 'complacency in respect of a lack of scientific knowledge and understanding' among CCRC staff and recommends the recruitment of permanent staff members with scientific backgrounds. Kim Johnson MP, the chair of the APPG on miscarriages of justice, said the Post Office Horizon scandal and the exonerations of Malkinson and Sullivan highlighted the need for urgent reform of forensic provision. 'These cases are not isolated incidents but symptoms of deep, systemic failings in our criminal justice system,' she said. 'We owe it to victims, their families, and the wider public to demand transparency, accountability, and meaningful reform. We must see the government act on this report without delay to restore trust and prevent future injustices.' A CCRC spokesperson said that in response to an independent review of its handling of the Malkinson case it had taken a number of steps to improve its forensics provision, including training sessions for staff. It said its Forensic Opportunities Programme, announced last year, was analysing pre-2016 convictions to assess whether advances in DNA technology could identify an offender and that it had recently recruited a full-time forensic science and evidence adviser. A government spokesperson said: 'We understand the importance of high-quality, timely forensic evidence for an effective criminal justice system that prevents crime, prosecutes suspects and gives victims the justice they deserve. 'In November 2024 at the NPCC/APCC summit, the home secretary acknowledged that the adoption of forensic science across the board has been uncoordinated. That's why we are appointing a national forensic science lead who will transform our approach by helping to create a new model of delivery with the police and forensic leaders to raise standards and improve efficiency, and ultimately build greater public confidence in our criminal justice system.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nurses threaten strikes in vote on ‘grotesque' pay deal
Nurses will consider strike action as a vote on the profession's 'grotesque' 3.6 per cent pay rise opens. Almost 350,000 nurses across the UK will vote on whether to accept or reject the pay award for 2025-26 from Monday. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) said it was the biggest single vote of the profession ever launched in the UK. It comes as the Government faces a summer of discontent with doctors already balloting to strike, and teachers and airport staff threatening disruption. Last month, the Government said NHS staff on the agenda for change banding system, which includes nurses, would receive a pay uplift of 3.6 per cent this year, after accepting the recommendation of the pay review body. But the profession was incensed after resident doctors, formerly junior doctors, were told they would be getting 5.4 per cent on average on top of the 22 per cent rise they received last year. The RCN said the award for nurses was 'grotesque' and that the pay rise would be 'entirely swallowed up by inflation'. It said the outcome of the vote would inform its next steps, which could include a ballot to strike. Doctors, teachers, prison officers and the armed forces will all be receiving a bigger increase. The vote will include RCN members working in the NHS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, but not Scotland, where nurses accepted an eight per cent rise over two years to ensure they remain the best paid in the UK. Prof Nicola Ranger, the RCN general secretary, will tell an international conference in Helsinki, Finland, that she is 'with nurses from around the world today asking why it is our ministers in the UK who have once again put nursing at the back of the queue when it comes to pay'. 'Nursing is an incredible career, but despite being the most valued profession by the public we continue to be weighted to the bottom of the NHS pay scale and are set to receive one of the lowest pay awards,' she said. 'It is time to show that nurses are valued and, from today, hundreds of thousands of nursing staff working in the NHS will give their verdict on whether 3.6 per cent is enough.' The RCN said nurses in England had faced more than a decade of pay erosion since 2010-11, with pay down by a quarter in real terms. As a result, there are more than 26,000 unfilled nursing posts, while student recruitment has 'collapsed' and the number quitting is 'skyrocketing', said the Royal College. Nurses went on strike for the first time in NHS history over the winter of 2022-23, staging four separate two-day walkouts. Under strike rules, unions are required to re-ballot members to continue striking every six months. But the RCN did not secure the required turnout of more than 50 per cent of its members, and so lost its mandate to continue striking in 2023 despite remaining in an official dispute with the Government. Its members previously voted to reject the 5.5 per cent pay award for 2024-25 last year, as well as the five per cent in 2023-24 the year before, which also came with a one-off payment of at least £1,655, despite other unions accepting it. Resident doctors are currently balloting to strike again after demanding the 5.4 per cent increase awarded to them for this financial year is nearer to 30 per cent. The ballot closes on July 7, 2025. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nurses to vote on pay deal as potential strike looms
Almost 350,000 nursing staff in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be asked to vote from Monday on a 3.6% pay increase. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has already dismissed the award as "grotesque" and says the vote will be crucial in determining the next steps which could include a ballot for strike action. A bitter pay dispute saw nurses striking in England, Wales and Northern Ireland from late 2022 and through the winter. Some members of other health unions also staged walkouts over pay. With the possibility of another round of industrial action looming, the vote is being billed as the biggest single vote by the profession ever launched in the UK. Ministers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland all announced pay awards following review body recommendations. There was a 5.4% average increase for resident doctors, formally known as junior doctors, 4% for consultants and other senior doctors, and 3.6% for nurses and other health workers. RCN General Secretary Professor Nicola Ranger said that the government had "once again put nursing at the back of the queue when it comes to pay". "Nursing is an incredible career, but despite being the most valued profession by the public we continue to be weighted to the bottom of the NHS pay scale and are set to receive one of the lowest pay awards." According to the Ranger, nursing staff in England have endured "over a decade of pay erosion", which has resulted in "skyrocketing" numbers of nurses quitting. "It is time to show that nurses are valued and, from today, hundreds of thousands of nursing staff working in the NHS will give their verdict on whether 3.6% is enough," Ranger will say. Resident doctors in England are already being balloted on strike action over pay. Other health unions are organising votes on the pay awards. All this may cast a shadow over a government 10-year plan for the NHS in England due in the next few weeks. The Scottish government has already agreed a two-year 8% pay offer with health unions.
