Bills would provide more Utah campgrounds options, acquire federal land advance
The bill by Rep. Steve Eliason, R-Sandy, gives the state the ability to create campgrounds — not a full blown state park — through a bottom-up process.
Utah state parks received more than 1.3 million visitors in fiscal year 2024 and are often packed. Eliason spoke of how he sought to make a reservation at one particular park early in the season, but it was already booked during prime camping time.
His bill, HB34, would give the state the ability to create state campgrounds but only with the approval of the local governing body such as a city council or county commission. The campground proposal would also need buy-in from the state representative from the area as well as the state senator.
'This bill does not create any state campgrounds. It simply creates the process by which we would evaluate and potentially approve state campgrounds,' Eliason said. 'It is a bottom up approach versus top down, which we are all too familiar with.'
Eliason pointed to the example presented by the Utah Raptor State Park, due to open later this year. It moved forward by cobbling a number of landowners parcels together, including the school trust lands administration, the Division of Fire, Forestry and State Lands, as well as the federal government.
This sort of cooperative approach was enshrined in a bill last year that had unanimous support, but Eliason said the Senate simply ran out of time to get it passed.
'There are all sorts of opportunities,' with state campgrounds that can alleviate to an extent the pressure valve on state parks, he stressed.
Another measure directs the Utah Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office to conduct a survey of federal lands that may be suitable for lease or purchase. It caps the acreage at 30,000 acres per year and would have to be for the purpose of providing public good.
SB158, introduced by Sen. Keven Stratton, R-Orem, sets up a process to facilitate a survey of federal lands that if acquired would accomplish a beneficial public purpose.
Counties have worked in tandem with the federal government for such purposes, such as putting in a landfill, a park or fire station.
'What this bill does is it's an information gathering and a unifying voice within the state, under direction of PLPCO to track and provide resources and allow that (information) to be drawn upon,' Stratton said. 'We need to track that and have that information available if we're desiring to continue and continue the course of wise stewardship of the resources in our care.'
Redge Johnson, director of PLPCO, said the mechanism has been used with success before with the federal government with success using provisions in the federal Recreation Public Purposes Act.
'But I don't think anybody knows exactly how many acres we've gotten, so I think this is a good bill to get in and track and see how many we have,' he said.
The bill does not preclude private nongovernmental organizations from making purchases or leases.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
Trump admin axes Biden approval of ‘irresponsible' wind farm in Idaho
The Trump administration on Wednesday canceled a major wind farm development in Idaho, a project approved late in former President Joe Biden's term that had drawn criticism for its proximity to a historic site where Japanese Americans were incarcerated during World War II. The Bureau of Land Management in December signed off on a scaled-down plan for the Lava Ridge Wind Project northeast of Twin Falls, with 241 wind turbines instead of 400. But the development had been on hold since the first day of President Donald Trump's second term, when he issued an executive order halting the permitting of wind power projects across the country and telling the Interior Department to review the Lava Ridge decision. 'By reversing the Biden administration's thoughtless approval of the Lava Ridge Wind Project, we are protecting tens of thousands of acres from harmful wind policy while shielding the interests of rural Idaho communities,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. 'This decisive action defends the American taxpayer, safeguards our land, and averts what would have been one of the largest, most irresponsible wind projects in the nation.' Advertisement 5 Windmills on the eastern foothills overlooking the small town of Idaho Falls in Southeast Idaho. Flickr Vision The project, five years in the works, faced opposition from local residents concerned about the height of the turbines — up to 660 feet (201 meters), or more than twice the height of the Statue of Liberty. It also drew concerns it would spoil views from the Minidoka National Historic Site, where thousands of Japanese Americans were imprisoned during World War II. Under the plan, the closest turbine to the historic site would have been 9 miles (14 kilometers) away. Advertisement Robyn Achilles, executive director of the nonprofit Friends of Minidoka, said in a text message her organization was reviewing the announcement. 'We must protect Minidoka from future development, so we continue to seek long term protections for the BLM land in Minidoka's cultural viewshed,' Achilles wrote. 5 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks, as he and Apple CEO Tim Cook (not pictured) present Apple's announcement of a $100 billion investment in U.S. manufacturing, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 6, 2025. REUTERS The Interior Department's statement rescinding Lava Ridge's approval did not mention Minidoka. A spokeswoman for the company that proposed the development, Magic Valley Energy, did not immediately return messages seeking comment. Advertisement The Bureau of Land Management said when it approved the project that it could power up to 500,000 homes and that its decision reflected 'a careful balance of clean energy development with the protection of natural, cultural, and socioeconomic resources on this historically significant landscape.' Onshore wind is one of the cheapest sources of electricity generation. New wind farms cost less to build and operate than new natural gas plants on average in most regions of the United States, even without tax credits. 5 A sign objecting to a proposed wind farm is seen along a country road on April 11, 2023 in Eden, Idaho. Getty Images The Trump administration and congressional Republicans have targeted wind and solar projects as expensive and unreliable while taking steps to support the burning of fossil fuels, which is dangerously heating the planet. Advertisement Renewable energies such as wind and solar provide an intermittent supply of electricity when it is windy or sunny. Increasingly, batteries are getting paired with solar and wind projects to allow renewables to replace fossil fuels like oil, gas and coal, while keeping a steady flow of power when sources such as wind and solar are not producing. The tax-and-spending legislation signed by Trump last month phases out tax credits and other subsidies for clean energy, and an executive order issued by Trump a few days later further restricts subsidies for what he calls 'the Green New Scam.' 5 The Minidoka National Historic Site is in an isolated area of southcentral Idaho near the city of Jerome, Idaho. UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Since then, Burgum has issued a series of memos targeting wind and solar power, including a July 17 memo that requires his personal approval of all solar and wind energy projects on federal lands and waters. The order authorizes Burgum to conduct 'elevated review' of activities ranging from leases to rights of way, construction and operational plans, grants and biological opinions. The restrictions on clean-energy projects are aimed at 'ending preferential treatment for unreliable, subsidy-dependent wind and solar energy,' the Interior Department said in a statement. 5 A protester holds a sign opposing the construction of the Lava Ridge wind farm at a rally April 11, 2023 in Twin Falls, Idaho. Getty Images Late last month, Burgum canceled plans to use millions of acres of federal waters for new offshore wind development. Advertisement And earlier this week, he issued a new secretarial order requiring that Interior agencies evaluating new wind and solar consider 'capacity density,' or how much area the projects cover. Commercial-scale solar and wind projects typically require a much greater amount of land and water than other energy sources such as oil and natural gas. 'This isn't oversight,' said Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, which represents the renewable industry. 'It's obstruction that will needlessly harm the fastest growing sources of electric power.'


Washington Post
5 days ago
- Washington Post
Trump administration reverses Biden approval of major wind farm in Idaho
SEATTLE — The Trump administration on Wednesday canceled a major wind farm development in Idaho, a project approved late in former President Joe Biden's term that had drawn criticism for its proximity to a historic site where Japanese Americans were incarcerated during World War II. The Bureau of Land Management in December signed off on a scaled-down plan for the Lava Ridge Wind Project northeast of Twin Falls, with 241 wind turbines instead of 400. But the development had been on hold since the first day of President Donald Trump's second term, when he issued an executive order halting the permitting of wind power projects across the country and telling the Interior Department to review the Lava Ridge decision.


Fox News
6 days ago
- Fox News
EXCLUSIVE: Trump admin nixes giant wind farm approved 'last-minute' by Biden team
FIRST ON FOX: President Donald Trump's Interior Department is canceling what would have been one of the largest land-based wind farms in the United States after former President Joe Biden's "last-minute" push to approve the project during his final weeks in office. The Lava Ridge Wind Project, approved in December 2024 by the Biden administration's Bureau of Land Management, was expected to be a 1,000-megawatt wind farm with up to 231 wind turbines across nearly 57,447 acres in southern Idaho. Following a review of the project by the Trump administration, officials at the Interior Department claimed to find "crucial legal deficiencies" with Biden's approval of the project, including certain statutorily binding criteria that were ignored, according to a press release announcing the decision to terminate the wind farm project. "Under President Donald Trump's bold leadership, the Department is putting the brakes on deficient, unreliable energy and putting the American people first," said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum. "By reversing the Biden administration's thoughtless approval of the Lava Ridge Wind Project, we are protecting tens of thousands of acres from harmful wind policy while shielding the interests of rural Idaho communities. This decisive action defends the American taxpayer, safeguards our land, and averts what would have been one of the largest, most irresponsible wind projects in the nation." The Interior Department's action follows a Day One executive order signed by Trump that moved to place a temporary moratorium on the controversial wind project. The order was followed up by another executive directive from Idaho GOP Gov. Brad Little, which directed state agencies to comply with Trump's order to halt the Lava Ridge project and other wind energy leasing in all areas within the Offshore Continental Shelf. In Trump's executive order, the president also requested a new review be conducted by the Interior Department, citing the fact that the Biden administration may have skirted certain legal obligations associated with approving the Lava Ridge project. Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador previously accused the Biden administration of not adequately reviewing the wind farm's potential risk to low-flying aircraft. According to Labrador, Federal Aviation Administration rules dictate that any structure over 200-feet tall must be evaluated for low-level flight hazards. Labrador has also asserted that the Lava Ridge project would have mainly shipped generated power to California, as opposed to Idaho. Meanwhile, Idaho GOP Congressman Mike Simpson accused the Biden approval process in a June op-ed of failing to "genuinely engage with stakeholders to address concerns about the Minidoka National Historic Site, grazing, wildfire response, and more." "For four years, the Biden administration demonstrated that it would rather prioritize renewable wind power over multiple-use mandates directed by Congress," Simpson added. In a press release put out Wednesday, the Interior Department said it was "restoring common sense to American energy policy by reversing the Biden administration's misguided, last-minute push to approve the Lava Ridge Wind Project." "Under President Donald J. Trump, the Department of the Interior will no longer provide preferential treatment towards unreliable, intermittent power sources that harm rural communities, livelihoods and the land," the press release concluded. "The Department of the Interior will continue its review of wind energy leasing and permitting practices, with a focus on assessing the impact these developments have on our nation's natural resources and communities."