Iran Gives Position on New Nuclear Talks With US
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Iran's foreign minister has ruled out any imminent return to nuclear negotiations with the United States, calling talk of renewed diplomacy after the war with Israel "speculation" and insisting that "there has not even been talk of negotiations."
Abbas Araghchi's comments came after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between the two countries and suggested that discussions with Tehran could resume as early as next week.
Newsweek has reached out to the State department for comment.
Why It Matters
The pause in direct conflict has not eased global concerns as Iran's refusal to resume nuclear talks signals a major setback. Tehran's rejection shows that U.S. pressure has hardened its stance, narrowing oversight after damage to its nuclear sites and suspended inspections. For Washington, this undermines months of diplomacy and weakens efforts to contain nuclear risks. The international community now faces fewer tools to prevent Iran's nuclear advancement, setting a troubling precedent where military action, not dialogue, shapes engagement limits.
An Iranian flag hangs on a building which was hit by an Israeli strike last week, in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, June 25, 2025.
An Iranian flag hangs on a building which was hit by an Israeli strike last week, in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, June 25, 2025.
Vahid Salemi/AP Photo
What to Know
In an interview with Iranian state TV, Araghchi denied any agreement to restart nuclear negotiations, pushing back on Washington's expectations. The conflict, sparked by Israeli strikes on June 13 and followed by U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear sites, abruptly ended talks aimed at reviving a deal. "The situation has completely changed and it is not possible to reach an agreement as easily as in the past," he said.
Araghchi accused the U.S. and Israel of deliberately provoking the conflict despite ongoing diplomacy. When European mediators urged Iran to halt the fighting and return to talks, he responded, "What do you mean? We were in the middle of diplomacy! They were the ones who started the war."
Despite rejecting formal negotiations, Araghchi stressed that diplomatic channels remain open. Messages continue to pass through mediators like Oman's Foreign Minister, who led the previous five rounds of talks. A planned sixth round in Oman was canceled after the outbreak of conflict.
In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attends a meeting with Russia's President at the Kremlin in Moscow on June 23, 2025.
In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attends a meeting with Russia's President at the Kremlin in Moscow on June 23, 2025.Damage to nuclear sites
Araghchi also acknowledged that the U.S. strikes inflicted "serious harm" on its nuclear facilities. "This damage has not been minor—serious harm has been done to our facilities," he said, noting that Iran's Atomic Energy Agency is conducting a thorough assessment of the destruction.
In the U.S., debate continues over the strikes' effectiveness. President Trump declared the attacks "obliterated" their targets, but some senior Democrats remain skeptical about how much was truly destroyed.
What People Are Saying
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: "No agreement has been made to restart negotiations, and there has not even been talk of negotiations. There is no point in negotiating now."
President Donald Trump: "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated."
Democrat Senator Chris Murphy: "The president was deliberately misleading the public when he said the program was obliterated."
What Happens Next
The U.S. faces a tough path as Iran rejects talks and hardens its stance after recent strikes. Washington must balance pressure on Tehran with regional concerns, risking further instability. How the U.S. handles this will impact the future of the nuclear deal and Middle East security
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
Energy Insecurity Threatens Food Production
TOPSHOT - In this picture taken on April 23, 2022, farmer Jinadasa Paranamana works in a paddy field ... More in Tissamaharama, Hambantota district. - Farmers were once big supporters of the Rajapaksas, but a bungled fertiliser ban withered their crops along with their backing for Sri Lanka's previously powerful and popular political clan. - TO GO WITH SriLanka-agriculture-economy-politics-unrest,FOCUS by Aishwarya KUMAR (Photo by Ishara S. KODIKARA / AFP) / TO GO WITH SriLanka-agriculture-economy-politics-unrest,FOCUS by Aishwarya KUMAR (Photo by ISHARA S. KODIKARA/AFP via Getty Images) Prior to Israel's recent attacks on Iran, energy prices and supplies were buffeted by the continuing war between Ukraine and Russia. Following the American bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, Iran threatened to close the Straits of Hormuz, but quickly backed off. Following the Middle East ceasefire declare June 24, energy prices, which did not soar as might have been expected, stabilized, but remain high by recent standards. Brent crude is up more than 10% to over $76/barrel, and diesel in Europe has risen nearly 15%. Like Iran, which targeted the Ashdod power station and the Haifa refinery during its most recent hostilities with Israel, Russia and Ukraine have also made it a point to target each other's vital infrastructure, especially after Ukraine terminated Russian transshipments of natural gas to other parts of Eastern Europe. (Source). Indeed, Ukraine has intensified drone, missile, and bomb attacks on critical Russian infrastructure, from energy depots and logistics railways in Bryansk to major fertilizer plants in the Tula and Stavropol regions. At the same time, Russia has ramped up its bombardment of Ukrainian Black Sea ports and agricultural logistics hubs. Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, those two nations, along with Turkey and the United Nations, negotiated the 'Black Sea Grain Initiative' in July 2022 as a way to protect the export of grain to the world. (Source). That deal, however, has not kept the cost of the inputs of food production stable. Russia has continued to strike the Ukrainian ports of Odesa, Pivdennyi, and Chornomorsk, which according to media reports have been widely used to launch drones attacking Russian warships. In doing so, they also have hit grain elevators and storage facilities, which had the exact opposite impact from the Black Sea Grain Initiative. Globally, fertilizer prices already have risen 11% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to last year, per World Bank data. (Source). Nitrogen fertilizers like urea, essential for crops, jumped over 20%, with potash and phosphate up 18% and 20%, respectively. The recent Ukrainian drone strikes on the Novomoskovsk Azot plant and the Nevinnomyssk Azot plant, which have a combined output comparable to the annual nitrogen fertilizer consumption of France and Germany, have reportedly caused a temporary suspension of operations at these two facilities. While many are arguing (or speculating) about the true reason behind the attacks, as Ukraine had not attacked fertilizer plants before Russia did so, the global food security and fertilizer markets are likely to suffer severe collateral damage no matter what the reasons for the attacks may be. European farmers are now confronting winter planting decisions against a backdrop of tightened supply and renewed market premiums. It appears that Vladimir Putin may be trying to rerun the disaster that befell Sri Lanka in 2021, only this time caused by an outside stimulus. In Sri Lanka, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa decided to ban synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, forcing millions of Sri Lanka's farmers to go organic. The decision, while wrapped in a concern for the environment, was ill-advised. It wound up precipitating a famine that ultimately destroyed Sri Lanka's economy and caused the overthrow of President Rajapaksa himself. (Source). Meanwhile, in Ukraine, Putin is striking grain elevators and storage facilities. It is anybody's guess what happens now if Moscow targets Ukrainian fertilizer plants like those in Rivne in retaliation for Ukraine's strikes on Russian fertilizer plants. Beyond disrupting production, such an escalation risks an environmental catastrophe on the EU's doorstep. The Tula and Stavropol strike already has pushed up prices on nitrogen-based products like urea and UAN by 6-10% in recent weeks, and threatens to add 20-40% to broader fertilizer costs. Commodity markets already are impacted. In agricultural futures trading, wheat has jumped by 50-70% in some contracts during similar past disruptions. (Source). Analysts warn that any renewed Black Sea export interruption could trigger an equivalent surge within months. Corn, with Ukraine responsible for some 15% of all global exports, could spike another 30-50%, assuming U.S. and South American producers do not immediately ramp up acreage. The sunflower-oil market, dominated by Ukraine (50%) and Russia (17%), is particularly vulnerable: March 2022 saw a one-month price jump of 23% alone, and experts now predict possible increases of 40-60% during an export halt, with ripple effects raising palm and soy oil by 20-30%, as well. Earlier this year, Ukraine had to shut down one of its main sunflower plants at Kernel due to a raw material shortage. (Source). Having brokered a ceasefire in the 12-day conflict in the Middle East, the United States has secured considerable diplomatic momentum and might use it to put the brakes on Russia and Ukraine's escalating attacks on critical food and fertilizer infrastructure. For President Trump, the goal of averting a global famine would earn him high marks.
Atlantic
16 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Knows Iran Has Wanted Him Dead
Hours before launching B-2 bombers at Iran, President Donald Trump stood on a secured airport tarmac 40 miles west of Manhattan, under the watchful guard of the U.S. Secret Service and a militarized counterassault team. When a reporter asked about the risk of terror attacks on U.S. targets overseas by Iranian proxies, the world's most protected man instead spoke of his own risk of assassination. 'You are even in danger talking to me right now. You know that?' he said. 'So I should probably get out of here. But you guys are actually in danger. Can you believe it?' Before walking away, he looked a reporter in the eye. 'Be careful,' he said. The threats against the president do not rank among the stated reasons for Trump's decision to target nuclear sites in Iran, and White House officials and other outside advisers told us they have not come up in meaningful Situation Room discussions. 'The president makes decisions on Iran based on what's in the best interest of the country and the world, not himself,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told us. But the fear of being killed at the behest of a foreign government has hung over the president and his senior team for months, an anxiety-producing din that has limited their daily routine, especially after two failed assassination attempts by alleged homegrown assailants. Now some Trump allies are privately wondering how much the ever-present risk is shaping the president's thinking about the current conflict. At least twice in 2024, federal authorities gave private briefings to campaign leaders on the evolving Iranian threat and adjusted Trump's protection. The Justice Department revealed two indictments last year alone that described disrupted Iranian plots against U.S. officials. Top aides worried that Trump's Boeing 757 campaign plane, emblazoned with his name, would be shot out of the sky, and at one point they used a decoy plane—sending alarmed (and presumably more expendable) staff off on 'Trump Force One' while Trump himself flew separately on a friend's private plane, according to a Trump-campaign book by the Axios reporter Alex Isenstadt. 'Big threats on my life by Iran,' Trump posted on social media last September. 'The entire U.S. Military is watching and waiting. Moves were already made by Iran that didn't work out, but they will try again.' Since this week's air strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, military and security analysts have been on guard for asymmetric responses, such as terrorist attacks and assassinations. The Department of Homeland Security warned of a 'heightened threat environment' in a Sunday bulletin and noted Iran's 'long-standing commitment to target US Government officials.' FBI agents who had been reassigned to focus on immigration were told over the weekend to focus back on counterterrorism, counterintelligence, and cyberissues, NBC News reported Tuesday. Trump's two-week window for diplomacy was a smoke screen Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has denied his government's involvement in any assassination plots. But he and other Iranian leaders have done little to ease concerns. 'Iran reserves all options,' Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, posted on X after the attack, before the country launched a missile barrage at a U.S. military base in Qatar that did little damage. 'Threat equals intent plus capability,' Matthew Levitt, an expert on Iranian operations at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told us. 'We are very clear on their intent. We are less clear going forward on their capabilities.' Trump has publicly indicated that the focus of U.S. military action against Iran is narrowly tailored to its nuclear program. 'We want no nuclear. But we destroyed the nuclear,' he said in the Netherlands on Wednesday. The question of Iran's assassination posture remains a sensitive one inside Trump's circle—'very top of mind,' one person, who requested anonymity to speak frankly, told us. And close allies assume it must also be for the president. 'It'd probably be in the back of my mind if I were him,' an outside White House adviser told us. During the run-up to the U.S. bombing of Iran, Tucker Carlson suggested in a debate with Texas Senator Ted Cruz that there needed to be an immediate attack on Iran if there was evidence of an assassination threat against Trump, even as he doubted the legitimacy of such reports. 'We should have a nationwide dragnet on this, and we should attack Iran immediately if that's true,' Carlson said. Last year, then-President Joe Biden sent word to the Iranian regime that any assassination attempt against former U.S. officials would be considered an 'act of war,' according to people briefed on the plans, who were not authorized to speak publicly. Pezeshkian told NBC News in January 2025 that 'Iran has never attempted to, nor does it plan to, assassinate anyone.' 'At least as far as I know,' he continued, not entirely engendering confidence in the assessment. Trump, in his less diplomatic style, has repeated Biden's warning, albeit in much more colorful language. He told reporters in the Oval Office in February that he had 'left instructions' for what should happen if he is murdered by Iran. 'If they do it, they get obliterated,' the president said. 'There will be nothing left.' Such U.S. retaliation has a historical basis. When former President George H. W. Bush, his wife, and two sons survived an alleged car-bomb assassination attempt during a visit to Kuwait in 1993, U.S. investigators tied the plot—involving a Toyota Land Cruiser packed with plastic explosives—to Iraqi Intelligence Services. Months later, then-President Bill Clinton ordered retaliatory cruise-missile attacks on the intelligence headquarters in Baghdad. Nearly a decade later, President George W. Bush cited the foiled attack as part of his case for the U.S. military invasion of Iraq that toppled its president, Saddam Hussein. 'There is no doubt he can't stand us,' the younger Bush said of Hussein in 2002. 'After all, this is the guy who tried to kill my dad at one time.' The Biden administration disclosed the latest specific allegations of a plot to kill Trump three days after last year's presidential election. In charging documents filed in federal court, the FBI described a phone interview it conducted during the heat of the campaign with Farhad Shakeri, an Afghan national residing in Tehran, who had been deported from the U.S. in 2008 following a 14-year prison stay in New York for robbery. Prosecutors have charged Shakeri with attempting to hire hit men to kill an Iranian American journalist living in New York. But Shakeri claimed in his conversations with the FBI, according to the criminal complaint, to have received new orders in September from an official of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps: kill Trump. Shakeri told the FBI that he warned his contact that such an effort would cost a 'huge' amount of money, according to charging documents. In response, the Iranian official said, 'we have already spent a lot of money . . . [s]o money's not an issue,' Shakeri told the FBI. Shakeri further explained that he believed the official was referring to money already spent to try to assassinate Trump. Shakeri said his military contact asked on October 7 for an assasination plan to be delivered within seven days. If Shakeri failed to do so, he said the contact told him they would try again after the election, which the Iranians expected Trump to lose. (Such an assessment was also likely upsetting to Trump.) Around the same time that Shakeri was charged, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence announced in an unclassified November 2024 report that 'Iranian officials continue to publicly reiterate their vows to conduct lethal operations in the United States.' The 'priority targets' listed in the report included Trump, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former Commander of U.S. Central Command Kenneth McKenzie, who were all directly involved in the 2020 assassination of Qassem Soleimani, the former head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. 'I'll be taking precautions the rest of my life,' McKenzie told the United States Naval Institute and Coast Guard Academy last year. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr.: Inside the decision to assassinate Iran's ruthless general Soleimani was killed by a drone strike in Iraq, where U.S. officials said he was directing attacks against American forces. His death sparked calls for revenge against U.S. officials. In 2022, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei featured an animated video on his website that depicts a targeted assassination of Trump by Iranian drones as he golfs near his Mar-a-Lago estate. In the video, Trump receives a text message before he is killed that reads, 'Soleimani's murderer and the one who gave the order will pay the price.' Such public calls could inspire a lone-wolf attacker. 'Part of the problem is it's not just hit men or just officials of the government that may be doing this,' Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton told us. 'The threat can come from a variety of different places. It's not just those expressly organized by the government in Tehran.' Bolton has also been targeted for assassination by Iran for his role in the Soleimani strike, according to the Justice Department. The FBI is still offering a $20 million reward for any information that leads to the arrest of Shahram Poursafi, a uniformed member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, for a 2022 plot to kill Bolton. Poursafi attempted to pay individuals as much as $300,000 to 'eliminate' Bolton in Washington or Maryland, including at one point providing an individual with specific details of Bolton's schedule that did not seem to be publicly available, according to court documents. (If Bolton was successfully dispatched with, Poursafi added at one point, he had a second 'job,' this one worth $1 million.) The unclassified November 2024 report pointed to another alleged Iranian assassination plot that members of the government have separately said they believe included Trump. On August 6, U.S. prosecutors unsealed a criminal complaint against Asif Merchant, a Pakistani national who had recently traveled to Iran. They alleged that he'd flown to Texas four months earlier to recruit others, including a confidential informant for the FBI, to assassinate 'U.S. officials,' according to a complaint filed in federal court. 'Specifically, Merchant requested men who could do the killing, approximately twenty-five people who could perform a protest as a distraction after the murder occurred, and a woman to do 'reconnaissance,'' the complaint stated. The target of his assassination plot, he later told undercover law-enforcement officers posing as hit men, was a 'political person,' and the protests would take place at political rallies, according to the complaint. Merchant described himself as a 'representative,' a word the officers interpreted to mean he was working for other people outside the U.S. He was arrested after making plans to leave the country again. Kori Schake, the director of foreign and defense policy at the American Enterprise Institute and a contributing writer at The Atlantic, told us the threats from Iran 'should be taken incredibly seriously.' But she also pointed out that, almost immediately upon returning to office, Trump withdrew the security protections for some of his former officials facing similar danger, including Bolton and retired U.S. Army General Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 'So either he doesn't take the threat of it that seriously or he's recklessly putting at risk former senior officials,' she concluded. Bolton—still facing very real Iranian peril—was more blunt. 'Why doesn't he think about the assassination threat against him and his former officials? Well, he's as safe as anybody, and he doesn't care about the rest of us.'
Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Military hardware, gold refining top agenda in Mali–Tatarstan diplomatic meeting
Mali's transitional President Assimi Goïta is on an official visit to Russia, where military cooperation and gold sector development are high on the agenda. Mali's President Assimi Goïta visited the Kazan Kremlin to discuss military cooperation and the development of Mali's gold sector. Discussions included potential defense equipment acquisitions, economic ties, and collaborative projects like a gold refinery in Mali. These talks aim to build long-term strategic partnerships between Mali and the Republic of Tatarstan aiding Mali's geopolitical realignment. Goïta's visit highlights Mali's growing ties with Moscow in the wake of its exit from ECOWAS and its ongoing military transition—part of a broader effort to redefine the country's geopolitical stance and build new strategic partnerships beyond the West. Following a high-level meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, Goïta traveled to the Republic of Tatarstan, where he held talks with Rustam Minnikhanov, Rais of the Republic, at the Kazan Kremlin. The Republic of Tatarstan is a semi-autonomous republic within the Russian Federation, located in the Volga Federal District. While it is part of Russia, Tatarstan maintains a distinct cultural identity, with its own president (as a regional head), constitution, and official languages—Russian and Tatar. The meetings reflect both the symbolic and strategic dimensions of the strengthening Mali–Russia relationship, particularly in defense and resource cooperation. Minnikhanov welcomed Goïta to Kazan and expressed gratitude for Mali's interest in collaborating with Tatarstan: ' During your stay, you'll have the chance to become more familiar with our republic's capabilities, its history, culture, and traditions. We, in turn, will ensure your visit is both fruitful and engaging,' he said. The talks also emphasized the rapid economic growth across Africa in recent years and reaffirmed the growing importance of Russia's relations with the continent. Mali, Tatarstan seek relations in military, refining. On the security front, Mali is expected to request advanced military hardware, including drones, armored vehicles, and air defense systems, to reinforce its fight against jihadist insurgencies. During the meeting, Minnikhanov highlighted opportunities for strengthening trade and economic ties between Tatarstan and Mali. He noted that African markets are already familiar with Kazan-produced Mi-series helicopters and KAMAZ trucks, known for their Dakar Rally victories. ' There is a real promise in mechanical engineering, food processing, agriculture, and innovation,' he added. He also pointed to the gold refinery project spearheaded by the company 'Yadran' as a tangible example of ongoing cooperation. The refinery, currently under construction in Mali, is the result of collaboration between the Malian government, Russia's Yadran, and a Swiss investment company. Mali, one of Africa's largest gold producers, aims to boost domestic refining capacity through this strategic partnership. The cornerstone laying ceremony for the refinery took place on June 16. Construction is expected to be completed within 18 months, after which the facility will begin operations with an initial design capacity of 100 tonnes per year. Plans are already in place to expand capacity to 200 tonnes annually in subsequent phases. During his visit to Kazan, Goïta expressed interest in deepening industrial cooperation with Russian enterprises, particularly in the transport and defense sectors. 'We are interested in cooperating with KAMAZ and other enterprises,' Goïta stated, referring to the renowned Russian truck manufacturer known for its durability and performance in challenging environments. Goïta's visit signals a broader strategic shift. As Russia deepens its footprint in West Africa, countries like Mali are increasingly turning to Moscow for support—not only in defense, but also in critical sectors such as mining, infrastructure, and energy.
