
Energy Insecurity Threatens Food Production
TOPSHOT - In this picture taken on April 23, 2022, farmer Jinadasa Paranamana works in a paddy field ... More in Tissamaharama, Hambantota district. - Farmers were once big supporters of the Rajapaksas, but a bungled fertiliser ban withered their crops along with their backing for Sri Lanka's previously powerful and popular political clan. - TO GO WITH SriLanka-agriculture-economy-politics-unrest,FOCUS by Aishwarya KUMAR (Photo by Ishara S. KODIKARA / AFP) / TO GO WITH SriLanka-agriculture-economy-politics-unrest,FOCUS by Aishwarya KUMAR (Photo by ISHARA S. KODIKARA/AFP via Getty Images)
Prior to Israel's recent attacks on Iran, energy prices and supplies were buffeted by the continuing war between Ukraine and Russia. Following the American bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, Iran threatened to close the Straits of Hormuz, but quickly backed off. Following the Middle East ceasefire declare June 24, energy prices, which did not soar as might have been expected, stabilized, but remain high by recent standards. Brent crude is up more than 10% to over $76/barrel, and diesel in Europe has risen nearly 15%.
Like Iran, which targeted the Ashdod power station and the Haifa refinery during its most recent hostilities with Israel, Russia and Ukraine have also made it a point to target each other's vital infrastructure, especially after Ukraine terminated Russian transshipments of natural gas to other parts of Eastern Europe. (Source). Indeed, Ukraine has intensified drone, missile, and bomb attacks on critical Russian infrastructure, from energy depots and logistics railways in Bryansk to major fertilizer plants in the Tula and Stavropol regions. At the same time, Russia has ramped up its bombardment of Ukrainian Black Sea ports and agricultural logistics hubs.
Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, those two nations, along with Turkey and the United Nations, negotiated the 'Black Sea Grain Initiative' in July 2022 as a way to protect the export of grain to the world. (Source). That deal, however, has not kept the cost of the inputs of food production stable. Russia has continued to strike the Ukrainian ports of Odesa, Pivdennyi, and Chornomorsk, which according to media reports have been widely used to launch drones attacking Russian warships. In doing so, they also have hit grain elevators and storage facilities, which had the exact opposite impact from the Black Sea Grain Initiative.
Globally, fertilizer prices already have risen 11% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to last year, per World Bank data. (Source). Nitrogen fertilizers like urea, essential for crops, jumped over 20%, with potash and phosphate up 18% and 20%, respectively. The recent Ukrainian drone strikes on the Novomoskovsk Azot plant and the Nevinnomyssk Azot plant, which have a combined output comparable to the annual nitrogen fertilizer consumption of France and Germany, have reportedly caused a temporary suspension of operations at these two facilities. While many are arguing (or speculating) about the true reason behind the attacks, as Ukraine had not attacked fertilizer plants before Russia did so, the global food security and fertilizer markets are likely to suffer severe collateral damage no matter what the reasons for the attacks may be. European farmers are now confronting winter planting decisions against a backdrop of tightened supply and renewed market premiums.
It appears that Vladimir Putin may be trying to rerun the disaster that befell Sri Lanka in 2021, only this time caused by an outside stimulus. In Sri Lanka, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa decided to ban synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, forcing millions of Sri Lanka's farmers to go organic. The decision, while wrapped in a concern for the environment, was ill-advised. It wound up precipitating a famine that ultimately destroyed Sri Lanka's economy and caused the overthrow of President Rajapaksa himself. (Source). Meanwhile, in Ukraine, Putin is striking grain elevators and storage facilities. It is anybody's guess what happens now if Moscow targets Ukrainian fertilizer plants like those in Rivne in retaliation for Ukraine's strikes on Russian fertilizer plants. Beyond disrupting production, such an escalation risks an environmental catastrophe on the EU's doorstep. The Tula and Stavropol strike already has pushed up prices on nitrogen-based products like urea and UAN by 6-10% in recent weeks, and threatens to add 20-40% to broader fertilizer costs.
Commodity markets already are impacted. In agricultural futures trading, wheat has jumped by 50-70% in some contracts during similar past disruptions. (Source). Analysts warn that any renewed Black Sea export interruption could trigger an equivalent surge within months. Corn, with Ukraine responsible for some 15% of all global exports, could spike another 30-50%, assuming U.S. and South American producers do not immediately ramp up acreage. The sunflower-oil market, dominated by Ukraine (50%) and Russia (17%), is particularly vulnerable: March 2022 saw a one-month price jump of 23% alone, and experts now predict possible increases of 40-60% during an export halt, with ripple effects raising palm and soy oil by 20-30%, as well. Earlier this year, Ukraine had to shut down one of its main sunflower plants at Kernel due to a raw material shortage. (Source).
Having brokered a ceasefire in the 12-day conflict in the Middle East, the United States has secured considerable diplomatic momentum and might use it to put the brakes on Russia and Ukraine's escalating attacks on critical food and fertilizer infrastructure. For President Trump, the goal of averting a global famine would earn him high marks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
From protection to peril: What end of TPS means for Haitians in South Florida, elsewhere
The Trump administration's decision to end Temporary Protected Status for over half-a-million Haitians living in the United States has sent shock waves throughout South Florida, the beating heart of the Haitian community in the United States. Many advocates and experts expected the decision. It comes after Trump moved to end the deportation protections for Venezuela and rolled them back a year-and-a-half for Haiti. Now, hundreds of thousands of people are vulnerable to being forced to return to the Caribbean country, where the government is crumbling and armed gangs are terrorizing the population. A recent report from the United Nations found that Haiti is as dangerous for children as the Gaza Strip. Below, we break down what this move means, who it affects, and what may come next. Q: What is Temporary Protected Status? A: TPS is a humanitarian immigration program that allows citizens from countries facing natural disasters, armed conflict or extraordinary instability to temporarily live and work in the United States. It does not provide a pathway to permanent residency or citizenship, but it shields recipients from deportation as long as their country remains designated under TPS because they are unable to return there safely. Congress created TPS in 1990. The Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to designate countries and periodically review countries to grant or continue the protections. Q: Why was Haiti granted TPS in the first place? A: President Barack Obama first designated Haiti for TPS in the aftermath of the catastrophic 2010 earthquake near the capital of Port-au-Prince, which killed more than 300,000 people and devastated the country's infrastructure. Over the years, TPS has been repeatedly renewed due to chronic instability, gang violence, economic collapse and the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse in 2021. Q: How many Haitians in the U.S. are affected by the decision? A: Nearly 521,000 Haitian nationals are currently protected under TPS. Many have lived in the U.S. for years, built families, held jobs and contributed to their communities. Many are also part of mixed-status families where the immigration status of the households can range from undocumented to green-card holders and U.S.-born citizens. Q: What exactly did the Trump administration announce? A: On Friday, the Department of Homeland Security said the U.S. will end Haiti's TPS designation, citing 'sufficient improvement' in the conditions that allegedly make it safe for Haitians to return. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had already rolled back the Biden-era extension of February 2026, moving it up to August 3, 2025. Deportations are expected to begin after Sept. 2. Q: How did the administration justify the decision? A: A DHS spokesperson claimed the move 'restores integrity in our immigration system' by ensuring TPS remains 'temporary.' The department asserted that Haiti's conditions have improved enough to permit safe return. Q: Is Haiti really safe to return to? A: Many experts— and even the U.S. State Department — disagree. The State Department currently warns Americans not to travel to Haiti due to 'kidnapping, crime, civil unrest and limited health care.' This week, the agency urged Americans to depart the Caribbean country 'as soon as possible' or to be prepared to shelter in place for a long time. Armed gangs control up to 90% of Port-au-Prince. Over a million Haitians are displaced, and 5.7 million face acute hunger, according to the United Nations' Humanitarian Affairs Office. There has also been a collapse of social services, and many children are unable to go to school. Haitians who are deported face the risk of having to cross gang-controlled roads to get home — or having nowhere to go to if returned because gangs have taken over people's homes and neighborhoods. Q: What does this mean for Haitian TPS holders now? A: Haitian nationals under the designation must prepare to leave by Sept. 2, 2025, unless a court intervenes or the administration reverses course. DHS has 'encouraged' them to use the CBP One app to 'self-deport' — meaning leave the country voluntarily. Without TPS, Haitians will lose legal protection from deportation and authorization to work in the U.S. if they don't have other immigration process going. Q: Could this decision face legal challenges? A: It is very likely. The Trump administration attempted to end TPS for Haitians and others back in 2017, but the move was successfully challenged in federal court. Immigration advocates and legal organizations are expected to file lawsuits again, arguing that conditions in Haiti remain too dangerous for return. There is also an ongoing lawsuit in New York related to Noem's earlier decision to roll back Haiti's TPS Haiti's by 18 months. READ MORE: Haitians and clergy group sue Trump over decision to end protection from deportation Q: Didn't Biden already extend TPS for Haitians until 2026? A: Yes. In July 2024, before leaving office, President Biden extended TPS for Haitians through February 2026. However, Secretary Noem ordered a review of the extension and rolled back the expiration to Aug. 3, 2025. The legality of that reversal may also be contested in court. Q: How does this fit into Trump's broader immigration agenda? A: Since returning to office, President Trump has focused on aggressively undoing Biden-era immigration policies. He has sought to drastically limit humanitarian programs, including ending CHNV — a two-year parole program for migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela — and reducing TPS designations. The Supreme Court recently allowed the administration to revoke CHNV protections while legal challenges are ongoing. Trump also enacted a travel ban that limits visa issuance and entry for nationals from Venezuela, Haiti and Cuba. Q: What happens to other migrant groups under TPS or parole? A: The Haitian decision follows similar revocations for Afghans and Venezuelans. Around 350,000 Venezuelans may lose protection when their status ends in September. Advocates fear a domino effect targeting all migrants with temporary status under humanitarian grounds. Q: What are advocates and immigration attorneys saying? A: Immigrant rights groups say the decision is inhumane and premature, pointing to the spiraling gang violence, hunger crisis and government collapse in Haiti. Deporting people to a country without a functioning government, basic services or security, they argue, violates international human-rights norms. The Florida Immigrant Coalition said in a statement on Friday that Haiti was not in 'any shape to sustain human dignity and life, and any suggestion to the contrary is nothing but lies.' Q: What should Haitian TPS holders do now? A: Legal experts urge Haitians to consult immigration attorneys immediately. Some may qualify for other forms of relief or adjustment of status, such as a spouse- or family-based green-card petition. Others may be eligible for asylum if they can show evidence they would face persecution or violence upon return. Q: What is the political reaction to the announcement? A: Critics have slammed the decision as part of Trump's hard-line anti-immigration platform, which he promoted during his campaign with inflammatory and false remarks — including a 2024 campaign claim from Trump that Haitians 'eat their neighbors' pets.' Supporters argue that the administration is restoring the original, temporary intent of TPS and reclaiming executive control over immigration enforcement. READ MORE: 'It's a disaster.' In Miami, Trump leans into pet-eating falsehoods about Haitians Q: What's next? A: Lawsuits are expected, and courts may delay or block TPS termination, as happened in 2018. Advocacy groups plan to lobby Congress for a permanent solution, like a pathway to residency for long-term TPS holders. In the meantime, more than half a million Haitian immigrants are once again left in limbo.


Miami Herald
14 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Mall giant bets big on Brickell City Centre, spending half-billion on retail complex
Brickell City Centre's mall, home to the luxury stores and fine dining restaurants that have built upon the neighborhood's upscale identity, has been sold to a new owner. Swire Properties, the firm that developed Brickell City Centre, sold the mall and the parking garage under it to Simon Property Group, a company known for investing in retail complexes across the country. Business publications said that Simon paid upward of $500 million, with Bloomberg reporting a $512 million purchase price and Reuters citing a price tag of up to $548 million. For now, there's no indication that the sale will result in any major changes for shoppers. Since its completion in 2016, when rapper Pitbull cut the ribbon at Brickell City Centre's opening, the mixed-use complex has been a cornerstone of Brickell's rapid transformation. In total, the mall's four floors make up about 500,000 square feet of retail space rented out to over 90 businesses. The open-air shopping center is home to the likes of Saks Fifth Avenue, Sephora, Apple and Lululemon, among other various other stores, restaurants and entertainment venues. Simon owns shopping malls across the country and previously owned a 25% stake in Brickell City Centre's retail side before acquiring the rest, along with the complex's parking garages. The shopping-focused real estate firm has recently been expanding in South Florida. Just this month, Simon bought a closed Sears outlet in Palm Beach County and a JCPenney inside Kendall's Dadeland Mall. While many have already declared the death of the American mall, Simon appears to be investing all the more heavily into retail complexes. In a statement concerning the Brickell City Centre sale Friday, the company said its properties 'provide community gathering places for millions of people every day and generate billions in annual sales.' Swire, a Hong Kong-based developer with a headquarters in Miami, has several other investments in the area, including two luxury towers under construction on Brickell Key. Swire indicated that proceeds from the mall's sale would go toward the financing of other development projects.


Bloomberg
17 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Says He'll Pick a Fed Chair Who Wants to Cut Rates
President Donald Trump said he will pick a successor for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell who wants to cut interest rates, a condition that would strike at the heart of the central bank's independence. 'If I think somebody's going to keep the rates where they are or whatever, I'm not going to put them in. I'm going to put somebody that wants to cut rates. There are a lot of them out there,' Trump told reporters Friday.