logo
Democrats play hardball on Epstein files

Democrats play hardball on Epstein files

Yahoo4 days ago
Democrats are showing they're ready to get dirty and hit President Trump where it hurts by stoking the Jeffrey Epstein controversy that's severed his MAGA movement.
The strategy strays from the official line coming from top Democrats such as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.), who say they want their midterm campaign message to center on Medicaid cuts and other kitchen-table policies contained in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.'
But the focus on Epstein has also been remarkably successful, energizing the Democratic grassroots and aggravating tensions within the GOP.
And this week, it prompted Republican leaders to scrap their legislative plans and head early into the long summer recess — all to avoid votes on the Epstein saga.
Even traditionalist Democratic veterans are applauding the tactic for its effectiveness.
'As long as we don't live in the mud, crawling down in the mud every now and then is not bad, in the political arena,' Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) said.
The case of Epstein, the late financier and convicted pedophile, has roiled the Trump administration in recent weeks after the Department of Justice (DOJ) released an unsigned memo saying Epstein did not have a 'client list' and that there was no evidence that he sought to blackmail global 'elites' who might have committed sex crimes or other offenses. The DOJ also said it would not release any more documents surrounding the case.
The memo directly contradicted claims from Trump, who had campaigned on the notion of releasing at least some of the files, and many prominent figures in his orbit, who have long claimed that Epstein operated an extensive pedophile ring that involved some of the world's most powerful people — a criminal enterprise that was covered up by the government to protect those same elites.
Some of the loudest promoters of Epstein-related conspiracy theories have since been appointed to top positions in the Trump administration — including U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, Patel's deputy director — feeding expectations from Trump's supporters that the files would soon be released. In February, Bondi had fueled those expectations further when she said she had the 'client list' on her desk and was preparing to release it.
The DOJ memo dashed the hopes of many of the MAGA faithful, fracturing the movement that's stood at the heart of Trump's political ascension. And Democrats have found rare success in dumping salt on the wound.
At every turn, Democrats are publicly bashing the administration for reneging on promises to release the Epstein files, aggravating the unusual split within Trump's far-right MAGA base.
They're demanding votes on bills to force the Justice Department to release those files, paralyzing House floor activity on the Republicans' preferred legislative agenda.
And they're backing an obscure procedural maneuver designed to force a floor vote on the Epstein files in the fall, ensuring that the national debate on the sordid episode — and the headaches it's created for Trump and the GOP — will endure for at least a few more months.
'This is a cover-up of epic proportions, where you've got the majority party literally having us leave Congress early, and not having the Rules Committee meet, because they don't want to deal with releasing the Epstein files,' Rep. Ted Lieu (Calif.), vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, told reporters Tuesday in the Capitol.
'The story's not going to go away because, at core, this is an issue about underage women who are sexually abused and assaulted,' he continued. 'Attorney General Pam Bondi should not be protecting Epstein's legacy, nor his clients, nor should congressional Republicans be doing the same.'
The Epstein saga has created a huge headache for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and other GOP leaders in the Capitol, who have struggled to contain the unrest within a GOP conference that's divided over whether the Epstein documents should be released.
On Monday, the Democrats' vows to continue pushing Epstein resolutions brought action on the Rules Committee to a screeching halt, which in turn prevented Republicans from bringing their week's planned agenda to the floor.
Without bills to vote on, Johnson on Tuesday announced that the House will leave Washington on Wednesday, rather than Thursday, for the long summer recess. He insisted the move was not intended to shield Republicans from tough Epstein votes — or protect Trump from potentially embarrassing disclosures — but to end the Democrats' 'political games.'
'We want any individual who's been involved in any way in the Epstein evils to be brought to justice as quickly as possible,' Johnson told reporters. 'What we refuse to do is participate in another one of the Democrats' political games.
'We are not going to let them use this as a political battering ram.'
Complicating Johnson's efforts, some Republicans have joined Democrats in demanding the release of the Epstein documents. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) is a top sponsor of legislation that would force the DOJ to release the records, and he's also leading the effort to force a vote on that bill through a discharge petition.
Because of the obscure rules governing that procedural gambit, a vote on the underlying Epstein proposal won't happen until after Congress returns from the long summer recess in September— a timeline all but ensuring that the issue won't go away anytime soon.
Jeffries this week downplayed the focus on Epstein, saying Democrats hope to target the major pieces of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' particularly the cuts to Medicaid and food stamps that were included to help pay for tax cuts.
Other party leaders, however, said Democrats have no intention of taking their foot off the gas when it comes to attempting to release the Epstein files — and highlighting his ties to Trump.
'We're going to continue to support those efforts,' said Rep. Pete Aguilar (Calif.), chair of the House Democratic Caucus. 'Donald Trump and his son and his closest friends spent years fanning the flame of this theory, and now we're holding them accountable.'
'Do they want to protect the rich and the powerful? Or do they want the truth?'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold Holds Loss as Traders Seek Clarity on Trump's No-Tariff Vow
Gold Holds Loss as Traders Seek Clarity on Trump's No-Tariff Vow

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gold Holds Loss as Traders Seek Clarity on Trump's No-Tariff Vow

(Bloomberg) -- Gold held a loss after President Donald Trump said imports of bullion won't be subject to US tariffs, although traders were still waiting for formal clarification over the policy following a federal ruling last week that sowed chaos and confusion across the market. Spot gold held near $3,345 an ounce on Tuesday, following a 1.6% drop on in the previous session after Trump posted 'Gold will not be Tariffed!' on social media. Futures of the precious metal in New York edged lower, after a 2.5% plunge on Monday. Invest in Gold American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park US Customs and Border Protection stunned traders last week by ruling the imports would be subject to duties. The shock led futures on New York's Comex to surge more than $100 an ounce above benchmark spot prices in London on Friday. The spread has since narrowed to about $50. Washington's decision regarding gold tariffs has sweeping implications for the flow of bullion around the world, and potentially for the smooth functioning of the US futures contract. The administration had exempted the precious metal from duties in April, and until there is long-term clarity, traders say, precious metals markets will remain on edge. Gold has climbed more than a quarter this year, with the bulk of those gains occurring in the first four months. It's been supported by geopolitical and trade tensions that have spurred haven demand, along with strong central bank purchases. Elsewhere, the dollar held a gain ahead of a US inflation report due later Tuesday that may offer clues on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy path. Higher rates are negative for non-interest bearing gold, while a stronger greenback tends to make the dollar-denominated commodity more expensive for most buyers. Investors were also weighing Trump's move on Monday to extend a tariff truce on Chinese goods for another 90 days into early November. The move should ease worries of a renewed trade war between the two biggest economies, reducing haven demand. Spot gold rose 0.1% to $3,345.12 an ounce as of 8:15 a.m. in London. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index dipped 0.1%, after posting a 0.3% gain on Monday. Silver advanced, palladium was flat, while platinum fell. Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

China Commerce Ministry Expert Sees Uncertainty Despite US Truce
China Commerce Ministry Expert Sees Uncertainty Despite US Truce

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China Commerce Ministry Expert Sees Uncertainty Despite US Truce

(Bloomberg) -- Trade ties between the world's two biggest economies remain vulnerable to uncertainty even though President Donald Trump extended a pause for elevated tariffs on Chinese goods for another three months, according to a senior researcher at the Ministry of Commerce in Beijing. A better outcome for China would include a mechanism to ensure both sides make good on bilateral agreements, said Zhou Mi, an expert at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, a think tank that operates under the aegis of the ministry directly involved in the trade talks. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park The Trump administration 'frequently sends out a range of signals, often through its negotiation tactics and public statements — some of which even contradict each other,' Zhou said in an interview on Tuesday. 'This creates a climate of uncertainty that makes businesses and markets increasingly concerned about the stability and outlook for economic and trade policies between China and the US, as well as the US and other countries,' he said. The measured tone is a reminder of the threats that linger as China and the US try to hammer out a more lasting agreement. With ties still in flux, companies will likely find it difficult to plan for long-term development, or accurately assess potential returns and risks, Zhou added. Trump's order, signed just before a tariff hike set for Tuesday, prolonged the truce through Nov. 10. The decision came weeks after negotiators from the two countries agreed to a preliminary agreement on the delay in Sweden. Despite the pause, US tariffs on Chinese goods are already at 55% on average, much higher than the rates imposed on other countries. It's a discrepancy that's caused a slump in shipments to America this year even as Chinese exports soared to other markets. Ideally, Zhou said, China would like to bring US tariffs down through negotiations to their level prior to Trump's first term as president, which was at the most-favored-nation rate in low single digits. Restrictions in other areas — such as investment, technology collaboration and cultural exchange — should also be reduced to 'lower the costs of cooperation,' he said. Importantly, stable institutional safeguards need to be established, to 'ensure that current commitments and mutual agreements are fully implemented and minimize the chances of major changes or disruptions in the future,' Zhou added. Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's EU Allies Send Him New Ukraine Plea Ahead of Putin Summit
Trump's EU Allies Send Him New Ukraine Plea Ahead of Putin Summit

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's EU Allies Send Him New Ukraine Plea Ahead of Putin Summit

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European Union (EU) leaders issued a fresh joint appeal to U.S. President Donald Trump on Ukraine, imploring him ahead of his crunch summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15. Kyiv and its European allies fear Trump will consent to the concession of Ukrainian territory Moscow has seized during its invasion, which they say will reward Russia for its unlawful aggression and signal that it could take similar action elsewhere. Twenty-six EU leaders—Hungary being the only member state that did not want to co-sign—said in the statement Tuesday that they welcomed Trump's efforts to end Russia's invasion and seek "a just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine". But they warned: "A just and lasting peace that brings stability and security must respect international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and that international borders must not be changed by force. "The people of Ukraine must have the freedom to decide their future. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. "Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine has wider implications for European and international security. We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store