Hong Kong cannot allow its system of foreign judges to wither and die
Advertisement
The latest judge to depart is Robert French, the former chief justice of Australia's High Court. His resignation is a blow to the judiciary, casting further doubts on a system that has served the city well.
French, appointed as a part-time judge of the Court of Final Appeal in 2017, had previously stated he intended to stay. His withdrawal comes more than a year before the end of his contract.
The judge's comments on his departure should prompt reflection in Hong Kong. The government has been quick to highlight French's continued confidence in the independence and integrity of the top court's remaining judges.
He also rejected the idea that the foreign justices are 'somehow complicit in the application by the executive of national security laws or somehow confer on them a spurious legitimacy'. That view is often cited by critics of the judges overseas.
Advertisement
But French did not stop there. He also said the role of the part-time judges 'has become increasingly anachronistic and arguably cosmetic'. That is an observation that should be taken seriously.
The dwindling of the number of foreign judges tells its own story. When Beijing passed a national security law for the city in 2020, there were 15 of them. The maximum allowed by law is 30. That gives an idea of the size of the talent pool envisaged. Five departed last year and now only five remain. Two of them were hired in 2023 and 2024. But the system is becoming difficult to sustain.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
2 hours ago
- AllAfrica
NATO virtual meeting for Ukrainian security guarantees backfires
The Trump administration made a massive political blunder on August 20th in its pursuit of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. The blunder centered on a 'virtual' meeting led by NATO. Prior to that meeting, Trump had promised the Russians that any deal would rule out Ukraine's NATO membership. Apparently the Russians read Trump's assurance to include no NATO peacekeepers. That was a mistake. The administration did not consult with the Russians ahead of the NATO parlay. The NATO-led meeting was intended to lay out military options to meet Ukraine's request for security guarantees. The discussion apparently considered different views on what a security guarantee would actually look like: Would it, for example, include troops. If so, how many? Where would they be based in Ukraine? And what role would they perform? Stories are around that some countries – the British and French in one version, the British, Germans and Poles in another (unlikely option) – would actually put boots on the ground in Ukraine, although British sources insist that its troops would not be on the front line but 'far back' from the action. President Donald Trump says that the US won't send any troops, but will support a security guarantee for Ukraine with US aircraft, presumably mainly spy aircraft (which, anyway, the US is regularly doing). But Trump has also touted US air superiority against Russia, suggesting that the US air patrols might well include fighter aircraft such as the F-35. Would these aircraft operate from Ukrainian soil or from bases in Poland and Romania, for example? The virtual meeting included the defense chiefs from all 32 NATO member countries. The meeting was overseen by Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, the chair of NATO's Military Committee. Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone The new Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) and leader of the US European Command, US General Alexus Grynkewich, delivered his first briefing to the virtual meeting. Also attending was General Dan Caine, who is chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff. Russia's reaction came quickly and rejected foreign participation in security guarantees for Ukraine. Speaking about the possibility of foreign troops being deployed on Ukrainian territory, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said that Moscow has always viewed this as unacceptable. 'And I hope they understand that this would be absolutely unacceptable for Russia and for all sensible political forces in Europe,' Lavrov said.' He went on to say that such proposals are a 'road to nowhere.' It is hard to be sure what led the Trump administration to believe that the Russians would accept NATO states providing security for Ukraine. The very high level of US participation under the NATO banner creates a significant roadblock to a deal on Ukraine. There also is emerging pushback on any peace deal that involves Ukraine surrendering all or part of Donbas. In a story on August 21st, the conservative Washington Times in a front-page story (print edition) suggested any deal was dangerous. 'The ugly truth behind any deal that would cede a chunk of Ukraine's Donbas region to Moscow is that it could immediately strengthen the Russian military, providing a major win for one of America's leading adversaries in an era of great power competition. 'In such a scenario, Ukraine would lose some of its most heavily fortified defensive positions. Russian President Vladimir Putin's generals would seek to deepen their substantial footprint in the strategically vital theater with new military bases. The Russian navy could gain even greater control over the Black Sea. The Russian government and its armed forces could take de facto ownership of the significant mineral deposits underground in eastern Ukraine.' The Washington Times story goes on to quote a number of think tanks including the Institute for the Study of War, which has been strongly pro-Ukraine for some time. While the diplomatic process continues, problems are mounting for Trump's peace initiative for Ukraine. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.
RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
US, EU release details on tariff deal
US, EU release details on tariff deal The EU's trade commissioner said the deal for a 15-percent US levy on most European exports, is "the most favourable trade deal the US has extended to any partner." Photo: Reuters The US and EU released details of a trade deal on Thursday that foresees lower car tariffs but no relief for Europe's wine sector, but Brussels said it would push for further concessions. US President Donald Trump and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched a framework accord in July for most EU exports to face a 15-percent US levy. But many aspects remained unclear, as the EU sought to win carve-outs for some sectors and Trump threatened higher tariffs on others. A joint statement on Thursday brought some clarity, although negotiations are not over and some moving parts remain. The "maximum, all-inclusive" 15-percent rate would apply to the vast majority of European exports, including cars, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber, the EU said. "This is the most favourable trade deal the US has extended to any partner," EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic told journalists in Brussels, explaining the levy will not come on top of existing tariffs. In recent weeks Trump had raised the possibility of additional tariffs hitting certain sectors such as pharmaceuticals, which account for 20 percent of the EU's exports to the United States, and semiconductors. Sefcovic said he was confident that the rate for cars, which is lower than the current 27.5 percent, will apply retroactively from August 1, having received assurances on the matter from his US counterpart. But this will happen only once the EU introduces legislation to eliminate its own tariffs on US industrial products, something Sefcovic said the commission was "working very hard" on. Welcoming the clarity provided by the joint statement, Sigrid de Vries, director of European auto lobby ACEA, urged the commission to implement its part of the deal "without delay, mitigating the tariff impact which already has cost automakers millions of euros in duties every day." The 15-percent rate will also apply to wine and spirits despite a push by France, Italy and other wine-making countries to win a zero tariff exemption. "Unfortunately, here we didn't succeed," Sefcovic said, adding negotiations would continue, but did not want to give "false promises". "These doors are not closed forever," he said. The French wine exporters federation said it was "hugely disappointed". France exports 25 percent of its wines and spirits to the United States and Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard said "the situation cannot remain unresolved". In a post on X, she called the agreement "unbalanced" and said European negotiators needed to make the issue a priority as a matter of urgency. She also expected "strong European measures to support producers". French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said his government would seek "additional exemptions" in the trade deal. The office of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the agreement was "not yet an ideal or final point" but a "trade war" had been avoided. Under the agreement, the EU committed to significantly improving market access to a range of US seafood and agricultural goods, including tree nuts, dairy products, fruits, vegetables, pork and bison meat. On the other hand, a special more favourable regime will apply as of September 1 to a number of EU exports to the US including "unavailable natural resources" such as cork, all aircraft and aircraft parts and generic pharmaceuticals. These would effectively face a "zero or close to zero" rate, the commission said. (AFP)
RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
US, EU release details on tariff deal
US, EU release details on tariff deal The EU's trade commissioner said the deal for a 15-percent US levy on most European exports, is "the most favourable trade deal the US has extended to any partner." Photo: Reuters The US and EU released details of a trade deal on Thursday that foresees lower car tariffs but no relief for Europe's wine sector, but Brussels said it would push for further concessions. US President Donald Trump and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched a framework accord in July for most EU exports to face a 15-percent US levy. But many aspects remained unclear, as the EU sought to win carve-outs for some sectors and Trump threatened higher tariffs on others. A joint statement on Thursday brought some clarity, although negotiations are not over and some moving parts remain. The "maximum, all-inclusive" 15-percent rate would apply to the vast majority of European exports, including cars, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber, the EU said. "This is the most favourable trade deal the US has extended to any partner," EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic told journalists in Brussels, explaining the levy will not come on top of existing tariffs. In recent weeks Trump had raised the possibility of additional tariffs hitting certain sectors such as pharmaceuticals, which account for 20 percent of the EU's exports to the United States, and semiconductors. Sefcovic said he was confident that the rate for cars, which is lower than the current 27.5 percent, will apply retroactively from August 1, having received assurances on the matter from his US counterpart. But this will happen only once the EU introduces legislation to eliminate its own tariffs on US industrial products, something Sefcovic said the commission was "working very hard" on. Welcoming the clarity provided by the joint statement, Sigrid de Vries, director of European auto lobby ACEA, urged the commission to implement its part of the deal "without delay, mitigating the tariff impact which already has cost automakers millions of euros in duties every day." The 15-percent rate will also apply to wine and spirits despite a push by France, Italy and other wine-making countries to win a zero tariff exemption. "Unfortunately, here we didn't succeed," Sefcovic said, adding negotiations would continue, but did not want to give "false promises". "These doors are not closed forever," he said. The French wine exporters federation said it was "hugely disappointed". France exports 25 percent of its wines and spirits to the United States and Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard said "the situation cannot remain unresolved". In a post on X, she called the agreement "unbalanced" and said European negotiators needed to make the issue a priority as a matter of urgency. She also expected "strong European measures to support producers". French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said his government would seek "additional exemptions" in the trade deal. The office of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the agreement was "not yet an ideal or final point" but a "trade war" had been avoided. Under the agreement, the EU committed to significantly improving market access to a range of US seafood and agricultural goods, including tree nuts, dairy products, fruits, vegetables, pork and bison meat. On the other hand, a special more favourable regime will apply as of September 1 to a number of EU exports to the US including "unavailable natural resources" such as cork, all aircraft and aircraft parts and generic pharmaceuticals. These would effectively face a "zero or close to zero" rate, the commission said. (AFP)
