
Major setback for Trump as U.S. court blocks tariffs
A U.S. federal court has blocked most of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, boosting markets on Thursday with a ruling that could derail his trade strategy. The three-judge Court of International Trade, in two separate cases, ruled on Wednesday that Mr. Trump had overstepped his authority, and barred most of the import duties announced since he took office in January, including the 'Liberation Day' tariffs announced on April 2. The judges said the cases rested on whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) delegate such powers to the President 'in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world'. 'The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder,' the ruling said. Attorneys for the Trump administration promptly filed an appeal against the ruling, which gave the White House 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process of halting the tariffs. The White House called the ruling 'blatantly wrong,' expressing confidence that the decision would be overturned. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told presspersons that the judges 'brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump.' The White House also said that top U.S. officials have been in touch with their counterparts in other countries to discuss Wednesday's ruling. The ruling marks a significant setback to Mr. Trump as he bids to redraw the U.S. trading relationship with the world by forcing governments to the negotiating table through tough new tariffs. Mr. Trump had argued that the U.S.'s trade deficits and the threat posed by the influx of drugs constituted a 'national emergency' that justified widespread tariffs. The federal trade court was ruling in two separate cases — brought by businesses and a coalition of State governments — arguing that the President had violated Congress's power of the purse. The judges stated that any interpretation of the IEEPA that 'delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional'. 'It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. 'President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness,' Mr. Desai said.
The ruling comes as Mr. Trump was using the tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations with friends and foes, including the European Union and China. Beijing, which was hit by 145% tariffs before they were sharply reduced to give space for negotiations, reacted to the court ruling by saying the U.S. should scrap the levies. Mr. Trump unveiled sweeping import duties on nearly all trading partners on April 2, at a baseline 10%, plus steeper levies on dozens of economies, including China and the EU. The U.S. court's ruling also quashes duties that Mr. Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately using emergency powers. Asian markets rallied on Thursday and U.S. futures pointed to early gains, but Europe was mixed, with London in the red while Paris and Frankfurt rose. The Indian government is assessing the potential impact of the U.S. court's ruling that blocked the sweeping tariffs imposed by President Trump, according to government sources. They added that talks for India-U.S. free trade agreement were 'progressing well'. The sources confirmed the U.S. team of negotiators for the ongoing India-U.S. Free Trade Agreement discussions would be in India on June 5-6. Indian delegation, under Commerce and Industry Ministry Piyush Goyal, returned from week-long trip to U.S. last week. Trade experts said India must use the opportunity provided by the U.S. court decision to pause and reassess strategy in FTA talks.
The Hindu's Editorials
The Hindu's Daily Quiz
At which university has the Trump administration sought to ban the enrolment of international students
Stanford
Harvard
Columbia
Princeton
To know the answer and to play the full quiz, click here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
30 minutes ago
- News18
Indian-American Megha Vemuri's Pro-Palestine Speech Sparks Vile Comments: ‘B*tch...Deport Her To Gaza'
Last Updated: Following the backlash she faced for her pro-Palestine speech, Megha Vemuri deactivated her LinkedIn profile. Megha Vemuri, an Indian-American student and president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MIT) Class of 2025, made headlines after she delivered a speech to condemn Israel's actions in Gaza. She also criticised MIT for its research ties with the Israeli military. Wearing a red keffiyeh, a well-known symbol of Palestinian support, Megha said, 'The Israeli occupation forces are the only foreign military that MIT has research ties with." She further praised students who have been protesting on campus for months and said, 'You showed the world that MIT wants a free Palestine." Megha also claimed that protesters had faced 'threats, intimidation, and suppression" from the MIT administration. During her speech, Megha made a comparison between the celebration in Cambridge and the harsh reality in Gaza, saying, 'Right now, while we prepare to graduate and move forward with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza." Soon after her speech, a flood of negative comments poured in online. The backlash was so intense that Megha decided to take down her LinkedIn profile. One user on X (formerly Twitter), named Ouriel, posted screenshots of Megha's deactivated LinkedIn profile and wrote, 'Make that b*tch famous. May she never find any career path and be humiliated for what she just did and did before that. PS: Megha if you really want to sound cool, work on your 'rrrrrhaazzzza" accent." Another person said, 'They should have pulled her off the stage and begun deportation proceedings on the spot." 'She should buy a one-way ticket to Gaza right away and go work on the ground!!" someone else commented. 'If MIT graduates can be so easily swayed by one-sided narratives, what hope is there for the average person? This is a failure of critical thinking at its core," read another comment. 'She is an example of how to hit your feet on an axe just to show the world how brave she is!" an individual remarked. Another sharp comment read, 'She not only wasted his parents' money to put her through top school, she also embarrassed her whole family by pulling such a stunt. What a shame!" Megha, who was supposed to serve as the marshal at the commencement ceremony, was informed by MIT's chancellor, Melissa Nobles, that she would not be allowed to participate. The Boston Globe reported that Nobles sent an email to Megha stating that both she and her family were banned from campus for most of the day following her speech. 'Participation in Commencement activities is a privilege. You deliberately and repeatedly misled Commencement organisers," Nobles wrote, as per the outlet. 'While we acknowledge your right to free expression, your decision to lead a protest from the stage, disrupting an important institute ceremony, was a violation of MIT's time, place and manner rules for campus expression," she added. According to MIT's leadership released a statement saying they fully support the disciplinary action taken against Megha. The statement read, 'MIT supports free expression but stands by its decision, which was in response to the individual deliberately and repeatedly misleading Commencement organisers and leading a protest from the stage, disrupting an important Institute ceremony." An MIT spokesperson also mentioned that the speech Megha actually delivered was different from the version she had submitted to university officials before the event. First Published:
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
31 minutes ago
- First Post
'We are going to beat this': Biden talks about his cancer diagnosis for the first time in public
Former US President Joe Biden, diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer, expressed optimism about his prognosis in Delaware, urging Americans to defend democracy and honor military sacrifices. read more On Friday, former US President Joe Biden spoke out in public for the first time after it was revealed that he was diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer. In his address at an event in Delaware, Biden said that he was optimistic about his prognosis but urged Americans to keep fighting to defend the American democracy. 'All the folks are very optimistic … The expectation is we are going to be able to beat this,' he said about the cancer diagnosis in his address. Biden was delivering a speech at the event commemorating members of the military killed in service. The ceremony was held just a few days after Memorial Day. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During his speech, the former president recalled how it would be the 10th anniversary of the death of his son Beau, who died of brain cancer at the age of 46. Earlier this month, it was announced that the veteran Democratic politician was suffering from an 'aggressive form' of prostate cancer that had spread to his bones. He urges Americans to fight for democracy During his speech, Biden spoke with vigour and passion to families of military men and women who lost in the line of duty. He drew a direct line between their sacrifice and what he said people need to do now. 'They are not asking us to risk our lives, they are asking us to stay true to what America stands for. They are not asking us to do their jobs, they are asking us to do our jobs – to protect our nation, in our time, now, to defend democracy,' he said. In his address, Biden did not take the name of US President Donald Trump or his self-referential Memorial Day address. While speaking to the reporter after the address, Biden said that the US is at 'an inflexion point where the decisions we make in the next little bit are going to determine what things look like for the next 20 years'. Recalling his brief run in the 2024 US Presidential Election, Biden claimed that he had no regrets, despite being pressured into dropping out of his re-election campaign, and then watching Trump win back the White House. 'No regrets,' he said, adding, 'I'm very proud. I'll put my record as president against any president at all.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When asked about his cancer diagnosis, Biden told reporters that he had 'No regrets,' he said, adding: 'I'm very proud. I'll put my record as president against any president at all.' 'It's not in any organs, my bones are strong,' he said. He also mentioned that he was under the care of a world-class surgeon who had himself beaten prostate cancer three decades ago.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Defamation case: Court rejects Rahul's plea seeking info on Savarkar grand-nephew's maternal lineage
A court in Pune on Saturday rejected Rahul Gandhi's application seeking details of the maternal lineage of Satyaki Savarkar , the grand-nephew of V D Savarkar , over his defamation complaint filed against the Congress leader for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue . Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Amol Shinde dismissed the application, observing that the case pertains to an alleged defamatory speech made by Gandhi in London and not to the family tree of late Himani Ashok Savarkar, the mother of Satyaki Savarkar. Himani Savarkar was the daughter of Gopal Vinayak Godse, the younger brother of Mahatma Gandhi's assassin Nathuram Godse. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Gandhi, through his counsel Milind Pawar, had submitted that while the complainant had provided details of his paternal ancestry while filing the complaint, his maternal lineage had not been disclosed. The defence argued that this information was crucial for the hearing. "The case is not related to or disputed on the family tree of late Himani Ashok Savarkar. Therefore, this court does not find any merit in the application of the accused. There is also no need to send the matter for further investigation," the court said in its order. Live Events Meanwhile, the court also rejected Satyaki Savarkar's application seeking cancellation of Gandhi's bail, stating that the grounds cited were not sufficient to warrant such action. Savarkar had alleged in his plea that the case is already posted for recording of plea of the accused since January 10, 2025, but the latter is not recording his plea on one pretext or another and adopting delaying tactics. The judge noted that Gandhi had been granted bail with a permanent exemption from personal appearance and there was no evidence to suggest that he was deliberately delaying the proceedings. "It is not found that the accused is prolonging the matter. The grounds mentioned in the application are not justified to take strict action against the accused. Hence, the application is liable to be rejected," the order stated. Satyaki Savarkar had filed a defamation complaint against Gandhi over his speech in London in March 2023, wherein the Congress leader allegedly claimed that V D Savarkar had written in a book that he and a group of friends once beat up a Muslim man, and that Savarkar felt happy about it. The complainant contended that Savarkar never made such claims and termed Gandhi's remarks "fictitious, false, and malicious".