
Warnings of tax rises after Downing Street welfare U-turn
The Prime Minister said that the concessions strike 'the right balance', but think tanks have warned that the changes announced on Friday morning have made Rachel Reeves' 'already difficult budget balancing act that much harder'.
Downing Street declined to rule out the possibility of increases in the autumn, telling reporters on Friday that 'tax decisions are set out at fiscal events'.The concessions on offer include protecting personal independence payments (Pip) for all existing claimants, while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said on Friday that the changes make tax rises in the budget expected in the autumn more likely.
Associate director Tom Waters said: 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult budget balancing act that much harder.'
Ruth Curtice, chief executive at the Resolution Foundation, said that 'the concessions aren't cheap, costing as much as £3 billion and more than halving the medium-term savings from the overall set of reforms announced just three months ago'.
She added: 'This adds to the already mounting pressure to deliver fresh consolidation in the budget this autumn.'
The Resolution Foundation noted that extending a freeze in personal tax threshold by one year would save '£4 billion a year'.
Asked about how the climbdown would be funded, Downing Street said on Friday that 'There'll be no permanent increase in borrowing, as is standard.
'We'll set out how this will be funded at the budget, alongside a full economic and fiscal forecast in the autumn, in the usual way.'
Asked whether they could say there would be no tax rises, a Number 10 spokesman said: 'As ever, as is a long-standing principle, tax decisions are set out at fiscal events.'
Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would have halted the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks when it faces its first Commons hurdle on July 1.
The list of Labour MPs putting their name to the amendment had been growing throughout the week, as Downing Street said that they would be pressing on with next week's vote.
After the late-night U-turn, Sir Keir said that 'the most important thing is that we can make the reform we need'.
'We talked to colleagues, who've made powerful representations, as a result of which we've got a package which I think will work, we can get it right,' he added.
'For me, getting that package adjusted in that way is the right thing to do, it means it's the right balance, it's common sense that we can now get on with it.'
While leading rebels believe the concessions are likely to be enough to win over a majority, some remain opposed to the plans in their current form.
Dr Simon Opher, who represents Stroud, said in a statement that he is glad the Government 'are listening', but that the changes 'do not tackle the eligibility issues that are at the heart of many of the problems with Pip'.
'The Bill should be scrapped and we should start again and put the needs of disabled people at the centre of the process,' he said.
It is also understood that talks are under way over rebel attempts to lay another amendment next week as they seek to delay the plans, as reported by The Guardian.
The fallout also threatens to cause lasting damage, with some backbenchers having called for a reset of relations between Number 10 and the parliamentary party.
Speaking to the PA news agency, a number of Labour backbenchers expressed deeper frustration with how Downing Street has handled its backbenchers since last year's election.
The Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit.
Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition.
Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms.
The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Our welfare system needs reform, not arbitrary cuts
As the smoke settles from yet another astonishing tyre-screeching U-turn by Kier Starmer on his welfare proposals, the stark reality is that instead of significant savings, we will all now face an extra tax bill of £3bn in the autumn. This U-turn isn't surprising to me because their proposal was a classic panicky short-term Treasury driven cut but in no way genuine reform. I even doubt that the savings would in the longer term have materialised. This is because I believe they were going at it the wrong way. The Covid lockdowns blasted a hole in our welfare system. Since 2020, the number of households where no one has ever worked has doubled. Economic inactivity due to long-term sickness has risen by 800,000. And taxpayers today are shelling out an extra £30 billion every year on sickness and disability benefits, on top of an already bulging bill. Lockdown reversed much of the progress we had made under the transformations of Universal Credit, in part relaxing eligibility rules and assessments for benefits, a leniency that astonishingly continues to this day. But also expanding the 'claim culture', albeit inadvertently, through schemes like furlough. It is easy to forget that by 2019 we had the lowest rate of workless households on record. Clearly, we have to get a grip. But solving this problem will take thought, courage and time. The Government's proposals are rushed in order to be 'scored' by the OBR in time for the Spring Statement. In a panic, the Treasury opted to simply top-slice spending by raising the threshold for disability benefits across the board. This leads to some deeply concerning outcomes. According to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), three in four Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants with arthritis, two in three with cardiovascular disease, and even a third with cancer could lose support. Yet there is another way, one which focuses on the root causes of the crisis. But that must start with a grown-up conversation about mental health. Monthly PIP claims have more than doubled, driven in large part by a threefold increase in people citing mental health conditions. Meanwhile the majority of people on Universal Credit receiving health-related top-ups now also report poor mental health. Tragically, it is disproportionately young people fuelling this rise, those most likely to suffer the mental and emotional consequences of being out of work. And yet it is the system itself that is driving worklessness and dependency. Of course, PIP eligibility does not require someone to be out of work. Yet five in six recipients are. Taken in the round, once you tot up all the various benefits, the system has tilted towards incentivising ill health rather than supporting recovery. There is another way. New research from the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) shows that better targeting of mental health benefits – focusing help to those with more serious conditions – could save the Government up to £9 billion. A more humane and sustainable approach to reform would recognise that, for many people with anxiety or depression, ensuring proper treatment is much more compassionate than parking them on benefits and slamming the door to an independent life. First, the government could use the savings to fund a £1 billion investment in NHS Talking Therapies, expanding 1.5 million additional treatment courses. CSJ polling also finds that nearly half the public believe people with less severe conditions should be supported through programmes and services, compared to one in five saying cash. Second, the Government should accelerate the rollout of Universal Support, originally launched by the last Conservative government and now rebranded as Connect to Work. This scheme works with the local charities and community organisations best placed to help people who are furthest from the workforce. These inspirational people are already on the ground, collaborating with employers to tackle the most difficult barriers to work, whether family breakdown, debt, addiction, and poor health. Finally, for the first time, sickness benefit is being brought into Universal Credit as I had designed originally. The DWP now has powerful tools Universal Credit provides. The NHS has made it clear that for depression and anxiety, the largest new claimant group, work is a health treatment. Yet far too many people were left on sickness benefit with no meaningful contact. Many who were off work for health reasons received no time with a work coach at all. Now under Universal credit that can change. The system should be doing more – using AI to free up work coach time – to increase the contact time with claimants and not leaving them parked on the sidelines. Our welfare system needs reform, not arbitrary cuts. I understand the pressure Liz Kendall is under. But short-term fixes risk doing lasting damage. We need a system that treats people with compassion while actively supporting them to recover and return to work. That's how to reduce dependency, control costs, and rebuild lives.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Amazon's £40bn expansion brings 1000s of jobs: what it means
Amazon's investment will bring cutting-edge tech, better wages, and fresh career opportunities to the UK 🌍 Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Amazon is investing £40 billion in the UK over the next three years, boosting regional growth New fulfilment centres in Hull and Northampton will create at least 4,000 jobs by 2026 Two more warehouses planned for the East Midlands in 2027 will add thousands more roles Investment also includes upgrades to data centres, tech like drones, and Amazon's London HQ The move supports the government's 'levelling up' agenda, spreading innovation outside London Amazon is making a bold bet on Britain's regions, announcing a landmark £40 billion investment aimed at creating jobs and fuelling economic growth far beyond the traditional powerhouses of London and the South East. At the heart of the expansion are four new fulfilment centres – including confirmed sites in Hull and Northampton – which will bring at least 4,000 new roles by 2026. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Two more large-scale warehouse facilities are planned for the East Midlands in 2027, likely adding thousands more jobs, though the exact locations remain under wraps. But this isn't just about warehouses. Amazon's investment, which spans the next three years, also includes billions in data infrastructure, cutting-edge technologies like drones and robotics, improvements to staff wages and benefits, and a major upgrade to its London headquarters in Shoreditch. (Photo:) | Getty Images The scale and spread of the spending signals a new chapter in Amazon's UK strategy – one that aligns with the government's 'levelling up' agenda and sends a strong message to global investors: Britain, post-Brexit and amid political change, is still a key destination for innovation and growth. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called it a 'massive vote of confidence in the UK,' while Chancellor Rachel Reeves described it as a 'powerful endorsement of Britain's economic strengths.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Amazon CEO Andy Jassy emphasised the company's commitment to reaching every corner of the UK. He said: 'When Amazon invests, it's not only in London and the South East – we're bringing innovation and job creation to communities throughout England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.' What does it mean for the UK economy? With more than 75,000 already on its payroll, Amazon is one of the UK's largest private sector employers. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This new injection of funding not only strengthens its logistics network but also helps build long-term regional resilience by introducing high-tech jobs, skills training, and digital infrastructure in under-served areas. For Hull, Northampton, and the East Midlands, it means more than just jobs – it could mark the beginning of a deeper transformation, bringing global tech investment into areas historically overlooked. As the UK economy seeks stable ground and sustainable growth, this investment could provide a much-needed anchor. Are you struggling to make ends meet as costs continue to rise? You can now send your stories to us online via YourWorld at It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Middle classes flee Britain for the Med after Reeves tax raids
Countries in southern Europe have reported a surge in middle class families fleeing Britain for the continent since Labour's election victory last summer. New figures show that applications from the UK for golden visas in countries such as Greece and Portugal have risen sharply over the past year. It comes amid warnings that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is readying another tax raid on businesses and workers in the autumn to plug holes in the UK's finances. Experts said there had been a 'clear uptick' in families looking to leave Britain and that sky-high taxes were 'certainly a driver' of the trend. Greece has become a popular destination, with golden visa applications from the UK having surged by almost 50 per cent since last summer. The country offers a five-year residency permit and a route to EU citizenship for people who invest as little as 250,000 euros in property. In the year up to April, there were 626 applications to the scheme granted to people from the UK, the latest Greek government statistics have revealed. That was up from 427 the year before – a 46.6 per cent rise – according to analysis carried out by Astons, a global investment immigration firm. Portugal also registered a sharp jump in the number of Britons applying for its golden visa scheme last year, either side of July's election. There were 389 applications from the UK in 2024, compared with 234 the year before – a 66.2 per cent increase. The country offers a similar route to permanent residency and EU citizenship as Greece, also for as little as a 250,000 euro investment. Alena Lesina, a citizenship, residence permit, and real estate investment expert for Astons said the firm had seen 'a clear uptick in interest from UK nationals exploring residency-by-investment programmes over the past year'. 'While the broader economic and tax environment in the UK is certainly a driver, what's notable is the evolving profile of applicants,' she said. 'These schemes are no longer the preserve of ultra-high net worth individuals alone. We're increasingly advising middle class families, remote-working professionals, and even retirees who are re-evaluating their lifestyle priorities post-pandemic. 'For many, it's about quality of life, future planning, and unlocking mobility in an increasingly uncertain global climate.' Figures for other European countries show that the popularity of golden visas with Britons had been growing before last year's election. Spain, which closed its scheme in April, attracted 3,601 applications from Britons in 2023, a rise of almost 70 percent on 2022. Outside Europe, there has also been a reported surge in Britons moving to the United Arab Emirates to take advantage of its lower cost of living. Interest in such visa programmes grew as taxes rose to record levels in the UK, a trend that began under the Tories and has continued under Labour. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'It pains me that the young, ambitious, optimistic people our country needs are leaving because they think they can have a better life outside the UK. This just demonstrates the far-reaching consequences of Labour's punishing tax rises, which are wreaking untold damage on the economy. 'There is a real danger that Rachel Reeves' ideological war on aspiration will backfire and leave the state of the public finances even worse off. It wouldn't be a surprise if the OBR now forecasts lower tax takings in the autumn, leaving the Chancellor with an even bigger black hole to fill.' Ms Reeves launched a raid on the wealthy in her autumn Budget, abolishing the non-dom status and tightening inheritance tax rules. But she is now looking at ways to backtrack on some of the changes after they sparked a flight of the rich, threatening to dent her tax takings. A Treasury spokesman said: 'Our tax system is fair and progressive, and keeps the UK an attractive place to live. The UK's main capital gains tax rate is lower than any other G7 European country, and we are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible. 'That's why, at last autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT.' Last week, a report by Henley and Partners warned that Britain was set to lose more millionaires this year than any other country. It predicted that 16,500 would emigrate, which would be the largest exodus any country has experienced over the last decade. Nigel Farage's Reform UK and Kemi Badenoch's Tories have both since unveiled policies designed to lure the wealthy back to the UK. Reform has said it would introduce a 10-year residency permit called a Britannia Card, which foreign businessmen could buy for £250,000. The permit would exempt them from having to pay UK tax on overseas income and assets. Meanwhile the Tories said they are looking at plans for a golden visa scheme that would include exemptions from Labour's inheritance tax on global assets.