Khamenei says Trump ‘exaggerated' impact of US strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hailed his country's 'victory' over Israel and vowed never to surrender to the US. (EPA Images pic)
TEHRAN : Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said today that the US President Donald Trump 'exaggerated' the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, in his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel took hold.
In a statement and a televised speech carried by state media, he hailed his country's 'victory' over Israel and vowed never to surrender to the US, while claiming that Washington had been dealt a 'slap' after striking Iranian nuclear sites.
Khamenei's remarks come two days after a ceasefire ended a 12-day war between Iran and Israel, the foes' deadliest and most destructive confrontation in history.
It also follows a stinging row in the US over the actual extent of the damage inflicted by American strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites during the conflict.
'The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration,' Khamenei said.
The US 'has gained nothing from this war,' he said, adding that American strikes 'did nothing significant' to Iran's nuclear facilities.
'The Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America,' he said, a reference to Iran's missile launch targeting the largest US base in the Middle East.
'I want to congratulate the great Iranian nation… for its victory over the fallacious Zionist regime,' he added, claiming that Israel had 'almost collapsed' because of Iran's strikes.
Both Iran and Israel had already claimed they won, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing on Tuesday a 'historic victory' for Israel.
US defence
In the US, leaked intelligence this week opened up a Pandora's box of accusations and counter-claims over the extent of the damage caused by the strikes.
Later today, US defense secretary Pete Hegseth is due to offer a fresh assessment of the attacks.
After waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since June 13, the US bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities.
An initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strikes did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear programme was set back only months at most.
Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400kg of enriched uranium – which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country.
The US administration has hit back furiously, with Trump saying the attack 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain, and that it had set the programme back by 'decades'.
Trump said that Hegseth, whom he dubbed 'war' secretary, would hold a news conference at 12am today to 'fight for the dignity of our great American pilots'.
CIA chief John Ratcliffe said in a statement yesterday that 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'.
The Israeli military said it had delivered a 'significant' blow to Iran's nuclear sites but that it was 'still early' to fully assess the damage.
Netanyahu announced that 'we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project'.
'And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt,' he said.
Nuclear talks?
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told Al Jazeera that 'nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure'.
After the war derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the US, Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope 'for a comprehensive peace agreement'.
Trump told reporters that Israel and Iran were 'both tired, exhausted', before going on to say that talks were planned with Iran next week.
'We may sign an agreement. I don't know,' he added.
Iran has systematically denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its 'legitimate rights' to the peaceful use of atomic energy.
It has also said it was willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington.
The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said.
Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to official figures.
A state funeral will be held on Saturday in Tehran for top commanders and nuclear scientists killed in the war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
36 minutes ago
- The Star
Hope in fraught times: Trump-Xi bond could shift ties for the better, say US experts
BEIJING: US President Donald Trump's free hand domestically and open admiration for Chinese President Xi Jinping could make him the wild card capable of shifting the relationship between the world's two largest powers from rivalry to cooperation, American scholars have said. Speaking at a session developed in collaboration with The Straits Times at a World Economic Forum event in Tianjin on Thursday (June 26), Harvard professor Graham Allison pointed out that Trump is not a China hawk. 'If you look at the campaign last year, there were a thousand people running for office in the country in which 80 per cent of the people have a negative view of China,' he said, referring to the US general election in 2024. 'Only one person had positive things to say about China. This was Donald Trump.' Prof Allison noted that Trump had said to Xi that when China and the United States work together, they can solve most of the world's problems. He said he believed that Trump is determined to be a 'great deal maker' and a 'great peacemaker'. 'If he is going to succeed in that mission, the opportunity for Trump and Xi to surprise us on the upside, I think, is enough to be hopeful,' said the national security analyst who has served under former US presidents Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. Prof Allison's optimism stands out in the current climate. Since Trump began his second term in January, the US-China rivalry has intensified – most notably with the US' imposition of unprecedentedly high tariffs on Chinese goods – leading many observers to take a pessimistic view of the world's most consequential relationship. His optimism is also striking, given that he is famous for popularising the 'Thucydides Trap' – a concept that draws upon historical pattern to suggest that conflict becomes likely when an established power feels threatened by a rising power. (Clockwise from left) ST Foreign Editor Li Xueying moderating a session with Professor Graham Allison, Professor Jin Keyu, Professor Monica Toft and Professor Happymon Jacob at a World Economic Forum event in Tianjin on June 26. - Photo: World Economic Forum Another American scholar at the same session shared his optimism. Professor Monica Toft of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy said Trump has significant leeway to take a softer approach on China, given that most Americans are not interested in foreign policy and that Congress and the courts are unlikely to challenge him. 'If President Trump decided he could align US interests more closely with China – without giving away the store – he has both the prerogative and the opportunity to do that,' she said. Prof Toft noted that global politics today is shaped by two strongmen – Trump and Xi – who share a personal rapport. 'They talk to one another, they respect one another, they admire one another,' she said. 'It could be an extraordinary period for humanity if they can find a way to collaborate and coordinate on certain issues.' Speaking at the same session, Professor Jin Keyu from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology also saw bright spots in an otherwise gloomy picture of the US-China rivalry. 'I do not agree with the view that they are in a new Cold War,' she said. She said while China and the US may be politically opposite and economically competitive, there is a need for them to cooperate to provide global public goods. 'There is space to collaborate, whether it's on the risk of artificial intelligence, climate, data transparency, and so forth,' she said. At the session titled 'Geopolitics: An Unfolding Story', moderated by ST Foreign Editor Li Xueying, the panel also discussed the erosion of the 'nuclear taboo', a normative belief that the use of nuclear weapons is unacceptable, even in situations where it might be strategically advantageous. This concept was brought into sharp focus by recent conflicts. In June, the US and Israel attacked Iran to destroy its nuclear weapons development programme. In 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, which found itself less able to defend itself because it had given up its nuclear capabilities decades ago. Professor Happymon Jacob, who teaches nuclear disarmament at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in India, pointed out that while the taboo against the use of nuclear weapons remains, the taboo against the possession of nuclear weapons appears to be collapsing. 'Ukrainians would say we made a mistake in giving up our nuclear weapons,' he said at the same panel. 'The Russians will tell you that we have nuclear weapons, thousands of them. There is no way we are going to be defeated in this war.' He noted how South Korea, faced with the threat of nuclear-armed North Korea, is also thinking about developing nuclear weapons. - The Straits Times/ANN
Barnama
37 minutes ago
- Barnama
Push For Gaza, Ukraine Peace Like Iran-Israel Deal
Turkey's President Tayyip Erdogan speaks during a press conference at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands June 25, 2025. REUTERS/Piroschka Van De Wouw ANKARA, June 26 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Thursday hailed United States (US) President Donald Trump's efforts in achieving a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. "I told Trump that, referring to his efforts in the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the same level of effort is expected to help end the conflicts in Gaza as well as in the Russia-Ukraine war," Erdogan told reporters aboard his return flight from the NATO summit in the Netherlands. 'The closure of the Strait of Hormuz would cause major problems. We believe Iran would not take such a step,' the Turkish president said. bootstrap slideshow Erdogan underlined that the latest conflict between Iran and Israel has once again highlighted how important energy supply security is. 'As Türkiye, we are carrying out intensive efforts to increase our own energy resources,' Erdogan said. 'At the same time, we are continuing our oil and natural gas exploration activities with seriousness and determination,' he said. 'We do not consider it even remotely possible that Iran would cut off our natural gas supply,' Erdogan said, adding: 'At the moment, our natural gas from Iran is flowing, and we are not facing any issues.' Israel launched air strikes on several sites across Iran on June 13, including military and nuclear facilities, alleging that Tehran was on the verge of producing a nuclear bomb, a claim vehemently denied by Iran. While Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes, the US joined the conflict by bombing three Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Nato's Trump flattery buys time but dodges tough questions
LAVISHING praise, playing the royal card and copying his slogans — the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) pulled out all the stops to keep President Donald Trump happy and hold the alliance together at a summit in The Hague. The plan came off, although it largely avoided tough topics of vital importance to Nato such as the war in Ukraine, Russia strategy and a likely drawdown of United States troops in Europe. Sooner or later, Nato will have to deal with them, too. As Nato boss Mark Rutte had planned, the main summit outcomes were a vow by the allies to heed Trump's call to spend five per cent of gross domestic product on defence — a big increase on the current two per cent target — and a renewed US commitment to Nato's mutual defence pact. There was nothing subtle about Nato's strategy to keep Trump on board. Rutte gushed with compliments in a message to Trump, made public by the US president as he flew to The Hague. "You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," said the former Dutch prime minister in his message, putting some of his words in capitals like Trump. "Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win." Right before the summit, in another sign of chumminess with Trump, Rutte reacted to the US president's comments berating Iran and Israel by saying that "daddy has to sometimes use strong language". Given Trump's threats to quit Nato in his first term and not to protect allies who failed to spend enough on defence, the stakes for Nato have been high. Most Nato members see Russia as an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and know they would struggle badly to defend themselves against attack without their nuclear-armed superpower ally. After the summit, Trump's previously harsh rhetoric on Nato had been replaced by something very different. "I left here saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a rip-off, and we're here to help them, protect them," As part of Nato's The Hague charm offensive, Trump was granted the rare honour of staying overnight at the ornate royal palace of Dutch King Willem-Alexander before the summit. The king hosted a three-course meal for leaders prepared by 20 chefs and served by 18 footmen in the baroque 17th century "Orange Hall" in the Huis ten Bosch palace. At the start of the summit, other Nato leaders lined up to praise Trump. Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda suggested the alliance adopt the motto "Make NATO Great Again". Rutte kept the summit short and simple, minimising the risks of any blow-ups with Trump. The summit's final statement ran to just five paragraphs — compared with 38 in the text from last year's leaders' meeting in Washington. It does not explicitly describe Russia's military action in Ukraine as a war or invasion, nor does it repeat or reaffirm a previous pledge that Ukraine will one day join the alliance. By focusing on reaffirming commitments to Nato and the new spending pledge, it papered over major differences between Washington and many European allies on Russia and Ukraine. To the discomfort of many Europeans, Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance with Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor Joe Biden as he seeks to end the war. While such diplomatic fudges may hold Nato together for now, it will be hard for the alliance to function effectively if there is a major long-term difference between the US and Europe on a question as fundamental as how to handle Russia. "A Nato summit that essentially ignores the war that is still raging in Ukraine should worry all of us," said Julianne Smith, who served as the US ambassador to Nato under the Biden administration. Peter Bator, Slovakia's former ambassador to Nato, said, "we have just missed an opportunity to send a strategic message to the ruler in the Kremlin. And it will cost us in our security".
