California DMV warns of new vehicle registration support scam
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — The California Department of Motor Vehicles is urging drivers to be wary of a new online scam offering assistance to renew vehicle registration at a discounted rate.
DMV officials say the latest scam uses social media posts to advertise help that could save people up to 50% on vehicle registration renewal fees.
Those who respond are asked to give their license plate, Vehicle Identification Number and the customer's full name, as well as to make a payment through an online platform like CashApp.
System error may have affected traffic court notices in California. Are you impacted?
According to the department, requests for these details or payments will never be made through unofficial channels. They further encourage drivers to only conduct business with the DMV or with an authorized business through the Business Partner Automation Program.
A list of businesses that participate in this program can be found on the DMV's website.
An example of what the advertisement looks like can be found below.
'The safest way to renew your vehicle registration is directly through the official DMV website,' DMV Director Steve Gordon said in a release earlier this month. 'We do not offer discounts, and we never conduct official business through social media or other unofficial channels.'
To avoid falling victim to this scam and others that have been circulating in recent months, the DMV encourages Californians to take these precautions:
Steer clear of offers offering discounted DMV services — the department does not offer special deals through unauthorized third-parties or on social media.
Do not respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts.
Verify the source if you are unsure whether something you come across is official or if you have concerns. Officials encourage Californians do this by contacting the department's customer service team at 800-777-0133.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom says California needs to build a water tunnel. Opponents argue costs are too high
As Gov. Gavin Newsom pushes for building a giant water tunnel beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, his administration is saying it's the 'single most effective' way for California to provide enough water as the warming climate brings deeper droughts and more intense storms. Environmental advocates and political leaders in the Delta, among other opponents, condemned a new state analysis that draws that conclusion, arguing that building the tunnel would harm the environment and several types of fish and would push water rates much higher for millions of Californians. The potential costs of building the 45-mile tunnel are generating heated debate. The state has estimated the project, if water agencies participate and contribute, would cost $20.1 billion. But in a separate analysis, economic research firm ECOnorthwest found the costs would probably range from about $60 billion to $100 billion or even more. 'Unfortunately, the Newsom administration is brushing over and leaving out the real costs of the tunnel, both to the ratepayers and taxpayers and the environment,' said Carolee Krieger, executive director of the California Water Impact Network, a nonprofit group that commissioned the economic analysis. She said the high costs would fall largely on people in Southern California through their water bills, and that there are better and more economical ways of securing water supplies for the region. The Newsom administration released the report Tuesday outlining actions it said would 'climate-proof' the state water system so that it can operate for generations in hotter, drier conditions. Department of Water Resources Director Karla Nemeth wrote that the State Water Project — the system of aqueducts, pipelines and pumping plants that delivers supplies from the Delta to farmlands and cities — now 'needs revitalization,' and that 'maintenance of the aging project and a modernized tunnel system to transport water under the Delta are the most valuable adaptations.' The department said in a written statement that the state's 2024 estimate was prepared according to industry standards and that the ECOnorthwest report appears to be based on unsupported assumptions that 'overestimate the cost.' Newsom, who is set to leave office after 2026, has said the tunnel plan, called the Delta Conveyance Project, is essential for the state's future and has made it a central priority. Since May, the governor has sought to fast-track the plan by short-cutting permitting for the project and limiting avenues for legal challenges, saying the effort should not be held back by delays and 'red tape.' But legislators representing areas around the Delta have fought attempts to adopt the governor's plan. The Newsom administration continues to advocate with legislators to accelerate the project, said Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for the governor. She said in an email that the legislative proposal is 'aimed squarely at removing bureaucratic processes and pointless delays that create unnecessary costs to taxpayers — something Californians have been very loudly and clearly in support of preventing.' Meanwhile, the State Water Resources Control Board is considering a petition by the Newsom administration to amend water rights permits so that flows could be diverted from new points on the Sacramento River where the tunnel intakes would be built. The tunnel would create a second route to transport water to the south side of the Delta, where pumps send it into the aqueducts of the State Water Project and onward to cities and farmland. According to the state's plan, the tunnel would be about 36 feet wide on the interior and buried about 140 feet to 170 feet underground. Lawmakers who represent the Delta region criticized the state report as flawed, saying it overlooks the project's costs and their concerns that it would damage the ecosystem and harm communities and farms in the area. In a joint statement, state Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton) and Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City) said the Newsom administration has made false claims about what they view as an 'extremely costly and environmentally destructive project,' and that 'there are far more affordable alternatives to the tunnel project that are much better for the environment, including increasing water recycling and groundwater storage.' Communities in the Delta would be overtaken by extensive construction work for years, they said. Seeking to address those concerns, Newsom earlier this month announced a plan to create a $200 million program to address or minimize or address the effects of construction on local communities. Delta community advocates dismissed that as a hollow attempt to sway some local people, and said they believe the project would be disastrous for local farms and the estuary's struggling fish species, including Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Some said they see political ambition driving the project. Newsom apparently 'wants to have something for his campaign when he runs for president,' said Brett Baker, a lawyer representing the Central Delta Water Agency and its agricultural landowners, who are challenging the project in court. Baker said the governor seems to be hoping to 'to put his name on it to say he did something. So I think he's become a little bit more desperate.' The project is in an extensive planning stage, and preliminary planning costs are being paid by 18 water districts, including agencies that supply farmland in the San Joaquin Valley as well as urban agencies in Southern California and Silicon Valley. The largest share of those costs, about $142 million, is being paid by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which delivers water for 19 million people. The MWD isn't expected to decide whether to invest in building the tunnel until 2027. Managers of the Eastern Municipal Water District, which serves about 1 million residents in western Riverside County and northern San Diego County, are among those supporting Newsom's plan. 'The existing conveyance system in the Delta is not sustainable and threatens water supply reliability,' said Joe Mouawad, Eastern Municipal's general manager. 'We've worked diligently over years and decades to diversify our water supply portfolio and provide resilient local water supply, but imported water is still going to be a critical source for our customers and for our communities.' Mouawad noted that the area has some of the fastest growth in California, and he said the Newsom administration's strategy is a 'well-thought-out approach' to meeting long-term water supply needs.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Father's murder in Lincoln Park still unsolved nearly two decades later
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — On Aug. 16, 2006, 31-year-old Andre Mahan, a father of two and a custodian with the San Diego Unified School District, was fatally shot inside the family's apartment at Creekside Villas in Lincoln Park. Investigators have not identified a suspect or determined a motive in the case. 'It hurts like it happened today,' said his widow, Essie Mae Horne, who was home with their 18-month-old son and 7-year-old daughter when the shooting happened around 2:30 a.m. Horne recalled hearing a loud noise that she thought was a car backfiring. Moments later, she said she saw a teenage boy standing in her doorway with a gun. Police seek answers nearly 3 decades after woman's body found in El Cajon 'There was a young light-skinned Black male, looked to be 13 or 14 years old, standing in my doorway facing me with his arm up — and he fired,' Horne said. The bullet missed her but struck Mahan, who collapsed in the kitchen. Horne said her husband tried to speak as blood came from his mouth and nose, but he died within minutes. Their daughter, Dominique, who was still a young child at the time, later wrote a poem about her grief. Horne said her son, who was too young to remember his father, still wonders who he was. In the years since, Horne has launched a nonprofit called TWEEN-SWAG — which stands for 'Together We Elevate Each Other in our Neighborhood Simply With A Lot of Grace' — to support families coping with gun violence. She continues to hope someone will come forward with information about the killer. 'If anybody who came here August 16, 2006, to kill my husband and try to kill me, please say something,' she said. Authorities said anyone with information about the case can contact San Diego County Crime Stoppers. A $1,000 reward is being offered. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
HelloFresh ordered to pay $7.5 million in penalties for making subscriptions difficult to cancel
HelloFresh, the world's largest meal kit delivery company, has been ordered to pay $7.5 million in penalties for making subscriptions difficult to cancel. A lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County alleged HelloFresh misled Californians into enrolling in auto-renewing subscriptions and failed to offer an easy way to cancel them. 'No company, no matter how big or well-known, is exempt from California's consumer protection laws,' Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said in a statement Monday. 'We will aggressively pursue enforcement when businesses take advantage of consumers by failing to clearly disclose subscription terms, obtain proper consent, or provide a fair way to cancel. Consumers have a right to know what they're signing up for, and they deserve better,' he continued. While most of the settlement will be divided among prosecuting agencies, $1 million will be distributed to 'eligible California consumers,' according to a press release from the D.A.'s office. A HelloFresh spokesperson denied any wrongdoing in a statement to The Independent: 'We take our commitment to customer transparency very seriously, and our subscription model and cancellation policies have been consistently clear to customers throughout the whole customer journey.' 'While we deny any wrongdoing, we have cooperated fully with the coalition of California District Attorneys and have entered into a settlement agreement with them to resolve the matter amicably,' the spokesperson said. HelloFresh, based in Germany, makes up 75 percent of the U.S. meal kit delivery market. Consumers can personalize the kinds of recipes they want with options including 'Family Friendly' and 'Under 20 Minutes.' Based on their preferences, how many people they need to feed, and how many recipes they want per week, HelloFresh sets customers up with a plan and delivers the ingredients and recipes needed to make the meals. The lawsuit claimed HelloFresh failed to 'clearly and conspicuously' share its subscription terms before collecting payment, obtain customers' 'affirmative consent' before charging their cards, provide an acknowledgement with its subscription terms after payment and offer an 'easy-to-use mechanism' for canceling subscriptions, the D.A.'s press release said.