logo
An Exhausted Israeli Public Turns Against War in Gaza

An Exhausted Israeli Public Turns Against War in Gaza

Hindustan Times22-05-2025

TEL AVIV—In the days following the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attack, Israelis were unified in the belief that the country had to fight back. More than 19 months later, many are saying it is time to stop.
Support for the war was widespread in the days after the attack, but Israelis quickly split over which of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war aims should be given priority: freeing the 251 hostages taken that day or defeating Hamas. In January 2024, the Israeli public was nearly equally divided on the question, polls conducted by the Jerusalem-based Israel Democracy Institute found.
Not so today. Polls now show that around 70% of Israelis support an end to the war in exchange for the release of the remaining hostages. For months after the attack, weekly protests in Tel Aviv and around the country demanded Netanyahu bring them home, but most protesters hardly ever carried signs calling for an end to the fighting. Today, posters all over Tel Aviv explicitly call for an end to the war.
Repeated tours of duty for Israeli reservists have exhausted troops and their families, and commanders say it is getting harder to recruit forces for new rounds of fighting. Thousands of reservists and retired veterans have signed public letters in recent months calling for the war to stop in exchange for the hostages.
The shift is coming as Israel is under increasing pressure from allies, including the U.S., to end the fighting. This week, the U.K., France and Canada threatened consequences if Netanyahu pursued a new ground offensive in Gaza. A White House spokeswoman said President Trump wants the fighting to stop.
One sign that Israelis are increasingly uncomfortable with the war effort is a surge in support for Yair Golan, the leader of what remains of the once-powerful Israeli left. His Democrats party would be the third or fourth largest in Israel if elections were held today, some recent polls have shown.
'A sane country doesn't wage war against civilians, doesn't kill babies as a pastime, and doesn't engage in mass population displacement,' Golan said on Israeli radio on Tuesday. Such sentiments would have been unthinkable for a Jewish Israeli politician to utter at the start of the war.
The change in public opinion comes amid growing distrust of Netanyahu's management of the war. There are still hostages in Gaza, Hamas hasn't been defeated and there is no plan for what comes next. Polls consistently show that Netanyahu and his right-wing coalition would lose power if elections were held today. Many of his critics allege that he is prolonging the war to appease his far-right partners on which his coalition relies. He denies the allegations.
On Wednesday, Netanyahu said at a news conference that the war in Gaza has taken so long because of battlefield conditions. 'No other army in the world has met an urban environment like this with tens of thousands of terrorists above ground, 50 meters below ground, with a population that supports them,' he said.
Hen Mazzig, a popular pro-Israeli online advocate with over 700,000 followers across platforms who has defended the country's military campaign, called for an end to the war on the social-media platform X this week, saying Trump is right to pressure Israel to stop the fighting in exchange for the release of hostages.
'I think in the first few months we understood the need for this war or the justification,' said Mazzig, who lives in Tel Aviv. But in the past year, he said, it has 'just been very challenging to defend Israel and to defend the actions of the government.'
Rotem Sivan-Hoffmann, a radiologist and mother of three, founded a movement called 'Ima Era,' consisting of mothers of combat soldiers calling on the government to manage the war responsibly. Her eldest son is stationed at the border with Gaza and waiting for orders to enter the enclave.
'They are sending my son to die for Netanyahu's political survival and taking over Gaza,' she said. More people are joining the movement's WhatsApp groups and events, she noted.
One of the key drivers of war-weariness is the burden on reservists. Israel relies on a small pool of reservists for its fighting and they are exhausted after serving for hundreds of days in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and the occupied West Bank.
Dalit Kislev Spektor, another member of the Ima Era group, is intimately familiar with the toll on reservists. Since the start of the war, her husband and two sons have all been serving in the military. Both of her sons are currently in Gaza.
'Throughout the war, the feeling that we lost our way got stronger and stronger,' she said. 'At a certain point the feeling was that the war was becoming a political war with unclear goals and this feeling reached its peak in the recent period,' she said. She added that she isn't opposed to going back to fighting Hamas once the hostages are free.
While international opposition to the war in Gaza appears driven by the high Palestinian death toll—more than 53,000 have been killed, according to Palestinian health authorities, though their figures don't say how many are combatants—this hasn't been the major driving force in Israel. For a long time, the country was consumed by its own trauma from the Oct. 7 attack and television channels didn't air gruesome images of Palestinians killed in the fighting.
Still, humanitarian-based opposition to the war is growing among the center-left in Israel, even though it isn't mainstream, said Tamar Hermann, a pollster and senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute.
'There is an awakening. I wouldn't say large but it can be felt—for the war to stop for humanitarian reasons,' Hermann said.
On Sunday, hundreds of people turned up for a protest at the Gaza border calling to end the war, said Alon-Lee Green, founder of Standing Together, a left-wing Israeli-Arab coexistence group that has long called to end the war. While he acknowledges that he is still the minority, he sees a shift in the way Israelis are viewing the war conduct in Gaza.
Previously, when he and other activists held photos of Palestinian children killed by Israel at demonstrations, people would try to take them down or even attack them.
'Now whenever we do that, people are looking at their eyes,' he said. 'They are looking at their faces. Sometimes they give us a thumbs-up, and say, 'Well done, you're right.' '
Write to Anat Peled at anat.peled@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump aide says Colorado fire bomb attack suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman an ‘illegal alien'
Trump aide says Colorado fire bomb attack suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman an ‘illegal alien'

Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump aide says Colorado fire bomb attack suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman an ‘illegal alien'

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said that the suspect who attacked a crowd with inflammable devices at a pedestrian mall in downtown Boulder during a demonstration in support of Israeli hostages still held in Gaza 'illegally overstayed' a tourist visa. He said that the suspect, identified as 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman, was granted a visa by the Biden administration, following which he illegally overstayed the visa and was given a work permit. 'He was granted a tourist visa by the Biden Administration, and then he illegally overstayed that visa,' Miller wrote in a post on his official X handle. 'In response, the Biden Administration gave him a work permit,' he added. A terror attack was committed in Boulder, Colorado by an illegal alien. He was granted a tourist visa by the Biden Administration and then he illegally overstayed that visa. In response, the Biden Administration gave him a work permit. Suicidal migration must be fully reversed. — Stephen Miller (@StephenM) June 2, 2025 The FBI is investigating the incident as an 'act of terror'. FBI Special Agent Mark Michalek said that six elderly people suffered serious burn injuries after Soliman allegedly threw Molotov cocktails at the ones taking part in the rally for Israeli hostages held captive by Hamas in Gaza. The victims, who are aged between 67 to 88, are being treated in hospitals, with one being in critical condition. 'It is clear that this is a targeted act of violence and the FBI is investigating this as an act of terrorism,' Michalek said. Who is Mohamed Sabry Soliman? Forty-five-year-old Soliman is an Egyptian national who first arrived at the Los Angeles International Airport on August 27, 2022, on a non-immigrant visa. Under this visa, he was authorised to stay in the United States till February 26, 2023, but he 'overstayed' and never left, according to Fox News. He reportedly also filed for asylum in 2023 and was given a work permit by the Biden administration, which expired on March 28, 2025. Soliman allegedly used a makeshift flamethrower during the attack at the Pearl Street Mall and yelled 'Free Palestine'. The FBI said that the suspect was also injured in the attack and taken to the hospital with 'minor injuries'. The attack comes barely a week after a man fatally shot two Israeli embassy staffers outside a Jewish museum in Washington after he yelled 'Free Palestine'.

Colarado Firebomb Attack: Was pro-Palestine attacker Mohamed Sabry Soliman an 'illegal alien'?
Colarado Firebomb Attack: Was pro-Palestine attacker Mohamed Sabry Soliman an 'illegal alien'?

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Colarado Firebomb Attack: Was pro-Palestine attacker Mohamed Sabry Soliman an 'illegal alien'?

Mohamed Sabry Soliman is an Egyptian national whose visa, which was granted during the Biden administration, expired in March 2025 (Image Credit: X) Following Sunday's firebomb attack in Colorado, speculation swirled about the suspect's nationality. The incident occurred near a pro-Israel group rallying for the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, was arrested and taken to the hospital with minor injuries after his alleged attack on the "Run for Their Lives" group that was gathering on Pearl Street, police said Sunday night. The speculation turned out to be right: Yes, he was not an American national but an "illegal alien." According to Fox News citing three sources from homeland security and US immigration and customs enforcement, Soliman, an Egyptian national, entered the United States during the Biden administration and remained beyond his visa expiration. Records show Soliman entered the US through Los Angeles International Airport on August 27, 2022, on a non-immigrant visa. Although his authorised stay expired on February 2, 2023, he remained in the country after filing a claim with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on September 9, 2022. He received work authorisation on March 29, 2023, valid until March 2024. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller stated on X: "A terror attack was committed in Boulder, Colorado by an illegal alien. He was granted a tourist visa by the Biden Administration and then he illegally overstayed that visa. In response, the Biden Administration gave him a work permit. Suicidal migration must be fully reversed." Witnesses reported that Soliman shouted "Free Palestine" during the incident near the county courthouse on Pearl Street. Authorities responded to reports of an armed individual setting people alight. The FBI reported that six individuals, aged between 67 and 88, required hospitalisation, with one person in critical condition. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino confirmed the investigation is treating this as an act of "ideologically motivated violence". Soliman was detained at Boulder County Jail on Sunday evening, with charges pending announcement. His nationality again push people to think that Trump's policy against illegal immigrants might be a right.

'Unjustifiably low' satcom spectrum price, says COAI
'Unjustifiably low' satcom spectrum price, says COAI

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Unjustifiably low' satcom spectrum price, says COAI

India's top telcos have slammed the satcom recommendations from the telecom regulator, terming the spectrum price as 'unjustifiably low' and said that the proposals are based on "incorrect assumptions" and are "non-transparent".In their first reaction to the recommendations given by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) last month, all three bitter rival operators have closed ranks and said that if implemented in the current form, the regulator's satcom suggestions would create a non-level playing field and impact the sustainability of terrestrial services. In a strongly worded joint letter through the Cellular Operators Association of India ( COAI ) to various government authorities, seen by ET, the carriers highlighted data and said the planned capacity of Elon Musk-owned Starlink and Jeff Bezos led-Amazon Kuiper are set to surpass the current capacity of Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea. "These recommendations are non-transparent based on non-justifiable assumption rather than factual data," the telcos said in the letter, marked to Trai, Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Finance Ministry, Commerce ministry, Ministry of Electronics and IT (Meity) and Niti Aayog etc. The operators have said the proposed spectrum charges are even lower than the administrative fees currently levied on GSO-based VSAT services-which do not compete with terrestrial networks. "It appears that Trai has underestimated the potential capacities of satellite network while possibly overstating those of terrestrial networks that have resulted in a flawed foundation for the entire exercise," the letter said, adding this fundamental flaw in the capacity assumptions exercise undermines the DoT's clear mandate to ensure competitive parity between satellite and terrestrial services. Trai had recommended the administrative allocation of satcom spectrum for a fee pegged at 4% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR) to be assigned for five years. There won't be any upfront fee for getting spectrum. Trai chairman AK Lahoti had categorically rejected the level-playing field argument by telcos, stating that the two technologies were different and that satellites could only be complementary. "It's not factually correct that satcom services are competing with terrestrial services because there is a huge difference between the capacity of the terrestrial network and the satellite network," he had said while releasing the recommendations. The telcos, however, feel the entire exercise was flawed as it was based on incorrect assumptions. "Despite a clear mandate from DoT, Trai's consultation process and final recommendations do not appear to address the core issue of competitive parity which shows a misalignment between the intent of DoT references and Trai's approach during the consultation process," the telcos said. The additional proposal by Trai to subsidise user terminals or satellite operators through the Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN) fund further tilts the level playing field against the terrestrial operator, especially given that a majority of the DBN levy is contributed by telcos.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store