
School board member hires attorney to defend against discrimination complaints
Frederick County Public Schools received 32 Title IX Discrimination and Harassment complaints and six Hate Bias Incident complaints submitted by employees and community members that specifically denounce Black's language toward transgender and gender non-conforming students at a Jan. 8 school board meeting.
Referring to the part of FCPS' gender identity policy, Policy 443, that instructs teachers and staff members to use a student's preferred name and pronouns, Black said at that meeting: 'Just as much as you have your right to be you, we have our right to be free from you.'
Black has said he was referring to First Amendment rights of speech and association for people who object to the policy's requirements on preferred names and pronouns.
The complaints are dated between Jan. 8 and 17. Some complaints use identical language to describe the problem and how the complainant would like the problem to be resolved.
On Jan. 11, the Frederick County Democratic Central Committee posted a public statement on Facebook urging people to file Title IX Discrimination and Harassment complaints.
A complaint submitted to the school system triggers a response from the FCPS Title IX coordinator, who then identifies an investigator and contacts the complainant, according to FCPS regulation.
Rae Gallagher, president of the school board, on Thursday declined to comment on a Title IX investigation against Black.
Steven Blivess, chief legal counsel for the school district, on Friday declined to comment on the process of a Title IX investigation in the school district.
In an interview on Friday, Black directed questions to his attorney. During a board member comment period at Wednesday's school board meeting, he called on Gallagher to resign, calling it an 'unlawful investigation.'
'We will not be silenced,' he said.
Matthew Ray, legal counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing Black, said Friday that Black's speech is protected under the First Amendment.
The Alliance Defending Freedom describes itself as 'the world's largest legal organization advancing every person's God-given right to live and speak the truth.'
Ray said Black received a message from Blivess on Jan. 15 saying that a Title IX investigation has begun. Brigit Berkeley, a spokesperson for Alliance Defending Freedom, declined to share a copy of the message with The Frederick News-Post.
TITLE IX COMPLAINTS
FCPS Policy 443 was created to 'prevent discrimination, stigmatization, harassment, and bullying of students who are transgender or gender nonconforming' and to 'create school cultures that are safe, welcoming, and affirming for all students.'
The policy — which is up for review by the school board's Policy Committee in May — also details specific guidelines for FCPS students and staff members.
For example, the policy directs students to use locker rooms and bathrooms consistent with their gender identity, and says students can play on sports teams and participate in physical education classes consistent with their gender identity.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination based on sex in federally funded schools and education programs and protects students from sexual harassment in educational spaces.
FCPS Policy 116 and corresponding Regulation 116-01 govern Title IX interpretations within the school system and explain procedures for an investigation.
In April 2024, the U.S. Department of Education under the Biden administration enshrined protections for LGBTQ+ students in its prevention of sex-based discrimination.
In January of this year, a federal district court judge in Kentucky struck down those protections and reverted the policy back to a version from 2020 during President Donald Trump's first term.
About a third of the complaints submitted to the school district recommended that Black be removed from the board or publicly apologize for his comments at the Jan. 8 meeting.
The Title IX complaints also include a multiple choice section about what the alleged discrimination or harassment was based on. The complaints filed included the answers 'sexual orientation,' 'gender identity,' 'gender expression,' 'sex,' or a combination of the four.
One of the complaints from an FCPS community member alleged that Black's comments at the Jan. 8 school board meeting 'suggests that he believes some students can be excluded from FCPS schools and as a board member, may take action that results in exclusion based on sex.'
A different complaint from an FCPS employee said Black's comments were 'hurtful and discriminatory to families, teachers, and trans kids like my daughter.'
The News-Post made a Maryland Public Information Act request for the complaints on Jan. 15. FCPS' legal counsel provided copies of the complaints to the News-Post on Feb. 7, after redacting identifying information about each complainant.
Black said in an interview on Friday that he was notified of an external investigation against him by an email from Blivess.
Ray said on Friday that Black was notified on Jan. 15 by email that the school board retained outside legal counsel to conduct a Title IX investigation against him.
He said the email from Blivess indicates that Mareco Edwards of South River Partners was hired by FCPS to conduct the investigation.
Edwards could not be reached for comment by email or phone on Friday. A phone number on the South River Partners website had a message that it doesn't accept incoming calls. An email message to the company was not immediately returned.
Ray said the email from Blivess explained that the investigation would include an interview with Black and interviews with the complainants. He said Black, as of Friday, had not been interviewed.
'At the end of that process, a determination would be made as to whether Mr. Black's comments did in fact violate the Title IX policy,' he said.
Ray said the investigation 'in and of itself violates Mr. Black's First Amendment rights' and the investigation is 'the Board of Education weaponizing its Title IX policy to silence him.'
'As an elected official, Colt had the duty to speak about these issues that are important to teachers, parents and the students of Frederick County,' he said. 'When he was speaking, he addressed his concerns about the board Policy 443, which he was concerned that violated the First Amendment rights and compelled the speech of students and staff in the school district.'
Ray said the First Amendment protects Black's right to speak on that issue and 'we demanded that the school immediately cease this investigation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
9 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Perceptions on who faces discrimination in US have changed, poll finds. See how
Americans' perceptions of discrimination in the United States are different now than four years ago — with a new group being recognized as facing the most discrimination, a poll found. Immigrants without legal status are now being perceived by the public as experiencing more discrimination than any other group in the U.S., and the number of Americans who said Asian people and Black people are being discriminated against has decreased significantly since 2021, according to a July 31 Associated Press-NORC poll. The survey of 1,437 U.S. adults was taken July 10-14 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. While the earlier poll came on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic — a time when many were worried about incidents of violence against Asian Americans because of the pandemic's reported origin — and nearly a year after the death of George Floyd while communities were still holding sweeping demonstrations against racial inequality in the country, the recent poll comes as President Donald Trump's administration continues an aggressive immigration crackdown. More than 60,000 immigrants in the U.S. illegally, including some who do not have criminal records, were arrested within the first 100 days of Trump's second term, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data. Immigrant advocacy groups have complained and filed lawsuits against the administration in cases involving the deportation of U.S. citizens or people married to U.S. citizens, along with the mass deportations, McClatchy News reported. A majority of Americans, 58%, said they think immigrants without legal status face 'a great deal' or 'quite a bit' of discrimination — a shift from four years ago when Black Americans were seen as the group experiencing the most discrimination, according to the poll. Twenty-six percent of respondents said immigrants living illegally in the U.S. face a 'moderate' amount of discrimination, while 15% said they face 'only a little' or 'none at all,' per the poll. A plurality of respondents, 42%, said immigrants living in the U.S. with legal status face a lot of discrimination, the poll found. Black people and Hispanic people were also seen by Americans as facing higher amounts of discrimination, with 45% and 44%, respectively, saying that was the case, according to the poll. However, the number of respondents who said Black people face a lot of discrimination dropped significantly: 15 percentage points since a previous poll in April 2021, researchers said. The number of people who said Asian Americans were experiencing a 'great deal of' discrimination also considerably decreased from 45% in 2021 to 32% in 2025, according to the poll. Perceptions of discrimination among Hispanic people and white people also saw a small drop since 2021, researchers said.

USA Today
39 minutes ago
- USA Today
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down following Trump budget cuts
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting had long provided federal funding to local public radio and television stations across the country. Congress recently revoked $1.1 billion in funding. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced on Aug. 1 that it was starting an 'orderly wind-down of its operations' weeks after Congress passed a measure that clawed back more than $1 billion in funds to the organization. The corporation disperses federal funds to NPR and PBS. President Donald Trump called for the outlets' federal funding to be pulled in May, saying 'neither entity presents a fair, accurate or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens.' Corporation for Public Broadcasting employees were told on Aug. 1 that most staff positions would be slashed as the fiscal year ends on Sept. 30. Some staff would remain through January 2026 to 'ensure a responsible and orderly closeout of operations,' according to the corporation's news release. 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life, providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country,' Corporation for Public Broadcasting President and CEO Patricia Harrison said. 'We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.' The Corporation for Public Broadcasting was established by Congress in 1967. This is a developing story. Check back for updates. BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump is paving over Rose Garden lawn, trying to rename Kennedy Center. Time to pray
When I first learned the lawn of the beloved Rose Garden was getting paved over, the news saddened me. All my life, the Rose Garden and the White House went together like a horse and carriage. The Rose Garden has been associated with several first ladies, each one adding her touch to make it more beautiful than before. The idea for a garden on America's lawn first came about in 1903, when first lady Edith Roosevelt helped to create a colonial-style garden, according to the National Park Service. A decade later, in 1913, first lady Ellen Wilson expanded on the idea and replaced the garden with roses, hence, the Rose Garden. Americans loved the garden. But like any other garden, upgrades were needed from time to time. One of those upgrades came during the John F. Kennedy administration, when first lady Jacqueline Kennedy worked with designer Rachel Lambert Melton to redesign the garden. Melton created the central grass lawn in 1962, the one now being paved over for a patio. During the Kennedy era and some years following, when security wasn't as tight as it is today, the White House and its grounds were open to the public. Tourists and visitors often stopped to take pictures near the Rose Garden. It was our garden, our pride and joy. The Rose Garden came to mind when I learned there is a move to rename the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts after President Donald Trump. While the controversial move is being pushed by some Republicans - Rep. Bob Onder, a Missouri Repubican House member introduced a bill to change the center's name to Trump on July 23— many Americans are outraged. Just as the Rose Garden was a part of the legacy of some former first ladies, the Kennedy Center is a part of the legacy of the late President John F. Kennedy and his commitment to the arts. But these moves are not about paving over the Rose Garden or renaming the Kennedy Center. These moves are blatant efforts to rewrite our history. They take their place right along with the banning of books and the erasing of Black history from our history books. This didn't start with the destruction of the Rose Garden or the effort to rename the Kennedy Center after Trump. Remember when President Trump, during his first term, refused to hold an unveiling ceremony for the portrait of President Barack Obama? Many Americans were outraged at Trump's actions. Not because they were so in love with President Obama. But they recognized that even if they didn't like Obama, he had served as the president of the United States of America for two terms. In fact, in April, the Trump administration announced it had moved a portrait of Obama in a White House hallway and replaced it with a painting of Trump pumping his fist after his assassination attempt last year. One of the things that bothers me about the goings on in our country today is this spirit of hate and spite. President Trump's ability to hate so openly and unashamedly is so strong that it is rubbing off on many other Americans. His disrespect for the truth and his burning hate for anyone who disagrees with him is tearing apart our country. As a nation, I don't believe we can continue to go down this road without some serious consequences. I remember his birthing campaign against Obama. The hate that he held for the former president, and his disregard for the truth, was too strong for him to hide. Even before he was elected to the presidency the first time, he spent millions of dollars trying to prove the first African American president of the United States wasn't born in America and therefore was an illegal president. Even when birthing experts proved him wrong, he never apologized. He'd rather believe a lie than the truth. President Trump seems to be so wrapped up in deceit and hate he incited his followers to stage an insurrection on our nation's Capital, which took the lives of several innocent people. Yet, in all the reports that I read or interviews that I saw on television, Mr. Trump never took responsibility for the insurrection or offer condolences to the families of the people who were unjustly killed on Jan. 6, 2021. How did we get here, America? How did we let things get so out of hand that we are literally watching our American values being destroyed, our traditions ripped apart and our history rewritten? And what's worse, many so-called Christians aren't willing to stand with holy boldness and call out the president, or any other leader, when they are wrong. Many will quote the passage from the Bible that says, '… God hath not given us the spirit of fear…' yet they stand like spiritual cowards in the sight of God and our fellow human beings. By the same token, I don't see many Republicans standing up for what they know is the right thing to do. Are you that afraid, too, my Republican friends? When I was growing up and something devasting happened in our family or in our neighborhood/community/country, I would hear my mother saying, 'Ya'll, it's praying time!' Today, it's praying time. We must pray for our president and other world leaders. Calling out our leaders when they are wrong is the right thing to do. Good parents who love their children do not uphold them in their wrongdoing. If we love President Trump (yes, I said love) as the lord tells us to, we must not sit quietly by and watch him saturate our country with hate and untruth. Like me, many of you are too old to march in protest. But we can pray. A simple, earnest prayer each day from our heart to God's ear will go a long way to the eventual healing of America. And President Trump. My friends, the eyes of God are upon us and one day we will all be held accountable. When we know something to be wrong, we must stand with holy boldness and say so.