
8 Assumptions About Gen Z Employees—And Why They're Incorrect
Gen Z seeks workplaces with open communication, psychological safety, and opportunities for growth.
Generation Z, born between 1997 and 2012, represents the largest cohort of new workers, and by 2030 is expected to represent 30% of the total workforce. Gen Z is also considered by most managers (74%) to be the most challenging generation to work with. Issues surrounding Gen Z run the gamut from being unprepared to enter the workforce to lacking in motivation to unable to take feedback.
This disconnect between management and Gen Z makes sense when you consider the landscape from which these younger professionals have emerged. Gen Z represents the first generation of true digital natives—people who have never known a world without smartphones, instant connectivity, and information that is literally at their fingertips. And the differences aren't just technological. They're also experiential, cultural, and deeply human.
When hiring Gen Zers, companies should consider these differences, and it isn't about accommodating weakness—it's about being understanding. In this article, we will explore how to bridge these generational gaps productively.
Assumptions About Gen Z Workers
This generation isn't avoiding hard work, they're redefining what meaningful work looks like. Sixty-five percent of Gen Z employees describe themselves as extremely eager to learn, and nearly three-quarters are motivated to contribute more than is required.
Gen Zers experienced their formative years during cascading crises: an economic recession, climate anxiety, social upheaval, and a global pandemic. These experiences created a heightened consciousness of life's fragility that drives them to seek purpose in their daily activities.
The numbers support this: 89% of Gen Zers see purpose-driven work as essential to their overall well-being, and the majority will research a potential employers' social impact before applying for work. Unlike previous generations who compartmentalized work and life, Gen Z seeks integration—they want their values reflected in their daily tasks, not relegated to weekend volunteer activities.
How managers can respond: Make your commitments to social issues, work-life balance, and growth trajectories known. When work aligns with personal values, intrinsic motivation flourishes. When it doesn't, Gen Zers' efforts may seem hollow, not because they're lazy, but because they're looking for meaning in the work they do.
Companies that regularly communicate their social impact through transparent reporting create what psychologists call "moral engagement," where employees' personal identities become intertwined with the organization's mission, leading to discretionary effort that extends far beyond job descriptions.
Unlike previous generations who prioritized salary above all else, Gen Z's priorities are split nearly evenly between compensation and purpose in their career decisions. What managers interpret as entitlement often reflects sophisticated boundary setting. Gen Z is entering the workforce with clearer expectations about reciprocity and they are more inclined to invest deeply in organizations that invest meaningfully in them.
This is a group that was rewarded at an early age for simply showing up as parents peddled the "everyone gets a ribbon for participation" value. They grew up in structured environments where expectations were explicit, and with parents and schools that espoused formulas about how to achieve and what achievement looks like. From organized sports to standardized testing, they learned to function with clear feedback loops and acknowledgment of effort.
How managers can respond: Show appreciation. Managers often expect young professionals to work extra hours "because that's what we did," without verbal appreciation or tangible recognition. If you demand sacrifice, demonstrate reciprocal investment.
Neuroscience research reveals that recognition activates the same neural pathways as monetary rewards, with verbal acknowledgment releasing dopamine that reinforces positive behaviors. Teams receiving regular recognition consistently demonstrate higher productivity and better performance compared to those operating under traditional command-and-control structures.
Picture a generation raised on real-time updates: grades posted online, immediate responses to social media posts, GPS that recalculates the route when you take a wrong turn. Gen Z learned to course correct quickly because information was always available. They also grew up with protective parents and feedback-rich schooling, which shielded them from failure's sting.
So for many Gen Z employees, feedback serves as an anxiety-reduction tool. A study found that most Gen Z employees want feedback regularly, and many would like it weekly. Without regular input on their trajectory, uncertainty breeds stress. They view feedback as navigation data, not personal judgment.
How managers can respond: Course correct quickly. Annual review cycles that delay feedback frustrate employees who thrive on continuous calibration. Teams implementing frequent feedback loops see faster skill development and role clarity.
Managers often cite being 'busy' as a reason for cancelling one-on-one meetings, but the price is leaving younger workers rudderless and anxious. A brief check-in to answer questions can keep Gen Zers on track, and they will view you as someone who cares and is trustworthy.
While many managers believe Gen Z lacks communication skills, the reality is they communicate constantly, but do so via different channels and styles than previous generations. They have mastered communication through images, brief text, video gaming, and ephemeral messages.
Think about the cognitive skills they have acquired: conveying emotions through carefully chosen emojis; building relationships through curated visual content and gaming; and parsing nuanced meaning from abbreviated exchanges. These communication patterns reflect specific expectations: brevity over elaboration, visual over textual, and immediacy over delay.
However, in traditional corporate communication formats, Gen Zers may be less skilled and need explicit training. When comparing Gen Z to other generations, Mental Health America found that 63% of Gen Z employees do not feel confident expressing their opinions, and 60% felt that they could not be themselves at work. This raises the issue that while Gen Zers' style of communication is different, they also don't feel safe expressing themselves in the workplace.
How managers can respond: Effective intervention requires parallel tracks. First, organizations must acknowledge that communication competency exists on multiple planes. They should offer training in traditional business communication while also embracing multimodal communication, such as visual collaboration tools. Brief check-ins can enhance overall company communication.
Second, creating psychological safety becomes paramount. When young professionals feel genuinely heard and valued, their natural communication abilities will flourish. This means establishing mentorship structures that bridge generational communication styles while building confidence in formal channels. When psychological safety increases, communication barriers dissolve and retention improves dramatically.
More from AllBusiness:
Gen Z knows how to work effectively and efficiently at home. Many entered college remotely, started careers from their childhood bedrooms, and learned professional norms through Zoom squares rather than conference rooms.
This generation, however, is "pro-office" with 65% preferring working hybrid and only 29% preferring working fully remote. They want hybrid arrangements, not to avoid doing work, but because they value work flexibility as a means to peak performance. They also value authentic human connection and have discovered that focus and creativity can be enhanced by controlling their surroundings. Research on autonomy confirms that when people have control over their work environment, their motivation and well-being increase dramatically.
How managers can respond: Offering employees only fully remote or in-person work options misses the nuanced preferences that not only drive retention, but encourage employee engagement and innovation. Organizations that offer thoughtful flexibility will see the highest satisfaction rates with Gen Z as well as all generations of employees.
Gen Z was raised on screens, and many use their devices intentionally for work-related tasks such research, networking, skill development, and collaboration. For this generation, the distinction between digital and analog tools doesn't exist, and their phones, while capable of causing distraction, are also productivity extensions. A Gen Z employee on their phone may be cross-referencing client information, coordinating with remote team members, and researching industry trends—all simultaneously.
How managers can respond: Blanket phone policies may alienate digital natives and reduce efficiency. Smart organizations should establish technology guidelines that distinguish between productive and distractive use, leveraging rather than limiting capabilities. For example, during meetings, set guidelines for when it's okay to be on the phone to do work, and to know which meetings are an absolute no phone zone.
A survey of recent college graduates found that 92% want to be able to talk about mental health at work. Between Covid, climate anxiety, and mass shootings, this group has been exposed to sensitive conversations from an early age, which has reduced the stigma of mental health. Their openness about psychological wellness isn't a weakness—it's strategic transparency about factors that affect workplace performance.
In a McKinsey study, over a quarter of 18- to 24-year-olds say that mental health significantly impacts their work performance. Previous generations often wore stress as a badge of honor, equating burnout with dedication, but Gen Z sees this as counterproductive. They seek work environments that sustain long-term high performance rather than short-term heroics that can lead to eventual collapse.
How managers can respond: Organizations that dismiss mental health needs as "soft" lose high performers to companies that understand the connection between psychological safety and productivity. Workplaces that invest in meaningful mental health programs see significant reductions in turnover compared to those that do not. High-trust organizations report 50% higher productivity and 76% greater engagement.
Gen Z respects competence and authenticity over titles and tenure. They grew up with unprecedented access to information and learned to base their belief structure on what they consider substance rather than status. Having been taught to question, research, and verify information online, they apply the same critical thinking to workplace hierarchies.
Gen Zers will respond positively to leaders who demonstrate expertise, maintain transparency, and invest genuinely in their development. They want to understand the reasoning behind decisions as well as contribute to solutions. They're not necessarily asking "why" to challenge authority, but to understand context that will help them perform better.
How managers can respond: Organizations with managers who act as coaches rather than commanders will see significantly higher engagement, retention, and performance—especially among younger workers. Leadership research shows that coaching-oriented managers produce teams with superior problem-solving capabilities and faster skill development compared to traditional hierarchical approaches.
Transparent decision-making processes where rationale is shared openly create what organizational psychologists call "cognitive buy-in," leading to higher implementation rates of new initiatives among Gen Z team members.
How Gen Z-Ready Is Your Organization?
Is your business Gen Z-ready? Answer yes or no to the following questions:
□ Do you offer weekly feedback opportunities?□ Can employees work hybrid when needed?□ Are advancement paths clearly communicated?□ Do you have robust mental health resources?□ Do you have multi-channel communication platforms?□ Do managers coach rather than command?□ Is your company's mission clearly articulated?□ Do you recognize effort beyond just results?
Count the number of yes responses. 6-8=Well-positioned; 4-5=Needs attention; 0-3=Not Gen Z-friendly
If your company isn't ready to attract and keep Gen Z employees, here's what you can do to change that:
Your Next Move
The choice is clear: continue paying the hidden costs of clinging to assumptions, or invest in understanding the generation that will define the next decade of workplace evolution.
Gen Z isn't asking organizations to lower standards, they are asking us to consider the larger social and cultural implications of our practices, to remember that mental health does not suddenly disappear when we walk into work, and that everyone works better with open communication, psychological safety, and opportunities for growth.
The data is compelling. The choice is yours.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla's valuation is hard to read as Musk's EV empire falters
Prickly billionaire Elon Musk is at a crossroads with Tesla (TSLA) — and investors are shouldering the outsized risk. "I think we are in the transition phase, so it's a very critical phase for Tesla at the moment," Gradient Investments' Lisa Schreiber said on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid (watch above). On July 23, Tesla reported much weaker second quarter earnings compared to a year ago. During the earnings call, Musk cautioned about headwinds and shared that ride-hailing and autonomous features will be a key focus for the company going forward. Shares fell directly after the earnings announcement and closed down 8.2% on Thursday. Tesla remains an innovator, with robots and AI in its portfolio. Its EV business, however, is sharply declining as competition rises and backlash grows against Musk's politics. The expiration of a $7,500 federal credit for EVs won't help matters, either. "When we look at valuation, investors do not know exactly how to value [Tesla]. Is it an EV maker? Is it more than that? The thing is, it's not just an EV play anymore," Schrieber said. "But it's also not a robotaxi [and] robot company already. So we have struggles here." To Schrieber's point, Tesla's stock trades more like a hot tech player trying to take on juggernauts like Nvidia (NVDA). Shares trade at 161 times the estimated forward price to earnings. (Nvidia, with much stronger growth, trades around 55 times.) Ford (F), a pure-play automaker, trades at 9.6 times. Meanwhile, some perceive Tesla as a company that isn't sure what it wants to be when it grows up. The innovation around autonomous driving is noteworthy, but the waiting can make even the most patient investor antsy. "Especially with Tesla, we have to be a little bit careful," Schreiber said, noting that Musk has a history of huge promises but delayed launches. The robotaxi, for instance, launched this past June in Austin, Texas. William Blair analysts Jed Dorsheimer and Mark Shooter, who rate Tesla's stock at Market Perform, noted that rival company Google's (GOOG) Waymo robotaxi "represents a six-year head start." "We think the training wheels will get taken off quickly and the pace at which robotaxi scales will surprise the upside," the pair wrote. "Although maybe not to half of Americans by the end of the year." During Tesla's earnings call, Musk also discussed humanoid robots, AI, and their integration into the vehicle fleet, calling the company's cars "essentially a four-wheeled robot." "Optimus is a robot with arms and legs," he said. "So the same principles that apply to optimizing AI inference of the car applied to Optimus because they're both really robots in different forms." If Musk and Co. can deliver, investors like Schreiber will likely be among the first in line to celebrate, but for the time being, they are content to watch and wait. "I think we have to be a little bit careful here," she said. "For us to be able to be a buyer here, we would need to see some foot on the ground and we would need to see some realization first."Grace Williams is a writer for Yahoo Finance. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Investing in "The DORKs" a Good Idea Right Now?
Key Points The DORK stocks -- Krispy Kreme, Opendoor Technologies, Rocket Companies, and Kohl's -- are getting attention. Each of these companies is losing money, but trading volume is spiking. 10 stocks we like better than Krispy Kreme › There's a new investing trend out there. Well, perhaps "newish" is the best way to put it, because to my eyes this is just a recycling of the meme stock fad that swept through the markets four years ago. That didn't end well for a lot of people, and I have similar expectations for this one. The stocks feeding into this trend are known as DORK stocks -- an acronym for the stock tickers of Krispy Kreme (NASDAQ: DNUT), Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ: OPEN), Rocket Companies (NYSE: RKT), and Kohl's (NYSE: KSS). Just as in the meme stock boom of old, some of these companies are seeing wild changes in price and valuation for no good reason. But the trading volume is up as investors' interest is piqued. If the DORK stock name isn't enough to scare you off, then perhaps a closer look at the companies would do it. However -- and I can't stress this enough -- investing in DORK stocks seems to be a really bad idea. If you're itching to try it, here's what you should know. Hype isn't a realistic strategy First, let's take a look at the companies. Krispy Kreme makes great doughnuts, but I'm not willing to say it's a good investment today. Opendoor, which operates a digital platform that allows people to sell their houses, is linked closely to Rocket Companies, which allows people to apply for mortgages and manage their money. Kohl's is a struggling big-box clothing retailer. Krispy Kreme saw first-quarter revenue drop by 15% from a year ago, and posted a loss of $33.4 million and an earnings per share loss of $0.20. Opendoor's Q1 revenue dropped by 2%, to $1.2 billion, and the company posted a net loss of $85 million. Rocket saw its Q1 revenue drop 25% from a year ago to $1.03 billion, and posted a loss of $212 million. And Kohl's saw net sales for the first quarter drop 4.1% to $3 billion. Like other DORK names, Kohl's was in the red for the quarter, posting a loss of $15 million. So, the DORK stocks, at least today, are officially losers. But there are a few meme-type catalysts that are pushing them into the public eye, such as short interest. Rocket and Kohl's both have more than half of their outstanding shares shorted, while Opendoor has more than 30%. All of those numbers are incredibly high. When investors short a stock, they're betting that the price will go down, so there's a lot of money out there betting that these names will drop. Retail investors can lap up additional shares in hope that hedge funds that are betting against a stock will find themselves squeezed and have to sell at a higher price -- similar to the infamous short squeeze of GameStop in 2021. We're back to 2021 I know there are lots of retail investors who enjoyed the 2021 meme stock fad that included names like GameStop, AMC Entertainment, and BlackBerry. I wasn't one of them. In fact, I wrote pretty stridently against investing in meme stocks, because I see it as a sure way of losing money over the long term. When you're trading on pure momentum without a solid underlying business, you're just asking to lose your money. Some of the DORK stocks are already showing major volatility. Kohl's, which normally has a trading volume of 13 million shares, saw 209 million shares traded on July 22. The stock price jumped 120% over a two-day period, but has since lost nearly all those gains. Opendoor became hot when a hedge fund manager put a price target of $82 on the stock, which had been struggling to remain at more than $1 and avoid potentially being delisted from the Nasdaq. Now Opendoor is up 380% in the last month (although at this writing, it still trades for less than $2.50 per share). The stock saw massive trading volume of 1.8 billion shares on July 21 and 1.07 billion shares on July 23. (Its average volume is only 164.8 million shares.) Krispy Kreme's shares haven't been as volatile (probably because the short interest is comparatively low). But it still had more than 152 million shares trade hands on July 23, compared to its average trading day of 8.2 million. Rocket Companies also saw action July 22 and July 23 as more than 51 million shares changed hands each day, versus the company's average trading volume of 15.4 million shares. But the reality is that you can't time the market, and many more people lose money than win trades with meme stocks. Because short-term stock prices are a product of supply and demand, you can't predict how a stock price will move -- and if you guess wrong, you could sustain some big losses. How to invest My advice is to hold back. There are hundreds of better choices than a meme stock, and you should instead be looking for names with good fundamentals, decent profit, and a sustainable business model. But if you are determined to invest in DORK stocks, hedge your bets. Invest responsibly, with only a small part of your portfolio that you are willing to lose. You never want to overplay your hand, particularly with volatile investments -- and those include DORK stocks. Should you buy stock in Krispy Kreme right now? Before you buy stock in Krispy Kreme, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Krispy Kreme wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Patrick Sanders has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends BlackBerry and Rocket Companies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Investing in "The DORKs" a Good Idea Right Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Data Deluge Brings a ‘Moment of Truth' for Markets This Week
(Bloomberg) -- Wall Street pros are staring down a pivotal week that will likely set the tone for the rest of the year in markets and the economy. The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy First and foremost is the conclusion of the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, and although it isn't expected to cut interest rates, traders and investors will be poring over commentary for clues about the path ahead. Then there's a string of Big Tech earnings with Inc., Apple Inc., Meta Platforms Inc. and Microsoft Corp. all reporting. And sprinkled throughout are some of the leading indicators on the state of the economy, from gross domestic product to nonfarm payrolls. In other words, if there ever was a five-day stretch that would define the second half of the year, this is it. 'This week's packed calendar — trade negotiations, the FOMC, the jobs report and four of the Magnificent Seven names reporting — makes it truly a moment of truth for markets,' said Julian Emanuel, chief equity and quantitative strategist at Evercore ISI. He was referring to the Federal Open Market Committee, the panel within the Fed that sets interest rates. The fire hose of releases will test investors' faith in the resilience of the US economy and the stock market's seemingly unstoppable rise. And with President Donald Trump's self-imposed tariff deadline of Aug. 1 — which he's said won't be extended — markets are hoping for some sense of stability on trade negotiations after months of whiplash. 'I think there is more of a chance of markets getting clarity on the continued resilience of the economy, while we get less clarity on the trade front,' said Kevin Gordon, senior investment strategist for Charles Schwab & Co. ''Reciprocal tariff' deadlines are staggered for some of our largest partners, and there are still lingering questions around already-announced deal frameworks, so I don't think of Aug. 1 as some magical date on which we'll stop being gripped by tariff anxiety.' S&P 500 companies are generally beating forecasts and profits are up 4.5% from this time a year ago, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data. Firms like Southwest Airlines Co., which said tariffs shaved $1 billion from its annual pre-tax profit this year, expect to see improvements in the second half. 'We already see signs that demand is coming back in volumes,' Chief Executive Officer Bob Jordan said in an interview. Much of the earnings strength is being driven by wealthier customers. American Airlines Group Inc. highlighted strength in their premium cabin demand, while Deckers Outdoor Corp. cited pricey shoes like Ugg sheepskin boots and Hoka sneakers. United Airlines Holdings Inc. and Delta Air Lines Inc., said corporate travel was leading their rebounds. On the flip side, Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. cut its guidance because the 'lower-income consumer is under pressure,' Chief Executive Officer Scott Boatwright said, which has led to a drop in spending. There are other signs of stress, with companies like Conagra Brands Inc. and Abbott Laboratories discussing higher costs due to tariffs. In particular, consumer discretionary stocks are expected to see profit declines into the start of 2026 as trade policies start to bite, Bloomberg Intelligence strategists Gina Martin Adams and Michael Casper warn. 'We already have some corporate commentary as to what effect tariffs are having and will at an individual level,' said Dan Greenhaus, chief economist and market strategist at Solus Alternative Asset Management. 'But the truth is, we probably need several more months before having a firmer handle on the cost distribution.' Economic Uncertainty Economic data has also been uneven as the tariff impact is just starting to hit. The government's initial estimate of second-quarter GDP is expected to show a notable rebound in growth after a monumental surge in imports caused a contraction at the start of the year. 'It won't be until after the market and economy have had an opportunity to digest the new tariff rates that become effective on Friday that we will know where we stand,' said Michael O'Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading LLC. Other reports due this week may point to some softening in the economy. Economists expect consumer spending barely grew in June after adjusting for inflation, and other estimates point to a continued slowdown in hiring and uptick in unemployment. They're also projecting an acceleration in the Fed's preferred measure of inflation — the personal consumption expenditures price index — as tariffs start to hit. 'It's not the cliff that most people are always looking for when it comes to an economic downturn, but it is a visible slowdown if you take the time to actually lift the hood and look at the underlying details,' said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon. Despite all the uncertainty, the stock market is trading at record highs as fears of worst-case tariff scenarios have failed to materialize. The question is how long that can last. 'I think there are a few different factors here. First, there are signals that the labor market is holding up well, wages are growing faster than inflation — both of which supports the consumer in aggregate,' said Cayla Seder, macro multi-asset strategist at State Street. 'When it comes to the stock market, earnings have been beating a low bar, which has indicated the companies are holding up better than feared.' --With assistance from Shelly Banjo and Matt Turner. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.