logo
How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?

How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?

Yahoo3 days ago
The Government's 'one in, one out' deal to return migrants to France in a bid to tackle Channel crossings is set to begin.
The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday with detentions expected in the coming days.
The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers under a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK.
Here is a closer look at the plan and what the issue is.
– What is the concern over the Channel crossings?
Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018.
This is up 48% on this point last year (17,170) and 70% higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data.
At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel.
Ministers want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys.
On Tuesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch claimed the failure to stop migrants crossing the Channel is putting community cohesion at risk.
Data on the crossings of migrants in 'small boats' like inflatable dinghies has been collected since 2018.
In the first year of data, just 299 people were recorded to have arrived in the UK this way.
Since 2018, 94% of migrants who arrived by small boat crossing have claimed asylum in the UK, or 145,834 out of 154,354 people.
– What has the Labour Government's approach been to the issue?
Since Labour came to power last July, the party has vowed to 'smash the gangs'.
Ministers are seeking to ramp up enforcement action against smugglers with new legislation to hand counter terror-style powers to police, and new criminal offences aiming to crack down on the illegal trade.
The Government is also seeking to reset the UK's relationship with Europe over the crossings, and France has agreed to change its rules to allow police to intervene when boats are in shallow water, rather than requiring them to still be on land.
Meanwhile ministers are hoping to deter new arrivals promised jobs when they come to the UK by cracking down on illegal working and deportations of ineligible asylum seekers.
– What is the new deal and how will it work?
Last month, the Prime Minister and French president agreed a plan to send back small boats migrants, with an asylum seeker being sent to the UK in exchange in equal numbers.
Under the pilot scheme, adults arriving on a small boat can be detained and returned to France for the first time.
The trial is set to run until June 11 2026, pending a longer-term agreement or cancellation by either the UK or France with one months' notice.
Asylum seekers accepted to come to the UK under the deal would travel via a safe, legal route, 'subject to strict security checks'.
Those in France could express an interest to apply for asylum to the UK through an online platform developed by the Home Office, and would then carry out the standard visa application process and checks.
Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs, and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK.
If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits.
Their claim could still be rejected during their time in the UK, and they could then be removed from the country.
It is not clear what the criteria will be for deciding which migrants who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, other than being aged over 18.
New arrivals will be screened at Manston processing centre, in Kent, which is current procedure, before individuals determined to be suitable for the pilot and for detention, will be picked and held in an immigration removal centre.
Their removal is expected to be made on the grounds of inadmissibility, that they have arrived from the UK from a safe country where their case can be heard instead, because an agreement is in place with France.
The treaty confirms the migrants would be returned back to France by plane.
It also agrees for a joint committee to be set up to monitor the agreement and arrange logistics.
Migrants will be able to appeal against the decision based on exceptional circumstances.
The Home Office said it had learned from the 'lengthy legal challenges' over the previous government's Rwanda scheme and would 'robustly defend' any attempts to block removal through the courts.
– How many people will be part of the pilot and much will it cost?
No official number of migrants has been confirmed to take part in the pilot, but it is understood numbers will grow over the pilot period and depend on operational factors.
The Home Secretary has said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount as she believes it could aid criminal gangs.
It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year.
There is no funding to France associated with this agreement, and operations around the returns and arrivals will be paid for from the existing Home Office budget.
– What has the reaction been to the deal?
Opposition politicians were scathing about the Prime Minister's deal with Mr Macron, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp claiming the small percentage of arrivals to be removed would 'make no difference whatsoever'.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also branded it a 'humiliation'.
Meanwhile refugee charities have also criticised the plan and have urged the Government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead.
Reacting to the plan coming into force, Amnesty International UK's refugee rights director, Steve Valdez-Symonds, said: 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Earner Not Rich Yet? Meet France's Nicolas
High Earner Not Rich Yet? Meet France's Nicolas

Bloomberg

time16 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

High Earner Not Rich Yet? Meet France's Nicolas

Nicolas is 40-something, French, working a steady job in the prime of life — and feeling utterly screwed. Looking at the horizon, he sees cruise ships packed with boomers basking in the glow of a pension he'll never have. Looking at his payslip, he sees almost half his wage go to a state whose handouts he doesn't get. And when he looks at the headlines, he's told he will have to work more for less to help repair a hole in the public finances. Perhaps it might be time to think about a stint in Dubai or Milan after all? Nicolas isn't a real person but a meme and a hashtag: 'Nicolas pays.' He's the French variation on the viral theme of millennial disillusionment, from the HENRYs of Britain — High Earners Not Rich Yet — to the quiet quitters of America. Nicolas is cruder and more populist, stereotyping his foes as chavs living on handouts or sun-tanned Costa cruisers. He's also a little whinier, given France is really not that bad a place to be (one suspects Nicolas is out of office in August). High-profile commentators have called the meme cruel, selfish and ultimately a Trojan horse for the far-right. Indeed, transport Nicolas back to the 1950s and he might feel most at home with that era's small-state, anti-foreigner poujadistes.

Gaps already emerging in US and Russian views of potential Trump-Putin summit
Gaps already emerging in US and Russian views of potential Trump-Putin summit

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Gaps already emerging in US and Russian views of potential Trump-Putin summit

Russia Donald Trump War in UkraineFacebookTweetLink Follow A day after US President Donald Trump told European leaders he intended to meet soon with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, gaps have emerged in how Washington and Moscow are characterizing a potential summit. While the Kremlin claimed Thursday a meeting next week was all but agreed to, US officials suggested nothing had been finalized – including the format, date or location for talks. If the meeting does go ahead, it would be the first held between the leaders of the two countries since 2021, when Putin met former President Joe Biden in Geneva, Switzerland. Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. One uncertainty is whether there will be a meeting that includes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump on Thursday said he would not condition a sit-down with Putin on the Russian president also meeting with Ukraine's leader. Asked by CNN's Kaitlan Collins whether Putin must meet with Zelensky before a Trump-Putin summit could proceed, Trump said: 'No, he doesn't (have to).' 'They would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing,' he went on. Trump had made clear in his phone call Wednesday with the Europeans – which included the British prime minister, German chancellor and Finnish president – that he intended to meet both Putin and Zelensky, who was also on Wednesday's phone call. He said later Wednesday there was a 'very good prospect' of a summit between all three men – though he added that he had been 'disappointed' by the Russian president in the past. But on Thursday, even as the Kremlin said preparations were underway for a Trump-Putin meeting that could take place as early as next week, the Russian leader sounded cool to the idea of meeting Zelensky, saying certain conditions would first need to be met. Zelensky, for his part, has insisted on a trilateral meeting, saying in his nightly address Thursday that 'everyone knows that key decisions in Russia are made by one person. And that this person is afraid of sanctions from the United States of America … it is only fair that Ukraine should be a participant in the negotiations.' Differences have also emerged over who proposed the meeting. The White House said it was the Russians who 'expressed their desire' to meet Trump. However, Ushakov claimed it came 'at the suggestion of the American side.' Putin suggested it didn't matter. 'Who was the first to say and what, it doesn't matter anymore,' he said. As of Thursday, no location had been set for the talks, though Putin said the United Arab Emirates would be a 'perfect' option as he was meeting with the leader of the Gulf nation, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, in Moscow. Other locations in the Middle East have also been under discussion, people familiar with the matter said. One European diplomat said it was unlikely a meeting would occur in Europe, since Putin wouldn't view a country there as neutral ground. The idea of a Putin-Trump meeting emerged after Witkoff met Putin for three hours in Moscow on Wednesday. Following the meeting, Trump said there had not been a 'breakthrough' between the two men and was also cautious when questioned about the timeline for a deal, saying he has 'been disappointed before with this one,' in reference to the Russian president. The Witkoff-Putin meeting, which saw the US envoy visit Russia for the fifth time this year, came after a frustrated Trump imposed a deadline on Moscow, which is due to expire on Friday, to agree to a ceasefire or face tough secondary sanctions, hitting countries that buy Russian oil with a 100% tariff. Just hours after the meeting, the US leader announced an additional 25% tariff on India as punishment for its imports of Russian oil. Pressed on Thursday over whether his deadline to Putin still stood, Trump said, 'It's going to be up to him. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed.' Trump has been attempting to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine since taking office in January, having initially claimed he could end the war within 24 hours. In the many months since, there has been little progress, with Russia insisting that it wants peace while simultaneously ramping up the scale of its attacks on Ukraine. Critics have suggested Putin's actions in recent months have been attempts to stall proceedings and buy time for his troops to gain further ground on the battlefield in Ukraine. Trump, meanwhile, has repeatedly expressed his growing frustration that Putin says one thing, but then does another. 'We had a deal done four times and then you go home and you see (that Russia) just attacked a nursing home or something in Kyiv. So what the hell was that all about?' the US leader said in an interview with the BBC last month. Zelensky, who spoke to Trump following Wednesday's meeting between Putin and Witkoff, said Wednesday that 'it seems that Russia is now more inclined toward (a) ceasefire.' 'The pressure on Russia is working. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details. Neither us, nor the United States,' the Ukrainian leader said during his nightly video address to the nation. This story has been updated with additional details. CNN's Lauren Said-Moorhouse, Svitlana Vlasova, Kylie Atwood, and Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.

Bradford set to benefit from big shake up in how Government funds Councils
Bradford set to benefit from big shake up in how Government funds Councils

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bradford set to benefit from big shake up in how Government funds Councils

A MAJOR shake up in how Councils are financed is expected to leave Bradford better off, despite fears many Councils may lose out. The Government is planning to create a new methodology to assess local authority needs, factoring in population and deprivation. It will also assess need for adult and children's services. While the overall Government spend on local authorities will not change, the new methodology will mean some areas see a reduction in central government funding for Councils, while others see an increase. Bradford Council's Leader Susan Hinchcliffe believes that Bradford is likely to be one of the areas that benefits from improved funding. Under the changes, it is believed overall spending will fall for 186 councils and rise by the same total sum for 161. One in 10 will see a fall in overall funding, while one in 10 will see an increase of 10 per cent or more. Any rise in central Government funding could prove vital to Bradford Council, which is currently only avoiding bankruptcy through a mix of borrowing and selling assets. Cllr Hinchcliffe said: "We've been lobbying to get a new fairer funding formula in place for councils for years, something the last Government failed to do. 'So it's a relief to see the new Government pushing ahead with these changes, early in their term. "Most Northern councils have been at the mercy of an old Government regime that took money away from us and instead directed it to more affluent areas. 'We anticipate that our financial settlement will improve under this new funding formula so we'll be backing it. We won't know the exact amount until later in the year but the sooner it can be put in place the better." A new report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies says the changes would create big 'winners and losers' as ministers attempt to address perceived unfairness in levels of core funding across the country. Sir Keir Starmer's own council, Camden in north London, will be hit by the reforms when taking inflation into account, the IFS added. The think tank said Camden, along with other inner London boroughs including Westminster, will have less money to spend on services even if they increase council tax by the maximum amount allowed. The IFS believes the East Midlands (22 per cent) and Yorkshire & the Humber (19 per cent) are set to see the biggest increases in funding.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store