UK Imposes Historic Sanctions On Hardline Israeli Ministers
In a historic shift in UK-Israel relations, Britain is imposing formal sanctions on hardline Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich (Finance) and Itamar Ben Gvir (National Security) after months of inflammatory statements about Gaza have caught the world's attention.
The sanctions, unveiled Tuesday, are to include asset freezes and travel bans, following similar measures from the governments of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and others. These countries have previously sanctioned various radical Zionist settler groups and individuals, something the US also did under Biden.
Ben Gvir has several times called for the 'voluntary emigration' of Gazans, and he along with Smotrich have frequently made statements overtly backing an ethnic cleansing program.
'My right, my wife's, my children's, to roam the roads of Judea and Samaria are more important than the right of movement of the Arabs,' Ben Gvir said for example in 2023 of occupied West Bank areas.
Both Israeli ministers have actively supported the most extreme settler groups operating in the West Bank, made up of individuals who call for the removal of Palestinians by force or even death. They've long been involved in movements and political parties who also advocate for the expulsion of all Arabs from Israeli society.
According to an Al Jazeera backgrounder:
The 47-year-old lawyer and politician has led the far-right party Jewish Power (Otzma Yehudit) since 2019, and was sworn into the cabinet after last year's elections.
He was later appointed the national security minister and handed control of Israel's Border Police division in the occupied West Bank.
A settler in Kiryat Arba, one of the most radical settlements in the occupied West Bank (all of which are illegal under international law), Ben-Gvir has been convicted of incitement to racism, destroying property, possessing a 'terror' organisation's propaganda material and supporting a 'terror' organization – Meir Kahane's outlawed Kach group, which he joined when he was 16.
Ben Gvir responded to the UK's sanctions move later on Tuesday. He expressed 'contempt for the White Paper' – characterizing it as akin to the 1939 UK policy paper limiting Jewish immigration to British-administered 'Mandatory Palestine'.
'We survived Pharaoh, we will also survive Keir Starmer,' he said. 'I will continue to work for Israel and the people of Israel without fear or intimidation!'
At a dedication ceremony for a new settlement near Hebron, Smotrich, Ben Gvir said that 'Britain has already tried once to prevent us from settling the cradle of our homeland and we will not allow it to do so again.' He emphasized in front of settler groups, 'We are determined to continue building.'
But ironically many of the same Western governments now sanctioning the two Israeli officials have long supplied heavy weapons to the Israeli military. These governments still remain a party to one side of this war which has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians, and utter decimation of the Gaza Strip in the wake of the Oct.7, 2023 Hamas terror attacks, but there appears no peaceful solution on the horizon.
Also read: 'Invest Now Or Learn Russian Later': NATO Chief Wants 400% Increase In Europe's Air Defense Spending
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
9 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Iran: All US Bases Within Reach
Iran's Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said Wednesday that Tehran will strike US military bases in the region if nuclear talks fail and Washington decides to launch an attack on the Islamic Republic. 'Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us… all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries,' Nasirzadeh said during a press conference, warning the US to 'leave the region' in the 'case of any conflict.' 'We have made very good progress in defense affairs. Our operational forces are fully equipped,' the defense minister added, revealing that Iran recently tested a missile with a two-ton warhead. '[If] a conflict is imposed on us, the casualties of the other party will definitely be much heavier than ours,' he went on to say. The comments came in response to escalating threats from Washington, coinciding with increased tension in nuclear talks between Iran and the US. When asked at a hearing of the House of Representatives on Tuesday if Washington is prepared to 'respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran,' the chief of US Central Command (CENTCOM) said he has 'provided the secretary of defense and the president a wide range of options.' US President Donald Trump said on the same day in an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier that Iran has become 'much more aggressive' in nuclear talks. 'They're just asking for things you can't do. They don't want to give up what they have to give up,' adding that it is 'disappointing' because 'the alternative is a very, very dire one.' Trump said on Monday that he was 'less confident' in the ability to reach a deal. Iran has rejected a new US proposal that would significantly constrain its ability to enrich uranium, and has said it will soon put forward a counteroffer. A new round of talks is set to take place in the coming days. Trump has repeatedly threatened to attack Iran if the negotiations fail. Israel has also drawn up plans for an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. In a phone call between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday, the US president said he is still pushing for a deal, adding that an Israeli attack on Iran would be unhelpful and is 'off limits' at the moment, according to Hebrew reports. However, Trump has previously signaled that Israel would play a key role in any attack in the event that nuclear negotiations fail. Iran's Intelligence Ministry announced recently that it has obtained thousands of sensitive documents on Israel's nuclear program. The chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Hossein Salami, said the intel will provide Iran with an advantage if it is forced to respond to an Israeli attack. Also read: US Ambassador to Israel Suggests Muslim Countries Should Give Up Land for Palestinian State
Gulf Insider
9 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Muslim Nations Should Give Land for Palestinian State
The US ambassador to Israel has suggested 'Muslim countries' should give up some of their land to create a future Palestinian state. Mike Huckabee told the BBC: 'Muslim countries have 644 times the amount of land that are controlled by Israel. 'So maybe, if there is such a desire for the Palestinian state, there would be someone who would say, we'd like to host it.' The ambassador also strongly criticised US allies, including the UK and Australia, for sanctioning two far-right Israeli ministers over 'repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities' in the occupied West Bank. In his interview, the ambassador called a two-state solution – a proposed formula for peace between Israel and the Palestinians that has generally received international backing, including from multiple US administrations – 'an aspirational goal'. The two-state solution envisages an independent Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank and in Gaza, with East Jerusalem as its capital. It would exist alongside Israel. In a separate interview with Bloomberg, Huckabee said the US was no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state. US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce later said the ambassador 'speaks for himself', and that it was the president who is responsible for US policy in the Middle East. Later this month, at the United Nations in New York, French and Saudi diplomats will host a conference aimed at laying out a roadmap for an eventual Palestinian state. Although Huckabee did not say where any future Palestinian state could be located specifically or whether the US would support such an effort, he called the conference 'ill-timed and inappropriate'. 'It's also something that is completely wrong-headed for European states to try to impose in the middle of a war,' he said, arguing that it would result in Israel being 'less secure'. 'At what point does it have to be in the same piece of real estate that Israel occupies?' he said on the BBC's Newshour programme. 'I think that's a question that ought to be posed to everybody who's pushing for a two-state solution.' Asked if the US position was that there could not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Huckabee said: 'I wouldn't say there can never be, what I would say is that a culture would have to change. 'Right now the culture is that it's OK to target Jews and kill them and you're rewarded for it. That has to change.' Israel rejects a two-state solution. It says any final settlement must be the result of negotiations with the Palestinians, and statehood should not be a condition. Huckabee has previously been a strong supporter of the idea of a 'greater Israel', seeking permanent Israeli control of the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and using the biblical term 'Judea and Samaria' for the West Bank. Some of his language echoes positions frequently taken by ultranationalist groups in Israel. Some in this movement, including far-right ministers in the Israeli governing coalition, have argued for the expulsion of Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza, saying any future Palestinian state could exist in Arab or Muslim countries. If such a policy were enacted, rights groups and European governments say it would be a clear violation of international law. Click here to read more Also read: US On High Alert In Anticipation Of Potential Israeli Strike On Iran, WaPo Reports
Gulf Insider
10 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Oil Rises as Trump Voices Doubt Over Iran Nuclear Talks
The NY Post has published a new Trump interview focused on apparently stalled Iran nuclear deal efforts which resulted in a surge in oil prices. The President said in the interview he's getting 'less confident' about ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran, soon after which oil rose as well as benchmark treasury yields and gold, as investors weigh the possibility of US-Iran nuclear talks falling apart. Trump was asked whether he thinks the Islamic Republic will agree to shut down its nuclear program. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more — less confident about it,' he responded. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' Trump continued. 'Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made.' Then the question was raised by the Post, 'what happens then?' To which Trump responded: 'Well, if they don't make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon,' Trump answered. 'If they do make a deal, they're not going have a nuclear weapon, too, you know? But they're not going a have a new nuclear weapon, so it's not going to matter from that standpoint. 'But it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying, it's so much nicer to do it. But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal. I think they would make a mistake, but we'll see. I guess time will tell.' On the question of China's influence on Tehran, Trump described, 'I just think maybe they don't want to make a deal. What can I say?' he said. 'And maybe they do. So what does that mean? There's nothing final.' On Tuesday Trump acknowledged in a Fox News interview that Iran is becoming 'much more aggressive' in these negotiations. And the day prior he had told reporters that the Iranians are 'tough negotiators' and sought to clarify that he would not allow Tehran to enrich uranium on its soil, after some recent contradictory reports suggested the White House had backed off this demand. Washington is awaiting a formal response from the Islamic Republic, which is expected to submit a counter-proposal in the coming days, just ahead of an expected sixth round of indirect talks with the US in Muscat, Oman, slated for Sunday, June 15. * * * More geopolitical headlines via Newsquawk: Iranian Foreign Minister 'As we resume talks on Sunday, it is clear that an agreement that can ensure the continued peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program is within reach—and could be achieved rapidly.'. Thereafter, US President Trump is less confident about the Iran deal, according to a New York Post podcast interview. Iranian Foreign Minister says 'Trump's position on Iran's possession of nuclear weapons could form the basis of the agreement ', according to Al Arabiya. US Secretary of State Rubio said the US condemns sanctions imposed by the governments of the UK, Canada, Norway, New Zealand, and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. Rubio also stated that Israel sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war, while he added that the US urges a reversal of the sanctions. 'Iran's Defense Minister warns on US officials' threats of conflict should negotiations falter: We hope for successful talks, but if conflict is imposed on us, Iran will respond decisively, targeting all US bases in host countries.', via Journalist Aslani. 'Iran successfully tested a missile equipped with a two-ton warhead last week', according to Iran International citing the Iranian Defense Minister. Also read: US On High Alert In Anticipation Of Potential Israeli Strike On Iran, WaPo Reports
