Sara Duterte should be convicted, groups clamour outside Senate
Crimson robe to be worn by senator-judges during the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. - Senate photo
MANILA: Progressive groups trooped to the Senate on Tuesday (June 3) to pound on the establishment's gates and appeal for the conviction of impeached Vice President Sara Duterte.
Among these progressive groups are Bayan, Gabriela, and Kilusang Mayo Uno.
Bayan Secretary General Mong Palatino said they are willing to hold vigils in front of the Senate if senators fail to act on the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte.
'We will make the Senate accountable because, instead of listening to the voices of the people, and instead of showing evidence that there had been corruption, the chamber chose to conceal and protect the thief,' said Palatino.
'What does this teach us? That it is okay to steal? It's okay to hide confidential funds? That unexplained wealth is okay? That betrayal of public trust is acceptable as long as there's negotiation between them and those who are in power?' he asked.
'We will not allow that,' he said.
Senate President Chiz Escudero earlier moved the presentation of Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte from June 2 to June 11.
He said the schedule change was made 'to allow the Senate to tackle priority legislative measures before the 19th Congress adjourns.'
The Senate chief likewise clarified that the 19th Congress — even if it convenes into an impeachment court before the present Congress adjourns — 'cannot bind' the subsequent Congress with its decisions.
He explained that the 20th Congress will need to reconvene as an impeachment court and decide on its own in terms of the fate of the impeachment trial against the vice president.
Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives in a move that garnered over 200 signatures from lawmakers.
On the same day, Feb. 5, the Articles of Impeachment were transmitted from the House of Representatives to the Senate.
The upper chamber adjourned its sessions on that day. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
19 hours ago
- The Star
Holding Sara Duterte trial isn't a choice, it's our constitutional duty, says senator
MANILA: Sen Sherwin Gatchalian (pic) reminded his colleagues in the Senate on Friday (June 6) that proceeding with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is not a matter of choice, but a constitutional mandate of the Senate. 'This is no longer our decision. It's not up to us whether to proceed or not — this is our constitutional duty,' he said in an interview over DZMM. It has been four months since the House of Representatives transmitted the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte to the Senate on Feb 5. Once transmitted to the upper chamber, Gatchalian said the Senate has no other choice but to proceed with the impeachment proceedings. 'This is very clear in our Constitution that once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted to the Senate, we no longer have a choice but to proceed with the impeachment court,' Gatchalian pointed out. 'In fact, the word 'forthwith' is even written there. It's no longer our decision; it's our duty to carry it out,' the senator repeated. He made the remark when asked about the draft resolution initiated by Sen. Ronaldo 'Bato' Dela Rosa, seeking to declare the 'de facto dismissal' of the impeachment case against the vice president. The resolution cited the 'inability' of the Senate to immediately act on it when the Constitution explicitly provides that the 'trial shall forthwith proceed' after the Articles of Impeachment were transmitted to the upper chamber. Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero originally set the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment by the House of Representatives panel of prosecutors for June 2 but later moved it to June 11, the last day of session before the 19th Congress adjourns sine die on June 13. The Senate can only convene as an impeachment court after the reading of charges against the vice president. 'In my opinion, our senators should remember that this is no longer a personal decision or an individual choice. As senators, this is now our constitutional duty,' Gatchalian said. 'When we were sworn in as senators, we also swore an oath to uphold our Constitution — and it clearly states that once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted to us, we are duty-bound to proceed,' the senator specified. Once the impeachment court is convened, Gatchalian said the trial will continue until a decision is reached. Although he acknowledged that the trial could not be finished within month or before the 19th Congress ends on June 30, the senator believes the Senate impeachment court can cross over to the next Congress. 'This will definitely carry over into the 20th Congress, and I see it as part of the Senate's mandate to continue the impeachment court hearings, as the Senate is a continuing body,' he pointed out. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Trump says he told Elon Musk to exit administration, threatens funding cuts
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said he asked Elon Musk to leave his role in the Trump administration, and appeared to threaten billions of dollars in government funding as the row between the once close allies continued to widen Thursday, Anadolu Ajansi reported. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump wrote in a social media post. Trump appeared to threaten government subsidies for the multiple companies Musk runs, saying, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" he said in a second post. The comments are the latest salvo as the US president and the world's richest man continue to deepen their intensifying feud. Musk said earlier in the day that Trump would have lost the 2024 US election without his support, and suggested that it may be time for the country to establish a new political party. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude." Musk posted a poll asking his more than 220 million followers if it is time to form a new political party in the US. While the poll has 23 hours to conclude, over 83 per cent of respondents said it is time. The comments, and the apparent testing of the political waters, mark the latest escalation in the growing feud between the once-close political allies after Musk left the White House where he led Trump's government-slashing effort. Trump said Thursday that he is "very disappointed" with Musk amid the tech billionaire's campaign against the president's signature spending and tax bill. The president suggested that Musk's criticism of the "big, beautiful bill" may be rooted in jealousy. "I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office," he said. "I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate," Trump said in the Oval Office as he hosted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The "EV mandate" refers to a long-standing one-time tax credit of up to $7,500 for those who purchase electric vehicles. Shares of Tesla were sharply lower in late-day trading, with the auto manufacturer down 11.6 per cent amid the intensifying row. Musk quickly responded with a post on X with "whatever," and rebutted Trump's suggestion that he had even seen the bill before he left the White House, calling the claim "false." He acknowledged, however, that some of his opposition stems from the elimination of the electric vehicle tax credit. "This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" he wrote. Musk ramped up his crusade Wednesday to convince lawmakers to kill Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which is estimated to add $2.42 trillion to US budget deficits over the next decade. "Bankrupting America is NOT ok!" Musk posted Wednesday on X.
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Trump says he told Elon Musk to exit administration, threatens funding cuts
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said he asked Elon Musk to leave his role in the Trump administration, and appeared to threaten billions of dollars in government funding as the row between the once close allies continued to widen Thursday, Anadolu Ajansi reported. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote in a social media post. Trump appeared to threaten government subsidies for the multiple companies Musk runs, saying, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' he said in a second post. The comments are the latest salvo as the US president and the world's richest man continue to deepen their intensifying feud. Musk said earlier in the day that Trump would have lost the 2024 US election without his support, and suggested that it may be time for the country to establish a new political party. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote on X. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk posted a poll asking his more than 220 million followers if it is time to form a new political party in the US. While the poll has 23 hours to conclude, over 83 per cent of respondents said it is time. The comments, and the apparent testing of the political waters, mark the latest escalation in the growing feud between the once-close political allies after Musk left the White House where he led Trump's government-slashing effort. Trump said Thursday that he is 'very disappointed' with Musk amid the tech billionaire's campaign against the president's signature spending and tax bill. The president suggested that Musk's criticism of the 'big, beautiful bill' may be rooted in jealousy. 'I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office,' he said. 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate,' Trump said in the Oval Office as he hosted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The 'EV mandate' refers to a long-standing one-time tax credit of up to $7,500 for those who purchase electric vehicles. Shares of Tesla were sharply lower in late-day trading, with the auto manufacturer down 11.6 per cent amid the intensifying row. Musk quickly responded with a post on X with 'whatever,' and rebutted Trump's suggestion that he had even seen the bill before he left the White House, calling the claim 'false.' He acknowledged, however, that some of his opposition stems from the elimination of the electric vehicle tax credit. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' he wrote. Musk ramped up his crusade Wednesday to convince lawmakers to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is estimated to add $2.42 trillion to US budget deficits over the next decade. 'Bankrupting America is NOT ok!' Musk posted Wednesday on X.
