&w=3840&q=100)
Why Tibet & Dalai Lama make China nervous?
Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama speaks in a video broadcast at the start of the 15th Tibetan Religious Conference, a meeting of religious leaders in McLeod Ganj, near Dharamsala on July 2, 2025. (Photo: Sanjay Baid/AFP)
Even as the Dalai Lama has given up the demand of Tibet's independence and has called for a 'middle way' approach, China has rejected it and has continued to call the 90-year-old leader as a 'separatist'. China has made it clear that there will not be any compromise.
Under the middle way approach, the Dalai Lama has sought genuine autonomy for Tibet within the Chinese state wherein Tibetans would have rights for the management of religious, cultural, educational, linguistic, health, and environmental affairs and China would be in charge of foreign relations and defence.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
China has rejected the approach and said it calls for 'splitting China' and has accused the Dalai Lama of seeking a 'semi-independent political regime' or a 'state within a state' within China under the guise of autonomy. The real reason, however, is that an autonomous Tibet, is incompatible with Communist China's ethos.
The subjugation of Tibet has been a must for the Communist Party (CPC) and any cordial co-existence has been off the table since the very beginning, according to Prof. Tej Pratap Singh, a scholar of China at the Department of Political Science at Banaras Hindu University (BHU).
Indeed, one of the first things that the CPC leader Mao Zedong did after establishing the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 was to order the invasion of Tibet. The fact that Chinese began the invasion of Tibet even as Tibetan negotiators were holding talks with the Chinese envoy, General Yuan Zhongxian, in Delhi shows that talks were a ruse and the invasion was decided from the beginning.
'The People's Republic of China is an ethno-nationalist state of the Han people and the Communist Party has no tolerance for any other ethnic group having a province of their own and that too an autonomous province like Tibet. Moreover, China wanted to control Tibet to lay claims to Indian territories. So, the subjugation of Tibet and the erasure of Tibetan identity have been enshrined in the foundations of Communist China,' says Singh.
Indeed, China's claims on India's Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh are rooted in its claim on Tibet. China has said that Ladakh and Arunachal are parts of Tibet, and as it claims to be a part of China, it also claims these Indian regions to be a part of China.
Totalitarian China has no room for non-Han people
Even though China claims to be a multi-ethnic, atheist state, it is a totalitarian ethno-nationalist state of the Han people.
It's not just that the vast majority of Chinese people —91 per cent— are Han, all Chinese leaders from Mao to Xi Jinping have been Han.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
By definition, an ethno-nationalist state is one in which national identity is defined by shared ethnicity. Formally, China considers 56 ethnic groups as part of China, but that is a farce as China's policies lay bare that it is a Han ethno-nationalist state and everyone has to comply to the Han way of life.
For example, China has made it clear that all religious groups and institutions in the country, whether Buddhists in Tibet or Muslims in Xinjiang, have to incorporate 'Chinese characteristics' in the practice of their religious.
For Muslims, China has even gone to the length of demolishing traditional mosques and getting them rebuilt as per the architecture of the Han people. Similarly, China has set up internment camps and put hundreds of thousands of Muslims in those camps to be taught the Han way of life — China calls them 'reeducation camps'. For Tibetan Buddhists, China has denied them the right to recognise their leader, the Dalai Lama, and has said it will appoint the next Dalai Lama.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The 'Chinese' national identity is essentially Han identity and every ethnic group, whether Tibetan Buddhists or Uyghur Muslims, have to mould themselves as per the Han way of life, says Singh, the China scholar at BHU.
Scholars have described the imposition of Han way of life on other groups inside China in the name of Sinicization as 'internal colonialism' where regions of non-Han people like Tibet and Xinjiang have been converted into Han colonies.
No room for Tibet & Dalai Lama in China
As China is an ethno-nationalist state of Han people, a Chinese leader can never tolerate someone like the Dalai Lama — even if he offers concessions like ceding the demand for independence for autonomy within the People's Republic.
'The Dalai Lama is a symbol of Tibetan Buddhists and a reminder that Tibet had remained out of China's active control for centuries. China can never allow the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet and can never allow an autonomous Tibet to coexist with China as that would give prominence to a non-Han people and their leader. That's why China is committed to not just subjugating Tibet but keeping the Dalai Lama out of Tibet and erasing the Tibetan identity with the destruction of monasteries, replacement of Tibetan language with Mandarin, and the break-up of the Tibet province,' says Singh.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Historically, Tibet comprised three provinces of U-Tsang in central Tibet that included Lhasa and was the spiritual centre, eastern province of Kham, and northeastern region of Amdo that had many monasteries. China broke large parts of Kham and merged them into Sichuan and Yunnan provinces and parts of Amdo were incorporated into Qinghai and Gansu. Currently, the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) is less than half of the size of the pre-1950 Tibet.
Singh says that China wants to name the next Dalai Lama as the one it would support would toe its line and lead its Sinicisation efforts.
'On the other hand, a successor recognised by Tibetans in exile, as the Dalai Lama announced last week, is bound to be anti-China and is bound to deny legitimacy to the Chinese rule in Tibet and any territorial claims on Indian land that arise from Chinese rule. That would be unacceptable to China,' says Singh.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
American Firms Flag Hit From US Export Controls Targeting China: Report
More than a third of US companies surveyed by a US-China business group reported "negative effects" from Washington's export control policies, said a report released Wednesday, while flaring tensions and tariffs are chief among concerns. The survey, conducted between March and May, came as President Donald Trump unveiled tariffs on allies and competitors alike, with especially steep rates on Chinese products. This has fueled uncertainty as companies try to adjust supply chains, such as by diversifying away from China or deepening localization. "While 82 percent of companies reported profits in 2024, fewer than half are optimistic about the future, reflecting concerns over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty," said the US-China Business Council (USCBC) in its 2025 member survey. About 40 percent of firms surveyed reported "negative effects from US export control policies," the report said, noting the rise in this proportion signals export curbs are impacting firms beyond the semiconductor industry. Companies cited issues such as lost sales to international or Chinese competitors, severed customer ties and reputational damage in China "due to the intensifying perception that US firms are unreliable suppliers," the report said. The USCBC warned of Chinese tech firms' growing capabilities eroding the competitiveness of US businesses over time. But despite challenges, "the ability to operate in China's fiercely competitive market remains non-negotiable for American companies," USCBC President Sean Stein said. Nearly all firms said they cannot remain globally competitive without their China operations. Meanwhile, companies continue to report declining market share as Beijing's industrial policies boost domestic firms, the survey said. "32 percent of companies reported losing market share in China over the last three years, while nearly 70 percent are concerned about losing market share in the next five years," the council said. The USCBC represents some 270 American companies that do business with China. This year's survey involved a pool of 130 member firms.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
India, China, Brazil can be hit by sanctions over Russia trade: NATO chief
At a time when Delhi and Washington are working on a trade deal before the pause on reciprocal tariff ends August 1, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said Wednesday that countries like India, China and Brazil could be hit very hard by secondary sanctions if they continued to do business with Russia. Speaking in Washington, Rutte, according to the Reuters news agency, said countries in business with Russia should make a phone call to President Vladimir Putin and 'tell him that he has to get serious about peace talks (on ending the Ukraine conflict), because otherwise this will slam back on Brazil, on India and on China in a massive way'. 'My encouragement to these three countries, particularly, is if you live now in Beijing, or in Delhi, or you are the president of Brazil, you might want to take a look into this, because this might hit you very hard,' Rutte told reporters. The NATO chief's remarks come amid tariff uncertainties and global trade wars with the US, and India's own trade with Russia, particularly oil imports. Weeks ago, there were concerns in India over a controversial Bill in the US that proposed 500 per cent tariffs on countries that continue to trade with Russia. More recently, US President Donald Trump also threatened 'biting' secondary tariffs at the rate of 100 per cent on buyers of Russian exports unless there is a Russia-Ukraine peace deal within 50 days. Industry watchers and experts see these as tactics to force Putin's hand by pressuring countries who import from Russia. India has so far not scaled back on its oil imports from Russia, and has maintained that it is willing to buy oil from whoever offers the best price, as long as the oil is not under sanctions. Russian oil itself is not sanctioned, but the US and its allies have imposed a price cap of $60 per barrel, as per which Western shippers and insurers cannot participate in Russian oil trade if the price of Moscow's crude is above that level. India and China are the top importers of Russian crude, and Delhi is engaging with US lawmakers and the Trump administration to voice concerns regarding India's energy security. India depends on imports to meet around 88 per cent of its crude oil needs, and Russia has been the mainstay of India's oil imports for nearly three years now. With much of the West shunning Russian crude following the country's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia began offering discounts on its oil to willing buyers. Indian refiners were quick to avail the opportunity, leading to Russia, earlier a peripheral supplier of oil to India, emerging as India's biggest source of crude, displacing the traditional West Asian suppliers. Indian refiners are adopting a wait-and-watch approach while keeping Russian oil flows robust. In fact, imports of Russian crude may rise further amid the tariff threats as Indian refiners would ideally want to stock up before any tariff action takes effect. While the discounts have varied over time, Russian oil flows to India have remained robust despite Western pressure and limited sanctions on Russia's oil trading ecosystem. Booming oil trade with Russia has also catapulted the country to the list of India's biggest trading partners. In data: India's Russian oil imports India's Russian oil imports rose to an 11-month high in June, further cementing Moscow's continued dominance in Delhi's oil import basket. According to tanker data, Russian crude accounted for a massive 43.2 per cent of India's total oil imports in June, outweighing the next three suppliers — West Asian majors Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE — put together. In June, India imported 2.08 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude, the highest since July 2024, and higher by 12.2 per cent on a month-on-month basis, according to vessel tracking data from global commodity market analytics firm Kpler. According to India's official trade data, oil imports from Russia were at 87.4 million tonnes in the financial year 2024-25, accounting for almost 36 per cent of India's total oil imports of 244 million tonnes. Prior to the war in Ukraine, Russia's share in India's oil import basket was less than 2 per cent. In 2024-25, the value of India's oil imports from Russia was over $50 billion, or 35 per cent of India's total oil imports worth $143 billion. 'This resurgence in Russian volumes reflects both commercial incentives and geopolitical realignments. Russian barrels have remained highly competitive due to discounts, payment mechanisms, and logistical flexibility via alternative shipping and insurance networks. Despite mounting Western sanctions, Indian refiners have managed to maintain — and even expand — procurement from Russia. Barring any severe logistical or regulatory disruptions, this trend is likely to persist in the coming months,' said Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining & Modeling at Kpler. 'Looking ahead, Russia will likely remain India's largest crude supplier – with a share of 35-40 per cent (in India's oil imports) – supported by price competitiveness and techno-economics. However, this dominance could face pressure if the West escalates enforcement of secondary sanctions targeting financial or shipping facilitators. Such a scenario could either reduce Russian volumes or push Indian refiners to seek greater compliance safeguards,' Ritolia said. Oil imports from West Asia are also expected to stabilise in the 35-40 per cent range. Tariff threats: Will they, won't they? It is yet to be seen if the recent tariff threats made against countries like India and China for their energy imports from Russia will translate into tangible tariff action. The Trump administration has been rather mercurial when it comes to trade tariffs; making sweeping announcements, then pausing and negotiating. The hope in India's oil sector is that the US won't actually implement tariffs related to India's oil imports from Russia, as it is in the interest of the US and the global economy that the international oil market remains well-supplied. If Russia is unable to supply its crude, global oil prices are bound to rise due to lower supply being available. But if the US indeed goes ahead and imposes such tariffs, India would be pushed to cut down oil imports from Russia and increase imports from other suppliers, primarily its traditional West Asian suppliers like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, which would push up the cost of imports by a few dollars a barrel. Additionally, it could also lead to complications in India's ongoing trade deal negotiations with the US, its largest trading partner. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
3 threats for Golden Temple on 3rd day; SGPC chief to cops: ‘Wake up'
Amritsar: The committee that manages the Golden Temple on Wednesday received three fresh threat emails warning of an attack at the iconic Sikh shrine, taking the number of such messages to five within just 36 hours and sparking demands for quicker action. The latest threats came even as police were yet to trace the origin of the first email that was sent on Monday. Amritsar police commissioner Gurpreet Singh Bhullar said they had obtained some IP addresses, and the content of the emails suggested they had been sent from a south Indian state. "We are ensuring security and there is no need to worry," he added. Bhullar's assurances, however, did not calm down Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) president Harjinder Singh Dhami, who asked the police and state govt to "wake up". "We informed the police immediately after receiving the first email, but there has been no concrete response. If such threats don't alarm the govt, what will?" he said. Dhami criticised the silence of Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann and Amritsar MP Gurjit Singh Aujla, saying they too had gotten the emails. Citing the deployment of Border Security Force (BSF) personnel around Golden Temple, Dhami called it a deliberate attempt to create fear and reduce the number of people visiting the shrine. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Lợi ích khi giao dịch CFD Bitcoin IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo "It seems like an orchestrated effort to terrorise the sangat (community). If not, then why hasn't the source of the emails been traced yet? Any govt with basic cyber capabilities can trace an IP in an hour," he added. Dhami said they had activated their own cyber teams, but the responsibility lied with the state. "Culprits must be exposed without delay," he added. Shiromani Akali Dal president Sukhbir Singh Badal, Punjab BJP chief Sunil Jakhar and Punjab Congress president Amrinder Singh Raja Warring have expressed concern over the threat emails. Badal urged both Punjab and central govts to conduct a thorough investigation into the emails to apprehend the culprits, while Jakhar termed the threats a "symbol of the Punjab govt's failure".