Shocking plunge by Southwest flight departing LA was to avoid another aircraft
PTI
Last Updated:
Las Vegas, Jul 26 (AP) Passengers aboard a Southwest Airline jet that took a dramatic plunge to avoid an oncoming aircraft were told by the pilot that they nearly struck another plane before landing safely in Las Vegas.
The Boeing 737 jet dropped hundreds of feet in a little over 30 seconds during a flight on Friday, according to a flight tracking website.
Caitlin Burdi, who was on the flight, said it took a short plunge and then a more drastic drop as passengers screamed in terror.
'We really thought we were plummeting to a plane crash," Burdi told Fox News Digital in an interview at the Las Vegas airport. She said the pilot told passengers they had nearly collided with another plane.
The Federal Aviation Administration said the flight, Southwest 1496, was responding to an on board alert about another aircraft in its vicinity. The FAA is investigating. Southwest said the crew responded to two alerts that required the pilot to climb then descend. The flight left Hollywood Burbank Airport just before noon.
Another passenger, comedian Stef Zamorano, said she saw a woman who wasn't wearing her seat belt shoot up and out of her seat, and a man next to her was clutching her arm. A woman across the aisle was panicking, she said.
'She was pretty much verbalizing how we all felt, saying, I want to get off this plane. I want to be on the ground'," Zamorano told The Associated Press on Friday. Another woman was panicking and saying she wanted 'to get off this plane." The plane was in the same airspace near Burbank as a Hawker Hunter Mk. 58, according to the flight tracking site, FlightAware. Records show it is owned by Hawker Hunter Aviation, a British defence contracting company.
The company didn't respond to messages on Friday and Saturday seeking comment.
Southwest said the flight continued to Las Vegas, 'where it landed uneventfully." The airline said that it is working with the FAA 'to further understand the circumstances" of the event.
This close call is just the latest incident to raise questions about aviation safety in the wake of January's midair collision over Washington, DC, that killed 67 people. (AP) RD RD
view comments
First Published:
July 27, 2025, 00:45 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Earthquake today: Russian doctors perform surgery middle of 8.8 quake: Equipment, floor shook but hands remained clam. Details here
Synopsis Russian scientists said the quake off the coast of Kamchatka, which triggered tsunami warnings as far away as Hawaii, Japan and Chile, was the most powerful to hit the region since 1952. AP In this image taken from a video released by Russian Emergency Ministry Press Service, rescuers inspect a kindergarten damaged by an earthquake in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia, Wednesday, July 30, 2025. (Russian Emergency Ministry Press Service via AP) A team of doctors was in the middle of surgery in the Far Eastern Russian city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky when Wednesday's very powerful magnitude 8.8 earthquake shook their equipment and the floor beneath them. The medics used their hands to try to steady both the patient and their equipment, CCTV footage released by the Kamchatka region's Health Ministry showed."Despite the danger, the doctors remained calm and stayed with the patient until the very end," Oleg Melnikov, the minister, wrote on Telegram. He gave no details of the surgery but added that the patient was currently out of scientists said the quake off the coast of Kamchatka, which triggered tsunami warnings as far away as Hawaii, Japan and Chile, was the most powerful to hit the region since spokesman Dmitry Peskov said there had been no casualties in Russia from the quake, crediting solid building construction and the smooth working of alert there were scenes of chaos along Russia's remote and sparsely populated Far Eastern seaboard, and scattered reports of damage. Roman Kripakov, a chef in Severo-Kurilsk on Paramushir, one of the Pacific Kuril Islands chain, said he was at the cafe where he works when it began to shake.'We ran out onto the street, and saw that all the buildings were trembling. Pipes, bricks, they were all falling down from the roofs,' he told Reuters'Did I think about death? Yes, it did come to mind. I asked everyone for forgiveness, and recalled happy moments in my life. I wrote to my wife.'A verified video shot by a Severo-Kurilsk resident showed water engulfing a fish processing plant as it rushed inland, carrying a lightweight metal building and containers with it.A woman can be heard cursing as she laments the loss of the plant. "Our factory is sinking along with our seafood production," she on the Kamchatka Peninsula, video showed startled sea lions diving into the sea as the quake hit Antsiferov Island, just off the island is known as a natural habitat for Steller sea lions, a large, near-threatened species. Q1. What happened during the Russia earthquake and tsunami event?A1. On July 30, 2025, a massive magnitude 8.8 earthquake struck off Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, at a shallow depth near Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. This was the strongest seismic event in the region since 1952 and ranks among the most powerful globally in recent history. The quake triggered tsunami warnings across the Pacific—including in Japan, Hawaii, Alaska, the U.S. West Coast, Canada, New Zealand, and parts of Latin America. In Severo‑Kurilsk, tsunami waves reached up to 5–6 meters, causing flooding and property damage, though no fatalities were reported in Russia. Q2. How can people respond safely to such earthquakes and tsunamis? A2. During shaking: follow the 'Drop, Cover, and Hold On' method—take shelter under sturdy furniture, protect your head and neck, and stay put until the shaking stops.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Who Dares Wins: Indian WWII warriors, Special Air Services, and an untold story
When people talk about the world's most elite special forces, the British Special Air Services (SAS) often takes the spotlight -- thanks to war movies, action games, and tales of daring missions behind enemy lines, especially World War what many forget is that during the same war, Indian soldiers were pulling off their own silent, fearless missions -- deep in the jungles of Burma, far from the headlines (warding away Japanese militia from Rangoon). They didn't just support the war effort; they shaped it, often without ever being named or British soldiers David Stirling and Jock Lewes built the SAS from scratch in the deserts of North Africa, Indian operatives like Anil 'Sunil' Dutta Gupta -- better known by his codename 'SDG' -- were torching enemy stockpiles, spreading resistance from within, and risking their lives with courage. This is a story of parallel bravery -- of bold British raids and equally daring Indian missions -- and why it's time we remember both with equal THE 'DEVIL'S WHISPER' CAME TO BEIn 1941, with Nazi Germany destroying and making advancement across Europe and North Africa, Britain needed a weapon. David Stirling, a maverick officer, proposed something unusual: to strike deep into enemy territory with small, mobile units. Many saw this as vague and more of a suicidal tactic. But then British PM Winston Churchill saw potential in such July, Stirling had approval to recruit a handful of volunteers into what was ironically called 'L-Detachment, SAS Brigade' -- a name that suggested a larger airborne unit than existed. In reality, it was barely 60 men first mission in November 1941 was a disaster. A storm scattered the men parachuting into Tobruk. Only 22 of 62 made it back. But they learnt fast. David Stirling, founder of the Special Air Service (SAS), pictured during WWII. Teaming up with the Long-Range Desert Group (LRDG), the SAS adapted. Rather than parachuting, they were driven to strike targets, launching bold raids on Axis airfields across Libya. Over Christmas and New Year's, they struck the same airstrips twice -- catching the enemy off guard and sowing confusion in the desert the ongoing image that people have in mind today of the SAS with their well-equipped weaponry and air support, initially they lacked supplies and even stole a piano from a nearby New Zealand unit. This often also included basic supplies like bedding, chairs, and decoy tactics soon became a trend rather than an off-beat (and fluke) tactic to beat the military. In the 1971 Indo-Pakistan War, for example, India used the strategy of deception by famously using the 'Phantom Brigade' trick – a strategy that was believed to be similar to the time when the SAS was created and LEWES: THE GENIUS BEHIND SASBehind the glamour of Stirling's leadership stood Jock Lewes, the SAS's first training officer and as Stirling himself would put it, 'arguably its true architect'. An Oxford-educated soldier, Lewes structured and framed the training programme that transformed volunteers into desert mimic parachute jumps when no aircraft were available, recruits initially jumped from the backs of moving trucks -- an improvisation ordered by their Kabrit base in Egypt, he drilled men in everything from demolition to wilderness medicine. Several accounts also suggest that after two men died during training due to faulty parachutes, Lewes, like a true leader, volunteered to be the first to jump most lasting innovation was the 'Lewes bomb', a hybrid explosive made of thermite, diesel and plastic explosive -- designed specifically to destroy aircraft on the ground. The National Army Museum describes it as ideal for sabotaging vehicles and planes, despite early doubts from ordnance experts. (AI-Generated Image) advertisementIt is widely believed that Lewes's leadership helped the SAS pull off their first real success in December 1941. Though his team suffered losses during an airfield raid, they still managed to destroy several German Jock Lewes died, he was just 28 years old, but he died with a dream and the assurance that, unlike other wartime units, this one would not be disbanded after the war. He believed it would continue to rise in glory and he was SAS went on to become a pioneer and remains one of the finest special forces units in the Lewes in a letter to his mother, in 1941, wrote 'Together we have fashioned this unit. David has established it without, and I think I may say I have established it within... the unit cannot die as Layforce died; it is alive and will live gloriously renewing itself by its creative power in the imagination of men.'advertisementTHE INDIAN COUNTERPART: WARRIORS IN THE SHADOWS Fighting in the shadows, or guerrilla warfare, has long been a hallmark of Indian warriors, dating back to the medieval era. Whether it was Maharana Pratap or Shivaji Maharaj, this tradition continued through to the elite units and special operations of the modern the SAS was making headlines in the West, what often went unnoticed was how another elite force was fighting in the jungles of Asia -- waging a covert campaign against Japan through units like Force 136 and the 136, the Far East arm of Britain's Special Operations Executive (SOE), was born in 1944. Operating from India and Ceylon, it trained some 20,000 local fighters -- Indians, Burmese, and Malays for guerrilla missions in Japanese-occupied job was to blow up bridges, gather intelligence, and support local resistance. Most operated in complete secrecy, even from their own allies. According to research by historian Robert Lyman, their work remained classified for STORY OF SDG In The Special Operations Executive in Burma, author Richard Duckett provides a detailed account of covert missions carried out in the region -- one of the most remarkable Force 136 operatives was an Indian, code-named 'SDG' -- real name Anil 'Sunil' Dutta Gupta. Parachuting into Burma in 1943, he posed as a dockworker in Rangoon. Special thanks to Richard Duckett for preserving this image and history. Personnel record of SDG -- Anil 'Sunil' Dutta Gupta -- the Indian Force 136 operative deployed in 1943 for Operation Mahout in Japanese-occupied Burma. advertisementOver two years, SDG orchestrated sabotage from within. It is documented that he burned a Japanese wood stockpile meant for railway construction, destroying 15,000 logs in one go. The Japanese called it an accident, unaware they were being infiltrated from also spread anti-Japanese propaganda and encouraged Indian labourers to defect. Such solo missions, often without back-up, show the level of trust and responsibility given to Indian agents -- and the extreme risks they also reflects the capabilities and valour of many Indian soldiers who operated behind enemy lines. It underscores that Indian soldiers, too, were pioneers in the world of special BEYOND THE HEADLINES By the end of World War 2, elite units had reshaped the battlefield. The SAS had become a legend -- its tactics influencing militaries across the globe. Stirling's motto, 'Who Dares Wins', is now engraved into the fabric of modern special it is equally essential to remember the soldiers whose silent contributions went unrecognised for decades. The Karen guerrillas, Indian saboteurs, Gurkha raiders may not have made it to any Western book or film but that's not the point.- Ends
Scroll.in
9 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Why Indians were discouraged from migrating to Cuba in the early 20th century
On a summer morning in 1926, twelve exhausted Indian men disembarked from the SS Croya at the British port of Liverpool. They had boarded the steamship in Cuba, disillusioned by their life on the Caribbean island. As subjects of the British Empire, they had the legal right to reside in Britain, but their intention was to return to India as soon as possible. 'They planted themselves on the landing stage and upon being approached by the police explained they hoped to be able to work their way home on a boat to India from Liverpool,' wrote GW Coster, a clerk at the West Derby Union, in a letter to the local Board of Guardians. Since the men, all from Punjab, were destitute, the Board of Guardians was obliged under local law to care for them until they found employment or secured funds to sustain themselves. Another option for the board was to sponsor their repatriation to India. While providing food and accommodation, the board reached out to the High Commissioner for India for guidance. Since the men were eager to return home, the High Commissioner recommended their repatriation and agreed to share the cost of the voyage with the Guardians. However, this incident raised alarm among officials managing Indian affairs in London. 'The High Commissioner desires to bring this case to notice as he is anxious not to be faced with a succession of cases of the kind, and that everything possible may, therefore, be done to prevent their recurrence,' wrote the Assistant Secretary to the High Commissioner in a letter to the Government of India's Foreign and Political Department. Years earlier, colonial authorities in India had warned subjects against migrating to countries like Cuba in search of manual labour, but such advice was often ignored. From the 1880s, the British government frequently received repatriation requests from Indians stranded in Cuba, as well as claims from Indian families for the assets of relatives who had died on the island. Cuba also drew the Empire's attention due to complaints from the United States and Canada that Indian subjects were using it as a transit point to enter those countries illegally. In addition, reports from the 1910s suggested Cuba was becoming a hub for Indian revolutionaries. British discouragement Informal Indian migration to Cuba can be traced to the late 19th century. Inspired by the relative success of the Indian indenture system in the West Indies, Spanish plantation owners in Cuba petitioned colonial authorities to allow former indentured labourers from places like Trinidad and Jamaica to move to the island. With pressure building in Cuba to abolish slavery, Indian labour was seen as a viable alternative. In 1881, a proposal to bring Indian workers from the Caribbean was submitted to the colonial authorities in London. But the government of India's Home Department strongly opposed the idea. In a note to the Secretary of State for India in 1881, the Home Department wrote: 'It is difficult to see on what grounds the Government of India could justify any abandonment of its objections to emigration to Cuba. Slavery still continues there under another name, and will not be finally abolished for many years to come. The treatment of slaves in Cuba has always been particularly inhuman have been so hardened that they are not likely to make good masters to coolies.' The note highlighted the poor treatment of emancipated slaves and Chinese indentured workers in Cuba, concluding: 'If we were anxious to extend emigration to foreign colonies, Cuba would probably be one of the very last places we should choose for the purpose.' The Home Department reminded that the British government had consistently resisted sending Indian labour to Cuba. 'In the first place, we have no real security for the proper treatment of our Indian subjects (of the coolie class) except under our own flag,' its note said, 'Secondly every attempt which we make to guard their interests involves us in lengthy, unsatisfactory, and sometimes irritating, correspondence.' Some Indians did reach Cuba via French territories like Martinique but these were people from French-ruled parts of India and there was little the British could do to stop them. Cuban attempts to recruit Indian labour continued after slavery was officially abolished in 1886 and persisted even after Spain lost control of the island to the United States following the Spanish-American War in 1898. After Cuba gained full independence in 1902, recruiters painted it as a land of opportunity for Punjabis seeking work in the Western Hemisphere. Some were told that Cuba would serve as a convenient transit point to the United States and Canada. But, of course, those assurances were belied. Many migrants who found their way to the island faced severe hardships and turned to the British diplomatic mission in Havana for help. In 1913, the Indian government's Department of Commerce and Industry asked provincial governments to discourage migration to Cuba. 'Labour conditions in Cuba are not suitable for Indians,' the department warned, adding that migrants expecting to move on to other countries often found themselves blocked by immigration laws or the overall 'undesirable character' of Cuba. Authorities at Indian ports were instructed to inform potential migrants of the risks. Tiny community British intelligence began tracking Indian movements to Cuba around 1917, amid fears that Ghadar Party revolutionaries were using the island as a base to reach out to compatriots in the West Indies. Two such revolutionaries, Mangu Ram and Harnam Chand, were arrested from a sugar plantation near Guantanamo for labour agitation and espionage. At the request of British officials, Cuban authorities deported them to Florida. Other Indians arriving from Panama also came under surveillance, suspected of being part of what British authorities called 'a seditious movement to overthrow British rule in India'. In April 1917, a secret foreign office memo noted that there had 'recently been a tendency among Indians, some at least of whom are reported to be disaffected, to collect in Cuba'. The memo cited an earlier letter that suggested efforts to establish 'an Indian colony' on the island and called for increased surveillance in Havana, a task given to the British Legation. Later that year, Stephen Leech, head of the legation, reported to Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour that he had found no evidence of Ghadar activity in Cuba. 'It is chiefly in the eastern end of the island, and especially at Guantanamo, that Indians have been wont to reside,' he wrote. Leech added that most Indians in Cuba had arrived via Jamaica from Panama, where they had worked as watchmen during the construction of the Panama Canal. He estimated the Indian population in Cuba at no more than 150 to 200 people. He said the Cuban secret police were actively assisting him in 'watching and reporting on Indians'. Gateway to America As the Ghadar movement waned, another wave of Indian migrants began arriving in Cuba – Punjabis hoping to eventually enter the United States or Canada. But immigration was heavily restricted. The US imposed strict quotas on Indian immigration through the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act. Canada, meanwhile, only permitted Indian immigrants who arrived via a 'continuous journey' from India – a nearly impossible route to take. By 1925, many Indians who believed they could reach North America through Cuba found themselves stranded and turned to the British Legation in Havana. 'Many Indians are arriving with the intention of proceeding to United States,' wrote the chargé d'affaires in a telegram to the government of India's Foreign Department. 'Owing to United States Immigration Law this is not possible and they are here absolutely destitute: recommend no others should be allowed to come and as charitable or other funds are not available render any assistance here beg authority to repatriate them..' In response, a policy was enacted requiring Indian passports to clearly state: 'Not available for the United States of America without a visa from an American Consular Officer.' Similar restrictions were considered for countries like Japan, but it was realised that this was not going to deter people from attempting the voyage. Still, officials recognised that migrants were circumventing the rules: 'Indian British subjects have been trying to evade the U.S. immigration laws by proceeding by easy stages towards the United States,' the Foreign Department noted. 'They leave India without giving any idea that their ultimate destination is the States... and proceed, say, to Japan and thence to Mexico or, as in this case under consideration, to Cuba.' Eventually, it was agreed that the British mission in Havana would fund the repatriation of the stranded Indians and recover the costs from the India Office. Stricter scrutiny A year later, when the group of 12 Indian men reached Liverpool, the High Commissioner for India received a bill for 220 pounds for their passage to Bombay on the SS Karonga. One member of the group fell ill and died in a local hospital and was cremated in Liverpool. The High Commissioner's office paid half the cost of the tickets, while the local Board of Guardians covered their half plus the 17-day accommodation expenses, totalling 40 pounds. A man named Keharsingh Gurditsingh, who joined the group after arriving separately in Liverpool, managed to find work as a motor driver and stayed on in Britain. Following this episode, colonial authorities imposed stricter scrutiny on those suspected of planning to reach North America via Cuba. News of the hardships faced by Sikhs and other Indians on the island spread through Punjab, effectively closing this migration route. According to a January 2025 brief from India's Ministry of External Affairs, a small component of the Indian community in Cuba today consists of descendants of migrants who moved there from the West Indies in the early 20th century. Most settled in Guantanamo province and have since been fully assimilated into the local population. The Ministry noted it has no official record of these individuals.
