Benefit sanctions will mean young parents 'end up on the street', Māori youth service says
they will mean people 'end up on the street'.
E Tipu E Rea Whānau Services mana whakahaere (general manager) Cindy Kawana says young parents have been completely left out of this year's Budget.
Photo:
Supplied / E Tipu E Rea Whānau Services
A kaupapa Māori youth service says this year's Budget delivers "nothing" for young parents, and new sanctions on benefits for rangatahi could push them into unsafe situations and homelessness.
With a kaupapa Māori framework, E Tipu E Rea Whānau Services provides dedicated support to mātua taiohi (young parents) and their whānau across crisis, employment, health and more.
Mana whakahaere (general manager) Cindy Kawana said the whānau it works with have been completely left out of this year's Budget.
"There's nothing in it for our young whānau or for rangatahi," she said.
"Rangatahi have missed out - but those that are parents have missed out more. All we've seen are punitive responses to youth."
On Budget Day, Minister for Social Development Louise Upston announced the government would means-test benefits for 18- and 19-year-olds against their parents' income from 2027.
Kawana said this policy would have devastating impacts.
"It's just another way of denying their place in society. They're adult enough to join the army, they're adult enough to vote, but they aren't adult enough to get financial support from the government when they need it ... That just seems crazy."
E Tipu E Rea run many services offering dedicated support to uplift young whānau - including their Tūpuna Parenting kaupapa.
Photo:
Supplied / E Tipu E Rea Whānau Services
Kawana said the policy overlooks the complex realities rangatahi face and assumes a level of family support that often doesn't not exist.
"It's a really privileged position to be able to think that all of the 18- and 19-year-olds, and specifically those our experiences are with, have relationships with their parents, that even if their parents could afford to support them, [they] would support them," she said.
"That's a really privileged position for the government to be sitting in."
She said the policy also ignores complex whānau dynamics, such as children returning from state care to rebuild family relationships.
"At 18 they're told, 'You can't go on the benefit. Your parents have to support you'. We know what will happen to those kids. They will be living on the street."
Kawana said the consequences are visible now through the housing crisis.
"What's happening right now with housing and emergency housing - our kids live on the streets. Our māmā's with babies live on the streets. These are direct consequences of the government trying to call back money because we have an unfair economic system going on.
"And it's always those, the least that can afford it, that are penalised, forgotten and hidden in the statistical data."
She said the sanctions would cause more harm to already struggling whānau.
"Some of our young whānau are looking for support - not just financial, but a safe place to stay. What happens when they can't get a benefit? We know what will happen. They'll go out on the street, or they'll stay in really, really dysfunctional, unsafe situations."
Kawana criticised the government's messaging around personal responsibility, saying it ignores structural inequality and real-life experiences of tamariki in poverty.
Minister for Social Development Louise Upston says the government isn't "willing to watch any young New Zealanders get stuck on the benefit".
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
"We don't means-test superannuation. Why is it different for rangatahi at the start of their lives? We have millionaires getting taxpayer money. And yet young people are told they don't deserve support?"
She said young parents, especially Māori and Pasifika, are often "talked about, but never talked to".
"Youth might be asked to the table sometimes. But young māmā and pāpā with pēpi - they're left out completely."
Investment should focus on prevention and support, Kawana said.
"As a society, we do have a responsibility for our youth. The state has intervened in many of their lives - and done a terrible job for some. We can't now turn around and say: 'We owe you nothing'.
"Recognise our mātua taiohi as whānau in their own right. Support them financially, emotionally, practically - so that their tamariki thrive."
In response, Minister for Social Development Louise Upston said the welfare system should support those who need it most - but "we aren't willing to watch any young New Zealanders get stuck on the benefit".
"We don't accept that a life on welfare is as good as it gets for any of our young people," she said.
"That's why our government is taking steps to make sure work, training or study is the focus for all young people."
Upston said the Budget prioritised funding for community coaches, bonus payments, and personalised plans to "hold young people accountable" while supporting them with job coaching and needs assessments.
The final decisions on the parental income test will be made later this year, with considerations for hardship and caregiver situations.
Minister for Māori Development and Associate Minister of Housing Tama Potaka.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Minister for Māori Development and Associate Minister of Housing Tama Potaka said it was "wrong to say the government doesn't care about housing for vulnerable young people".
"Our housing policy has lifted hundreds of Māori whānau and tamariki out of dire emergency housing and into better homes," he said. "That can mean a world of difference for young people in terms of better health, regular school attendance or maintaining employment."
He said the government wants rangatahi to grow their education at kura or follow their own ambitions through mahi or business enterprise.
"The government is investing in rangatahi Māori through the overall increase in education funding as well as extra investment in Māori education specifically, including funding for kura, te reo Māori proficiency and training for kaiako.
"Our aspirations are the same as many parents across the motu: we want all rangatahi to make the most of their talents. That's why we're saying 18- and 19-year-olds who aren't working or studying should be supported by their parents or guardians, not the taxpayer."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer on the longest suspension in Parliament
Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii This week, Parliament took the unprecedented step of suspending both Te Pāti Māori leaders - Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi - for 21 days. Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days - but had also been punished with a 24-hour suspension on the day over a haka all three had performed in Parliament, against the Treaty Principles Bill, in November. It is against the rules of the House for members to leave their seats during a debate - which all three did. Ngarewa-Packer told Saturday Morning that the 21-day suspension, which was seven times harsher than any previous sanction an MP has faced, was not proportionate. "I think the backlash from the public, nationally and internationally, validates that," she said. Previously, the longest suspension for an MP had been three days, given to the former prime minister Robert Muldoon for criticising the speaker in the 1980s. While New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said the duration of the suspension would have been lessened if the Te Pāti Māori MPs had apologised, Ngarewa-Packer said that was never requested by the Privileges Committee. "What we have here is a situation where, and some are calling it Trumpism, we've been a lot more specific - we have an Atlas agenda that has not only crept in, it's stormed in on the shores of Aotearoa and some may not understand what that means, but this is just the extension of the attack on the treaty, on the attack on Indigenous voices. "We made the point the whole way through when we started to see that they weren't going to be able to meet us halfway on anything, even a quarter of the way, on any of the requests for tikanga experts, for legal experts when we knew the bias of the committee." Ngarewa-Packer added that the Privileges Committee process was not equipped to deal with the issue. "We hit a nerve and we can call it a colonial nerve, we can call it institutional nerve... "I think that this will be looked back on at some stage and say how ridiculous we looked back in 2025." Ngarewa-Packer also added that the language from Peters during the debate on Thursday was "all very deliberate" - "and that's what we're contending with in Aotearoa". "Everyone should have a view but don't use the might of legislation and the power to be able to assert your racism and assert your anti-Māori, anti-Treaty agenda." Peters had taken aim at Waititi on Thursday as "the one in the cowboy hat" and "scribbles on his face" in reference to his mataora moko. Rawiri Waititi. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii He said countless haka have taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. "They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they?" Peters added that Te Pāti Māori were "a bunch of extremists" and that "New Zealand has had enough of them". "They don't want democracy, they want anarchy," he said. "They don't want one country, they don't want one law, they don't want one people." Winston Peters. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Should I contribute to KiwiSaver or pay mortgage faster? Ask Susan
The short answer is it depends. Photo: RNZ I was wondering, is it better to invest more in your KiwiSaver or into your mortgage? We are lucky and have a little bit of extra cash every pay, so we have been making additional mortgage repayments. With the upcoming changes to KiwiSaver, we won't be able to continue to do this if we don't opt out. What is the better option? My thinking is the lower the mortgage, the less interest we pay, which would see us better off in the long term. Fisher Funds Kiwisaver general manager David Boyle says he has received questions like this over the years and the answer is: "it depends". "It's hard to know, without knowing the total financial position and how long they've got until they retire," he said. "Paying more off your mortgage and contributing to KiwiSaver are both smart choices, if you find yourself with a bit of money leftover before payday. "To help with this here are some things they should consider if they keep paying a bit more off the mortgage." It's probably worth talking to a financial adviser about this. If you opt to focus on paying your mortgage faster, you might need a plan to get you on track for retirement, once that loan is gone. The increase to contributions of 4 percent is stepped over the next couple of years. Are you likely to receive a pay rise over that period that will help you continue paying a bit off your mortgage, as well as contribute a bit more? You also have the option to temporarily lower your contribution rate back to 3 percent if you want. I am the epitome of being a victim of the government's totally unfair direct deduction policy. I should have started receiving my richly deserved superannuation when I qualified for it 9.5 years ago and the Winter Energy Payments seven years ago when they began. Consequently, over $300,000 has been stolen from me and I live in abject poverty as a result. I am a dual citizen from America. I have lived here 19.5 years, so on what legal basis has the government for denying the WEPs? Its written explanation is that it would be difficult to administer to NZ seniors not currently receiving a government benefit such as superannuation. That is mind boggling and I hope you see fit to write about this outrageous treatment of nearly 100,000 Kiwi seniors. Sorry, yes, I've checked with the ministry and it confirms that people who are not getting NZ Super because of an overseas pension cannot get the Winter Energy Payment. Generally, if your NZ Super entitlement has been eliminated by your overseas pension, it's because what you receive from overseas is more than the NZ Super payment. Send your questions to Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Twelve-month prescription renewals: What you need to know
The government's plan will allow some patients to go longer between prescription renewals. Photo: 123RF In the annual flood of Budget coverage a few weeks back, one of the big announcements for the health sector was a move to allow 12-month prescription renewals from 2026. But how is it going to work and how will it affect your health services? RNZ is here to explain it all. The current maximum prescription length for most medicines is three months, but the government's new plan would extend that to 12 months for many medicines. This means that some patients will no longer need to visit their GP every three months to get their standing medication renewed. While some repeat prescriptions can be filled without a doctor's visit now by contacting their office, guidelines by the Medical Council of New Zealand on good prescribing practice say "patients receiving repeat prescriptions should be assessed in person on a regular basis" and repeats are given only with a doctor's discretion. In announcing the plan , Health Minister Simeon Brown said the current system "creates unnecessary barriers for patients on stable, long-term medications like asthma inhalers, insulin for diabetes, and blood pressure tablets. It means added costs for patients and more paperwork for health professionals, taking time away from patients with more urgent or complex needs". Medicines will still have to be dispensed every three months from pharmacies. "It's a win-win for patients and the health system - fewer avoidable hospitalisations, better health outcomes and reduced long term costs," Brown has said. Not until the first quarter of 2026. Luke Bradford of the Royal New Zealand College of GPs. Photo: supplied This is expected to mostly affect people on long-term medicines, the Ministry of Health said. The increased prescribing limit will also apply to oral contraceptives, which currently have a six-month prescribing limit. Royal New Zealand College of GPs medical director Dr Luke Bradford said that during consultation on the plan, the college had supported a six-month prescription renewal instead of 12. "We submitted on this and said 12 months is probably too long, six months would be reasonable." Dr Bradford said there would not be a centralised list of drugs that are part of the scheme and physicians will need to determine who benefits from 12-month renewals. "It's very much going to be a patient by patient situation and we can't put blanket rules across this. It depends on a whole raft of things but predominantly depends on conditions being managed." If you have multiple prescriptions for multiple conditions, you are far less likely to get 12-month renewals as a physician needs to monitor your ongoing health and possible interactions. "Prescribers will be responsible for determining the clinically appropriate prescription length and can prescribe for up to 12 months, or for shorter periods if they consider that most appropriate," a spokesperson for the Ministry of Health said. Controlled substances - which include opiates such as morphine and fentanyl - are not included. Controlled substances will not be included. Photo: 123RF/Steve Heap 2016 The Budget allocated $91 million over four years "to support this change". "It is expected this change will increase patients' access to medicines and therefore create a higher demand for medicines. Funding is required for the Combined Pharmaceutical Budget to meet the increased demand for medicines," the Ministry of Health spokesperson said. "The Budget includes $10m initial funding in the 2025/26 financial year, with outyear funding held in contingency, pending information gathered from the initial uptake." Some patients won't have to go to the GP quite as often, in theory. GP visits are charged differently from place to place and can run anywhere from $20 to $90 depending on the complicated calculation of fees at individual doctors' offices. The Ministry of Health has said that the average patient who renews prescriptions four times a year could save up to $105 a year on GP fees. It also has said the change could mean less time off work or school for appointments and it could make life easier for people in rural and remote areas who travel to get to their doctor. No. The $5 co-payment for most prescriptions - which was brought back under the current National-led government - will remain unchanged. And you'll still need to go back to the pharmacy every three months to have your prescriptions dispensed even if you're on a 12-month renewal from your doctor, Dr Bradford said. "There's some safety mechanisms built into this in that they're not going to dispense 12 months of medicines. People aren't going to suddenly have huge boxes of medicine at home." In a statement to RNZ, the Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand said it cautiously supported the move, but had concerns. "PSNZ support the increased period in principle, but with some provisos - as always, it's the detail that will matter and we are waiting to receive that. "For example, there is currently no indication that funds to support the extra monitoring and counselling that may be required, when patients are picking up their medication every three months without any interacting with their general practice." If people visit their GPs less often, it will affect the income their practices receive. In its submission on the proposal , the Royal College said prescriptions account for between seven to 10 percent of practice revenue. "The financial impact on practices that rely on revenue from current prescription renewals could be substantial, e.g., one specialist GP calculated a $320,000 loss in a patient population of 14,500," that submission also reported. "There will definitely be an impact on that," Dr Bradford said. At the same time, it won't necessarily reduce the admin work needed. Doctors will still need to do the legwork with their patients to keep on top of ongoing records, tests and screening, he said. Health Minister Simeon Brown. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro On its website, the Ministry of Health said the Medicines Regulations will need to be amended to increase the maximum length of prescriptions, and IT systems will need to be updated to allow this change. The Medicines Regulations 1984 will need to be amended. Pharmac will make changes to the Pharmaceutical Schedule, while Health NZ will work to support GPs, other prescribers and pharmacies with updating systems and the transition. The Pharmaceutical Society said it also would work to ensure the prescription plan changes go smoothly. "PSNZ will use this time to engage with officials to support a smooth transition and highlight any unintended consequences, particularly any changes in workload and financial pressures that this change could place on pharmacists and their teams," it said in its statement. General Practice Owners Association chair Dr Angus Chambers recently told RNZ that many patients with chronic conditions needed regular reviews by a doctor or nurse. "Just to leave someone for 12 months to have their diabetes deteriorate may well lead to more emergency department visits and hospital admissions." Everyone manages their conditions differently, Dr Bradford said, and no two cases are quite the same. "If you're on five different meds for diabetes you're going to need three-month checkups." In announcing the plan, Simeon Brown said it would give GPs a breather. "Instead of spending time on routine repeat prescriptions, they can focus more on supporting those with complex or deteriorating health needs." Dr Bradford said the current three-month renewals do give a "safety net" for physicians to keep on top of issues. "By taking that away we either say we've still got to do that or the pressure goes on GPs to do it anyway and have to sit their own reminders for those periods of time and follow it up in their hour of clinic time." "The majority of patients will be fine," but a visit to a GP involves a lot more than just checking off a prescription renewal box, Dr Bradford said. "The moment you come in we're watching how you're walking, we're looking at your body language and listening for cues and we're reminding you of the screening you haven't done. "Those things that happen because you come in and say, 'Oh, I'm just here for my asthma medicine, doc,' are at risk of being lost." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
