Prosecution, CIO ramp up investigation into Yoon ahead of special counsel probe
According to the prosecution's investigation team, led by Seoul High Prosecutors' Office chief prosecutor Park Se-hyun, the prosecutors have obtained key evidence, including phone server-related data from Yoon's secure phone lines and CCTV records from the Presidential Security Service on Monday.
Since January, the investigation team has attempted to secure such records more than once through search warrants, but the PSS denied previous requests, citing the Criminal Procedure Act. The act bans any seizure and search attempts in a place where secret military matters are held, including the presidential residence, without the permission of the authority in charge.
The PSS decided to cooperate with the prosecution, which on May 29 initiated another attempt to secure more evidence to substantiate charges against the former president. And the additional digital data stored on the server is reportedly taking time to access, as the PSS is making a voluntary submission while coordinating with the prosecution.
The Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, which is investigating Yoon's alleged interference in a military investigation into the death of Cpl. Chae Su-geun, also requested additional phone records from the presidential office on Monday.
Chae is a marine conscript who drowned during a rescue mission in 2023.
The Democratic Party of Korea claimed that Yoon tried to hinder an investigation into Lim Seong-geun, the then-commander of the deceased marine's division, and his possible negligence or other wrongdoings in Chae's death.
The anti-corruption investigative agency previously secured data related to a specific phone number, which is suspected to be associated with Yoon's private office or workroom.
The number was allegedly used to call then-Defense Minister Lee Jong-sup and the marine's case, scheduled for transfer to the police at the time, was suspended shortly thereafter. The CIO suspects Yoon instructed the former minister to delay the transfer of the case via phone.
The CIO is reportedly receiving evidence necessary to identify the origin of the phone number.
"The agency will transfer the necessary records once the special counsel probe is launched. But, until special prosecutors are appointed, we are committed to investigating the case thoroughly," the CIO official said in a press briefing on Tuesday.
Though the National Assembly approved the special counsel probe bills on June 5, both the prosecutors and the state anti-corruption agency pushed ahead with their investigation to ensure there is no investigative gap in the probe.
The prosecution, the CIO and the police are required to comply with the special prosecutors' request for investigative records, evidence or the transfer of cases currently under trial.
The extent to which the special prosecutors will take over the martial law-related cases is expected to be decided after the special counsel probe is formally activated.
Meanwhile, the police are likely to consider an arrest warrant request for Yoon as the former president continued to defy the summons.
The police's special investigation unit announced Monday that a second summons was sent to Yoon.
'We requested that he appear for questioning on June 5, but Yoon's legal team rejected the summons. We asked him to comply with the second summons on Thursday,' the police officer said in a press conference held on Monday.
Police typically request an arrest warrant if a suspect fails to respond to the third summons
The police reportedly claimed that there is nothing more to share in regards to the possible arrest warrant since only the second summons has been issued. But it vowed to take the utmost efforts to conduct all possible investigations.
While denying the former president's alleged criminal offenses, Yoon Kab-keun, one of Yoon's legal representatives, insisted Monday that the investigation can be carried out in a written questionnaire, suggesting Yoon is unlikely to comply with the summons.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
19 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Will ex-PM Han be next Cabinet member detained?
Former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo attended a questioning session on Tuesday to comply with a summons from special counsel Cho Eun-suk's team, which has been tasked with investigating former President Yoon Suk Yeol's alleged insurrection and treason. Han, who was summoned as a suspect, arrived at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office at approximately 9:25 a.m. and entered the building without answering questions. Reporters asked whether he maintained his position that he neither participated in nor supported Yoon's alleged insurrection. The former prime minister briefly said, 'Thank you for your hard work.' While the special counsel reportedly questioned Han on his alleged role in former President Yoon's martial law declaration on Dec. 3, Tuesday's summons is seen as an effort to build the case ahead of the possible detention of the former prime minister. Han is suspected of both failing to prevent and potentially facilitating the unconstitutional imposition of martial law. According to the Constitution and Government Organization Act, the prime minister supervises ministries on behalf of the president and oversees the ministers' actions. Any proposal made by the defense minister and interior minister to declare martial law must go through the prime minister before it reaches the president. Since Han was in a position involving him in the decision-making process before and after the martial law declaration as the vice chair of the Cabinet meeting, the special counsel team views him as one of the key figures in the alleged insurrection. Han was previously named as an accomplice who attempted to prepare false public documents. According to the special counsel team, former President Yoon fabricated an official martial law document on Dec. 5, two days after declaring martial law. Although the National Assembly lifted martial law within hours, Han and then-Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun reportedly backdated the document to make Yoon's declaration appear legally proper. Kang Eui-gu, who at the time was a secretary at the presidential office and drafted the document, reportedly testified in the special counsel investigation that the document was discarded at Han's request and upon Yoon's approval. The decision would be in violation of Article 82 of the Constitution, which stipulates that acts of the president under law be executed in writing and that such documents should be signed by the prime minister and Cabinet members concerned. The special counsel team has raised the additional suspicion that Han called then-ruling People Power Party Floor Leader Rep. Choo Kyung-ho to interfere with the National Assembly's effort to lift the martial law declaration. Han is also accused of perjury for claiming in testimony to the Constitutional Court and the National Assembly that he was unaware of the martial law declaration in printed form until after the decree was lifted. During a press briefing, assistant special counsel Park Ji-young referenced the Constitutional Court's March ruling that dismissed the impeachment of former Prime Minister Han, noting that the court at the time found no objective evidence. 'Since then, the situation has changed significantly. The special counsel team was launched after the Constitutional Court's ruling and has collected additional evidence, including documents and records related to the martial law declaration,' Park said, suggesting that the legal interpretation of Han's alleged role in the martial law could shift. According to reports, Han attempted to dissuade Yoon after hearing him express his intention to impose martial law. When Yoon remained resolute, Han reportedly suggested hearing opinions from other Cabinet members. Once the quorum of 11 Cabinet members was met, Yoon delivered his intent to impose martial law in a two-minute statement. 'Given the Constitutional Court's March ruling, the central question now may be why the proposal to convene the Cabinet meeting was made in the first place,' the assistant special counsel said. 'It is necessary to determine whether this constituted a failure to fulfill official duties or an active involvement in Yoon's martial law declaration.' The special counsel team had previously summoned Han in early July and carried out search and seizure operations at his and Kang's residences on July 24. If the team applies for a warrant to detain the former prime minister and the court grants it, Han will be the third Cabinet member of the Yoon administration to be detained regarding martial law-related matters, following former Defense Minister Kim and former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min.
Korea Herald
21 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Will ex-PM Han be another Cabinet member to be detained?
Former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo attended a questioning Tuesday to comply with a summons by special counsel Cho Eun-suk's team tasked with investigating former President Yoon Suk Yeol's alleged insurrection and treason. Han, who was summoned as a suspect, arrived at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office at approximately 9:25 a.m. and entered the building without answering questions. Reporters asked whether he maintained his position that he neither participated nor supported Yoon's alleged insurrection. The former prime minister briefly said, 'Thank you for your hard work.' While the special counsel reportedly questioned Han on his alleged role in former President Yoon's martial law declaration on Dec. 3, Tuesday's summons is seen as an effort to build the case ahead of a possible detention of the former prime minister. Han is suspected of both failing to prevent and potentially facilitating the unconstitutional imposition of martial law. According to the Constitution and Government Organization Act, the prime minister supervises ministries on behalf of the president and oversees the ministers' actions. Any proposal made by the defense minister and interior minister to declare martial law must go through the prime minister before it reaches the president. Since Han was in a position involving him in the decision-making process before and after the martial law declaration as the vice chair of the Cabinet meeting, the special counsel team views him as one of the key figures in the alleged insurrection. Han was previously named as an accomplice who attempted to prepare false public documents. According to the special counsel team, former President Yoon fabricated an official martial law document on Dec. 5, two days after declaring martial law. Although the National Assembly lifted martial law within hours, Han and then-Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun reportedly backdated the document to make Yoon's declaration appear legally proper. Kang Eui-gu, who at the time was a secretary at the presidential office and drafted the document, reportedly testified in the special counsel investigation that the document was discarded at Han's request and upon Yoon's approval. The decision violated Article 82 of the Constitution, which stipulates that acts of the president under law be executed in writing and that such documents should be signed by the prime minister and Cabinet members concerned. The special counsel team has raised the additional suspicion that Han called former then-ruling People Power Party floor leader Rep. Choo Kyung-ho to interfere with the National Assembly's effort to lift the martial law declaration. Han is also accused of perjury for allegedly claiming during his testimony to the Constitutional Court and the National Assembly that he was unaware of the martial law declaration in printed form until after the decree was lifted. The special counsel team had previously summoned Han in early July and carried out search and seizure operations at his and Kang's residences on July 24. If the team applies for a warrant to detain the former prime minister and the court grants it, Han will be the third Cabinet member of the Yoon administration to be detained regarding martial law-related matters after former Defense Minister Kim and former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
12,000 Koreans sue ex-President Yoon, wife over martial law
First lawsuit filed to jointly hold Yoon, Kim accountable for alleged abuse of emergency powers More than 12,000 South Koreans are filing a damages suit against former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife, Kim Keon Hee, claiming they suffered psychologically from Yoon's controversial declaration of martial law on Dec. 3, 2024. This is the first lawsuit to name both Yoon and Kim as co-defendants over the incident. More plaintiffs are expected to join the case. Attorney Kim Kyoung-ho, representing the plaintiffs, said he submitted the complaint to the Seoul Central District Court on Monday. Each plaintiff is demanding 100,000 won ($72) in compensation for emotional distress. Kim, the attorney representing the plaintiffs, told The Korea Herald in a phone interview that the people's psychological distress stems from the fear and disillusionment caused by what they see as illegal seizure of state power. 'By unlawfully declaring martial law and paralyzing the functions of the National Assembly, the defendants instilled in people the fear that South Korea was veering toward dictatorship,' he said. Kim explained that the situation evoked memories of the unlawful martial law imposed under Chun Doo-hwan in 1980, triggering public anxiety and trauma. 'But the damage was not only retrospective,' he added. 'The Dec. 3 martial law undermined the very democracy built through the Candlelight Revolution that ousted Park Geun-hye (in 2017), shattering the dignity and self-respect of democratic citizens." In their filing, the plaintiffs argue that Yoon's declaration of martial law was not merely a matter of negligence, but a 'deliberate and unlawful act' that violated the people's constitutional rights. They claim the move was driven by personal motives, particularly to block the passage of a special counsel bill to investigate Kim Keon Hee over alleged stock manipulation and luxury gift scandals, as well as to cover up evidence related to election meddling involving Myung Tae-kyun. The lawsuit further accuses the former first lady of playing an active role, asserting that she pressured her husband to impose martial law as a way to deflect scrutiny and communicated with alleged co-conspirators. 'Kim Keon Hee served as an instigator by persistently demanding a way out of her legal troubles, which led Yoon to take the extreme step of declaring martial law,' the filing states. The mass suit comes after the Seoul Central District Court last month ruled in favor of 104 plaintiffs in a separate damages case, ordering Yoon to pay 100,000 won per person for emotional harm caused by the martial law declaration. Yoon has appealed the ruling, seeking to suspend enforcement. The court granted a stay of execution on the condition that Yoon post deposits equivalent to the damages.
