logo
SMRT fined S$3M for September's train disruption; funds to help low-income families

SMRT fined S$3M for September's train disruption; funds to help low-income families

Photo: FB screengrab/SMRT
SINGAPORE: The Land Transport Authority (LTA) announced a S$3 million fine against Singapore public transport operator SMRT due to a six-day MRT disruption on the East-West Line (EWL) in September last year. The penalty will go to the Public Transport Fund to help lower-income families with their public transport expenses, Bernama reported.
LTA said the disruption from Sept 25 to 30 last year was likely caused by a degraded grease in the train's axle box, which caused it to overheat and fail.
'Degraded grease can cause increased wear and tear of the axle bearings, eventually causing overheating and failure,' LTA said in its Facebook post.
LTA noted that burnt rubber and metal parts from the chevron springs were found along the track where the train passed. However, LTA said it was not possible to establish a definitive root cause.
'LTA also found that SMRT had extended its overhaul interval for the incident train beyond its stipulated maintenance requirement of 500,000km to 575,000km in August 2022 and 750,000 km in August 2024. These extensions were carried out based on their internal procedures, without any detailed engineering and risk assessment, as axle box failures are not common,' it stated. See also Transport Minister apologises for MRT power disruptions
In deciding the penalty amount, LTA took into account the over S$10 million SMRT had already spent on repair works and on providing free alternative bus and shuttle train services at affected stations during the disruption period.
Train services fully resumed on Oct 1, 2024, after six days of repair work.
The following month, LTA announced a decline in the Rail Service Reliability Performance , particularly for the East-West Line (EWL). /TISG
Read also: F&B operators near Buona Vista MRT station said their sales dropped up to 70% amid East-West Line service disruption

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LTA plans to give equal prize money to men and women athletes at the Queen's Club by 2029
LTA plans to give equal prize money to men and women athletes at the Queen's Club by 2029

Independent Singapore

time3 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

LTA plans to give equal prize money to men and women athletes at the Queen's Club by 2029

INTERNATIONAL: The Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) has stated that it is committed to achieving equal prize money for men and women athletes at the Queen's Club and Eastbourne by 2029. This year, the women's event at Queen's Club will have a total prize money of US$1.415 million (about £1.043 million or S$1.80 million). This amount includes the voluntary increase by the LTA, which raised the standard prize money by approximately 33%. This is to show support for greater pay equality. However, despite the boost, the total women's prize pool is still significantly lower than the prize men athletes will receive for competing at the Queen's as well. This highlights the gap between the two events. With this, the LTA declared that they are determined to close the gap over the next few years. LTA chief executive Scott Lloyd expressed: ' The LTA is committed to growing women's tennis, both at professional and grass-roots level, and this move is an important part of that commitment.' See also Speedway SEA Championship returns for OCBC Cycle 2024 He added: 'This year, fans will be able to enjoy both men's and women's tennis on the biggest stages that we can offer… We want to develop the tournaments so that the women's events deliver a path to profitability and greater visibility for the sport.' More about the events The prize money minimums are set by the ATP and WTA tours. At the Queen's Club, the men's ATP event allotted €2.522 million (£2.122 million), and for the women's WTA tournament, which will return for the first time since 1973, will have a smaller prize fund. Both events are known to be '500' level tournaments. It means that it is just below the Grand Slams and the Masters 1000. The men's tournament is sold out, while over 80% of women's tickets are sold at lower prices. Moreover, the LTA is facing a challenge because money spent on prize funds can't be used to support grassroots tennis programs in the UK. Their summer events lost £4 million last year. With all of this, the LTA has pledged to achieve equal prize money at Queen's and Eastbourne by 2029, four years ahead of the WTA's 2033 deadline for standalone women's events. Furthermore, Eastbourne is a combined '250' event with prize money of US$389,000 (£286,650) for women and €756,875 (£637,000) for men, the highest payout for that category on the WTA Tour this year. In a social media post, LTA shared: 'A significant uplift in women's prize money for 2025 🙌… The women's prize money at the HSBC Championships and Lexus Eastbourne Open reaches record levels this summer… The LTA is committed to achieving true equal prize money for men and women at these events as soon as possible and no later than 2029.' WTA commented on the post and said: 'A win for women, a win for the sport, a win for future generations. This matters 💚' Some netizens also expressed their thoughts regarding this subject matter and said: 'We also want transparent draws of opponents' brackets' and 'Just not good enough.'

Should I stay in my government job, or should I look for a new one?
Should I stay in my government job, or should I look for a new one?

Independent Singapore

time3 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

Should I stay in my government job, or should I look for a new one?

SINGAPORE: A young Singaporean sought career advice online, writing that they've been working in a government role for the past three years but now wonder if it's time to move on to the next job. In a post on r/askSingapore on Thursday (June 5), u/chicky-mcnuggys wrote that they're now 26 years old and have been at the job since graduating. 'First ranking was ungraded, second and latest grades were C+. My ex-boss, with whom I had good relations, was pushing for me to get a B and had given me multiple stretch assignments, but someone else instead got the B because she was 'due' for promotion. Before my ex-boss left, she gave me additional assignments to justify a better grade for the next ranking, and I've completed them, with good reviews from Senior Management,' the post author wrote. They added that they hoped to get a rating of B in the next two years, which would qualify them for a promotion. See also How businesses can leverage their perks via skill swapping The problem appears to be their new boss, who seems less than generous with rankings. 'Let's just say that hope is out the window because s/he had no good feedback at all for me,' they wrote. While their supervisor disagrees with the feedback the new boss gave, in the end, what the boss says carries the most weight. This is causing the post author to worry that the next time they could be promoted would be in three or four years, and by then, they will be between 29 and 30 years old. 'Which is quite slow, no?… Is this normal, or should I just look elsewhere?' they asked, adding that they're due for rotation soon, which means they'll need to start again in a new division. 'I feel like I'm putting in 101% effort, but it sucks knowing it goes unacknowledged especially since I had to do way more than I'm expected to (since I was given stretch assignments),' they added, asking for advice as to whether or not they should keep their job, given the current job market. Commenters were sympathetic toward the post author, with many becoming upset on their behalf over someone else being due for promotion getting the 'B' rating instead of the post author. One advised them to manage their expectation about promotions. 'Title promotion can be fast, like with a senior/lead tagged to your current title. Usually comes with a little pay bump. Grade promotion is the one that takes longer. This one got a considerable bump in pay and usually takes three to four years from starting the position…unless you are chosen by heaven.' 'I always say, want to climb fast and high, go private sector to chiong, but also risk getting sacked for no reason. Gov't is slow and steady (unless you're a scholar) but (confirmed) will have a job through hell and back,' opined another. Others reassured her that for their age, their career progression is normal and that they shouldn't worry about it too much. See also Top 10 predictions for China cross-border e-commerce in 2019 'Gov't job good. Think thrice and understand private sector risks. Have a good financial plan for your career before any move,' urged a Reddit user. /TISG Read also: 'Just get your foot in the door,' Singaporeans tell new grad who's worried their starting salary isn't so high

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store