SMRT fined S$3M for September's train disruption; funds to help low-income families
SINGAPORE: The Land Transport Authority (LTA) announced a S$3 million fine against Singapore public transport operator SMRT due to a six-day MRT disruption on the East-West Line (EWL) in September last year. The penalty will go to the Public Transport Fund to help lower-income families with their public transport expenses, Bernama reported.
LTA said the disruption from Sept 25 to 30 last year was likely caused by a degraded grease in the train's axle box, which caused it to overheat and fail.
'Degraded grease can cause increased wear and tear of the axle bearings, eventually causing overheating and failure,' LTA said in its Facebook post.
LTA noted that burnt rubber and metal parts from the chevron springs were found along the track where the train passed. However, LTA said it was not possible to establish a definitive root cause.
'LTA also found that SMRT had extended its overhaul interval for the incident train beyond its stipulated maintenance requirement of 500,000km to 575,000km in August 2022 and 750,000 km in August 2024. These extensions were carried out based on their internal procedures, without any detailed engineering and risk assessment, as axle box failures are not common,' it stated. See also Transport Minister apologises for MRT power disruptions
In deciding the penalty amount, LTA took into account the over S$10 million SMRT had already spent on repair works and on providing free alternative bus and shuttle train services at affected stations during the disruption period.
Train services fully resumed on Oct 1, 2024, after six days of repair work.
The following month, LTA announced a decline in the Rail Service Reliability Performance , particularly for the East-West Line (EWL). /TISG
Read also: F&B operators near Buona Vista MRT station said their sales dropped up to 70% amid East-West Line service disruption
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- Straits Times
The rise of Silicon Valley's techno-religion
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The former Rose Garden Inn, now a part of the Lighthaven complex, in Berkeley, California, on May 9, 2025. The Rationalists, a community focused on the risks of artificial intelligence, regularly gather with tech figures and other like-minded people in a complex that covers much of a city block. BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA - In downtown Berkeley, an old hotel has become a temple to the pursuit of artificial intelligence and the future of humanity. Its name is Lighthaven. Covering much of a city block, this gated complex includes five buildings and a small park dotted with rose bushes, stone fountains and neoclassical statues. Stained-glass windows glisten on the top floor of the tallest building, called Bayes House after an 18th century mathematician and philosopher. Lighthaven is the de facto headquarters of a group who call themselves the Rationalists. This group has many interests involving mathematics, genetics and philosophy. One of their overriding beliefs is that artificial intelligence (AI) can deliver a better life if it does not destroy humanity first. The Rationalists believe it is up to the people building AI to ensure that it is a force for the greater good. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse Singapore 'I wish I can hear her sing again,' says boyfriend of Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Singapore-made bot amble matchmakes strangers virtually - without profile photos Asia What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Singapore Conditional warning for ex-manager at Mendaki accused of trying to obtain laptop as bribe They were talking about AI risks years before OpenAI created ChatGPT, which brought AI into the mainstream and turned Silicon Valley on its head. Their influence has quietly spread through many tech companies, from industry giants like Google to AI pioneers like OpenAI and Anthropic. Many of the AI world's biggest names – including Dr Shane Legg, a co-founder of Google's DeepMind; Anthropic's chief executive, Dr Dario Amodei; and Dr Paul Christiano, a former OpenAI researcher who now leads safety work at the US Centre for AI Standards and Innovation – have been influenced by Rationalist philosophy. Mr Elon Musk, who runs his own AI company, said that many of the community's ideas align with his own. Mr Musk met his former partner, pop star Grimes, after they made the same cheeky reference to a Rationalist belief called Roko's Basilisk. This elaborate thought experiment argues that when an all-powerful AI arrives, it will punish everyone who has not done everything they can to bring it into existence. But these tech industry leaders stop short of calling themselves Rationalists, often because that label has over the years invited ridicule. The Rationalist community is tightly entwined with the Effective Altruism movement, which aims to remake philanthropy by calculating how many people would benefit from each donation. This form of utilitarianism aims to benefit not just people who are alive today, but all the people who will ever live. Many Effective Altruists (EA) , have decided that the best way to benefit humanity is to protect it from destruction by AI. Rationalists often identify as EAs. And EAs often adopt Rationalist philosophies. Together, these two movements have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into companies, research labs and think - tanks that aim to build AI and ensure its safety. The biggest funders include wealthy tech moguls like Mr Jaan Tallinn, a creator of internet calling service Skype, and M r Dustin Moskovitz, a Facebook co-founder. 'They built a vast, well-funded ecosystem to spread, amplify and validate their ideology,' said Ms Mollie Gleiberman, an anthropologist who has studied the rise of the Rationalists and Effective Altruism. Whether they are right or wrong in their near-religious concerns about AI, the tech industry is reckoning with their beliefs. In late 2023, OpenAI's chief executive Sam Altman, was briefly removed from his job because board members with ties to the Rationalist and EA movements said they could not trust him to build AI for the benefit of humanity. Lighthaven is a physical manifestation of just how much these ideas have suffused Silicon Valley and the San Francisco Bay Area – a modern day temple. The main building, called Aumann Hall, after Israeli game theorist Robert Aumann, offers seven bedrooms and multiple common areas for parties and weekend conferences. Eigenspace, named for an esoteric mathematical concept, includes a gym and another communal area large enough for 40 people. Two hundred people can fan out across the synthetic grass-covered park, which also has chairs and electric fire pits. 'It's a place where serendipity can happen. Some people liken it to a college campus or the MIT Media Lab,' said Mr Alex K. Chen, a long-time member of the community, referring to the design lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Each spring, Lighthaven hosts LessOnline, a conference where bloggers and commenters from Rationalist websites meet in person. Every Tuesday at 6.30pm, almost like a Bible study, people gather to read and discuss The Sequences, the urtext that gave rise to the movement. 'Religion is text and story and ritual,' said Dr Ilia Delio, a Franciscan sister and professor of theology at Villanova University. 'All of that applies here.' The Rationalist movement is a lifestyle as much as a set of ideas. The adherents have mixed their focus on AI with advice for how to live your life and manage your career. The community embraces unconventional ideas, including polyamory and the genetics of intelligence as well as Effective Altruism, which is also a lifestyle. And for aspirational AI developers, Rationalist events have become essential networking opportunities. Gatherings like the Machine Learning Alignment and Theory Scholars (Mats) program me , hosted at Lighthaven each summer, are a more important way of getting into the field of AI safety than academia, said Ms Sonia Joseph, an AI researcher at McGill University in Montreal and tech giant Meta. The Rationalists emerged in the late 2000s when an online philosopher named Eliezer Yudkowsky wrote The Sequences, a collection of essays that taught people to re-examine the world through cold and careful thought. This often involved using statistics and probability to inform their decisions. Part tutorial, part entertainment, part mystic journey, Mr Yudkowsky's essays became a manual for the Rationalist community. In 2010, Mr Yudkowsky introduced the founders of a British AI company called DeepMind to venture capitalist Peter Thiel, helping to get their company off the ground. Less than four years later, DeepMind was acquired by Google for $650 million (S$837.3 million) . Now its technology and executives are leading the tech giant's AI efforts. Mr Yudkowsky also ran a nonprofit dedicated to AI safety called the Machine Intelligence Research Institute in Berkeley. Slowly, the movement went global. Rationalist group houses appeared in cities like New York and Boston. Meetings were held in Britain, the Netherlands and Australia. The first international Effective Altruism summit was held in 2013 at a group house in Oakland, California, that served as the live-in headquarters for Leverage Research, a startup with deep ties to the Rationalist community. Leading figures in the Rationalist community like Mr Yudkowsky and Mr Tallinn helped guide the EA movement toward their shared concerns about artificial intelligence. Criticism of the Rationalist and EA movements has been frequent, including claims of sexual harassment in group houses and complaints about the community's interest in eugenics and race science. The community's reputation was damaged in 2023 after Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of cryptocurrency exchange FTX, who was one of the primary financial backers of the two movements, was convicted of fraud. But the movement continues to prosper. Bankman-Fried had become a financial trader to benefit the most people through EA causes, including the fight to keep AI safe. In the end, he was found guilty of stealing $8 billion from his customers. 'When you think about the billions at stake and the radical transformation of lives across the world because of the eccentric vision of this group, how much more cult-y does it have to be for this to be a cult? Not much,' said Mr Greg M. Epstein, a Harvard chaplain who saw the rise of the Rationalist and EA communities at the university over the past decade and the author of 'Tech Agnostic', a book that discusses technology as a new religion. 'What do cultish and fundamentalist religions often do?' Mr Epstein added. 'They get people to ignore their common sense about problems in the here and now in order to focus their attention on some fantastical future.' Each December, hundreds from the community gather in places like the Chabot planetarium in the Oakland Hills and the Freight and Salvage music hall in downtown Berkeley for an annual holiday tradition. They celebrate the Winter Solstice, the longest night of the year, with songs, stories, humour and questions about the fate of the world. The most recent celebration opened with a song called Uplift, which praised the power of technology throughout human history. Backed by guitar, violin and keyboards, two singers began in the Stone Age and finished in the future. 'Light to push the sails, read the data, cities glow! Hands type the keys, click the mouse, out we go!' they sang. 'Our voices carry 'round the world and into space! Send us out to colonise another place!' But Mr Ozy Brennan, a long-time Bay Area Rationalist who served as master of ceremonies that night, warned of clouds ahead. 'We face a number of threats our ancestors couldn't have imagined: nuclear war, bioengineered pandemics, artificial intelligence,' he said. 'If we fail – and there is every chance we might – 100 per cent of the children will die, and so will everyone else.' Lighthaven's main building, a Tudor-style home with a pink-and-white facade, was built in 1905. In the 1970s, it became a bed-and-breakfast called the Rose Garden Inn and soon joined Berkeley's list of historic landmarks. About three years ago, the property was purchased for US $16.5 million by a company called Lightcone Rose Garden, according to property records. The company was owned by Lightcone Infrastructure, which runs LessWrong, the primary online home of the Rationalists. 'Light cone' is a physics term the Rationalists and the EAs often used to describe the volume of future events they can influence from the current point in time. Now, Lightcone runs Lighthaven, too. The staff that oversees the property includes Mr Ray Arnold, who organised the first Secular Solstice. It was purchased with money from two of the community's biggest funders: Mr Tallinn and Bankman-Fried, according to a legal complaint. The funds from Bankman-Fried, which were used as a deposit, were later returned as part of a court settlement. Outsiders are not always allowed into Lighthaven. Mr Oliver Habryka, the head of Lightcone, declined a request from The New York Times to tour the facility. Last year, Ms Joseph, the McGill and Meta researcher, spent the summer at Lighthaven after being accepted into the Mats programme . Now almost 30, Ms Joseph discovered the Rationalist community as a 14-year-old, when she started reading Harry Potter And The Methods Of Rationality . In the 660,000-word serialised novel, also written by Yudkowsky, Harry Potter refuses to accept the world of wizardry on blind faith, leaning instead on the laws of philosophy, science and rational thinking. It, too, attracted hundreds of people to the community. 'It attracts outsiders,' Ms Joseph said. 'If you are a gay kid in Kansas who is getting no support from religion, you might discover Harry Potter And The Methods Of Rationality and find a community that is really accepting.' Like LessWrong, Mats can be an on-ramp to jobs at AI companies. Applicants to the programme are often chosen by top AI researchers at companies like Anthropic. But for Ms Joseph and others, the programme is more than just a career move. Looking back on her summer at Lighthaven, she remembered the roses and stone cherubs that lined the path to a three- storey building with stained-glass windows. She remembered the glistening mirror at the bottom of the stairs that evoked Harry Potter And The Methods Of Rationality . She remembered the sign on a locked door that read: 'Eliezer Yudkowsky's Office'. 'All of this feels mythic,' she said. 'Even the non-Rationalist scientists find this compelling – the same way the Manhattan Project was compelling. We want to work on something mythic.' NYTIMES
CNA
39 minutes ago
- CNA
Two men charged over GST fraud involving S$181 million in allegedly fake sales
SINGAPORE: Two men were charged in court on Tuesday (Aug 5) over their alleged involvement in Goods and Services Tax (GST) "missing trader fraud", involving about S$181 million (US$140 million) in fictitious sales. Missing trader fraud happens when a seller collects GST from sales but does not pay the tax to Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). The seller is known as the missing trader. Meanwhile, businesses further down the supply chain continue to claim refunds from IRAS for the GST paid on their purchases. Derrick Yeo Wei Kin, 40, and Yeo Kian Huat, 73, are believed to have set up four shell companies and used them to operate a fraudulent business between November 2017 and April 2018. It is not clear if the men are related. According to a police statement, the men allegedly sold goods from one company to the other companies at inflated prices amounting to about S$181 million. The sales and purchases among the companies are believed to be sham transactions created to allow the men to claim GST from IRAS. The younger Yeo allegedly submitted three fraudulent GST refund claims to IRAS in an attempt to cheat the authority into disbursing S$11.8 million. He also allegedly forged a supplier's invoice and submitted it to IRAS so that the authority would approve the GST registration application of one of the shell companies. He also purportedly made fraudulent GST refund claims under the electronic tourist refund scheme by deceiving IRAS into disbursing GST cash refunds of more than $140,000 when there were no such purchases under the scheme. The two Singaporeans received four charges each of fraudulent trading under the Companies Act. Asked for their position on the charges, the younger Yeo said: "I'm not guilty". The older Yeo said he would be "claiming trial". The men were unrepresented and the younger Yeo has several other charges already tendered against him before this development. The cases were adjourned for pre-trial conferences.
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
LTA clears the air on cross-border e-hailing: Only licensed taxis, not Grab-style services
SINGAPORE: Singapore's Land Transport Authority (LTA) has clarified that it has no intention of fully liberalising cross-border ride-hailing services between Singapore and Malaysia, dispelling speculation raised in recent Malaysian media reports. The authority's statement on Aug 3, reported by Channel News Asia (CNA), follows discussions held between Singapore and Malaysian officials on Aug 1 regarding cross-border transport arrangements. While the possibility of enabling e-hailing platforms to operate across the Causeway was raised during the bilateral meeting, the LTA confirmed that no decision has been made. 'While we are open to ideas to improve the cross-border commuting experience, we would like to clarify that LTA has no plan to fully liberalise cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services,' the authority said in its statement. Licensed taxis to remain the backbone of cross-border services Instead of extending services to ride-hailing giants like Grab, Singapore is focusing on improving existing cross-border taxi arrangements. Under the current scheme, up to 200 licensed taxis from each side are permitted to ferry passengers between Singapore and Johor Bahru. However, these taxis are only allowed to pick up and drop off passengers at one designated point in the other country, Ban San Street Terminal for Malaysian taxis and Larkin Sentral for Singapore taxis. LTA noted that the full quota of cross-border taxis is not currently being maximised, and it is encouraging full take-up to better meet commuter demand. In tandem, it is considering expanding the number of boarding and alighting points in both countries, as well as integrating ride-hailing platforms for booking these licensed taxi services. These steps, according to LTA, are aimed at enhancing convenience without upending the regulated framework that protects the interests of local taxi and private hire drivers. Johor's proposal for on-demand transport not yet agreed upon Reports in Malaysia, including The Malay Mail , suggested that Johor and Singapore were considering the launch of a cross-border e-hailing service. Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi stated that such a service could provide more flexible transport options and help ease congestion, as quoted by CNA . However, the LTA made it clear that any changes to the cross-border point-to-point transport regime would require mutual agreement between both governments; the existing taxi scheme operates on a reciprocal basis, and no decision has been made with finality for now. Read related: Johor and Singapore explore cross-border e-hailing to ease congestion Open for future discussions Despite this stance, however, LTA's openness to using ride-hailing apps for licensed taxis and to revisiting this discussion shows a pragmatic middle ground: embracing technology without dismantling the structure of the existing scheme. In short, Grab-style cross-border rides remain off the table for now, but slow and measured changes to improve convenience are on the horizon. This would be possible as long as they fit within a regulated and reciprocal framework. Read also: Singapore to review Malaysia's request to start cross-border buses earlier
