
Putin stages major war games on NATO's doorstep as submarine fires torpedoes at mock Western ship and Russia vows to conduct 'dozens' more naval drills this summer
Footage shows the dictator's warships practising military drills in the Baltic Sea - a major area of contention between NATO and Russia.
The ships trained to counter marine drones and unmanned planes during the first of 'dozens' of drills promised by the dictator's navy this summer.
In one exercise, a diesel submarine fired torpedoes at a mock Western ship and, in another, 30-mm AK-630 automatic rifles were used against 'floating mines'.
The current display of power involves 20 warships and support vessels, 25 aircraft and helicopters, and 3,000 service personnel.
The war games involve Russia's Baltic and North fleets with support from Aerospace Forces from Moscow and Leningrad military districts and 70 units of 'military and special equipment'.
A key aim of the Putin drills is to train for 'defence of naval bases' in a sea where Russia and NATO compete for sway, according to the Baltic Fleet.
Russia has access to the Baltic via Leningrad and Kaliningrad regions - but no less than eight NATO states front the sea.
The ships trained to counter marine drones and unmanned planes during the first of 'dozens' of drills promised by the dictator's navy this summer
In a direct warning to the West, the fleet's military council said its forces 'will participate in more that several dozen exercises on various tracks in the summer period'.
A statement said: 'The efforts of the Baltic Fleet will be focused on securing the naval interests of the Russian Federation in the Baltic sea zone.'
The sea is the focus of increasing tension between the West and Putin's burgeoning military machine.
Estonia this month attempted to seize a Russian-bound oil tanker suspected of circumventing Western sanctions.
In retaliation, Russia detained a Greek-owned oil tanker that had recently left an Estonian port, escalating maritime tensions in the region.
Finland and Estonia have reported recent airspace violations by Putin's warplanes and Polish fighters intercepted a Russian Su-24 bomber performing 'dangerous' manoeuvres in international airspace over the Baltic Sea.
Last month RAF Typhoons were scrambled from Malbork Air Base in Poland to intercept Russian military aircraft, including an Ilyushin Il-20M surveillance plane and two Su-30MKI fighters, approaching NATO airspace.
There is also acute concern among NATO members over the security of undersea internet and communications cables, with the alliance launching Operation Baltic Sentry in January to enhance surveillance and protection.
But Russia suffered a setback in Ukraine - with its newest powerful Dan-N jet drone destroyed by a missile system developed Ukrainian military intelligence.
Footage shows the moment of destruction in the Odesa direction by a mobile anti-aircraft missile system equipped with R-73 missiles.
Separately, Ukraine also conducted a sabotage operation more than 6,200 miles from its territory in Desantnaya Bay, Vladivostok, triggering explosions at the 155th Marine Brigade of the Pacific Fleet of the Russian Navy.
Ukraine accused the bridge of mass war crimes, notably executions, including beheadings, torture in locations which as Bucha and Irpin.
Two explosions of military equipment near Vladivostok led to a massive military and 'anti-terrorist' operation on Friday.
Helicopters were scrambled over Desantnaya Bay near Vladivostok, with a major operation by the FSB secret service, military officers, anti-terrorism specialists, ambulances and police.
In the wake of the explosions two trucks removed 'large objects covered with tarpaulin' under military guard.
Russia has not informed its residents about the Ukrainian operation on its Pacific coast, instead telling people gas cylinders exploded in a car, an explanation widely mocked on social media.
In Russia's latest strikes on civilians, a girl, nine, was killed in Zaporizhzhia region, while a 16 year old was wounded.
'These are the consequences of the enemy attack on the frontline village of the Pologovsky district,' said Ukrainian official Ivan Fedorov.
'The Russians hit residential buildings with [aerial bombs].
'One house was destroyed.'
A 66-year-old mangas killed in Russian shelling of Kherson overnight.
In Rylsk, Kursk region, Ukraine reportedly hit a hotel where Russian military personnel were billeted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil rises 1% on stalled Russia-Ukraine peace talks, strong US demand
NEW YORK/LONDON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose by nearly a dollar a barrel on Thursday as Russia and Ukraine blamed each other for a stalled peace process, and as earlier U.S. data showed signs of strong demand in the top oil consuming nation. Brent crude futures were up 85 cents, or about 1.3%, at $67.69 a barrel at 1:42 p.m. EDT (1742 GMT), having hit a two-week high earlier in the session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 86 cents, or 1.4%, at $63.57 a barrel. Both contracts climbed more than 1% in the prior session. The path to peace in Ukraine remained uncertain, turning oil traders cautious after a selloff over the past two weeks on hopes that U.S. President Donald Trump would soon negotiate a diplomatic end to Russia's war with its neighbor. Both Moscow and Kyiv have since blamed each other for stalling the peace process. Russia on Thursday launched a major air attack near Ukraine's border with the European Union, while Ukraine claimed to have hit a Russian oil refinery. "Some geopolitical risk premium is slowly being pumped back into the market," oil trading advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates told clients on Thursday. The uncertainty in the peace talks means that the possibility of tighter sanctions on Russia has resurfaced, said Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates. Oil prices were also supported by a larger-than-expected drawdown from U.S. crude stockpiles in the last week, indicating strong demand. U.S. crude stockpiles fell 6 million barrels in the week ended August 15, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported on Wednesday, while analysts had expected a draw of 1.8 million barrels. "These tight domestic stockpiles stand in contrast to the oversupply outlook projected by both the IEA and EIA for 2026, challenging traders' broader market expectations," StoneX analyst Alex Hodes told clients. Investors were also looking to the Jackson Hole economic conference in Wyoming for signals on a possible Fed interest rate cut next month. The annual gathering of central bankers begins on Thursday, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell scheduled to speak on Friday.

The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
We must support Ukrainians in their resistance against invasion
What is completely absent from Mark Brown's piece is any sense of agency of the people of Ukraine, who he presents as the helpless victims of big-power politics. As in all modern conflicts, big-power politics do indeed play a role in Ukraine – but to deny the Ukrainian people any voice, as he does, is simply to reproduce the discourse of imperialism. READ MORE: David Pratt: Diplomacy is welcome but we must listen to what Ukraine wants The alternative is to support the people of Ukraine in their quest for self-determination, and in their resistance against Russian invasion. This calls for practical solidarity with Ukrainian civil society, and for military support if requested by Ukraine. Nato's expansion after the demise of the Soviet Union is no reason to turn our backs on Ukraine's people now. We have been here before, many times. For example, while one of the causes of World War Two was the imperialist carve-up of the Versailles Treaty after World War One, this did not invalidate support for the anti-fascist resistance in Europe, including the supply of weapons from Britain to the resistance in France, Norway and Yugoslavia. Readers of The National will need no convincing that the people of Scotland have the right to self-determination. But that right does not stop at Gretna: it applies to all nations, not least to Palestine and to Ukraine. In Scotland many organisations, such as Ukraine Solidarity Campaign Scotland ( are building that grass-roots solidarity. Join them if you can. Paddy Farrington Edinburgh I HAVE been involved in campaigning for LGBTQ+ equality in Scotland for 38 years and counting, and I really must protest at the counter-factual nonsense in Jim Taylor's letter of August 21. Trans people have been part of the campaign since it started. As a public example, in 1988 I was one of the organisers of Scotland's first ever Pride-style event, the Lark in the Park festival in Princes Street Gardens, protesting the introduction of Section 28. It was compered throughout by the excellent Fay Presto, the UK's first openly trans professional magician. Mr Taylor could google the Compton's and Stonewall riots of the 1960s, or the work of Magnus Hirschfeld in the early 20th century, to see earlier examples. READ MORE: Duolingo apologises after German app calls JK Rowling 'cruel' Mr Taylor goes on to write that the Gender Recognition Reform Bill should have been subject to a manifesto offer. It was! It was proposed in the SNP's manifesto for the 2021 Holyrood election (on page 33), and also in the Labour one (page 98), the LibDems' (page 51), and the Green manifesto (page 81). Unsurprisingly, therefore, the bill was introduced a year after that election, and was passed by 86 votes to 39. That's democracy! Had it not been for the profoundly anti-democratic use of Section 35 by the Westminster Tories, we would now have a de-medicalised statutory declaration system for gender recognition like that of our neighbours in Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Denmark and other countries. Needless to say, in none of those countries have the negative consequences predicted by the Tories and Mr Taylor come to pass. Tim Hopkins Edinburgh BRILLIANT letters in Thursday's edition by James Murphy and Jim Taylor in response to Ron Lumiere's. Jim Butchart via email RETURNING from holiday, I'm catching up on some articles I missed while away. After reading Kyle Renton's Long Letter on August 2 (It's Scots who should be telling stories about country's cultures and traditions), I read the Seven Days article of August 3 by Barbara Henderson about Andrew de Moray (The Invisible Man). In what was an informative article, there were a few word choices which made me think back to Kyle's letter: • John Balliol 'defied' Edward – surely as king of an independent country, John Balliol had to make the right decision for the people of Scotland, not necessarily to join England's wars? • The use of 'rebel' in relation to Andrew de Moray and William Wallace is also a strange choice. Rebelling against an invading force, or defending their homeland and fighting to preserve its independence? Having read Barbara's biography, she is certainly doing some wonderful work, but in this case, some more appropriate wording would have been more accurate. Steve Smart Newmachar, Aberdeenshire


Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
Promise of NATO-style security guarantees for Ukraine may be too good to be true
It all sounded so promising: A NATO-style mutual defence guarantee for Ukraine, provided by the US, and agreed to by Vladimir Putin. That was supposedly the concession won by Donald Trump during his summit with the Russian president in Alaska. US special envoy Steve Witkoff described the apparent breakthrough as "game-changing". But it seems it may be too good to be true. Because judging by the comments from Moscow since then, nothing has changed whatsoever. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov described the current discussions about future security guarantees for Ukraine as a "road to nowhere". And now, "hopeless". On both occasions, the veteran diplomat made it clear that the only security guarantee Russia is willing to accept is one that involves them, referring each time to a proposal put forward by Moscow at talks with Kyiv in 2022. Under those terms, Russia would be among a group of guarantors, along with China, and would have an effective veto over any efforts to defend Ukraine. It was a non-starter for Kyiv then, and it still is now. But the Kremlin knows this. I think it's a proposal that's designed to be rejected, so that Russia can continue its attempts to portray Ukraine as the barrier to peace, and try to distance Trump from Europe. "[Ukraine is] not interested in a sustainable, fair, long-term settlement," Lavrov said in Moscow, while also accusing Europe of "undermining" the "progress" made in Alaska. But the only progress appears to be circular - there's plenty of movement, but it's going nowhere, like a hamster stuck in a wheel. The same goes for the potential meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Putin. At the start of the week, Trump claimed the two sides were "setting it up", but Moscow still has its caveats. "Our president has repeatedly said that he is ready to meet," Lavrov said, "with the understanding that all issues…are worked out". Moscow claims Zelenskyy is an illegitimate leader, and Russia's foreign minister hinted that he would need to be re-elected before any peace deal is signed, and before a presidential summit is held. So, despite the Trump administration's optimism that a peace deal is within reach, it is clear that two of the fundamental stumbling blocks remain.