logo
‘Overly harsh': Backlash after Chinese university expels female student over alleged liaison with Ukrainian gamer

‘Overly harsh': Backlash after Chinese university expels female student over alleged liaison with Ukrainian gamer

CNAa day ago
DALIAN: A university student in China has been expelled for her suspected liaison with a former Ukrainian professional esports player, igniting fierce debate over whether the punishment was excessive, and whether her privacy was violated by being named and publicly shamed in a school notice and subsequent media coverage.
Dalian Polytechnic University in Liaoning province published the expulsion notice on its website on Jul 8, fully naming the female student, who is surnamed Li.
'Your inappropriate behavior on December 16, 2024, has caused a severe negative impact,' read the notice issued by the school's student affairs office.
'You are hereby subject to expulsion from our university,' it said.
In December, former Ukrainian esports player Danylo Teslenko, known as Zeus, claimed in a video to his fan group that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with a Chinese girl, who was allegedly Li, according to China Daily.
The university cited disciplinary regulations stating that students who engage in improper relationships with foreigners that undermine national dignity and the school's reputation may face a demerit or more serious disciplinary action, depending on the circumstances, as reported by the Global Times.
The university's announcement went viral on Chinese social media, stirring up fierce debate over Li's privacy and public shaming.
The hashtag 'disciplined student should not be publicly shamed' has been one of the top trending topics on the Sina Weibo microblogging site, with article shares and threads garnering over 57 million views.
'The decision to expel is overly harsh and unjustified and also raises concerns about abuse of authority,' wrote a Weibo user with the handle tintinwt23 in a comment that drew thousands of likes.
Others noted how Li's image still remained online, with her identity 'plastered across the internet'.
Weibo user Ono's melon field, said that while Li's actions were wrong, the school's decision to expel her remained questionable.
'If having improper relations with a foreigner undermines national dignity and the school's reputation, what about having improper relations with a Chinese national?'
Others noted how there was far less backlash surrounding the 38-year-old Teslenko and said publicly shaming Li for the incident was akin to being 'paraded on the streets'.
'Anger is being unfairly directed to the wrong person,' a Weibo user said.
The Paper, a digital newspaper from Shanghai, said that while Li was an 'imperfect' victim amid accusations, her behaviour did not warrant expulsion according to official clauses under Chinese higher education law.
Citing China's Civil Code, which protects citizens' personal data, Global Times said there was 'unlawful disclosure' of Li's private details.
'The current frenzy of sharing her intimate footage and personal data far exceeds the reasonable consequence she should bear for her misconduct,' it added.
Some users have also lashed out at mainstream media coverage deemed to be insensitive.
'(These outlets) talk about privacy, have they cared about the person's privacy? Let's not talk about independent outlets, some mainstream outlets have named her openly,' the user, going by the handle xiping junyushi, wrote on Weibo.
'Now that (these media outlets) have earned enough views and internet traffic, they're u-turning to talk about privacy, where's the shame?'
In posts to his X account on Sunday, Teslenko said that there was 'no explicit content or anything disrespectful' in videos he posted with Li.
He clarified that he was not married or in a relationship and refuted speculation about him having a wife or children.
'The only unfortunate thing is that the girl never mentioned she had a boyfriend,' said Teslenko.
Teslenko said he has since deleted the videos, adding that he 'never meant to hurt anyone'. He also appealed to people to 'stop the hate' and said everybody makes mistakes - and that he had learnt from his.
'At the time, it felt like just a normal moment from life. I didn't (realise how it) could affect someone's personal situation.'
'Later I found out the girl was in a relationship and she faced a lot of hate because of it. I truly regret that things turned out this way.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beijing reaffirms normalisation of ties with EU ahead of July summit
Beijing reaffirms normalisation of ties with EU ahead of July summit

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Beijing reaffirms normalisation of ties with EU ahead of July summit

Find out what's new on ST website and app. FILE PHOTO: EU and Chinese flags are seen in this illustration taken, March 20, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo BEIJING - China reaffirmed on Wednesday that it is normalising ties with the European Parliament, as Beijing seeks to forge closer economic and political ties with Brussels amid flaring global trade frictions. "In recent years, exchanges between Chinese and European legislative bodies have encountered some setbacks due to well-known reasons," China's foreign ministry said, referring to disputes over alleged human rights abuses in the Xinjiang region. "Under current circumstances, both sides believe it is very important for China and Europe to strengthen dialogue and cooperation," spokesperson Lin Jian said, adding that Beijing and the European Parliament had decided to lift all restrictions on mutual exchanges of lawmakers. The comments by China's foreign ministry came after the South China Morning Post reported that Beijing had removed "restrictions" on former EU lawmaker Reinhard Buetikofer sanctioned in 2021. The normalisation of ties was first confirmed by both the European Parliament and Beijing earlier this year. Wednesday's remarks also came ahead of a China-EU leaders' summit slated for later this month when the EU's Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa are expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang in Beijing. In March 2021, China blacklisted 10 EU individuals and four entities in response to Brussels' sanctions against Chinese officials for human rights abuses in Xinjiang. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA Singapore Strong argument for cockpit video recording, says Iata chief in wake of Air India crash report Singapore Here comes the sun: Less rain, more warm days in second half of July Asia Former deputy minister seen as surprise front runner for Malaysia's next Chief Justice: Sources Singapore Baby died after mum took abortion pills and gave birth in toilet; coroner records an open verdict Business Tycoon Robert Kuok's daughter Kuok Hui Kwong appointed CEO of Shangri-La Asia Singapore Acute psychiatry services to be expanded across all healthcare clusters: MOH Singapore New network links Home Team psychologists, mental health bodies to boost emergency response Buetikofer, a German politician who chaired the European Parliament's delegation to China at the time, was among those sanctioned, barred from entering China or doing business with it. Beijing had accused those sanctioned of seriously harming the country's sovereignty and interests over Xinjiang. REUTERS

China hands 3-1/2-year prison sentence to Astellas' Japanese employee, Nikkei says
China hands 3-1/2-year prison sentence to Astellas' Japanese employee, Nikkei says

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

China hands 3-1/2-year prison sentence to Astellas' Japanese employee, Nikkei says

Find out what's new on ST website and app. TOKYO - A Beijing court on Wednesday sentenced a Japanese employee of Astellas Pharma to 3-1/2 years in prison, the Nikkei newspaper reported, citing the Japanese ambassador to China. The man had been detained since March 2023 on suspicion of spying and had been indicted about a year ago. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday that the country's judicial authorities handle cases in accordance with the law, when asked a question about a Beijing court sentencing an employee of a Japanese pharmaceutical company to prison for espionage. The question did not name the company. China has always supported China-Japan economic and trade cooperation, and provides a good environment for the lawful operations of Japanese enterprises and personnel in China, Lin told a regular press briefing. REUTERS

Woman trailed to Pilates class by stranger with phone, netizens debate legality
Woman trailed to Pilates class by stranger with phone, netizens debate legality

Independent Singapore

time8 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

Woman trailed to Pilates class by stranger with phone, netizens debate legality

SINGAPORE: In a current viral Reddit post, a young woman narrated a troubling happenstance: a man she didn't know and had never seen before trailed her all the way to her Pilates class, with a camera phone in hand, purportedly taking photos of her. She labelled him as a 'pervert,' distressed by the fact that even in a public space, she felt anything but safe. But the story didn't end with her embarrassment. In the comment section of that Reddit post, there was a torrent not just of empathy, but of piercing discussions, legal opinions, and painful truths about how people navigate shared spaces in the era of smartphones. 'It's legal – but is it right?' A repeated theme from netizens was this: taking photos of people in public, while scary, isn't prohibited. 'As vile or repulsive as one may find it, taking photos of others in a public space is not an offence,' one user said. 'It's a big stretch to prove harassment.' Legally speaking, they're correct. In most territories, the right to privacy doesn't cover public situations. If someone's out in the open, photos can be taken of them, whether they're aware of it or not, or if they are comfortable with it. That reality was unsettling to many readers, particularly in a situation where a woman feels followed and objectified. 'Imagine you're just using your phone and someone thinks your angle looks suspicious—and suddenly people pin you down,' another commenter remarked, alluding to that the man in question was confronted physically. 'Those guys are lucky they didn't get charged.' When behaviour crosses a line However, others were quick to point out that there's a difference between taking a photo in a leisurely manner and following someone around. 'This is textbook stalking,' a commenter stressed. 'Nobody should be alarmed if they had their photo taken by a stranger in public. But if that stranger starts following them around, anybody would feel threatened.' There certainly is a key difference. While the law might not plainly outline this grey zone, informally and ethically speaking, the responses were far more unified. Trailing someone for a long period alters a permissible act into one of danger. One user even questioned why the man hadn't been detained, saying that constant following could be viewed as aggravation and harassment in many other legal systems. Freedom of expression or lack of respect? Another aspect of the conversation spun around clothes and permission, a theme as old as the public decorum dispute itself. Some contended that if a woman is donning form-fitting clothes in public, she tacitly invites attention. 'The same liberty that allows you to dress how you want,' one person claimed, 'also extends to others being able to photograph you.' Another commenter chimed in, 'If you don't think your outfit is too sexual, then the photos of it shouldn't be either.' But many discussants were quick to call this reasoning defective and risky. The notion that someone's clothing choices one way or another reduce their right to feel safe is a fragment of a bigger societal problem, one that has long beleaguered discussions about consent. 'There's a difference between looking and leering, between existing and stalking,' one netizen snapped. 'Not her fault, but…' – A troubling perspective As anticipated in situations like this, some remarks faintly deviated into victim-blaming. One user wrote: 'Not blaming her for her dressing or anything, but it's not an offence to take pictures. So, I don't get what she's so upset about.' Another weighed in, 'If this keeps happening to her, maybe she's unlucky—or maybe she's drawing attention with how she dresses.' Such views, while often outlined as concern or reason, echo a societal inclination to place responsibility on women to foil wicked actions from others, instead of holding the wrongdoers liable. The bigger picture This Reddit thread mirrors more than just one person's bad day. It's a picture of a society grappling with the restrictions of what is legal and what is decent, amidst the changing standards of a digital world. Yes, public spaces are shared, and yes, people have the right to take pictures of what they see. But when the camera lens turns into an instrument for terrorisation, or when people feel panic-stricken rather than observed, the conversation needs to shift.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store