logo
Conclave to select new pope begins at Sistine Chapel

Conclave to select new pope begins at Sistine Chapel

Perth Now07-05-2025

Catholic cardinals who will choose the next pope have filed into the Sistine Chapel, before locking themselves away from the world to elect the man they hope can unite a diverse but divided global Church.
In a ritual dating back to medieval times, 133 cardinal electors - including Australia's Ukraine-born Cardinal Mykola Bychok - will take an oath of perpetual secrecy under the gaze of the stern Christ depicted in Michelangelo's Last Judgement fresco, which adorns the chapel.
They will then hold their first ballot looking for a successor to Pope Francis, who died last month.
No pope has been elected on the first day of a conclave for centuries and voting could continue for several days before one man receives the necessary two-thirds majority to become the 267th pontiff.
There will be only one ballot on Wednesday. Thereafter, there can be as many as four votes a day.
The cardinals walked slowly into the chapel, taking part in a solemn Latin chant called the litany of the saints.
They beseeched nearly 100 men and women believed to reside in heaven to pray for them as they prepare to make what arguably will be the most momentous decision of their lives.
After the cardinals have pronounced their oath, Archbishop Diego Ravelli, the Vatican's master of ceremonies, will pronounce the Latin command "Extra omnes!" (Everyone out!), telling all those not involved in the gathering to leave.
The chapel's heavy wooden doors will then slam shut.
The only expected signal from the cardinals during the conclave will come in the form of smoke from a chimney atop the chapel, as the clerics burn their ballots.
Black smoke will mark an inconclusive vote; white smoke and the pealing of bells will signal that the 1.4-billion-member Church has a new leader.
At a Mass in St Peter's Basilica on Wednesday before entering the conclave, the cardinals prayed that God would help them find a pope who would exercise "watchful care" over the world.
In a sermon, Italian Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re told his peers they must set aside "every personal consideration" in choosing the new pontiff and keep in mind "only ... the good of the Church and of humanity".
Cardinals in recent days have offered different assessments of what they are looking for in the next pope.
While some have called for continuity with Francis' vision of greater openness and reform, others have said they want to turn the clock back and embrace traditions. Many have indicated they want a more predictable, measured pontificate.
A record 133 cardinals from 70 countries were expected to enter the Sistine Chapel, up from 115 from 48 nations in the last conclave in 2013 - growth that reflects Francis' efforts to extend the reach of the Church.
No clear favourite has emerged, although Italian Cardinal Pietro Parolin and Filipino Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle are considered the front-runners.
However, if it quickly becomes obvious that neither can win, votes are likely to shift to other contenders, with the electors possibly coalescing around geography, doctrinal affinity or common languages.
Among other potential candidates are France's Jean-Marc Aveline, Hungary's Peter Erdo, American Robert Prevost and Italy's Pierbattista Pizzaballa.
Re, who is 91 and cannot take part in the conclave, suggested the cardinals should look for a pope who respected the Church's diversity. "Unity does not mean uniformity, but a firm and profound communion in diversity," he said in his sermon.
The average length of the last 10 conclaves was just over three days and none went on for more than five days. The last conclave, in 2013, lasted just two days.
The cardinals will be looking to wrap things up quickly again this time to avoid giving the impression they are divided or that the Church is adrift.
Some 80 per cent of the cardinal electors were appointed by Francis, increasing the possibility that his successor will in some way continue his progressive policies despite strong pushback from traditionalists.
Among their considerations will be whether they should seek a pope from the global south where congregations are growing, as they did in 2013 with Francis, from Argentina, hand back the reins to Europe or even pick a first US pope.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why the biggest threat to women's sport isn't testosterone
Why the biggest threat to women's sport isn't testosterone

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Why the biggest threat to women's sport isn't testosterone

We've seen it play out repeatedly. If you dare to say biological men don't belong in women's sports then prepare for the pile on. If you speak a truth that many quietly acknowledge but hesitate to voice, you risk being labelled a bigot and transphobic much like author JK Rowling. The biggest threat to women's sport isn't testosterone. It's cowardice. And no 'authority' exemplifies that better than the International Olympic Committee. Newly leaked medical results show Olympic boxer Imane Khelif does in fact have the male chromosome XY. Her Italian opponent Angela Carini didn't just lose her 2024 match - she was pummelled out of the boxing ring by Khelif. It was deeply disturbing to watch. Mid-fight at the Paris Olympics, Carini raised her hand and returned to her corner after a barrage of heavy punches from Khelif who landed a devastating right to her nose in the opening seconds. Carini later said she quit to 'safeguard my life', while Ms Khelif went on to win gold. Khelif failed a gender eligibility test a year earlier. After the recently leaked test was conducted the IOC waved off any XY issue as nonsense and green-lit her anyway for female events in the Paris Games last year. What it means is that the IOC, once revered as the bastion of sporting fairness, chose obfuscation and outright gaslighting. These bureaucrats dismissed the XY results as 'not legitimate' and 'ad hoc' with a bizarre allegation that the test itself might have been a disinformation ruse by Russia. Khelif, now 26, has always asserted she's female but the science revealed a more complicated picture and one the IOC chose to ignore. You can well imagine them fretting at their Lausanne HQ in that glorious pocket of Switzerland, heaving with wealthy, leisurely folk and perched next to shimmering Lake Geneva. Better to hit the Kremlin panic button when faced with a scientific result they didn't like rather than admit the truth. Better to undermine themselves than risk offending someone. What we have is an IOC which shows feint interest in protecting the rights of female athletes, which is surely 50 per cent of its mission in sport, the other being the rights of male athletes. On its website, it states as mission one: 'The IOC's role is to encourage and support the promotion of ethics and good governance in sport as well as education of youth through sport and to dedicate its efforts to ensuring that, in sport, the spirit of fair play prevails and violence is banned.' The spirit of fair play. Indeed. Equity and safety are the two values sport, especially at a global level, is supposed to uphold. We can have compassion for people with gender dysphoria. We can even debate the need for a separate trans category. But none of that justifies letting biological males into women's sport. World Boxing has this week done what common sense demands by announcing mandatory sex testing for all competitors. A simple cheek swab will determine the presence of the SRY gene which identifies the Y chromosome. No exceptions will be made and that includes Khelif, who won't be stepping into the ring in World Boxing events until she undergoes the required testing. Actual science will now be used to separate men from women. JK Rowling, who says she doesn't call for harassment or exclusion and is a passionate defender of female spaces, described it as a 'win for women'. That's because unlike the Olympic brass, World Boxing has decided it won't let ideology punch women in the face under the guise of inclusion. In the US state of Oregon, two high school track athletes Reese Eckard and Alexa Anderson delivered their own quiet protest. After placing ahead of a trans athlete in the state high jump championships, they stepped off the podium rather than pose alongside someone who, until recently, competed in the boys' category. Again, it wasn't hate. It was a statement. As Ms Anderson later said: 'In order to protect the integrity and fairness of girls' sports, we must stand up for what is right.' Back home, Netball Victoria banned two transgender athletes from their League after video footage surfaced of one trans player colliding with and knocking a female opponent to the ground. Not out of malice but simply due to size, strength and speed. These are advantages that female players, even elite ones, can't realistically match when faced with male physiology. This is a point that is expertly made by Sky News Senior Reporter Caroline Marcus in her excellent documentary 'Fair Game: The Fight for Women's Sport'. The issue isn't to reject anyone's identity but to ensure that identity doesn't overshadow objective reality. The science is settled. The tide is turning. The only thing that's been missing, until recently, is courage. And the IOC needs to swallow a big serve of it. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work.

Leo, the first US Pope, criticises nationalist politics
Leo, the first US Pope, criticises nationalist politics

The Advertiser

timea day ago

  • The Advertiser

Leo, the first US Pope, criticises nationalist politics

Pope Leo has criticised the emergence of nationalist political movements, calling them unfortunate, without naming a specific country or national leader. Leo, the first Pope from the US, asked during a mass with a crowd of tens of thousands in St Peter's Square that God would "open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred". "There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," said the pontiff. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on May 8 to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4-billion-member church. Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticising US President Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about Trump and Vice President JD Vance on X in recent years. The Vatican has not confirmed the new Pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election. Francis, Pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump. The late Pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a "disgrace". Earlier, Francis said Trump was "not Christian" because of his views on immigration. "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016. Leo was celebrating a mass for Pentecost, one of the church's most important holidays. Pope Leo has criticised the emergence of nationalist political movements, calling them unfortunate, without naming a specific country or national leader. Leo, the first Pope from the US, asked during a mass with a crowd of tens of thousands in St Peter's Square that God would "open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred". "There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," said the pontiff. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on May 8 to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4-billion-member church. Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticising US President Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about Trump and Vice President JD Vance on X in recent years. The Vatican has not confirmed the new Pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election. Francis, Pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump. The late Pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a "disgrace". Earlier, Francis said Trump was "not Christian" because of his views on immigration. "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016. Leo was celebrating a mass for Pentecost, one of the church's most important holidays. Pope Leo has criticised the emergence of nationalist political movements, calling them unfortunate, without naming a specific country or national leader. Leo, the first Pope from the US, asked during a mass with a crowd of tens of thousands in St Peter's Square that God would "open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred". "There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," said the pontiff. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on May 8 to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4-billion-member church. Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticising US President Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about Trump and Vice President JD Vance on X in recent years. The Vatican has not confirmed the new Pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election. Francis, Pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump. The late Pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a "disgrace". Earlier, Francis said Trump was "not Christian" because of his views on immigration. "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016. Leo was celebrating a mass for Pentecost, one of the church's most important holidays. Pope Leo has criticised the emergence of nationalist political movements, calling them unfortunate, without naming a specific country or national leader. Leo, the first Pope from the US, asked during a mass with a crowd of tens of thousands in St Peter's Square that God would "open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred". "There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," said the pontiff. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on May 8 to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4-billion-member church. Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticising US President Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about Trump and Vice President JD Vance on X in recent years. The Vatican has not confirmed the new Pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election. Francis, Pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump. The late Pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a "disgrace". Earlier, Francis said Trump was "not Christian" because of his views on immigration. "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016. Leo was celebrating a mass for Pentecost, one of the church's most important holidays.

Albanese need not shy away from his Catholic roots
Albanese need not shy away from his Catholic roots

The Age

time2 days ago

  • The Age

Albanese need not shy away from his Catholic roots

Australian historian Manning Clark described the Australian attitude to spirituality as 'a shy hope in the heart'. We are uncomfortable with overt displays of religiosity or, indeed, strident atheism. For most Australians, to be asked by a stranger (as happens in the US) if they know Jesus as saviour would be cringe-making. This is the cultural context in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who visited the newly installed Pope Leo XIV last month, claimed a strong Catholic heritage, then almost immediately repudiated that by telling journalists his faith played no role in his politics. It seems that Albo's faith is not so much shy as painfully introverted. It scarcely figures in his discourse compared with, say, his struggles growing up with a single mother in a council house. This is not to doubt his personal faith, but to suggest that he is constrained in the public arena. His papal visit and later counter-balancing remarks were carefully calibrated to please – or, at least, appease – both sides of the divide. Catholics are a quarter of the population, and agnostics probably more than half. Many people believe that for a politician to express faith is to betray the separation of church and state. Former PM Tony Abbott particularly suffered this because of his strong public Catholic identity, with one commentator calling him 'Pell's puppet' (a reference to the late Cardinal George Pell, Archbishop of Sydney at the time). Loading This is a terrible misunderstanding. Politicians who are believers cannot help but bring their faith to their work because it shapes their values and convictions. They should and they must. This doesn't mean seeking to advance the cause of religion, but that denying their core convictions would be hypocritical and inauthentic. Further, importantly, this is true not only of Christian politicians. Atheists, agnostics and people of other faiths are equally shaped by their values and convictions, and they owe it to their conscience and constituents to honour these. Those who don't risk becoming venal or corrupt. Philosopher Willard Quine provided a helpful analogy with his web of belief, in which the outer strands are contingent but the innermost and strongest are foundational, first principles that may never even be examined. This applies to all of us.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store