
Constitution Alone is Supreme, Not Parliament, Executive, or Judiciary: CJI Gavai
Nagpur: Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai on Wednesday offered a deeply personal, emotional, and reflective address in Amravati, recounting his journey from modest beginnings to the country's highest judicial office.
"Neither parliament, nor the executive, nor the judiciary is supreme. The Constitution of India alone is supreme, and the judges of higher judiciary are its custodians," he said, reiterating his judicial philosophy grounded in constitutional values, while replying to a grand felicitation by the Amravati District Bar Association, at Swami Vivekanand Auditorium on Wednesday evening.
Justice Gavai spoke of the heavy responsibility that judges bear, reminding that, "A judge can never be guided by what people feel about his judgment.
He is expected to decide according to the Constitution, the law, and his conscience." Emphasising the balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, he added, "In every decision, I have tried to uphold the values of social justice, equality, fraternity, and constitutional morality.
"
Reflecting on the recent Supreme Court ruling on the zudpi jungle issue of Vidarbha, Gavai called it a matter of shelter and livelihood rights.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
Describing his early life, Gavai recalled growing up in a small home with 10-15 family members and how his mother and aunts managed household duties under difficult circumstances. "My grandparents, my mother, my father — they all shaped my understanding of people's problems," he said, adding that he never initially intended to pursue law, having aspired to become an architect.
He credited his father, late RS Gavai — former Governor of Bihar and Kerala, and a staunch Ambedkarite — for influencing his decision to enter the legal profession.
"When my father was taking his LLB exams, he went to jail over a satyagraha, and could never give the exam. He then dedicated his life to public service. It was he who insisted I become a lawyer," Gavai recalled.
He acknowledged the early struggles of his legal career. "I wasn't sure if I would succeed. Many seniors and others stood by me when I needed them the most," he said.
He narrated how, when offered judgeship in 2001, he wrestled with the decision for nearly two years.
"My father told me, if you become a Supreme Court lawyer, you may earn bounty. But if you become a judge, you can help realise Dr Ambedkar's dream of equality. I'm glad I listened to him."
The CJI expressed heartfelt gratitude to his extended family, acknowledging their unwavering support. He thanked his wife and recalled how tough judicial life can be despite the appearance of ease. "People see the red light car, not the 15–16 hours of daily work. A judge must stay true to the Constitution and never be swayed," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Nefarious agenda': India slams Pakistan at UNSC; says it shelled civilians, supports terror
India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish addresses the UN Security Council Open Debate on civilian safety and accountability in conflict zones. NEW DELHI: India on Thursday strongly rejected Pakistan's remarks at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), accusing Islamabad of misusing the platform to push a "nefarious agenda" and deflect attention from its own child rights violations and cross-border terrorism. India's permanent representative to the UN, ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, made a detailed statement during the UNSC's open debate on Children and Armed Conflict (CAAC), responding to Pakistan's comments. "Pakistan is casting unwarranted aspersions over UN processes and also smearing India at various discussions to pursue its nefarious agenda. We reject this attempt by Pakistan to deflect attention from the atrocities committed against children in their country, as highlighted in the Secretary-General's report, as well as their rampant cross-border terrorism," said Harish. He also referred to the April 22 attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, in which 26 tourists were killed, and highlighted India's retaliatory strikes under Operation Sindoor. "The world has not forgotten the targeted attacks by Pakistani and Pakistani-trained terrorists killing 26 tourists in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir on 22 April 2025. The security council had issued a press statement on 25 April which underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organizers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act accountable and bring them to justice. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo India had undertaken non escalatory, proportionate and focused attacks that targeted nine terrorist infrastructure sites on 7 May 2025 in response through Operation Sindoor. The terrorists killed in these attacks were given straight funerals by Pakistan and yet they tried to preach to others," Permanent Representative of India to the UN said. Harish also referred to findings in the secretary-general's report on Children and Armed Conflict. "The secretary general's report on CAAC provides details of serious violations against children in armed conflict in Pakistan. Secretary General has expressed concern at the rise in such grave violations reported including attacks against schools, particularly girls' schools, against health workers, and about the incidents in the border areas with Afghanistan where a series of killing and maiming of Afghan children was directly attributed to cross border shelling and air strikes by Pakistani armed forces! The Pakistani army also deliberately shelled our border villages in May 2025, killing and injuring a number of civilians. To preach at this body after such behaviour is grossly hypocritical," he said.


India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Constitution or Parliament, which is supreme? Chief Justice answers amid debate
Amid an escalating tussle between the judiciary and executive, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai has asserted that not the Parliament, but the Constitution, was "supreme".Speaking at a felicitation event organised by the Bar Association in Amravati, his hometown, Justice Gavai said all three wings of democracy - the executive, legislature and the judiciary - work under the Constitution."While many say and believe that Parliament is supreme, according to me, it is the Constitution of India that is supreme. All three wings of the democracy work under the Constitution," the Chief Justice Buttressing his point, Justice Gavai said Parliament only had the power to amend, but cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution.- Ends


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
One Nation, One Poll: JPC to meet July 11; key legal consultations on cards
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. NEW DELHI: The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the 'One Nation, One Poll' initiative is scheduled to meet on July 11, 2025, at the Parliament House Annexe in New Delhi. The panel, headed by BJP MP PP Chaudhary, will hold consultations with legal experts and former officials as part of its ongoing deliberations on the proposed constitutional reforms, reported news agency ANI. The meeting is a part of the broader exercise to examine the Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024, which aim to enable simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. The committee's next phase involves seeking feedback from legal and institutional stakeholders to refine its recommendations. The proposed legislation, introduced in the Lok Sabha in December 2024, would allow the President to issue a notification on the date of the first sitting of the Lok Sabha, likely in 2029, to fix the schedule for future simultaneous elections. Under the plan, assemblies elected after 2029 would have terms ending with the five-year term of that Lok Sabha, aligning all future polls by 2034. PP Chaudhary has earlier stated that assemblies elected in 2032, including Uttar Pradesh's, may have shortened tenures to match the national cycle. 'Tenures of assemblies may be reduced to two or three years to ensure that all elections are held together in 2034,' Chaudhary had explained. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The 39-member committee includes 27 Lok Sabha MPs and 12 Rajya Sabha MPs, with representation from across the political spectrum. Notable members include BJP's Anurag Thakur and Bansuri Swaraj, Congress leaders Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and Manish Tewari, and NCP's Supriya Sule. The committee has so far visited Maharashtra and Uttarakhand, with plans to tour more states and Union Territories before finalising its report. The government has maintained that holding simultaneous elections will streamline governance, reduce the frequency and cost of polls, and minimise policy paralysis caused by the Model Code of Conduct. However, critics, including several opposition parties, have flagged concerns over its impact on India's federal structure and the autonomy of state governments. The July 11 meeting is expected to offer further clarity on the legal and logistical roadmap for implementing the 'One Nation, One Election' framework, a key priority of the Modi government.