Ohio sees slight dip in affordable housing shortage, according to new study
Stock photo from Getty Images.
Ohio is lacking more than 264,000 affordable rental units, according to a new report.
This is actually about a 1% decrease compared to last year — which had a shortage of 267,382 affordable units available, according to the 2025 Gap Report released by the National Low Income Housing Coalition and the Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio.
'The new housing programs that Ohio created in the last budget bill are having a positive impact, even as pandemic-era housing assistance expired and rents continued rising,' COHHIO Executive Director Amy Riegel said.
Ohio has more than 438,000 extremely low-income households with only 40 affordable units available to every 100 extremely low-income household, according to this year's report. Extremely low-income is income that is at or below either the federal poverty guideline or 30% of their area median income.
Columbus has 25 affordable housing units available for every 100 extremely low-income (ELI) household — making it less affordable than other major cities, according to the report. San Francisco has 31 units per every ELI 100 households and New York City has 34 units, according to the report.
And it's not just Columbus. Rural and suburban counties in Ohio also have shortages of affordable and available housing:
Van Wert has 18 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Wayne County has 26 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Wood County has 24 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Delaware County has 26 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Williams County has 28 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Darke County has 28 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Fairfield County has 31 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Allen County has 33 units for every 100 extremely low-income households.
Ohio's 2023 budget created the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, which is modeled after the federal version. The Ohio House Finance Agency reserved $87.5 million in tax credits for new projects during fiscal year 2024 and low-income households moved into more than 5,000 new affordable rental housing units.
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine's state budget proposal would invest $100 million to the Ohio Housing Investment Opportunity Program in fiscal year 2026. Lawmakers in the Ohio House are currently working on the budget, which he must sign by July 1.
NLIHC Interim President and CEO Renee Willis said pending cuts to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development would make the country's affordable housing crisis worse. The Department of Government Efficiency plans to reduce HUD's staffing by about half.
'There is no path to addressing the housing crisis for the lowest-income renters that doesn't involve increasing resources for assistance and supporting the agencies that administer our housing programs,' she said in a statement.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
WA Medicaid data shared with federal immigration authorities, report says
(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images) Washington is one of a few states whose Medicaid data has reportedly been shared with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which could use it to potentially track down immigrants without legal status. The shared information, including names, addresses, and social security numbers, is from California, Illinois and Washington D.C., on top of Washington state, according to the Associated Press. This comes as the Trump administration seeks to ramp up deportations. Washington provides benefits that mirror Medicaid to immigrants in the U.S. without legal authorization. Enrollment is capped based on available funding, and only state dollars are used to pay for the program. The other states with data handed over offer similar benefits. The agency that runs Washington's Medicaid program, known as Apple Health, wasn't sure 'what information was disclosed or how it may have been used.' 'We've seen the reports and are deeply concerned about the potential misuse of personal health information belonging to Washington Apple Health clients,' state Health Care Authority spokesperson Katie Pope said in an email on Friday. 'We are currently working closely with the Governor's Office and the Attorney General's Office to understand the scope of what occurred, including what data from Washington has been shared and how many individuals may have been affected,' Pope continued. As of this spring, nearly 2 million Washington residents were enrolled in Apple Health, including over 850,000 children. Medicaid, primarily funded by the federal government and run by the states, provides health insurance to low-income residents. Federal law prohibits noncitizens from accessing Medicaid, but states can shell out money for programs that cover immigrants. Washington state lawmakers this year earmarked $150 million for this purpose, enough to continue coverage for about 13,000 people. California and Illinois have moved to freeze or shut down their similar programs. Republicans in Congress have proposed reductions in federal Medicaid reimbursements for states that provide this kind of coverage to immigrants. In a statement, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin said, 'President Trump consistently promised to protect Medicaid for eligible beneficiaries.' 'To keep that promise after Joe Biden flooded our country with tens of millions of illegal aliens CMS and DHS are exploring an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans,' McLaughlin continued. In light of a February executive order from President Donald Trump, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services late last month announced it was reviewing state Medicaid data to ensure federal funds weren't being used on immigrants without legal status. 'Medicaid is not, and cannot be, a backdoor pathway to subsidize open borders,' Mehmet Oz, the agency's administrator, said in a statement at the time. 'States have a duty to uphold the law and protect taxpayer funds.' California, Washington and Illinois shared information about noncitizens receiving health coverage, according to the AP, citing a June 6 memo. 'Protecting the privacy of our Apple Health clients is core to our mission, and we take these concerns very seriously,' said Pope, of the Health Care Authority. 'We'll continue to coordinate with state and federal partners to determine the facts and will take appropriate action as we learn more.' The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are within the Department of Health and Human Services, run by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose advisers ordered the Medicaid data shared with the Department of Homeland Security, the AP reported Friday. They reportedly shared the information despite pushback from federal Medicaid officials. The sharing came as federal immigration agents conducted immigration raids in California that led to protests. Trump has deployed National Guard troops and Marines in response to the demonstrations.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
What To Know About Iran's Nuclear Program After Israel's Strikes
Air raid sirens sounded in Jerusalem and loud blasts were heard on June 13, as the Israeli military said it had detected a missile launched from Iran. Credit - Jack Guez — AFP via Getty Images Iran's nuclear program suffered one of its most serious setbacks in years on Friday, after Israel launched a series of airstrikes on nuclear sites, top scientists, and military officials in a dramatic escalation of its long-running campaign to contain Tehran's atomic ambitions. Israeli officials described the strikes as a preemptive operation aimed at crippling Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon, following what they called a sharp and alarming expansion of uranium enrichment over the past six months. Initial damage assessments indicate that the strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear facility were particularly effective, knocking out the electricity on the underground area where the centrifuges used to enrich uranium are stored, Israel Defense Forces said in a statement Friday. Natanz had been the centerpiece of Iran's nuclear infrastructure and the site where much of its uranium fuel has been produced. On Friday evening, Iranian state media reported that Israel began striking Iran's other major enrichment site—Fordow, which is buried deep within a mountain and is considered nearly impervious to conventional airstrikes. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the campaign a 'strike at the head of Iran's nuclear weaponization program,' and said it would continue 'as many days as it takes' to eliminate the threat. Explosions were reported over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv Friday evening as Iran launched a broad retaliatory strike against Israel. Iran has insisted that it is not developing a bomb and that its nuclear program remains non-weaponized for peaceful energy purposes, though international inspectors have found increasing evidence to the contrary. The United Nations' nuclear watchdog reported that Iran's stockpile of 60% enriched uranium—just below weapons-grade—has grown large enough to produce multiple bombs if further enriched. Analysts say Iran could theoretically produce a bomb's worth of material in as little as a week, and that no other country has that level of uranium without a nuclear weapons program. 'This really was done as a last resort,' says Matt Kroenig, the senior director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center on international security who served in the Department of Defense and the intelligence community during the Bush, Obama, and Trump Administrations. 'They were out of time. The best estimates were that Iran's dash time to one bomb's worth of weapons grade material was down to about a week.' Read more: Trump Issues Grave Warning to Iran After Israeli Strikes: 'No More Death, No More Destruction' Here's what to know about Iran's nuclear program. Iran's nuclear journey began with American support. In 1957, the United States helped launch Iran's atomic energy program under President Eisenhower's 'Atoms for Peace' initiative, when the two nations were allies. By the 1970s, Iran was working on nuclear reactors with U.S. and European assistance, but that partnership collapsed after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Since then, the U.S. has watched with alarm as Iran pursued nuclear capabilities, largely in secret. The Natanz site has been a focal point of that concern. In the early 2000s, it was revealed as part of a covert network of nuclear sites that Iran had failed to disclose to international inspectors. Iran has insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful, aimed at energy production and medical research. It is also a party to the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which obliges members not to develop nuclear weapons. But international watchdogs have warned about the country's enrichment of uranium to levels far beyond civilian use and its concealment of key facilities. Tensions escalated when President Donald Trump in 2018 pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal reached under President Barack Obama, an agreement that rolled back much of Iran's enrichment activity, capped its uranium stockpile, and subjected its facilities to rigorous international inspections. Trump had called the deal 'a disaster' and instead initiated new sanctions on the regime to cripple its economy. But Iran responded by gradually abandoning the agreement's restrictions and ramping up uranium enrichment. It also removed all of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) equipment that had been installed for surveillance and monitoring. By 2024, Iran had resumed operations at Natanz and Fordow at a pace not seen in over a decade, deploying more advanced centrifuges and enriching uranium to 60-percent—alarmingly close to the 90-percent purity required for a nuclear weapon. Read more: Israel Gets the War It Wanted In recent months, Iranian officials confirmed they were building a third enrichment site, further deepening concerns that Tehran was preparing to take its nuclear program underground and beyond the reach of future diplomacy or attack. 'There are only really three key nuclear facilities [in Iran],' says Jonathan Panikoff, the former deputy national intelligence officer for the Near East at the National Intelligence Council, pointing to Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. 'If they succeed in destroying those three facilities, it will really set Iran's nuclear program back.' Technically, Iran has not yet built a nuclear weapon. But the infrastructure and know-how are in place, analysts say. Before Israel's strikes, the IAEA found that Iran could enrich enough uranium for a bomb in about a week. That means that in five months, Iran could have had enough for 22 nuclear weapons. However, analysts note that uranium alone isn't enough for a viable nuclear weapon and that it would take additional time to manufacture it. Netanyahu believes that a nuclear-armed Iran is an existential threat, claiming that Iranian leaders have openly called for the end of the Israeli state and have lent support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. 'Eighty years ago, Jews were victims of a Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime. Today, the Jewish state refuses to be the victim of a nuclear Holocaust perpetrated by the Iranian regime,' Netanyahu declared on Friday. For Israel, the fear is not just a direct nuclear strike, but that Iran could act more aggressively throughout the region under the protection of a nuclear deterrent. Trump, a strong ally of Israel, has insisted that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon' and framed the moment as a possible 'second chance' for Iran's leadership to quickly reach an agreement on curbing its nuclear program in order to avoid further destruction 'before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' Israel's strikes on Friday marked the first overt attack on Iran's core nuclear infrastructure. While it remains unclear how Iran's nuclear program will ultimately be impacted, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi told the U.N. Security Council on Friday that Natanz, the facility at the heart of Iran's nuclear ambition, was destroyed in the strikes. Other major nuclear sites were not initially hit, though Grossi later noted that 'Iranian authorities are informing us of attacks on two other facilities, namely the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan.' Several high-ranking Iranian military officials were also killed in the strikes, according to state-affiliated media, including six nuclear scientists and security forces tasked with protecting its nuclear sites. But analysts note that Iran still likely retains much of its expertise and equipment. A full dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure would likely require a sustained campaign involving not only air power, but also cyber warfare, intelligence operations, and potentially ground forces. Even so, the deeply buried Fordow site—nearly half a mile inside a mountain—could be beyond the reach of Israel's current munitions. Only the U.S. is believed to possess the most advanced bunker-busting bombs capable of reliably penetrating such sites, says Panikoff. Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool ready to make £100m PSG star their next signing: report
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Florian Wirtz may not be the only £100m man heading to Anfield. | Credit: Getty Images Liverpool have just agreed a £116.5m deal to sign Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen, and already they're eyeing up another £100m man. Advertisement The Wirtz move has been the story of the summer so far, with Liverpool reportedly agreeing on Friday morning to a new record Premier League fee. The Reds have already concluded a £29.5m deal for Jeremie Frimpong from the same Bundesliga outfit, but they aren't done there. Liverpool add £100m Paris Saint-Germain attacker to their shopping list Arne Slot has certainly earned this spending, clinching the Premier League title while barely spending a penny last summer | Credit:With Wirtz, Frimpong and a move for Bournemouth left-back Milos Kerkez mooted to cost around £40m, Liverpool are already fast approaching the £200m mark in their summer spending. Adding another £100m to their outgoings doesn't seem feasible, but the Merseysiders have already sold Caoimhin Kelleher in a deal worth up to £18m, and may yet be open to sales for all of Jarell Quansah, Harvey Elliott, Kostas Tsimikas and Darwin Nunez, to name just a few. Back-up goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher, plus a £10m early-release fee for Trent Alexander-Arnold, have been Liverpool's only outgoings this summer | Credit: Getty Images According to the Sun, Liverpool are ready to open their wallet back up for highly-rated PSG winger Bradley Barcola, ranked at no.5 in FourFourTwo's list of the best left wingers in the world right now. Advertisement It's thought that the 22-year-old would cost north of £100m, which, if progressed, could see the Reds footing a £300m bill in total this transfer window. The young Frenchman is also Bayern Munich's primary target, but that was also the case with Wirtz, who has ended up at Anfield. Barcola was once thought to be one of PSG's brightest talents, but has slipped down the pecking order in the French capital on account of the emergence of Khvicha Kvaratskhelia and Desire Doue. Bradley Barcola may need a move away from PSG to continue progressing | Credit: Ulrik Pedersen/NurPhoto via Getty Images In FourFourTwo's opinion, there's surely no way Liverpool spend two lots of £100m+ in one window, is there? If they do, have no doubt that clubs like Newcastle United, who seem to be in a perennial battle with Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) despite their wealthy owners, will have plenty of thoughts about it. But it's tough to deny that an attacking unit containing Wirtz, Barcola and Mohamed Salah would be an exciting watch next season. Barcola is valued at €70m, according to Transfermarkt.
