
Hidden Delhi museum swelling with over 1,000 artefacts awaits expansion
Blocks away from Delhi University's arts faculty, a relatively lesser-known museum, housed within the department of anthropology in North Campus, is preparing for a transformation. The museum, adjacent to the department of environmental studies and overlooking the vice chancellor's office, is home to 1,222 artefacts that span diverse cultural and material heritage from across the world; the 78-year-old museum currently displays less than half its collection due to a space crunch.
According to officials, a proposal for expansion has already been approved by the university administration and is now under review by the Union Ministry of Culture for funding. 'A high-level committee, comprising experts from all over India, had been formed to deliberate on the expansion of the museum. The plan has been approved by the competent committee constituted by the university administration, and a proposal has been sent to the Ministry of Culture, requesting funds for the same,' said Soumendra Mohan Patnaik, head of the department of anthropology and director of the Centre for Tribal Studies.
Patnaik added, 'The committee constituted included senior members from DU as well as former directors and sitting directors of premier national bodies such as the Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, National Museum and the Indira Gandhi Rastriya Manav Sangrahalaya.'
The museum, established in 1947 by Prafulla Chandra Biswas (who also founded the department), is housed in a heritage building dating back to the British era, marked by sprawling lawns and an arched, semi-open entrance leading to a glass-doored display area. At present, it is spread across just two rooms, flanked by two departmental libraries and a workspace used by PhD scholars.
'Once the application for the building grant gets cleared, other units will be shifted to the new building, and the central building will be used only to house the museum,' Patnaik added. The department has also been actively adding new artefacts to its collection — sourced through fieldwork and diplomatic collaborations.
While the museum doesn't have a dedicated curatorial staff — it is currently maintained by faculty members on an ad hoc basis — Patnaik clarified that accessibility is not an issue, thanks to its central location on campus.
On November 29, 2024, the museum received one of its most significant recent additions: a set of 28 textile-based artefacts from the Hmar Students' Association (HSA), joint headquarters, Delhi. These include traditional Hmar attire and ceremonial garments such as the Thangsuo Puon — a cloth of honour representing bravery and selfless community service — as well as the Zakuolaisen blouse and Puonlaisen wrap, worn by Hmar women during weddings and festivals, officials said.
'Each of these garments holds a cultural and ceremonial purpose. For instance, the Thlanlam Puon is used during funerary rituals,' said Abigail Lalnuneng, assistant professor at the department, while curating the brightly coloured fabrics. Other garments include the Hmar Puon (originally intended as a representation of the Hmar identity for women during dances and festivals), Tawnlo Puon (shawl of distinction, used by Hmar families to indicate their status and wealth), Tawllo Puon (the shawl of dauntlessness, used to drape the corpse of the Hmar hunters killed by animals), and Hmar-am (short skirt), among others, each linked to specific social or ceremonial roles in the Hmar community, which is an ethnic group based in northeastern states of India, including Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, and Assam. The collection also includes bead necklaces, earrings, headgear, and other cultural accessories, Lalnuneng added.
Another recent donation came from the Centre for Indigenous and Colonial Studies (CEIC) at the National University of Jujuy, Argentina. The CEIC gifted seven artefacts, including Tulma (vibrant woollen balls), a Bombo (drum), a Guena (flute), a handcrafted bag, wooden figurines of a llama and bird, and a bundle of llama and sheep wool, Lalnuneng said.
Open on all days except Sunday, the museum showcases artefacts representing livelihood, housing, jewellery, and weaving traditions from diverse tribal and indigenous communities. There is no entry fee, and while outsiders need permission from the department, access is generally granted without hassle. The collection spans from fishing tools used along Indian coastlines and a shawl presented by former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to Neanderthal skeletons from France and the US. Among the more eclectic items are wooden masks of Rama from Odisha and early 20th-century agricultural implements.
Despite this richness, the museum has struggled to capture the attention of the university's student body. 'Once the main work is done, we will also paint the walls, reorganise the artefacts, and display the new items. We want to make the museum more cohesive,' Patnaik said, adding that the New Education Policy 2020's focus on the Indian Knowledge System (IKS) will guide the department's revamp.
Patnaik highlighted the need for museums to move beyond colonial curatorial frameworks. 'We want to streamline our efforts to preserve the cultural heritage of India, and museums concretise that heritage in a sense. Museums need to be decolonised and revisited outside the colonial framework. Apart from the few pieces from outside, we will continue our efforts in procuring and studying the different tribal heritage in our country,' he added.
'Another aspect that is in the cards is digitisation. Due to the space crunch, we have been talking about it for a while and will be taking it up as well in the near future,' Patnaik said. With the expansion in the works, faculty and staff hope the museum will finally receive the visibility its collection deserves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
CUET vs Class 12 marks: Are board scores losing their value? Experts explain
It's a question thousands of students and parents are asking this admission season: with CUET now being the main route into India's top central universities, do Class 12 board marks even matter anymore?The then UGC Chairman M Jagadesh Kumar had also announced back in December 2024 that students would be able to opt for subjects in CUET which they didn't even have in Class 12. He had said this decision had been taken in order to 'cross the strict disciplinary boundaries in higher education'.advertisementHowever, in April, Delhi University noted that while Class 12 results will not impact the DU admissions conducted through CUET, except for pass marks requirement in the exam, students must take the CUET exam in the same subjects they studied in Class 12. So, while CUET has certainly changed the game, experts say it would be a mistake to write off board exams just OBSOLETE, JUST REPOSITIONED'The introduction of CUET has certainly shifted the spotlight from Class 12 board exams,' says Avnee Khosla, Vice President and Director of Admissions at Shoolini University. 'But it would be both a pedagogical misstep and an oversimplification to consider Class XII board marks obsolete.'She's not alone in this may now be the gateway for most central universities, but Class 12 marks continue to play a big role in determining eligibility, breaking tie situations, and even deciding scholarships and admissions in private or state-run no, Class 12 marks aren't dead -- they've just moved to a different place in the admissions Shekhar, Senior Director of Admissions and Outreach at Manav Rachna Educational Institutions, puts it clearly: 'The relevancy of Class 12 marks has not become obsolete, it has merely been redefined.' STILL CRUCIAL FOR ELIGIBILITY AND TIE-BREAKERSFor most CUET-participating universities, students must still meet a minimum Class 12 percentage to be considered. That's the baseline -- even a stellar CUET score won't help if you're not eligible to apply.'Students could still be rejected for the university or course if their Class 12 scores don't fit the minimum requirement,' says Kanupriya there's the tie-breaker angle. What happens when two students get the same CUET score? Often, it's the Class 12 marks that decide who gets the seat.'Class 12 marks become the decisive tie-breaking factor for final selection, particularly in competitive courses with many applicants,' explains Enid Verghese Jacob, Deputy Director at Hindustan Institute of Technology and COLLEGES AND STATES STILL DEPEND ON BOARD MARKSadvertisementNot every college has jumped on the CUET bandwagon. Several private universities -- and entire state-level systems -- still follow traditional admission methods. In these cases, board exam results carry far more weight.'Private universities often give greater weightage to Class 12 performance,' Enid Verghese Jacob notes. 'Additionally, a number of states have retained their traditional admission methodologies in lieu of adopting CUET.'So, if you're someone considering options beyond central universities, strong board marks open more doors than you MARKS HELP MORE THAN JUST ADMISSIONSWhat many students miss is how their Class 12 performance can come back into play later -- even after they're admitted.'These scores continue to function as indicators of a student's academic consistency, work ethic, and domain competence,' says Avnee Khosla. 'They guide decisions on institutional cut-offs, merit scholarships, programme-specific eligibility, and even postgraduate admissions in India and abroad.'Vishal Khurma, CEO of Woxsen University, echoes this sentiment. 'CUET can assess aptitude, but it cannot replace the depth of learning acquired in senior school,' he says. 'It's important that we continue to value a strong academic foundation.' advertisementBOARD STUDY = CUET PREPHere's another twist: students often think preparing for CUET and board exams are two different worlds. But in reality, they overlap much more than they domain-specific sections are based directly on the Class 12 NCERT syllabus. So, doing well in boards actually gives you a head-start in CUET.'Strong fundamentals built in Class 12 are invaluable for success in CUET,' says Avnee Khosla. Kanupriya Shekhar adds, 'Class 12 acts as the base that helps the student develop the necessary skills and knowledge to dominate in their CUET scores.'The time gap between boards and CUET is also just about 1.5 to 2 months -- which means students must have a solid understanding of their subjects before they even start preparing full-time for REAL RISK: UNDERMINING CLASSROOM LEARNINGIf the perception grows that board exams are no longer important, it could have serious side effects. Experts warn that this could lead to even more dependence on coaching, reduced focus on school learning, and a decline in writing and reasoning skills.'Reducing the perceived value of board examinations will undermine classroom learning, writing skills, and year-round academic discipline,' says Avnee Khosla. 'It will also fuel a hyper-coaching culture.' advertisementA SMARTER APPROACH: DON'T CHOOSE ONE OVER THE OTHERSo, what should students do?The answer is simple: don't treat board exams and CUET as two different paths. Prepare for both – smartly.'Students should not adopt a dismissive attitude toward board exams despite CUET's prominence,' says Enid Verghese Jacob. 'Viewing them as complementary to CUET preparation rather than separate entities provides maximum admission opportunities.'Kanupriya Shekhar agrees: 'Don't treat board preparation and CUET preparation as two separate tracks. Most of the syllabus overlaps. What's needed is a smart, integrated approach that builds deep understanding instead of rote learning.'With the right plan, students can balance both. They can use board prep as a springboard into CUET, and come out stronger at the end of 12 MARKS STILL MATTER, JUST IN A DIFFERENT WAYCUET may be the biggest headline in college admissions today, but Class 12 board marks still have their place -- in eligibility, in merit lists, in scholarships, and even as Vishal Khurma sums up, 'While CUET may have shifted the weightage in the admissions process, Class 12 is far from irrelevant. The knowledge and academic discipline built during these years form the bedrock on which higher education rests.'So to all students wondering if they can ditch the board exam grind -- the answer is no. It's still very much part of the a burden, not a side quest, but a solid stepping stone.


The Wire
4 hours ago
- The Wire
The Scaling of Kanchenjunga and What it Means to Sikkim's Culture and Autonomy
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Culture The Scaling of Kanchenjunga and What it Means to Sikkim's Culture and Autonomy Jiwan Rai 11 minutes ago On May 18 this year, an expedition team under the Har Shikhar Tiranga Mission, an initiative of the Indian Army, planted the national flag atop the Kanchenjunga peak. This has hurt the indigenous Buddhist communities of Sikkim, to whom the mountain is a deeply revered spiritual entity. Colonel Ranveer Singh Jamwal during the Kanchenjunga expedition. Photo: Facebook. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now Twenty-four years ago, while the rest of India was racing to open up 18 virgin peaks and 176 lesser-known summits to foreign climbers, the Sikkim government, through notification 70/HOME/2000, imposed a ban on expeditions to its highest peak, Kanchenjunga, along with seven other peaks considered sacred by local Buddhists. This administrative decision was actually the reaffirmation of a longstanding cultural tradition of reverence. In fact, an expedition to Kangchenjunga would fall under the scope of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which prohibits any desecration of sites held sacred. When British climbers Joe Brown and George Band first successfully ascended Kangchenjunga in 1955, they voluntarily stopped just short of the summit to honour local sentiments. Their act of restraint was more than a display of mountaineering ethics. It was a profound gesture of civilisational respect. Nearly seven decades after the respectful restraint shown by climbers on Kangchenjunga, fresh reports of another summit attempt have stirred a storm of emotions among the Bhutia and Lepcha communities of Sikkim. On May 18 this year, an expedition team under the Har Shikhar Tiranga Mission, a patriotic initiative of the Indian Army executed through the National Institute of Mountaineering and Adventure Sports (NIMAS), successfully planted the national flag atop the sacred peak. The mission, led by the celebrated mountaineer Colonel Ranveer Singh Jamwal, was envisioned as a tribute to India's unity in diversity. 'This wasn't just an expedition,' Colonel Jamwal remarked. 'It was a tribute to every corner of India. From the dense forests of the Northeast to the icy ramparts of Kanchenjunga, our Tiranga has now flown atop every state's highest point. I'm proud of the team and honoured to lead a mission that reflects the unity and diversity of our great nation.' Sacred However, beneath the wave of patriotic celebrations, are the hurt religious sentiments and cultural traditions of the indigenous Buddhist communities of Sikkim. To them Kanchenjunga is not merely a geographic pinnacle, it is a deeply revered spiritual entity. Its summit is considered sacred and has traditionally been off-limits to human trespass. This restriction is not unique to Sikkim; similar bans exist elsewhere. In China, Mount Kailash remains unclimbed due to its profound spiritual significance, while in Nepal, climbing Machapuchare and Khumbila is prohibited out of respect for their sacred status among the Gurung and Sherpa communities. The recent ascent has reignited a long-standing and sensitive debate between the fervour of national pride and religious belief. In this image released by @adgpi via X on May 19, 2025, a team of Indian Army and Nepali Army personnel climbs Kanchenjunga mountain. (@adgpi via PTI Photo) Photo: PTI In anticipation of this clash, the Sikkim Bhutia Lepcha Apex Committee (SIBLAC) had taken pre-emptive efforts. On April 4, it formally petitioned the Ministry of Defence and the governor of Sikkim, Om Prakash Mathur, urging them to halt the planned expedition. The irony should not be lost in how an initiative meant to celebrate the unity in India's diversity has hurt the sentiments of a religious and cultural group of a state that had merged with India by way of abolition of its own kingdom 50 years ago. True unity respects diversity, and true patriotism upholds the sentiments of all its peoples. Now, as the tricolour flutters over a peak considered sacred for centuries, the question before the nation is not merely who reached the top but at what cultural cost. When seen through a time-honoured Sikkimese lens, Kanchenjunga is not a trophy for adventurers, a playground for thrill-seekers, or just another tick on a climber's checklist. It stands as a symbol of cultural heritage and the pinnacle of religious identity for a significant section of Sikkim's people. In this context, the ban on climbing it is not merely a regulatory restriction. It is a civilisational assertion. And the significance of this act extends beyond religion or tradition. It is deeply political, rooted in the Sikkimese identity, dignity and autonomy. Politics Sikkim chief minister Prem Singh Tamang has written to Union home minister Amit Shah on the matter. But what exactly is the state government demanding in response to the violation? Why did it not act in advance? Given that the climbing ban was imposed by the state government back in 2001, should the authorities not have been consulted before any expedition was approved? Interestingly, Sonam Lama, the Sikkim Sangha minister – elected by a unique constituency which is reserved for Buddhist monks and nuns – downplayed the issue, noting that the expedition took place from the Nepalese side. It is unclear if the the Sikkim government fully grasps that at the heart of this issue lies the deeper question of Sikkimese autonomy. It must know that any violation here is not just cultural sacrilege but also an infringement of the special protections granted to Sikkim under Article 371F of the Indian Constitution. The state government thus faces a twofold responsibility: to safeguard the indigenous worldview of its people and to uphold the autonomy enshrined in its constitutional status. On one hand, the Bhutia-Lepcha cosmo-vision is being undermined. On the other hand, Sikkim's political and constitutional autonomy, hard-won and historically negotiated, must be defended against external decisions that bypass the state's authority and its cultural sensibilities. If Sikkim does not make its voice heard now, it risks losing its unique identity to India's broader and increasingly homogenised national narrative. The government must demand accountability for this violation, reaffirm the inviolability of its sacred landscapes and amplify indigenous voices before they are silenced forever. Jiwan Rai is a social and political commentator from Sikkim. He can be reached at jiwanr@ The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Creating a People's Biography of Rivers: Northeast's Own Digital Archive Sikkim@50: Violence Is the New Normal Political Rent-seeking of Armed Forces is Detrimental to Democracy 'Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning' Is an Operatic and Reverential, but Bloated Farewell After Greyhound Deaths in Anti-Maoist Operation, Maoists Call for Six-Month Ceasefire, Peace Talks How Contract Labour and Caste Inequality Undermine India's Sanitation Drive Govt Nixes Opposition Demand for Special Session by Early Announcement of Monsoon Session Dates Pakistan to Send Ambassador to Taliban Regime Three Punjabi Youths Missing in Iran Rescued by Cops in Tehran About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.


Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Archives: Queen Elizabeth II coronated in grand London ceremony
The bells of London pealed and the guns thundered to salute the crowning of Queen Elizabeth II. A great concourse in Westminster Abbey cried 'God save the Queen' as they watched the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Geoffrey Fisher, place on her head St. Edward's Crown, the symbol of the British monarchy. Outside, beneath grey skies, the cry was taken up by millions who had watched her progress to the ancient Abbey and waited to see her emerge again as the crowned Queen. Later, the Queen thanked her people for their ' loyalty and affection.' She ended a worldwide broadcast on her Coronation Day with these words: 'As this day draws to its close, I know that my abiding memory of it will be not only the solemnity and beauty of the ceremony but the inspiration of your loyalty and affection.' 'I thank you from a full heart. God bless you all.' Earlier, she pledged: 'Throughout all my life and with all my heart I shall strive to be worthy of your trust.' A congregation of more than 7,000 waited at the Abbey since early morning for the Queen's arrival. They heard her approach in State, heralded by a swelling roar of cheers along the route, while a massed orchestra in the Abbey played softly. Then through the west door of the Abbey along the blue carpet leading to the Coronation theatre before the altar, the stately procession began. First came the Abbey beadle bearing his golden staff of office. Behind him came churchmen in scarlet cassocks and sombre black. Then in a great multi-coloured stream, the heralds in medieval tunics, the court officials and the standard bearers. Slowly the colour moved across the golden carpet of the Coronation theatre in the centre of which the golden throne, upholstered in rose, stood in a raised dais. Prime ministers of the Commonwealth stepped aside into their allotted places giving way to the Archbishops of York and Canterbury in their pointed mitres and gold-embroidered robes. The Indian and Pakistani Prime Ministers, Mr Jawaharlal Nehru and Mr Mohammed Ali Jinnah, walked side by side in the procession into the Abbey. Behind them surrounded by heralds in bright medieval tunics came the Duke of Edinburgh, a burgundy robe trimmed with ermine billowing around his naval uniform. Amid this rich and multi-coloured scene the Queen appeared like a gold and crystal figure, supported by her maids of honour. A bishop walked on either side. As she entered the clear voices of 40 schoolboys rang out in the cry of Vivat Regina. There was a great crash of the organ and then the 400-voice choir echoed the salute. The Queen walked steadily, her hands clasped in front, her face tense and serious. As the cries of 'Vivat' soared upwards she seemed to tremble for a second, her hands unclasped, but quickly she clasped them again. As she reached the Chair of Estate, her arms dropped to her side and the maids withdrew. For a moment the Queen knelt in prayer, then took her place on the chair, while the regalia was placed on the altar. The moment had come now for the recognition. Once more her maids of honour escorted her to a corner of the theatre beside the Coronation Chair. There she stood alone as the Archbishop of Canterbury declared: 'Sirs, I here present unto you Queen Elizabeth your undaunted Queen: wherefor all you who are come this day to do your homage and service. Are you willing to do the same?' A great cry of ' God save Queen Elizabeth ' rose from the assembly, echoed twice by the Choir. Four times from each side of the theatre the Archbishop asked the question and each time the thunderous cry came back. Then he bowed to her and she returned to the Chair of Estate. Sitting upright in her chair the Queen next took the oath speaking her only words of the entire ceremony. 'Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa. Pakistan and Ceylon and of your possessions and other territories to any of them belonging or pertaining according to their respective laws and customs?' the Archbishop asked. 'I solemnly promise to do so,' she said in a clear voice. Afterwards, her maids of honour gathered around and escorted her into St. Edward's Chapel to prepare for her triumphal drive through the streets of London. As the Queen reappeared from the Chapel, arrayed now in a purple robe, crowned and carrying her sceptre in one hand and the cross-topped orb in the other, a fanfare of trumpets blared out and the Abbey rang with the national anthem: ' God save the Queen.' The rain streamed ceaselessly down, until dignitaries riding in open carriages were so wet that they had the hoods put up, almost hiding them from view. The Commonwealth Prime Ministers were each escorted by troops from their own countries except Mr Nehru who was escorted by British police. India's Prime Minister, Mr Nehru, drove from Buckingham Palace to the Abbey in a Royal Clarence and a pair of horses in the carriage procession of Commonwealth Prime Ministers. He was in Indian ceremonial dress, wearing an achkan and churidar and with him was his daughter, Mrs Indira Gandhi.