
‘They got us into this': Indiana Democrat says party leaders cannot lead fightback
When George Hornedo, 34, was still deciding whether to run in the Democratic primary for Indiana's seventh congressional district against longtime incumbent André Carson, a party elder looked him in the eyes and said: 'You are gonna get hurt.'
Hornedo went home that day and posted a TikTok video recounting the encounter. According to him, it highlighted the reality of the Democratic party.
'The people in charge don't just fight Republicans, they fight anybody who challenges them,' Hornedo said. 'That's not democracy, that's machine politics.'
Hornedo is one of many young insurgents challenging the party's status quo across the country. With months to go before primaries take place for the 2026 midterms, even some within the party hierarchy have backed efforts to disrupt the political lineup after Democrats lost the presidency and both chambers in Congress in November.
In February 2025, the Democratic National Committee, the party's executive leadership board, elected David Hogg, 25, as one of its vice-chairs. Hogg pledged to use his position to unseat incumbents in safe districts. On Real Time with Bill Maher, he said: 'I do not care if you have been there for decades or for one term: that seat is not yours, it is your constituents.' (Hogg has since left the committee after months of internal debate.)
In Indianapolis, at the end of April, Hornedo was busy trying to appeal to constituents and show them he can be an alternative to the party's old-guard. Dressed in sweatpants and a black hoodie, he had just finished cutting weeds at a community event by Fall Creek in Indianapolis when he spoke about the challenges facing the Democratic party.
'We're just trying to go where people are civically engaged, because they're probably voters,' Hornedo said. And if they're not, they can be. But right now, most voters aren't active in Democratic politics anywhere. So how do we help people see themselves in our party? I think that's important.'
Raised in Laredo and San Antonio, Texas, before moving to Indianapolis because of his dad's job, Hornedo calls himself a 'Hoosier by way of Texas'. His candidacy, Hornedo said, is not about him or about Carson, but about 'whether the government can work for people that need it the most.'.
'The real divide in the party is not left versus center and not even young versus old,' Hornedo said. 'The reality is that, with Trump and Musk dismantling things day in and day out, when Democrats come back in power, we are not walking back into a government that resembles that of which we knew. And I just don't think that the leaders that got us into this are the ones that are going to get us out of it.'
Hornedo criticizes Carson as one of the least effective lawmakers in Congress, pointing to the ranking of the University of Virginia and Vanderbilt University's Center for Effective Lawmaking, that sees Carson ranked 197th out of 220 Democrats in the 118th Congress for effectiveness. The center defines that using 15 metrics, including the number of bills sponsored, their progress, and their substantive significance.
Carson, 50, has held his seat for 17 years. He never had a competitive primary since he took over the seat of his grandmother, Julia Carson, in 2008. He has a strong base of support and has already held a town hall with House Democratic Whip, Katherine Clark on 2 May.
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Carson responded to Hornedo's criticism that Clark showing up to the event was a sign that the party worried about Carson's race. At a press conference after the event, Carson scoffed at Hornedo's comments. 'I have to remind folks that we had Speaker Pelosi in town, President Barack Obama, President Biden,' Carson said. 'These were official events, not campaigning events. He probably does not remember because he was not living here.'
Before launching his grassroots campaign, Hornedo, a lawyer, spent years inside the Democratic party machine. He worked on Obama's 2012 inaugural committee, handled press for Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch and advised Pete Buttigieg's 2020 presidential campaign.
'I came up with this idea of radical proportionality. In one phrase: how do we align the scale of our solutions to the scale of our challenges?' Hornedo said. 'I don't care if a solution is up into the left, up into the center, up into the right. I just care that we're moving up and actually doing a better job of trying to meet people's needs in solving these challenges.'
When asked if the party has an internal ideological struggle and which side he's eventually on, Hornedo dismissed the framing.
'I've been called a dem socialist, I've been called a moderate. My answer to that is: 'Call me whatever you want, just call me effective.''
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Republican who plans to tank Trump's 'big beautiful' bill taunts White House with enticing offer
Senator Rand Paul is tired of people painting him as public enemy number one when it comes to U.S. Senate opposition to President Trump's budget package, commonly referred to as the 'big, beautiful bill'. Paul has been a vocal opponent of the House version of the budget package since it made its way to the Senate, but he is far from the only Republican not backing the bill in its current state. During a Tuesday Fox News appearance, Paul, a Republican with strong libertarian convictions, told Mornings with Maria host Maria Bartiromo that he was not voting for the bill. 'I'm enthusiastically for the tax cuts, I voted for them in 2017 I helped to formulate those tax cuts in 2017,' Paul stated. 'I will not be the deciding vote against this, I promise you that. If I'm the deciding vote against this, they will negotiate with me.' 'Right now they are not negotiating with me, because they don't think they need me, so I will not be the deciding vote. The bill will not fail because of me,' the Senator continued. 'But if it is up to me, and I am the deciding vote, there will be a negotiation, but there is going to be a conservative shift to the bill if they want my vote, thats what I should do as a conservative,' Paul concluded. Rand Paul: "I will not be the deciding vote against this. I promise you that. If I'm the deciding vote against this, they'll negotiate with me. Right now they're not negotiating with me because they don't think they need me." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 17, 2025 At the start of June, Paul told Newsmax that if the only thing in the 'big, beautiful bill' was making the tax cuts permanent, he would back the legislation wholeheartedly. 'If the bill were solely about making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, I wouldn't be a yes; I'd be a hell yes,' Paul noted at the time. 'Unfortunately, that's not the reality with this bill. It includes the largest increase of the debt ceiling ever and will have the United States borrowing $5T over the next 2 years. This bill is the opposite of conservative, and we should not pass it,' Paul added. If the bill were solely about making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, I wouldn't be a yes; I'd be a hell yes. Unfortunately, that's not the reality with this bill. It includes the largest increase of the debt ceiling ever and will have the United States borrowing $5T over the next… — Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 4, 2025 Republicans currently hold a majority in the Senate with 53 seats out of 100. That means Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune can afford to lose the support of up to four of his colleagues on the bill, in which case a 49-49 tied vote could be broken by Vice President JD Vance. The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of the government budget funding package back in May, ahead of the Memorial Day Recess. The Trump White House is keeping the pressure on senators to work out a version of the bill in their chamber, and send it back to the House for a vote, so that the president can sign it by the Fourth of July. Paul has drawn the ire of the White House several times in recent weeks. Speaking to reporters out side of the Capitol last week, Paul shared that his invitation to the White House's congressional picnic had been cancelled. 'I've just been told that I've been uninvited from the [White House] Democrat will be invited, every Republican invited, but I will be the only one disallowed. I just find this incredibly petty', Paul said. The president then responded to Paul's claim's saying that the senator was welcome to attend the picnic after all. Trump contradicted his own White House last Thursday, indicating that 'of course' Paul and his family could attend, via a post made on Truth Social. 'Of course Senator Rand Paul and his beautiful wife and family are invited to the BIG White House Party tonight,' Trump wrote last week. 'He's the toughest vote in the history of the U.S. Senate, but why wouldn't he be? Besides, it gives me more time to get his Vote on the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media site Truth Social on Thursday morning. 'It will help to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! I look forward to seeing Rand. The Party will be Great!' Trump concluded. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is another member of the president's team who has recently thrown arrows at Paul. 'Well, anyone who votes against the one big, beautiful bill including Senator Rand Paul, will be voting for a tax hike of more than $4 trillion on the American people and their voters will know about it,' Leavitt warned earlier this month. Paul was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2010, long before Trump's foray into politics, and was easily reelected to a third term in 2022 during Joe Biden's presidency. Paul is not up for election again until 2028. Kentucky's other Senate seat is up as an open seat in the 2026 midterms election. The commonwealth's senior senator and former Leader Mitch McConnell - another running Trump nemesis - is not running for another term.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Jon Stewart on response to Minnesota shootings: ‘What are we doing?'
Late-night hosts respond to Donald Trump's underwhelming military parade, the record-breaking No Kings protests and Republican disinformation around the shooting of a Minnesota politician. Jon Stewart arrived at his Monday evening perch on the Daily Show reeling from an eventful weekend in US news. 'Let me just say this to start off: Fuck! Just to start off,' he said. 'This weekend – terrible! Again. I'm so sorry.' Stewart started first with Israel's military strike of nuclear facilities in Iran, a conflict Trump teased that the US military would join, after his administration deployed troops in Los Angeles to battle peaceful protests of his immigration raids. 'The only problem with their posture – that I see with it – is their reluctance to commit the American military to fighting drawn-out and often pointless wars doesn't seem to extend to America,' Stewart said of Republicans reticent to support Trump's foreign policy. 'The Maga mindset appears to be: we didn't vote for foreign wars, we voted for civil war.' 'They are looking for any pretense to stick their robot dogs on Democrats,' he said of Republicans supporting the use of military force on Los Angeles protesters, 'and the strategy that they're using is to inflate the threat that this country now faces, to so rile up their base as to make the left in this country – represented by over 75 million votes in the past presidential election – as a legitimate military target for the United States of America. It's a strategy that's been used before to gin up military conflict.' Stewart then pivoted to the horrific shooting of Melissa Hortman, a Minnesota Democratic state representative, and her husband, Mark, in their home. The suspect, Vance Boelter, had a hit list of Democratic representatives and appears to have espoused far-right views, but Stewart wasn't interested. 'I don't give a fuck why this person did it,' he said. 'I don't care whose team he's on, I don't care if he listens to NPR or Fox News, I don't give a flying fuck. What blows my mind is our resignation in the aftermath of this nonsense,' he said, referring to a campaign of misinformation and outright apathy in the wake of political violence. 'We're willing to do things about other issues,' he continued. 'Why are they attacking Los Angeles right now? Why is the right so willing to tear our cities apart in this moment?' Stewart then played a series of clips of Republican lawmakers claiming that any violence by any immigrant demanded a firm response. 'Violence should never be accepted, it should never be tolerated – but that's for their issue,' he said. 'In the wake of Sandy Hook, and Uvalde, and Parkland, and El Paso, and Lewiston, and Aurora, and Buffalo, and Boulder, and Binghamton, and Highland Park, and Monterey Park, and San Bernardino, and San Jose, and San Francisco, and the Pulse nightclub, and the Colorado Springs nightclub, and the Little Rock nightclub, and the Borderline Bar in Thousand Oaks, and the Ned Peppers Bar in Dayton, and the Waffle House in Nashville, and Virginia Tech, and UVA, and MSU, and UCSB, and FSU, and NIU, and SMC, and the Sutherland Springs Church, and the Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston, and the Living Church of God, and the Tree of Life Synagogue, and the Allen Mall, and the Westroads Mall, and Fort Hood, and Lockheed Martin, and – what are we fucking doing? What are we doing? By the way, that is a wildly incomplete list. We kept it to the last 25 years, and it's still not everything.' He continued: 'Why is it when a foreigner, or someone that shouldn't be here, kills one of us, we're gonna put $150bn into border security, we're gonna militarize our cities, we're gonna spend trillions to bomb and destabilize foreign countries overseas, we're gonna ban people from random countries from ever fucking visiting here, we're gonna take our shoes off at the airport forever – but when we do it to ourselves, nothing?' 'Is it that the only acceptable deaths are those that are made in America?' he concluded. 'Our only response now is to tally-up the psycho scoreboard on whose side the perp belongs to?' 'On Saturday, Trump had his much-anticipated stupid sweet 16, disguised as a tribute to the US Army he bone-spurred his way out of,' said Jimmy Kimmel, referring to Trump's military parade. The $50m event turned out to be 'boring' – 'it was basically the $50m version of when a five-year-old shows you every car in his Hot Wheels collection'. The parade boasted corporate sponsors including UFC, a crypto company and Scott's Miracle-Gro, 'which is the product Trump uses on his head', Kimmel quipped. 'There were flyovers, there were combovers, the whole thing!' 'After all this talk that this wasn't a birthday party for him, it kind of seemed like a birthday party for him,' Kimmel continued before a clip of the muted crowd singing 'happy birthday' to Trump. He then cut to a shot of Trump appearing to doze off during the firework show. 'There's sleepy Don taking it all in,' he said. 'In fairness, that's as close as he gets to being able to sleep with his wife, so he took the opportunity.' 'The turnout was much lower than expected, but as Trump would say, there were record-breaking crowds,' he added. 'The bleachers, as you can see, are almost empty. The crowds were sparse.' On the Late Show, Stephen Colbert celebrated Father's Day, because 'Daddy got just what he wanted: no one came to Trump's big stupid birthday parade.' The White House claims that 250,000 people attended, though Colbert was skeptical. 'Apparently a quarter of a million people looks like this,' he said over a photo of a sparsely populated lawn. 'They must be really good at hide and seek. Maga stands for Make America Grass Again, I guess.' 'That was so sparsely attended that these poor troops were forced to march past empty bleachers,' he added before a clip of squeaky tanks rolling by mostly empty stands. 'We may have one WWII, but this weekend we lost the battle with WD-40,' he quipped. 'It looked like no one was having a good time at this thing, not even Donald Trump,' he said before a photo of Trump scowling as he watched the procession. 'That is one sad sack of potatoes,' Colbert laughed. And on Late Night, Seth Meyers also mocked Trump's poorly attended birthday parade, where every administration official in attendance looked bored. At one point, the camera captured Marco Rubio yawning. 'Everything about this soggy, poorly attended birthday parade just made Trump look more pathetic,' said Meyers. 'The special guests were bored out of their minds, the bleachers were emptier than a football game at Oberlin, the lawn had enough empty space for a game of ultimate frisbee.' 'But while deflated Trump was watching robot dogs walk by sparse crowds for his birthday, millions of Americans were fanning out across the country for historic nationwide protests,' he added, referring to the 5 million or so Americans who showed up for the 'No Kings' protests in rebuke of Trump's administration. 'Our system of government is in dire straits, but the massive outpouring of energy across the country was proof that Americans will not easily give up democracy,' said Meyers. 'This was, by all accounts, one of the largest protests in American history. Compare that to the president who, despite all his power and wealth, looked like a guy who was using his crappy golden phone to call roadside assistance.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Senate tweaks to Trump tax bill seen adding to US debt in line with House plan
NEW YORK, June 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republicans' proposed changes to President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill are expected to push U.S. debt levels higher, roughly in line with projections from the House-passed version, analysts said on Tuesday. Senate Republicans on Monday unveiled proposed changes to the bill the House of Representatives passed last month. The proposals, subject to ongoing negotiations, would make some business-related tax breaks permanent while making the deduction for state and local income taxes more limited. "The fiscal effects of the Senate's legislation as it currently stands look likely to be similar over the next few years to what the House passed," Alec Phillips, an analyst at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note on Tuesday. The proposals will likely add "at least a few hundred billion dollars" to the estimated 10-year cost of the legislation, he added. The House-passed legislation would add $2.4 trillion to U.S. government debt over the next 10 years, or $3 trillion if interest costs are taken into account, the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated earlier this month. The cost would reach $5 trillion over a decade if policymakers extend temporary provisions, the committee has said. No formal cost estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan committee of the U.S. Congress, and by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office have been released since the Senate proposals. Concerns over the fiscal impact of the bill have been a key driver of the U.S. bond market in recent weeks, as a meaningful increase to the $36 trillion U.S. debt pile could push Treasury yields higher due to more sizeable government debt sales. "A key contributor to the bond-bearish narrative at the moment is the GOP's (Grand Old Party) budget bill," BMO Capital Markets analysts said in a note on Tuesday. The core of the bill remains similar, they said, as it would extend the bulk of 2017 tax cuts expiring at the end of this year and eliminate taxes on Social Security, overtime and tips. "At the end of the day, there will still be a significant increase in the deficit that the Treasury Department will be tasked with funding," the BMO analysts said.