In a stunning first for US academia, Harvard revokes tenure for ethics scholar Francesca Gino over data manipulation
Harvard revokes tenure for ethics scholar Francesca Gino in unprecedented US academic case. (Getty Images)
Harvard University has taken the extraordinary step of revoking tenure from Francesca Gino, a world-renowned ethics scholar, following an internal investigation that found evidence of data manipulation.
This rare decision marks one of the most significant disciplinary actions in US higher education in recent decades and has ignited widespread debate on academic integrity and research ethics.
The Harvard Corporation, the university's top governing board, confirmed the move this month, ending Gino's employment at Harvard Business School. Gino, celebrated internationally for her work on honesty and ethical behaviour, had faced serious allegations of academic misconduct and fraud, which she denied.
Several sources told the WGBH News that the decision was communicated to business faculty during a confidential meeting last week.
Feeling Alone While Studying Abroad? 7 Proven Tips to Build Real Connections and Friendships
Investigation uncovers manipulated data in multiple studies
Concerns about Gino's research surfaced in 2023 after a group of behavioural scientists running a blog called Data Colada flagged irregularities in some of her work. Harvard promptly launched an internal inquiry which concluded that Gino had manipulated data in at least four studies to support her hypotheses.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Todos os idosos deveriam ter um desse no banheiro! Veja só!
Evite quedas e escorregões
Saiba Mais
Undo
As a result, she was placed on unpaid administrative leave while the investigation proceeded.
The university's disciplinary action is highly unusual. According to Harvard, stripping a professor of tenure is a step not taken for decades. In fact, WGBH News could not identify any prior example where the Harvard Corporation had revoked tenure entirely. Gino's case is now seen as a landmark moment that may prompt other universities to revisit how they handle allegations of scientific fraud.
Lawsuit and court rulings deepen controversy
In response to the allegations and investigation, Gino filed a $25 million lawsuit against Harvard, Harvard Business School Dean Srikant Datar, and the Data Colada bloggers. She claimed defamation, gender discrimination, and invasion of privacy, arguing the accusations irreparably harmed her reputation. However, a federal judge in Boston dismissed her defamation claims last September, ruling that as a public figure she was subject to scrutiny protected by the First Amendment, as reported by the WGBH.
The legal battle and the university's disciplinary measures come at a tense moment for US higher education. The Department of Homeland Security recently moved to revoke Harvard's authority to enrol international scholars, who make up a quarter of its student body, unless the university hands over disciplinary records and protest footage. Harvard challenged this order in court, with a federal judge temporarily blocking the administration's action ahead of a scheduled hearing, as reported by the WGBH.
Wider implications for US academia and international students
M
any Harvard professors familiar with the case expressed concern over rising anti-intellectualism and attacks on academic freedom, especially from the current Trump administration. Some fear that these pressures risk damaging US higher education's global standing and could deter talented researchers from both inside and outside the country.
Gino, originally from Italy, has been a prominent figure internationally, delivering presentations to Fortune 500 companies worldwide. Over a third of Harvard Business School's MBA students come from abroad, contributing substantial tuition revenue that supports domestic students through financial aid.
Legal experts suggest that tenure revocations like Gino's could become more common if universities more aggressively address academic misconduct. However, as quoted by the WGBH, some warn that overly strict policing might discourage innovation and risk attracting negative attention to institutions.
This unprecedented case at Harvard serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing challenges facing US academia in balancing transparency, academic freedom, and research integrity.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Meet man who runs family business worth Rs 837520000000000, owns fleet of luxury cars, shares close relationship with Mukesh Ambani, Isha Ambani, he is…
Meet man who runs family business worth Rs 837520000000000, owns fleet of luxury cars, shares close relationship with Mukesh Ambani, Isha Ambani, he is… Anand Piramal, son-in-law of billionaire Mukesh Ambani and Nita Ambani, is the Executive Director at the Piramal Group. He is an important member of the Piramal group responsible for leading its financial services and real estate businesses. Valued at Rs 83,752 crore, the Piramal Group spans sectors such as real estate, healthcare, financial services, and pharmaceuticals. Under his leadership, the retail lending business has become one of the fastest-growing large retail NBFCs in the country, serving over 4 million customers across the country. Speaking of his educational qualifications, Anand Piramal, husband of Isha Ambani, pursued his master's degree in business administration from Harvard Business School. Not only this, but Anand earned a bachelor's degree in economics from the University of Pennsylvania. In 2024, he was recognised as one of India's '40 under 40' young leaders by The Economic Times and Fortune India. Meet man who runs family business worth Rs 837520000000000, owns fleet of luxury cars, shares close relationship with Mukesh Ambani, Isha Ambani, he is… According to the official website, Piramal Group is a global business conglomerate with diverse interests in pharmaceuticals, financial services, and real estate, with offices in 30 countries and its products sold in more than 100 markets. Although Anand Piramal's net worth isn't publicly available online, his father Ajay Piramal's net worth is said to be reportedly at $2.8 billion (around Rs 25,000 crore). According to Forbes, Ajay Piramal's net worth as per real time is estimated to be $ 3.4 B. He is ranked 1,172nd on Forbes' World's Billionaires List: The Richest in 2025. As a wedding gift, Anand and Isha were presented with a luxurious 50,000 sq ft residence named 'Gulita' in Mumbai's Worli area by their parents. Worth $100 million in 2022, the house has three basements, several dining rooms, an outdoor pool, a garden, a grand hall, and a diamond-themed bungalow. Anand also possesses a massive collection of luxury cars, including a Mercedes Maybach 3600 (Rs 10 crore), Aston Martin Rapide (Rs 3.29 crore), Lamborghini Gallardo (Rs 3 crore), Mercedes-Benz S350D (Rs 1.4 crore), and Range Rover Sports (Rs 1 crore). Isha and Anand tied the knot in December 2018 and are considered one of India's most powerful business couples. Anand's success and luxurious lifestyle are the result of his hard work and sharp business decisions
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: Vivek Ramaswamy shares cryptic post; says 'it's why we ... '
Amid the escalated rift between US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, . shared a cryptic post on social media. In a post on X, Ramaswamy said, "It's why we do it." Is it a mere coincidence or a deliberate post? No one knows, but the timing of the post seems to hint at a different story. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Ramaswamy, who was heading the Doge along with Musk, seems to have escaped the bullet with just an inch. He left the Doge to run for Ohio governor, that's what the official information was put out. Unofficially, insiders suggest he saw the writing on the Twitter wall—that DOGE was less a reform movement and more a digital kamikaze mission, powered by ego, caffeine, and libertarian hallucinations. After distancing himself from DOGE and moderating his Trump-aligned discourse, Ramaswamy has become a target of his former supporters who previously celebrated him as their biotech leader. Influential right-wing voices have labelled him disloyal. Conservative social media has begun comparing him to Liz Cheney through edited images. Within the aggressive right-wing internet discourse, his image has shifted from being an "America First entrepreneur" to a "globalist plant with a Harvard tongue. " Notably, the same group criticising Ramaswamy for "disloyalty" is now opposing Musk for "disrespect." In the MAGA community, allegiance operates as an absolute concept, where dissent leads to public condemnation. DOGE's trajectory has become a subject of political ridicule. Its failure was inevitable, given its management style resembling an online forum, its cryptocurrency-inspired branding, and leadership that prioritised data over substance. The speed of its decline was its only unexpected aspect. Musk's attempt to surpass Trump's influence proved unsuccessful, as MAGA culture acknowledges only one supreme leader—Trump himself. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Ramaswamy made a prudent decision by withdrawing early. He recognised, unlike Musk, that close association with Trump carries significant risks. Extended exposure proves harmful, whilst early withdrawal offers a chance of preservation. The current situation shows Musk experiencing political decline, Trump on the offensive, and Ramaswamy in Ohio, discussing policy innovation whilst avoiding MAGA-related social media conflicts, hoping for his past involvement to be forgotten. Whether this represents strategic thinking, risk aversion, or practical political management remains debatable. As Sun Tzu said—"he will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight."
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Top US universities raced to become global campuses. Under Trump, it's becoming a liability
Three decades ago, foreign students at Harvard University accounted for just 11% of the total student body. Today, they account for 26%. Like other prestigious U.S. universities, Harvard for years has been cashing in on its global cache to recruit the world's best students. Now, the booming international enrollment has left colleges vulnerable to a new line of attack from President Donald Trump. The president has begun to use his control over the nation's borders as leverage in his fight to reshape American higher education. Trump's latest salvo against Harvard uses a broad federal law to bar foreign students from entering the country to attend the campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. His proclamation applies only to Harvard, and a federal judge late Thursday temporarily blocked it. But Trump's order poses a threat to other universities his administration has targeted as hotbeds of liberalism in need of reform. It's rattling campuses under federal scrutiny, including Columbia University, where foreign students make up 40% of the campus. As the Trump administration stepped up reviews of new student visas last week, a group of Columbia faculty and alumni raised concerns over Trump's gatekeeping powers. 'Columbia's exposure to this 'stroke of pen' risk is uniquely high,' the Stand Columbia Society wrote in a newsletter. Ivy League schools draw heavily on international students People from other countries made up about 6% of all college students in the U.S. in 2023, but they accounted for 27% of the eight schools in the Ivy League, according to an Associated Press analysis of Education Department data. Columbia's 40% was the largest concentration, followed by Harvard and Cornell at about 25%. Brown University had the smallest share at 20%. Other highly selective private universities have seen similar trends, including at Northeastern University and New York University, which each saw foreign enrollment double between 2013 and 2023. Growth at public universities has been more muted. Even at the 50 most selective public schools, foreign students account for about 11% of the student body. As the middle class has grown in other countries, more families have been able to afford test prep and admissions guidance to compete for spots in the Ivy League, said Rajika Bhandari, who leads a firm of higher education consultants. 'The Ivy League brand is very strong overseas, especially in countries like India and China, where families are extremely brand-aware of top institutions in the U.S. and other competing countries,' Bhandari said in an email. Over the last two decades, she said, U.S. universities have increasingly recognized the benefits of international exchange, seeing it as a crucial revenue source that subsidizes U.S. students and keeps enrollments up in the STEM fields of science, technology, engineering and math. America's universities have been widening their doors to foreign students for decades, but the numbers shot upward starting around 2008, as Chinese students came to U.S. universities in rising numbers. It was part of a 'gold rush' in higher education, said William Brustein, who orchestrated the international expansion of several universities. 'Whether you were private or you were public, you had to be out in front in terms of being able to claim you were the most global university," said Brustein, who led efforts at Ohio State University and West Virginia University. The race was driven in part by economics, he said. Foreign students typically aren't eligible for financial aid and, at some schools, they pay much higher tuition than their American counterparts. Colleges also were eyeing global rankings that gave schools a boost if they recruited larger numbers of foreign students and scholars, he said. Some wealthier universities — including Harvard — offer financial aid to foreign students. But students who get into those top-tier U.S. universities often have the means to pay higher tuition rates, Brustein said. That provides further incentive to enroll more foreign students, he said, saving more scholarship money for American students. Still, international enrollment didn't expand equally across all types of colleges. Public universities often face pressure from state lawmakers to limit foreign enrollment and keep more seats open for state residents. Private universities don't face that pressure, and many aggressively recruited foreign students as their enrollment of U.S. students stayed flat. The college-going rate among American students has changed little for decades, and some have been turned off on college by rising costs and student debt loads. Supporters say foreign students benefit colleges — and the wider US economy Proponents of international exchange say foreign students pour billions of dollars into the U.S. economy, and many go on to support the nation's tech industry and other fields in need of skilled workers. Most international students study STEM fields. In the Ivy League, most international growth has been at the graduate level, while undergraduate numbers have seen more modest increases. Foreign graduate students make up more than half the students at Harvard's government and design schools, along with five of Columbia's schools. Harvard's undergraduate foreign population increased by about 100 students from 2013 to 2023, while graduate numbers increased by nearly 2,000. Part of that growth can be explained by increasing global competition at the graduate level, said William Kirby, a historian at Harvard who has written about the evolution of higher education. 'If you don't recruit the very best students internationally in your most important graduate programs, particularly in science and engineering, then you will not be competitive," Kirby said. The Ivy League has been able to outpace other schools in large part because of its reputation, Brustein said. He recalls trips to China and India, where he spoke with families that could recite where each Ivy League school sat in world rankings. 'That was the golden calf for these families. They really thought, 'If we could just get into these schools, the rest of our lives would be on easy street,'' he said. Last week, Trump said he thought Harvard should cap its foreign students to about 15%. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump said at a news conference. The university called Trump's latest action banning entry into the country to attend Harvard 'yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights.' In a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's previous attempt to block international students at Harvard, the university said its foreign student population was the result of 'a painstaking, decades-long project' to attract the most qualified international students. Losing access to student visas would immediately harm the school's mission and reputation, it said. 'In our interconnected global economy," the school said, 'a university that cannot welcome students from all corners of the world is at a competitive disadvantage.'
