In a stunning first for US academia, Harvard revokes tenure for ethics scholar Francesca Gino over data manipulation
Harvard University has taken the extraordinary step of revoking tenure from Francesca Gino, a world-renowned ethics scholar, following an internal investigation that found evidence of data manipulation.
This rare decision marks one of the most significant disciplinary actions in US higher education in recent decades and has ignited widespread debate on academic integrity and research ethics.
The Harvard Corporation, the university's top governing board, confirmed the move this month, ending Gino's employment at Harvard Business School. Gino, celebrated internationally for her work on honesty and ethical behaviour, had faced serious allegations of academic misconduct and fraud, which she denied.
Several sources told the WGBH News that the decision was communicated to business faculty during a confidential meeting last week.
Feeling Alone While Studying Abroad? 7 Proven Tips to Build Real Connections and Friendships
Investigation uncovers manipulated data in multiple studies
Concerns about Gino's research surfaced in 2023 after a group of behavioural scientists running a blog called Data Colada flagged irregularities in some of her work. Harvard promptly launched an internal inquiry which concluded that Gino had manipulated data in at least four studies to support her hypotheses.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Todos os idosos deveriam ter um desse no banheiro! Veja só!
Evite quedas e escorregões
Saiba Mais
Undo
As a result, she was placed on unpaid administrative leave while the investigation proceeded.
The university's disciplinary action is highly unusual. According to Harvard, stripping a professor of tenure is a step not taken for decades. In fact, WGBH News could not identify any prior example where the Harvard Corporation had revoked tenure entirely. Gino's case is now seen as a landmark moment that may prompt other universities to revisit how they handle allegations of scientific fraud.
Lawsuit and court rulings deepen controversy
In response to the allegations and investigation, Gino filed a $25 million lawsuit against Harvard, Harvard Business School Dean Srikant Datar, and the Data Colada bloggers. She claimed defamation, gender discrimination, and invasion of privacy, arguing the accusations irreparably harmed her reputation. However, a federal judge in Boston dismissed her defamation claims last September, ruling that as a public figure she was subject to scrutiny protected by the First Amendment, as reported by the WGBH.
The legal battle and the university's disciplinary measures come at a tense moment for US higher education. The Department of Homeland Security recently moved to revoke Harvard's authority to enrol international scholars, who make up a quarter of its student body, unless the university hands over disciplinary records and protest footage. Harvard challenged this order in court, with a federal judge temporarily blocking the administration's action ahead of a scheduled hearing, as reported by the WGBH.
Wider implications for US academia and international students
M
any Harvard professors familiar with the case expressed concern over rising anti-intellectualism and attacks on academic freedom, especially from the current Trump administration. Some fear that these pressures risk damaging US higher education's global standing and could deter talented researchers from both inside and outside the country.
Gino, originally from Italy, has been a prominent figure internationally, delivering presentations to Fortune 500 companies worldwide. Over a third of Harvard Business School's MBA students come from abroad, contributing substantial tuition revenue that supports domestic students through financial aid.
Legal experts suggest that tenure revocations like Gino's could become more common if universities more aggressively address academic misconduct. However, as quoted by the WGBH, some warn that overly strict policing might discourage innovation and risk attracting negative attention to institutions.
This unprecedented case at Harvard serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing challenges facing US academia in balancing transparency, academic freedom, and research integrity.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Why Trump wants $1 billion from UCLA but only $500 million from Harvard: The politics behind the numbers
UCLA faces higher penalty than Harvard as Trump administration targets universities The Trump administration has demanded $1 billion from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) whilst seeking only $500 million from Harvard University, despite Harvard having significantly more frozen federal funding. The stark difference in settlement figures has raised questions about the political calculations behind the administration's approach to higher education negotiations. Both universities face substantial financial pressure after the administration froze federal grants, with UCLA losing access to approximately $584 million and Harvard facing $2.3 billion in frozen funds. The disparity between frozen amounts and settlement demands reveals a complex strategy that extends beyond mere financial recovery. Public versus private university leverage UCLA operates as a public university within the University of California system, making it directly accountable to state taxpayers, legislators, and California's political establishment. This structure provides the Trump administration with multiple pressure points, allowing officials to simultaneously challenge a political rival state whilst establishing precedents for reshaping public universities nationwide. Harvard's position as a wealthy private institution grants it considerably more operational independence. The university can rely on its endowment exceeding $50 billion and possesses substantial resources for aggressive litigation. This financial strength provides Harvard with greater leverage to resist government demands, potentially explaining the lower settlement figure despite higher federal funding exposure. Symbolic political targeting California has maintained consistent opposition to Trump administration policies across immigration and climate initiatives. UCLA represents a symbolic crown jewel of the state's progressive higher education system, making the $1 billion demand as much about political messaging as financial recovery. The elevated demand sends a clear political message and energises the administration's base against what officials characterise as "blue state elites." Harvard faces different political calculations, already serving as an archetype of elite liberalism. The $500 million penalty, whilst substantial, focuses more specifically on campus activism and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices rather than direct confrontation with state government. Institutional reform requirements UCLA's draft settlement encompasses sweeping institutional changes including bans on overnight protests, restrictions on race-based scholarships and hiring, identification requirements for protestors, limits on transgender healthcare and athletics, and enhanced oversight of international students. The settlement's scope reflects the administration's demand for comprehensive systemic reforms. Harvard's negotiations have concentrated more narrowly on restoring funding, DEI programme rollbacks, and admissions transparency measures. The more limited institutional overhaul corresponds with the reduced financial penalty, suggesting a strategic approach linking demanded changes to settlement amounts. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Lisa Cook educational background and career journey: How this philosophy scholar became a US Federal Reserve governor
From Oxford to the US FED: Lisa Cook's academic journey and professional milestones. (Getty Images) Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has come under scrutiny following allegations of mortgage fraud made by a US housing official. On August 20, 2025, US President Donald Trump called for her immediate resignation via his social media platform, Truth Social . The accusations, which have not been confirmed, concern mortgage agreements on two properties—one in Michigan and another in Georgia. Cook, who is serving a term on the US Federal Reserve Board of Governors until 2038, became the first Black woman to hold the position when she took office on May 23, 2022. Her academic and professional journey spans prestigious institutions, policy roles, and contributions to economic research. Early education and academic foundations Born in 1964, Lisa DeNell Cook grew up in Milledgeville, Georgia. She is the daughter of Payton B. Cook, a Baptist hospital chaplain, and Mary Murray Cook, a nursing professor at Georgia College. As a child, she was involved in school desegregation efforts in Georgia and sustained physical injuries during that process. She is also a cousin of chemist Percy Julian. Cook earned a BA in Physics and Philosophy, magna cum laude, from Spelman College in 1986 and was named a Harry S. Truman Scholar. She became Spelman's first Marshall Scholar and went on to read Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE) at St Hilda's College, Oxford, completing her second BA in 1988. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo She also took postgraduate courses in philosophy at Cheikh Anta Diop University in Senegal. Shift to economics and doctoral research Cook shifted her focus to economics after a Mount Kilimanjaro hiking trip with an economist. She later earned a PhD in Economics from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1997. Her dissertation, supervised by Barry Eichengreen and David Romer, examined the underdevelopment of the banking system in czarist and post-Soviet Russia. Cook began her academic career as a visiting assistant professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Business School from 1997 to 2002. She also served as deputy director of Africa Research at Harvard's Center for International Development. Professional roles and policy contributions Between 2000 and 2001, Cook worked as a senior adviser on finance and development at the US Treasury Department under a Council on Foreign Relations fellowship. From 2002 to 2005, she was a National Fellow and Research Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Cook joined Michigan State University in 2005, became a tenured associate professor in 2013, and has published research on macroeconomics, African-American history, and innovation economics. Her work includes a study linking racial violence to declines in patent activity and the development of a database on lynching in the US. She served on the Obama administration's Council of Economic Advisers from August 2011 to August 2012 and has advised the governments of Nigeria and Rwanda on economic matters. She has also served on the Executive Committee of the American Economic Association and directed its Summer Program for underrepresented students since 2016. Nomination and confirmation to the Federal Reserve President Joe Biden nominated Cook to the US Federal Reserve Board of Governors on January 14, 2022. Following a series of procedural delays and partisan votes, she was confirmed by the Senate on May 10, 2022, with Vice President Kamala Harris casting the tie-breaking vote. In May 2023, Biden re-nominated her for a full 14-year term. The Senate confirmed her appointment on September 6, 2023, by a 51–47 vote. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Economic Times
7 hours ago
- Economic Times
Is starting a business more rewarding than studying at Harvard? Why one student is considering betting big on India's growth story
Synopsis A 26-year-old student at Harvard Business School is weighing whether to quit her course to move to India and join the country's booming startup sector, according to a post on X. A close friend revealed she is seeking operator roles in early-stage firms and wants to 'bet on the India story.' The post drew a flood of responses, with startup leaders offering roles while others urged her not to leave Harvard. The debate reflects India's growing global pull. TIL Creatives Representative AI Image A 26-year-old Harvard MBA candidate is thinking of quitting the programme to move to India. Her friend posted on X, calling her 'very sharp, generalist' and saying she wants to 'bet on the India story.' This isn't a whim — she is exploring operator roles in Seed, Series A or Series B startups and inviting founders and VCs to reach post struck a chord. AI and infra B2B leaders rushed to the wrote, "Great decision. If she is interested in working on the frontlines of the AI/infra B2B market in one of the fastest growing markets at one of the best positioned startups to win this space. It would be great to be introduced." They see real everyone agreed with stepping away from Harvard now."If she's a close friend, tell her not to drop out. Period. The India story is multidecadal; there will still be many many years to bet on it after a year or two." Another said, "Dropping out is a bad idea! Can do better after 2 years too."So what is she joining? India's startup ecosystem is substantial and growing. As of mid-2025, India hosts around 120 unicorns privately held companies valued over $1 billion, placing it among the top global ecosystems, as per previous news reports. From 2014 to mid-2024, startups in India attracted more than $150 billion in funding. Top hub, Bengaluru, Delhi NCR and Mumbai, garnered nearly 90 per cent of that. India recognised over 159,000 startups by mid-2025. Since 2016, those startups generated 1.7 million direct jobs and nearly half are in tech, as reported by a Business Insider report. report. In Hyderabad, STPI's network has backed over 1,400 startups through funding and facilities, with 44 per cent led by women. And these startups raised more than ₹574 crore, as per The Times of India . . Venture funds are pouring in. Artha India Ventures closed a ₹432 crore fund to back Series B and C firms, as per an earlier report by The Economic Times . . Bat VC launched a $100 million fund to support early-stage AI, fintech and enterprise startups across India and the US, according to the Business Insider . She'd be jumping into a rich and expanding ecosystem. India is not just producing unicorns, it is building structures. Thousands of jobs. A surge of funding. More diverse regions now getting attention, not just big advice she's getting captures it all. One view says don't rush. India's growth isn't one moment in time, there will be chances afterward. The other side sees less waiting, more doing. And both have something real. (Disclaimer: This article is based on a user-generated post on Twitter. has not independently verified the claims made in the post and does not vouch for their accuracy. The views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views of Reader discretion is advised.)
