"Let's make defence sector a role model for other sectors": French Foreign Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin on India-France bilateral ties
By Shailesh Yadav
Paris [France], June 3, (ANI): France and India should make the 'major success' of the defence sector in bilateral ties a 'role model' for other sectors, French Foreign Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin said after the high-level discussions with Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal.
Goyal commenced his three-day official visit to France on Sunday. This visit is part of his ongoing visit to France and Italy from June 1 to 5. During his engagements in France, Goyal held bilateral meetings with key French Ministers, including Laurent Saint-Martin and Minister of Economy Eric Lombard. These discussions are focused on strengthening the Indo-French economic partnership and exploring new avenues for enhancing trade and investment cooperation.
'The defence sector is one of the major success stories in India-France bilateral ties. Let's make this defence sector a role model, an example for other sectors,' Saint-Martin told reporters after the bilateral meeting in Paris.
The French minister expressed optimism about the stalled European Union-India free trade agreement, suggesting a breakthrough could come in weeks or months, as 'we believe in freer trade, and not in trade wars.'
'I am pretty optimistic that we can have an agreement in the coming weeks or months, because we have to showcase the world that we believe in trade, in freer trade, and not in trade wars,' he told reporters.
Saint-Martin emphasised that demonstrating commitment to multilateral trade cooperation carries special significance amid current global tensions. 'It means a lot for us, because we are living in very troubled times in terms of global trade,' he said, adding that both India and France must strengthen their economic and cultural ties.
The minister highlighted India's importance in European trade strategy, noting strong backing from Brussels. 'India is one of our priorities and I know that the European Commission really wants to fast-track the talks for the pact,' Saint-Martin said.
France seeks to reduce both tariff and non-tariff barriers while addressing sensitive sectors.
'We have to take care of, for example, our agriculture, and some norms that we have in terms of environment and sanitary standards,' he explained. 'A deal at the end is a consensus - both sides have to understand each other's concerns and sensitivities.'
Saint-Martin acknowledged that Europe-India trade relations remain below their potential, calling for increased exports, investments, and joint ventures between the regions. The 27-nation European Union represents one of India's largest trading partners, yet both sides see room for significant expansion.
'The FTA is a way of facilitating trade. This is why we need to lower barriers, but on the other hand, you have to protect sometimes some sectors, and I'm talking about agriculture,' he said, outlining the delicate balance required in negotiations.
The minister's comments come as global supply chains face disruption and countries seek to diversify trade partnerships beyond traditional routes. The France-India defence cooperation, which includes joint manufacturing and technology transfer agreements, serves as a successful model for deeper economic integration across multiple sectors. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
19 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Giorgia Meloni's 'anti-protest' law has divided Italy
Italy's new security law, pushed through by PM Giorgia Meloni's right-wing government, is stoking nationwide outrage. From harsher protest penalties and a ban on cannabis light to legal cover for police, critics warn it criminalises dissent and threatens civil liberties. Protests, international concerns and Senate drama have all followed read more Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni waits for the arrival of French President Emmanuel Macron, at Palazzo Chigi, in Rome, Italy, June 3, 2025. File Image/Reuters A new security decree introduced by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing coalition government has divided Italy. Approved by the Senate with 109 votes in favour, 69 against, and one abstention, the legislation has sparked a backlash from opposition lawmakers, human rights bodies and legal groups, who argue that it undermines fundamental freedoms and disproportionately punishes marginalised communities. The decree expands legal authority for law enforcement, imposes stricter penalties on demonstrators, and introduces a variety of criminal provisions touching on protests, public order, cannabis regulation, and social housing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the government insists the law is a necessary measure to safeguard security, critics see it as a repressive attempt to criminalise dissent and curb civil liberties in one of Europe's major democracies. What the new security law in Italy comprises Among the central features of the law is the criminalisation of disruptive protest tactics, such as blocking roads and defacing public monuments—methods commonly used by environmental activists and other political movements in Italy. Participation in sit-ins, particularly when they affect transportation or public property, may now lead to criminal prosecution and even prison time. The law also introduces new criminal categories tied to unrest inside prisons and migrant detention facilities. Notably, acts that had previously been treated as non-violent expressions of dissent — such as passive resistance — now carry the risk of formal charges. Tougher sentences are introduced for individuals accused of inciting or participating in riots within detention centres. Critics say this expansion of legal definitions could lead to disproportionate punishment for migrants and incarcerated individuals, especially in situations where the use of force by the state is already under scrutiny. Evictions of people occupying vacant buildings — especially those used for informal housing — will now proceed under stricter rules. Squatting, which was earlier treated with leniency in some cases due to Italy's housing crisis, will now invite potentially severe penalties, including longer prison terms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to lawyer Cesare Antetomaso from the National Association of Democratic Lawyers, 'There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in,' adding that the housing crisis should be addressed through welfare policy, not criminal enforcement. One of the decree's most controversial provisions bans the sale of 'cannabis light,' a legal form of hemp that contains only trace amounts of THC and does not have psychoactive effects. This decision has enraged business owners who argue that the move will destroy an entire legal market, cost thousands of jobs, and result in major financial losses in an already fragile economy. Another provision removes a long-standing legal exemption that allowed convicted pregnant women or mothers of small children to avoid incarceration or serve sentences in alternative facilities. The government justifies the move by claiming the rule was being exploited by repeat offenders, particularly among Roma women. Gianni Berrino, a senator from the Brothers of Italy party, defended this position by stating, 'It's useless to say that this decree is inhumane, because women who have children in order to steal are not worthy of having them.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How this law changes protection for police Under the new law, significantly enhanced protections have been granted to police and armed forces personnel. Officers under investigation or standing trial for actions committed during duty — including the use of force — will be eligible for legal assistance of up to €10,000. The legislation also establishes specific penalties for causing injury to law enforcement officers during demonstrations. An especially controversial aspect concerns the increased discretion granted to intelligence services, whose agents may now commit certain criminal acts without facing prosecution, provided these are justified on grounds of national security. Human rights watchdogs and opposition politicians have condemned this clause as a threat to democratic oversight and accountability. Meloni's government, which won power in the 2022 general election and has remained popular in polls, has described the law as part of a broader initiative to restore order and strengthen Italy's internal security. 'With the final approval of the Security Decree in the Senate, the Government takes a decisive step to strengthen the protection of citizens, the most vulnerable groups and our men and women in uniform,' Meloni said following the Senate vote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Party leaders have frequently linked their legal reforms to public demands for tougher governance. 'Order, security and legality are at the heart of the Meloni government's actions,' said Carolina Varchi, a deputy from the Brothers of Italy party. 'Challenging this decree means, in effect, turning one's back on the demand for security that comes from citizens.' How the new security law has divided Italy The opposition, led by centre-left parties, has reacted strongly both inside and outside Parliament. During the final Senate vote, lawmakers from the Democratic Party staged a protest on the chamber floor, chanting 'shame, shame' and sitting down in defiance of protocol. Elly Schlein, the party's leader, accused the government of using the law to silence political opposition: 'It is a decree that is not about more security, but about more repression.' Francesco Boccia, a senior Democratic Party senator, condemned the criminalisation of youth activism and labour protests: 'We challenge a government that wants to imprison children, students who strike and protesters outside factories.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Saturday, May 31, thousands of demonstrators marched through central Rome under heavy police presence, braving intense heat to protest the law. Participants carried trade union and Palestinian flags, chanting slogans and calling for the law's repeal. Speaking at the protest, Cesare Antetomaso of the National Association of Democratic Lawyers told AFP, 'We consider this law the biggest attack on the freedom to dissent in the history of the Italian republic.' He specifically criticised its approach to housing and homelessness: 'There is a drastic increase in penalties for occupying buildings to live in. The housing crisis cannot be solved with seven-year prison sentences for those without shelter, but with various social policies.' Human rights institutions have also issued multiple warnings about the decree's compatibility with international law. The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O'Flaherty, expressed deep concern in a letter to Senate President Ignazio La Russa, warning the law could compromise protections for protesters, migrants, and young activists under European standards. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights has earlier raised red flags, stating that several provisions in the law could 'undermine the fundamental tenets of criminal justice and the rule of law.' In two separate communications, eight United Nations Special Rapporteurs had intervened. Six of them highlighted how the decree might breach obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Meanwhile, the Special Rapporteurs on housing and poverty pointed to violations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, particularly concerning the criminalisation of squatting and homelessness. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Rahul Gandhi is right, I follow his guidance for politics: Salman Khurshid on 'surrender' remark
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader and former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid on Thursday extended his full support to Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, who is currently facing intense criticism from the NDA over his controversial "Narendra, surrender" comment. Speaking at the Congress' state headquarters in Bhopal, Gandhi had accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of surrendering to United States President Donald Trump. He claimed this reflected a historical pattern of the BJP and the RSS yielding to external pressure. Gandhi had said, "Jaise udhar se Trump ne ishara kiya, phone uthaya, kaha Modi ji kya kar rahe ho. Narendra... Surrender aur ji huzur kar Modi ji ne Trump ke ishare ka palan kiya," implying that Prime Minister Modi obediently followed the cues given by Trump. Supporting Gandhi's remarks, Khurshid, in an interview with IANS, said, "Rahul Gandhi is right. I support him. I belong to his party and follow his guidance for my politics. It is very clear, I am in Rahul Gandhi's party, I support him, and I act according to his directions." When asked about Gandhi's remarks being played on Pakistani television channels to support anti-India narratives, Khurshid dismissed the question, stating, "We strongly oppose what Pakistan has done. We want Pakistan to be brought to a position where it can never promote terrorism against India. That is our only concern. We don't watch Pakistani TV; our Indian channels are enough for us." Khurshid was also part of the all-party delegation led by JD(U) MP Sanjay Jha, which visited Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia as part of Operation Sindoor Outreach. The mission aimed to highlight India's stance on Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism. During the international visit, Khurshid, who had served as External Affairs Minister during the UPA government, also voiced concerns over political divisions back home and questioned why it had become so difficult for some to support patriotic causes. In a post on X, he wrote, "When on a mission against terrorism, to carry India's message to the world, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic?" When asked about this tweet, Khurshid strongly defended his position and took a dig at his critics, saying, "Is it so difficult to be patriotic? Why isn't anyone answering me? If someone is saying something for the nation, let them say it. Why create problems over it? Saying something in the interest of the country is not the wrong thing to do. It is the right thing to do. Everyone should support what is said for the nation's good."
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Suzuki Motors suspends Swift production amid China's Rare Earth export restrictions
Suzuki Motor's suspension of production of its flagship Swift subcompact is due to China's rare earth restrictions, two people familiar with the matter said, becoming the first Japanese automaker to be affected by the export curbs. The small car maker halted production of the Swift, excluding the Swift Sport version, from May 26 citing a shortage of components. Plans to resume output have been pushed back several times. Suzuki now expects a partial restart of production on June 13 with full resumption after June 16, as the "prospect of parts supply is clearer" now, it said in a statement. The company declined to comment on the reason for the suspension. The sources declined to be identified as they were not authorised to speak on the matter. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors. Alarm over the situation has grown with global automakers warning of potential production halts. Some European auto parts plants have suspended output and Mercedes-Benz is considering ways to protect against shortages of rare earths. Japan is planning to propose strengthening cooperation with the United States on rare earth supply chains in upcoming tariff talks, the Nikkei business daily reported on Thursday. The Nikkei was the first to report on the reason for the Swift model suspension.
