City rejects claims by family of victim killed after man fell from Leaside Bridge
The City of Toronto is arguing that a lawsuit filed by the family of a man who died after being crushed by another man who fell from the Leaside Bridge last year should be dismissed.
In a statement of defence filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice last month, the city denies all claims in the lawsuit brought by the family of 76-year-old Harold Lusthouse and denies any liability in his death.
According to the family, Lusthouse was a passenger in a moving car on June 16, 2024, when a man fell or jumped from the bridge toward the Don Valley Parkway and landed on the car, fatally injuring Lusthouse. Lusthouse died in hospital days after the incident.
The family, which is seeking $1.7 million and potential future legal costs, is suing the city for the lack of suicide barriers on the bridge, alleging they would have prevented Lusthouse's death.
No 'private duty of care' owed, city argues
In its statement of defence, the city denies it owes a "private duty of care" to Lusthouse. It also says it is protected by the City of Toronto Act, which states that no action will be brought against the city for damages caused by the "presence, absence or insufficiency" of a wall, fence, rail or barrier along any highway.
According to the city, Toronto city council's executive committee received a report in 2018 from the Toronto medical officer of health that advised that barriers on city bridges, including the Leaside Bridge, were to be assessed through feasibility studies and any work recommended would be done in conjunction with state-of-good-repair bridge work likely in or after 2028.
In 2023, the city's transportation services division began a feasibility study for the Leaside Bridge. The city notes that Lusthouse's death occurred before that study was completed and before the bridge was due for any state-of-good-repair work.
Highways in 'reasonable state of repair,' city argues
The city also argues that even if it owed Lusthouse a duty of care, the legal action would be inadmissible under section 390 of the City of Toronto Act, which it says provides immunity if a policy decision is made in good faith. It says a decision to install suicide barriers on the Leaside Bridge would have been a policy decision made by the city.
"The decision involves the allocation of millions of dollars and requires an evaluation of, among other things, the public purpose and efficacy of such barriers; the bridge's structural integrity; the resources required to ensure future maintenance of the infrastructure; and the balancing of these considerations with other pressing issues faced by the City given its finite resources," the statement of defence reads.
In addition, the city argues that its highways are a "reasonable state of repair" and it is not compelled to take "any and all" actions to prevent accidents, including this accident, from occurring.
"The fact that an accident is possible does not require a municipality, which must allocate finite resources, to take any and all conceivable measures to prevent such an accident. The City need only take reasonable steps to ensure the state of repair of its highways, which steps are informed by policy considerations, including but not limited to considerations of distributing scarce and finite resources," the statement of defence reads.
The city is asking that the lawsuit be dismissed with costs.
If you or someone you know is struggling, here's where to get help:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Northwestern and former head football coach settle wrongful termination lawsuit stemming from hazing scandal
Northwestern University and Pat Fitzgerald announced Thursday they've agreed to a settlement that ends a wrongful termination lawsuit filed by the former head football coach after he was fired following allegations of widespread hazing in his program. Northwestern's statement acknowledges that Fitzgerald did not know about the hazing in the football program and that he never 'condoned or directed any hazing.' The school also said that when made aware of the hazing going on within his program in July 2023, Fitzgerald was 'incredibly upset and saddened by the negative impact this conduct had on players within the program.' Fitzgerald filed a $130 million lawsuit in October 2023 after being fired a few months earlier as the hazing allegations were made public. The longtime coach of the Wildcats always maintained that he had no knowledge of hazing in his program. 'For the past two years, I have engaged in a process of extensive fact and expert discovery, which showed what I have known and said all along—that I had no knowledge of hazing ever occurring in the Northwestern football program, and that I never directed or encouraged hazing in any way,' Fitzgerald said in a statement released through his attorneys. 'Through discovery, I learned that some hazing did occur in the football program at Northwestern. I am extremely disappointed that members of the team engaged in this behavior and that no one reported it to me, so that I could have alerted Northwestern's Athletic Department and administrators, stopped the inappropriate behavior, and taken every necessary step to protect Northwestern's student athletes.' The terms of the settlement are not being made public, Northwestern said in its statement. The settlement marks the end of a long relationship between Northwestern and Fitzgerald, who starred as a linebacker for the Wildcats before becoming the school's head coach in July 2006. His 17 years as the school's head football coach were among the most successful in school history and he was seen as a Wildcat icon, having spurned interest from bigger schools in order to remain with his alma mater. But when the hazing scandal broke in the summer of 2023, Fitzgerald's time as the leader of the football program came to a shocking end. Fitzgerald's firing followed an independent investigation into the hazing allegations by a former Illinois inspector general. The inquiry began in December after an anonymous email address sent a complaint at the end of the 2022 season, according to an executive summary of the investigation made public by Northwestern. The investigation revealed 11 players, past and present, said hazing was ongoing in the program, university president Michael Schill said in a July 2023 letter to the Northwestern community. But, Schill added in the letter, the investigator didn't find 'any credible evidence that Coach Fitzgerald himself knew about it,' and Fitzgerald has denied any knowledge of hazing in the program. Fitzgerald was initially suspended for two weeks before he was fired. His lawyers contended that he had an agreement with school leadership that he would not face additional punishment beyond that suspension but was then fired days later. In his letter to the community, Schill said he may have erred in only suspending Fitzgerald, saying, 'In determining an appropriate penalty for the head coach, I focused too much on what the report concluded he didn't know and not enough on what he should have known.' The coach was fired a day after that letter was released. In his statement on Thursday, Fitzgerald called his firing the result of a 'rush to judgment in the media' and said reports that he 'knew about and directed hazing are false.' 'Though I maintain Northwestern had no legal basis to terminate my employment for cause under the terms of my Employment Agreement, in the interest of resolving this matter and, in particular, to relieve my family from the stress of ongoing litigation, Northwestern and I have agreed to a settlement, and I am satisfied with the terms of the settlement,' Fitzgerald said in his statement.
CNN
44 minutes ago
- CNN
Northwestern and former head football coach settle wrongful termination lawsuit stemming from hazing scandal
Northwestern University and Pat Fitzgerald announced Thursday they've agreed to a settlement that ends a wrongful termination lawsuit filed by the former head football coach after he was fired following allegations of widespread hazing in his program. Northwestern's statement acknowledges that Fitzgerald did not know about the hazing in the football program and that he never 'condoned or directed any hazing.' The school also said that when made aware of the hazing going on within his program in July 2023, Fitzgerald was 'incredibly upset and saddened by the negative impact this conduct had on players within the program.' Fitzgerald filed a $130 million lawsuit in October 2023 after being fired a few months earlier as the hazing allegations were made public. The longtime coach of the Wildcats always maintained that he had no knowledge of hazing in his program. 'For the past two years, I have engaged in a process of extensive fact and expert discovery, which showed what I have known and said all along—that I had no knowledge of hazing ever occurring in the Northwestern football program, and that I never directed or encouraged hazing in any way,' Fitzgerald said in a statement released through his attorneys. 'Through discovery, I learned that some hazing did occur in the football program at Northwestern. I am extremely disappointed that members of the team engaged in this behavior and that no one reported it to me, so that I could have alerted Northwestern's Athletic Department and administrators, stopped the inappropriate behavior, and taken every necessary step to protect Northwestern's student athletes.' The terms of the settlement are not being made public, Northwestern said in its statement. The settlement marks the end of a long relationship between Northwestern and Fitzgerald, who starred as a linebacker for the Wildcats before becoming the school's head coach in July 2006. His 17 years as the school's head football coach were among the most successful in school history and he was seen as a Wildcat icon, having spurned interest from bigger schools in order to remain with his alma mater. But when the hazing scandal broke in the summer of 2023, Fitzgerald's time as the leader of the football program came to a shocking end. Fitzgerald's firing followed an independent investigation into the hazing allegations by a former Illinois inspector general. The inquiry began in December after an anonymous email address sent a complaint at the end of the 2022 season, according to an executive summary of the investigation made public by Northwestern. The investigation revealed 11 players, past and present, said hazing was ongoing in the program, university president Michael Schill said in a July 2023 letter to the Northwestern community. But, Schill added in the letter, the investigator didn't find 'any credible evidence that Coach Fitzgerald himself knew about it,' and Fitzgerald has denied any knowledge of hazing in the program. Fitzgerald was initially suspended for two weeks before he was fired. His lawyers contended that he had an agreement with school leadership that he would not face additional punishment beyond that suspension but was then fired days later. In his letter to the community, Schill said he may have erred in only suspending Fitzgerald, saying, 'In determining an appropriate penalty for the head coach, I focused too much on what the report concluded he didn't know and not enough on what he should have known.' The coach was fired a day after that letter was released. In his statement on Thursday, Fitzgerald called his firing the result of a 'rush to judgment in the media' and said reports that he 'knew about and directed hazing are false.' 'Though I maintain Northwestern had no legal basis to terminate my employment for cause under the terms of my Employment Agreement, in the interest of resolving this matter and, in particular, to relieve my family from the stress of ongoing litigation, Northwestern and I have agreed to a settlement, and I am satisfied with the terms of the settlement,' Fitzgerald said in his statement.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texans safety Jimmie Ward sued by woman he was arrested for allegedly assaulting in June
This story contains depictions of domestic violence. Houston Texans safety Jimmie Ward has been arrested twice in two months and is now facing a civil lawsuit from the woman he allegedly assaulted in June, according to multiple reports Thursday. Ward, 34, was arrested on June 12 on a felony domestic violence charge. The suit, filed Wednesday in Harris County (Texas) District Court by the plaintiff, alleges that she was "violently assaulted multiple times, both sexually and physically" by Ward, whom she also accuses of drug use, emotional abuse, financial manipulation and death threats, according to ESPN's report. She is reportedly seeking $20 million in damages. The suit notes that Ward and the woman have been together for years and share a 3-year-old child, who allegedly has been present while Ward has allegedly assaulted the woman, according to ABC13. The woman reportedly alleges that early on the morning of June 12, Ward slapped, choked and threatened her and forced her to perform oral sex. The ESPN report states that as soon as the woman got a chance to remove herself and the child from the home, she took the child and ran into the street. The woman was naked at the time, and that's when she called 911, per the report. Reporting from the Houston Chronicle that day detailed that Ward was arrested around 5:30 a.m. after deputies with the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office responded to the situation. Ward was released that afternoon on $30,000 bond. Since Ward's initial arrest, he has violated his bond agreement twice, according to the suit: first when he contacted the woman and then again when he tested positive for alcohol, per ESPN's report. The second violation resulted in another arrest of Ward earlier this month. "Our main focus right now is the grand jury, that is set for first week of September, to try to convince the grand jury that Jimmie should not be indicted," Ward's attorney, Stephen Jackson, told ESPN. "We're going to take this one step at a time. We're going to focus on the criminal allegations to try to get those dismissed, and then we'll focus on the civil suit." The plaintiff's attorney is Tony Buzbee, whose firm recently represented a woman who filed a since-settled lawsuit that accused Pro Football Hall of Famer and media personality Shannon Sharpe of rape. Notably, Buzbee also represented multiple women in sexual misconduct and assault cases against former Texans and current Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson, who was ultimately suspended 11 games by the NFL in 2022 and fined $5 million after facing accusations from more than 24 massage therapists. While the Texans declined comment to ESPN, the franchise's general manager, Nick Caserio, said the team would "kind of let the legal process take care of itself" when he was asked about the matter on the first day of training camp. Ward is on Houston's physically unable to perform list due to a sprained foot he's still recovering from. The injury required season-ending surgery last season. Ward, voted a Texans captain in 2023 and 2024, has not practiced during camp this year and has not been activated.
