Aoun Says Hezbollah Has Shown ‘Flexibility' in Discussing its Weapons
Aoun's statement on Thursday came in the wake of US envoy Morgan Ortagus' visit and increased American pressure to ensure that all weapons on Lebanese territory are under the control of legitimate state authorities.
Following a meeting between the National Moderation Bloc and Aoun at Baabda Palace, MP Sajih Attieh stated that the discussion touched on the disarmament of Hezbollah.
He emphasized that the president is handling the matter with great wisdom and confirmed Hezbollah's openness to a phased and cooperative approach.
Aoun expressed optimism, suggesting that the party's positive stance should be met with understanding and a realistic outlook, given the current situation in the country.
Earlier, Asharq Al-Awsat reported exclusively that Aoun, in coordination with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, would lead direct talks with Hezbollah. These talks would explore not only the transfer of arms to state control but also strategies to integrate Hezbollah's military assets and address its political concerns.
This week, media reports citing unnamed Hezbollah sources claimed the group was willing to hand over its heavy weapons north of the Litani River - including drones, missiles, and anti-tank systems - if Israel withdraws from occupied Lebanese territories.
However, Hezbollah later issued a statement denying the reports and asserting that only official spokespeople represent the party's position.
Resolution 1701 as a Benchmark
Hezbollah has not officially engaged in disarmament talks but frames the weapons discussion within the context of 'defense and national protection.' Its lawmakers have expressed conditional openness to negotiations - only after full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel's complete withdrawal from Lebanese territory and an end to violations of the ceasefire.
MP Raed Berro told local station LBCI that any future conversation about the group's arms must occur within the framework of a national defense strategy and broader strategic security goals.
In a press conference held at the Lebanese Parliament on Thursday, Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah reiterated that the Lebanese government is responsible for taking formal steps to end Israeli aggression and upholding the national policy statement. He insisted that stopping Israel's violations of Lebanese sovereignty should be a priority for the government.
Fadlallah urged a 'serious national dialogue' focused on addressing the Israeli threat and achieving a collective defense strategy.
He accused the Israeli army of committing war crimes against unarmed civilians, actions he claimed occurred under the watch of the United Nations and the ceasefire monitoring committee.
He also denied claims about arms smuggling through the Port of Beirut, calling such allegations unfounded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Where did Iran's Arab supporters disappear?
A deathly silence looms over the Arab street, unmoved by the wave of dramatic events in the region. We have not seen demonstrations, protests, or sit-ins in the Arab countries, and in my view, this is the first time in seven decades or more that such displays have vanished. What has befallen Iran is no small matter; its military losses and nuclear facilities are immense — facilities that cost billions of dollars, and much blood and sweat to build. To its ballistic and nuclear losses, we can add the loss of the popular current it had cultivated across the region, from Iraq to Morocco. When the Lebanese government took its bold decision to confiscate Hezbollah's weapons, the response was limited to just a few dozen motorcycles roaming Beirut's streets in protest. So, what happened to the human waves, the millions who once flooded the streets at a mere gesture from the party's leader or from Tehran? The collapse of Iranian influence is clear within Arab regions, like the collapse of Nasserism after its defeat in the 1967 war. It lost the ability to mobilize the street and resorted to relying on its socialist party members and labor unions to attend events after the masses — who once filled the squares with passion and spontaneity in response to radio appeals that dominated people's awareness and emotions for nearly two decades — dwindled. In the wake of that defeat, a sense of shock and betrayal spread across the region, which had been waiting for the liberation of Palestine. People do not admire the defeated Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Iran, too, once enjoyed dominance and popular support in the region, defying attempts to block its ideas and curb its activities. It managed to raise generations of Arabs on its ideas. Tehran opened its doors and arms to extremist Sunnis, including leaders of Al-Qaeda, overlooking their anti-Shiite ideology, and supported most Sunni opposition groups and movements against their governments. It built an organic, deeply coordinated relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood. It organized nearly annual conferences and seminars for Arab nationalists and communists. It spent heavily to woo Arab politicians and intellectuals; books were published, and odes of praise were written in support of the imam's regime and in its defense. Tehran gathered Shiites, Sunnis, and Arab Christians alike — thinkers from the Gulf, Egypt, the Levant, the Maghreb, Sudan, Yemen, and Arab diaspora communities. It climbed onto many Arab media outlets to promote Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's line. At times, we could hardly understand how it managed to reconcile all these contradictions. In Tripoli — a city with tensions against the Shiites of Beirut — there were Sunni groups that, since the 1980s, continued to pledge allegiance to Tehran. In Jordan, among the Muslim Brotherhood, some openly declared their affection for Tehran's leaders. Numerous works emerged in its defense: in Egypt, for example, 'Iran and Political Islam'; in Kuwait, 'Iran and the West: Conflict of Interests'; in the Gulf, conferences were held under the banner of 'rapprochement' between sects, celebrating the history of Abbasid Caliph Al-Nasir Li-Din Allah. All these activities might have been laudable, were it not for the fact that the intentions behind them were not out of love for ending or easing sectarian strife, but rather as part of a political project of domination. Tehran was managing elite and grassroots movements in dozens of Arab cities; protests against novels, films, negotiations, and regimes. But in the recent wars, following the October 2023 attack, the kind of mobilization we were used to in every confrontation faded. The first reason: People do not admire the defeated. The second: The apparatuses that used to orchestrate these gatherings have lost their connections and their resources have dried up. The Arab street venerates the victorious hero until he falls, then replaces him with another hero. Its believers have been shaken by successive defeats, just as Nasserists were shattered by the setbacks of the 1960s. The remaining challenge is to hold on to its supporters within its Shiite popular base; they are the ones most harmed and who still live the trauma of shock. With time, the Shiites of Lebanon will come to realize the truth — that they are victims of Hezbollah and Iran; that it is a burden on them, rather than a support. For four decades they have borne the confrontation with Israel and the consequences of ties with Iran: economic and personal sanctions, the destruction of their areas and neighborhoods, the targeting of their remittances from Africa and the Americas, and more.
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump rules out sending US troops to enforce potential peace deal in Ukraine
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump has ruled out sending American troops to help enforce a potential peace deal in Ukraine, despite him expressing an openness to the idea on Monday.. In a phone interview on Fox News this morning, Trump was asked: 'What kind of assurances do you feel like you have, going forward, past this Trump administration, that it won't be American boots on the ground defending (Ukraine's) border?' 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president,' Trump responded. A White House official confirmed Tuesday that Trump is 'emphatic' about not sending US troops to protect Ukraine. But, that person added, there are other ways for the US to ensure Kyiv is protected. The official added that conversations regarding commitments on security guarantees are ongoing, and the specifics of what that will look like will continue to be the subject of negotiations between the US, its European allies and Ukraine. Foreign leaders want to know what resources Trump will commit to ensure that, once a potential peace deal is reached, Russia isn't able to regroup and go after more territory down the road. Trump said Tuesday that he still believes European countries are the 'first line of defense' when it comes to Russian aggression in Ukraine, but that the US will be involved in helping to secure the context: Trump was elected in part on a promise to keep American troops out of foreign conflicts, and even some members of his own administration have advocated for a vastly reduced US role in the Ukraine war. CNN
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Mediators await Israeli response to new Gaza ceasefire proposal
CAIRO — Arab mediators are awaiting a formal response from Israel after Hamas said it had accepted a new proposal for a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal. The plan was presented by Qatar and Egypt, which are trying to avert a major new Israeli offensive to occupy Gaza fully. Qatar said it was "almost identical" to a US proposal for a 60-day truce, during which around half of 50 hostages held in Gaza - 20 of whom are believed to be alive - would be handed over and the two sides would negotiate a lasting ceasefire and the return of the rest. In recent days, Israel's government has said it would no longer accept a partial deal - only a comprehensive one that would see all the hostages freed. Local media quoted a senior Israeli official saying: "Israel's position hasn't changed - release of all hostages and fulfilment of other conditions defined for ending the war." Later this week, the Israeli cabinet is expected to approve the military's plan to occupy Gaza City, where intensifying Israeli strikes have already prompted thousands of people to Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Israel's intention to conquer all of Gaza - including the areas where most of its 2.1 million Palestinian residents have sought refuge - after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire deal broke down last Monday night, a Hamas statement announced that the armed group and other Palestinian factions had approved a ceasefire proposal presented by Egyptian and Qatari mediators to their delegations in Cairo the previous official Taher al-Nunu told Al-Araby TV that they had not sought any amendments to the proposal, which he described as "a partial deal leading to a comprehensive deal".He also emphasised that on the first day of its implementation, negotiations would begin with the aim of agreeing a permanent ceasefire."We hope that the 60 days of ceasefire will be sufficient to conclude a final agreement that will completely end this war," he foreign ministry spokesman, Majed al-Ansari, told reporters in Doha on Tuesday that the proposal was "98%" similar to the one presented by US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff."I won't go into the details of the language that is on the table right now. But what I can say is that it is very close, almost identical to what was there on the table," Ansari said."It is within the confines of the Witkoff plan... It's a continuation of that process. Obviously, it's in the details where the devil lies."Witkoff had proposed a 60-day truce that would see Hamas release 10 living hostages and the bodies of 18 dead hostages in two phases, in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and detainees held in Israeli jails. He also said that negotiations on a final agreement to end the war would begin on the first day of the accepted Witkoff's plan, but Hamas rejected it, partly because it did not include a guarantee that the temporary ceasefire would lead to a permanent media reported that Israeli officials were examining the new proposal and Hamas's to public broadcaster Kan, Netanyahu has not ruled out the possibility of a partial deal despite his recent statements that he will only accept a comprehensive Saturday night, his office put out a statement saying that Israel would "agree to a deal on condition that all the hostages are released in one go, and in accordance with our conditions for ending the war".Those conditions included the disarming of Hamas, the demilitarisation of Gaza, Israeli control of the Gaza perimeter, and the installation of a non-Hamas and non-Palestinian Authority governance, it said in a video on Monday that he had discussed with senior Israeli military commanders their "plans regarding Gaza City and the completion of our missions"."Like you, I hear the reports in the media, and from them you can get one impression — Hamas is under immense pressure," he President Donald Trump meanwhile wrote on social media: "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be."However, the families of hostages fear the new offensive in Gaza City could endanger those being held Sunday night, hundreds of thousands of Israelis gathered in Tel Aviv to demand that their government agree a deal with Hamas to end the war now and bring all the hostages home. Netanyahu accused the demonstrators of hardening Hamas's negotiating Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 62,004 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health of Gaza's population has also been displaced multiple times; more than 90% of homes are estimated to be damaged or destroyed; the healthcare, water, sanitation and hygiene systems have collapsed; and UN-backed global food security experts have warned that the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out" due to food shortages. — BBC
