logo
There was no escaping the Nazis

There was no escaping the Nazis

Spectator09-07-2025
Soon after Hitler came to power in 1933, Charlotte Beradt, who as a Jewish journalist and a communist had been barred from publishing, found her sleep wracked by nightmares that unmistakably reenacted the terrors of the Nazi regime. Deprived of her regular employment, her own dream experiences prompted the subversive if dangerous idea of recording the dreams of her fellow citizens. 'I began to collect the dreams that the Nazi dictatorship had, as it were, dictated,' she wrote. Citing a dictum of a Nazi official that in Hitler's Germany no one has a private life except while asleep, the material she collected demonstrated how dreams 'as minutely as a seismograph' can record impinging external realities.
For much of my working life I practised as a psychoanalyst and both in my private and professional experience I've encountered dreams which report not merely on the vicissitudes of the dreamer's personal unconscious conflicts but bear unmistakable marks of the incursion of prevailing objective events. While reading The Third Reich of Dreams, first published in the 1960s, I had a relevant experience. I dreamt that one of the long-dead members of the Jewish Brigade, with whom my father was interned as a POW during the second world war, had been banned from giving a lecture at Cambridge (my alma mater) and was asking for my help in gathering support to resist the ban. The book had brought to the forefront of my unconscious, via my family's history, the pernicious recurrence of anti-Semitism in our own day.
Beradt was not a disciple of psychoanalysis, and the dreams she recorded were not opaque dramas requiring professional psychological decoding. On the contrary, they are remarkably easy to analyse. Her sample dreamers include 'a dressmaker, neighbour, aunt, milkman, friend'. She writes that she generally didn't reveal her purpose, 'for I wanted the most candid and unaffected responses possible'.
One woman dreams that lists of verboten words, the first 'Lord' and the last 'I', had been posted all round her neighbourhood. Another finds herself surrounded by innocent seeming workmen, prompting no anxiety until she spots a chimney sweep (because of the association with black, her family's code for the SS). The men then all perform a Nazi salute, chorusing: 'Your guilt cannot be doubted.' Herr S, a factory owner, dreams of a factory inspection by Goebbels, to whom he finds himself incapable of making a Nazi salute. After a protracted struggle to raise his arm, his spine cracks and breaks – one of several dreams whose meaning requires no elucidation.
Many others are about cunning methods of thought-policing, suggesting an intuitive recognition of this form of state terrorism long before Orwell wrote Nineteen Eighty-four. In one, a stormtrooper opens the door of the cosy stove that warms the dreamer's home and from it a shrill voice repeats all the jokes, criticisms and anti-establishment comments made by the household. In another, a lawyer, chatting to his brother on the phone, comments that he doesn't 'enjoy anything any more'. In the middle of the night the phone rings and a voice announces ominously,: 'This is the telephone Surveillance Office,' at which the terrified dreamer begins to grovel for forgiveness for the treasonable crime of non-enjoyment.
A number of dreams indicate a distressing degree of self-identification with Nazi propaganda. A Jewish dreamer sits on a rubbish bin and hangs a notice around his neck declaring: 'I'll make way for the trash.' Perhaps most illuminating are the dreams that indicate the dreamer's recognition of the psychological toll that internal collaboration with the morality of the state will take. A young woman with a Christian father and a Jewish mother has a series of dreams in which she feels profound hatred for the mother to whom she had always been close. A doctor finds himself in a concentration camp where there were dinner parties and plays performed and, in the dream, thinks 'Well then, so it really is all exaggerated, the things you hear about the camps' until he observes himself in a mirror wearing polished jackboots and a Nazi uniform.
Besides being brave, Beradt was shrewd: she protected herself and her fellow dreamers by concealing her findings in the bindings of her own books. She disguised the appearance of any political figures, turning Hitler, Göring and Goebbels into genial family members Uncles Hans, Gustav, and Gerhard. When the arm of state control grew more menacing, she posted her notes to friends overseas.
Happily, she escaped Nazi Germany and turned her groundbreaking field research into this short but sharply insightful and disquieting book. Her acute observations on the insidious reach of totalitarian ideology are bolstered by telling quotations from Orwell, Bertolt Brecht, Franz Kafka and Hannah Arendt. Many of the dreams have the dislocating, quasi-rational quality of a Kafka short story and Beradt's considered conclusions make a worthy coda to Arendt's The Origins of Totalitarianism. As the world turns darker and the exercise of state power again becomes more habitual, this book is a timely reminder that the culture we allow ourselves to exist within is capable of making deep and damaging inroads into our collective psyche.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is James O'Brien recycling an anti-Semitic lie?
Why is James O'Brien recycling an anti-Semitic lie?

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Why is James O'Brien recycling an anti-Semitic lie?

What kind of person would unquestioningly believe that British Jewish children are taught that 'one Jewish life is worth thousands of Arab lives and that Arabs are cockroaches to be crushed'? Step forward James O'Brien, LBC's prince of the bien pensant. Today, the radio presenter received a message from a listener calling himself 'Chris' who made these overtly anti-Semitic claims. O'Brien apparently duly repeated them on air without so much as a how's your father, prefaced by the baffling statement: 'I'm fascinated by objectivity, which is why I'm going to read out this from Chris'. The listener's message began by pointing out that 'warped views are not just an Israeli problem'. What? So it's OK now to smear an entire nation as holding 'warped views'? The fact that this alone did not set off alarm bells in O'Brien's mind was worrying enough. Make such a claim about any other people and the author of How To Be Right would surely be the very first to cry racist. But that was only the prelude. 'Chris' went on to extend this 'Israeli problem' to include Jews in this country as well as their cousins in Tel Aviv. 'My wife was brought up Jewish and at shabbat school in a leafy Hertfordshire town…' his message continued. Let's press pause again there. For one thing, it just sounded phony. 'My wife was brought up Jewish'? Yeah, right. But the mention of a 'shabbat school' was hilarious. There is, of course, no such thing. Jews do not go to school on the sabbath. These red flags also fluttered too high above O'Brien's head for him to notice. He continued to read out the message to his 1.5 million listeners. Thus, middle Britain was treated, in O'Brien's honeyed tones, to Chris's claim that at 'shabbat school', his 'wife' had been introduced to the aforementioned bigotry towards Arabs. The fact that O'Brien at no point realised the nature of what he was reading is downright disturbing. Let's make this absolutely clear. Of the 15 million Jews in the world, you'll be hard pressed to find any who holds such repugnant views of anybody, including Arabs. Attend any pro-Israel rally and you'll never hear anything like it. Especially not in Britain. It is true that a handful of extremists, especially in Israel, sometimes chant disgraceful things about their enemies. Jews have their thugs and nutters just like any other people. But these are in the vanishingly small minority, like the BNP in Britain. To suggest that this amounts to an institutional indoctrination, akin to the brainwashing in Gaza, is quite obviously an anti-Semitic lie. Obvious, at least, to anybody with common sense. In concluding his shameful monologue, O'Brien intoned: 'Whilst young children are being taught such hatred and dehumanisation, undoubtedly on both sides, as Chris points out, then they will always be able to justify death and cruelty.' He added: 'There is a danger, perhaps, that we only ever hear one side of the dehumanisation and propaganda.' No, there isn't. Not everything has two sides, James. There is such a thing as right and wrong. Obviously Israel, being a real-life country in the real world, isn't perfect; obviously it has its own extremists and criminals, like every other state on Earth. But to compare the Middle East's only democracy to Gaza, where every strata of society is poisoned with the toxic ideology of the death cult, is frankly abhorrent – let alone suggesting that British Jews are engaged in the same thing. Think of the scenes on October 7, when the half-naked corpses of Jewish women were paraded through Gaza while mobs spat at them, jeered and beat them with sticks. Could you imagine such a thing happening in Tel Aviv? Could you imagine Israelis cheering as children and the elderly were taken hostage? Of course not. But I wonder whether O'Brien can. Maybe I shouldn't be so surprised. In 2014 and 2015, the author of How They Broke Britain gave vast amounts of airtime to the bogus claims of the VIP sex ring based on testimony by Carl Beech, who was later imprisoned both for sex offences and for perverting the course of justice. He later expressed regret. But in August last year, he caused outrage by praising a video on social media that blamed 'Zionist backers' for the Southport riots. He later claimed not to have watched the clip in full and condemned it. A certain pattern is emerging here. As inexplicable as it might be, O'Brien has a huge listenership and more than a million followers on social media. LBC has removed the 'warped views' clip from the internet. For untold numbers of people, however, the damage has already been done.

We all need to speak up over the IDF outrages in Gaza
We all need to speak up over the IDF outrages in Gaza

Scotsman

time5 hours ago

  • Scotsman

We all need to speak up over the IDF outrages in Gaza

Relatives of Palestinian child Salem Hussein, 12, killed in an Israeli army bombardment of Gaza, mourn beside his body at Shifa Hospital in Gaza City yesterday. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi) I woke up yesterday morning planning to devote part of my column to the atrocities currently being enacted by the Israeli Defence Force (a misnomer if ever there was one) in Gaza when my attention was drawn to a letter in yesterday's edition of this paper. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Penned by Marjorie Ellis Thompson it eloquently put the case for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. I trust that she will forgive me for quoting her, but I found her letter to be a powerful indictment, both of Israel and the passive politicians who are allowing this to happen. She refers to footage of a British surgeon, 'practically in tears' as he says children in Gaza are being targeted 'as if it is a game' where one day they are shot in the head, another day the neck and on yet another day the testicles. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She says that 'Yet we, along with the US and Germany continue to aid and abet this 21st century holocaust.' Israel has embarked upon a programme of state terrorism, leading to a statement from UNICEF's Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa, Eduoard Beigbeder, who said 'In total more than 50,000 children have reportedly been killed or injured since October 2023. "How many more dead boys and girls will it take? What level of horror must be livestreamed before the international community fully steps up, uses its influence and takes bold, decisive action to force the end of this ruthless killing of children?' Too many people are keeping their own counsel for fear of being labelled anti-semitic, but this has to stop! Israel has used this tactic to great effect for too long. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Criticising Israel's government is not the same as attacking the Jewish religion, indeed many Jews have also protested against the action that the Israeli state is carrying out in their name. We all need to speak up!

Debate-style video roils internet after participant openly identifies as fascist
Debate-style video roils internet after participant openly identifies as fascist

NBC News

time8 hours ago

  • NBC News

Debate-style video roils internet after participant openly identifies as fascist

The YouTube channel Jubilee, which is known for its debate-style videos, is facing backlash online after a participant in a recent show self-identified as a fascist. The incident has roiled the internet, inspiring online discussion for days, and it has also had major consequences. The man, who identified himself as Connor in the video, says he was subsequently fired from his job. The episode, which was posted Sunday, featured British American journalist Medhi Hasan, who was tasked with debating 20 'far-right conservatives.' Hasan hosted a show on MSNBC from February 2021 to January 2024. Hasan had made the claim that President Donald Trump is 'defying the Constitution' as one of the topics of conversation. In a roughly seven-minute-long debate with Hasan, Connor spoke about his desire for an autocracy in the United States and praised the ideas of Carl Schmitt, a Nazi Party political philosopher, while saying there was 'a little bit of persecution' of Jewish people during the Holocaust. 'You're a fan of the Nazis?' Hasan asked the participant. 'I, frankly, don't care being called a Nazi at all,' Connor said. Later on, Hasan said, 'We may have to rename this show, because you're a little bit more than a far-right Republican.' 'What can I say?' Connor replied. 'I think you say, 'I'm a fascist.'' 'Yeah, I am,' Connor said with a smile as several others in the circle clapped. In just two days, the YouTube video has garnered 4 million views. Clips quickly began spreading online, sparking criticism that the channel and YouTube were platforming pro-fascist content. 'Jubilee this isn't even a debate anymore. It's just pure hatred that these people have in their hearts. Giving these people a platform is insane to me,' said a comment that got over a thousand likes under the YouTube video. A creator known by the username @mattxiv on X posted a remark that was viewed over 500,000 times: 'i don't think a channel that gives a platform of millions to people who self identify as 'fascist' should be allowed to monetize its videos. do you @youtube.' YouTube did not respond to a request for comment. Data from Google showed that searches for 'Jubilee' jumped significantly Tuesday after Connor announced he had been fired from his job. Hasan has since said online that the extent of the guests' views were not thoroughly communicated to him before he went on the show. 'To be clear, I didn't know they would be actual outright open fascists!' Hasan said on X. In another reply, responding to someone who had inquired about why Hasan would agree to go on the show if 'Jubilee invited a bunch of nazis,' he said that 'that's not how the debate was sold to me. You can see my shock when they start expressing their views openly.' Connor later claimed that he was fired because of his participation in the video. In an interview with the right-wing online social media brand TheRiftTV, Connor said being fired made him feel 'destroyed.' TheRiftTV started a fundraiser to help him as he looks for new jobs which has already received over $30,000. Connor did not respond to a request for comment. 'Unfortunately voicing fully legal traditional right wing political views results in real consequences,' read the description of the campaign on GiveSendGo, a Christian crowdfunding site that has become a go-to platform for controversial crowdfunding campaigns. 'This is cancel culture and political discrimination on full display.' In what appears to be Connor's Telegram channel, many rallied behind him in his debate, writing that Hasan 'had nothing to say because you were right,' among other hate comments about Hasan. The YouTube video was part of Jubilee's web series 'Surrounded,' in which one guest sits in the middle of a circle, 'surrounded' by around 20 people with opposing viewpoints. The web series has featured well-known political influencers as the main debaters, including Candance Owens, Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro. The show works by having the main guest start a debate by making a claim and having those who wish to debate it rush up to a chair facing the person in the middle. Whoever touches the chair first is allowed to take part. Whoever is sitting in the chair is able to take part in the debate until those surrounding the chair decide to vote the participant off. People who wish for the person in the middle to be voted off can raise a red flag, and if enough people raise their flags, the person is kicked off the debate and replaced by another person in the circle. This isn't the only video that has gone viral for its controversial participants. Clips from several other 'Surrounded' videos have caused controversy in the past, with users claiming that the channel was giving a platform to bigoted views. One of the channel's most viewed videos, a debate in which Kirk is surrounded by '25 Liberal College Students,' accumulated 30 million views. In an interview this year, Jubilee Media CEO Jason Lee addressed those concerns, saying the channel hosts people with controversial views to give their audiences the 'ability to hear nuanced perspective[s].' He added that the show tries to limit misinformation by incorporating fact-checks throughout the videos. Jubilee did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'It's a question that we've been asked about: 'Is it dangerous to platform or have certain voices or points of view on?' And the way I would respond to that is I feel like we live in a more dangerous world if two individuals are not able to sit in the same room together and have a conversation,' Lee said. 'It doesn't necessarily mean that conversation is going to be productive or that anyone is going to necessarily change your point of view, but I think that that is sorely missing.' The video featuring Hasan's debate with Connor features only one fact-check, for a claim Connor made about the number of people killed by Spanish dictator Francisco Franco. Jubilee's videos span a range of topic areas. Currently, the channel is recruiting people for its 'Surrounded' series, including 'Conspiracy Theorists,' 'Conservative Christians' and 'Anti Capitalist[s],' and are part of a larger trend of debate-style internet content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store