logo
‘Communities suffer while municipalities are not held accountable'

‘Communities suffer while municipalities are not held accountable'

The Citizen26-06-2025
Community members and political parties on Wednesday tried to urge the Ngwathe Local Municipality to not appeal to the court judgment for intervention, but to rather prioritise the well-being of the community when they gathered at the municipal building where Council was to make a decision on whether the municipality will appeal the court decision.
However, according to court documents an application to the High Court for leave to appeal was filed this week.
This follows Judge J.P. Daffue's ruling in favour of AfriForum on Friday, finding the Ngwathe Municipality not fulfilling its constitutional, legislative and regulatory obligations towards residents of Parys, Vredefort, Koppies, Heilbron and Edenville.
Daffue ordered as part of a structural interdict that the municipal council must be dissolved and the Free State provincial government must intervene in the municipality's affairs.
Speaking on the court ruling earlier this week, Dumisane Magagula, secretary of the South African Municipal Workers Union (SAMWU), slammed Ngwathe's executive mayor, councillor Victoria de Beer-Mthombeni's defence that her administration inherited a mess, saying that although a legacy issue, it is the successor's entitlement.
Magagula was clear that the former leadership cannot be blamed, while given the power and authority to bring change.
He explained the aim of a Section 139 ruling as mainly to stabilise a municipality.
He mentioned Ngwathe's failure to provide water and sanitation, and said the municipality had been mugged with maladministration and financial chaos, ending up in an over-estimated budget tabled at the State of the Municipality Address.
Magagula said it is unfortunate that AfriForum ended up getting the ruling, while the provincial government should have acted earlier. 'Communities suffer while municipalities are not held accountable,' he added.
He specifically referred to the budget tabled by Ngwathe, criticising councillors agreeing on a matter, even though it does not make sense and does not benefit the community.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gayton McKenzie racism row deepens as string of racist comments threaten national unity
Gayton McKenzie racism row deepens as string of racist comments threaten national unity

The Citizen

time20 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Gayton McKenzie racism row deepens as string of racist comments threaten national unity

'South Africa has not healed' from hate speech. A slew of racism charges against political leaders and a podcast underscore the persistent racial tensions in the country and could destabilise hard-fought national building efforts, according to an expert. 'Enforcement of the antidiscrimination laws is crucial if we are to address this racially charged rhetoric and hate speech,' said political analyst Rene Oosthuizen. The Human Rights Commission of South Africa (HRC) rejected the apology of the hosts of Open Chats podcast that labelled the coloured community as crazy, among other offensive remarks, and vowed to investigate the incident. ActionSA's MP Alan Beesley has also reported Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie to the body for racist remarks after he repeatedly used allegedly hateful slurs on social media in years gone by that served to degrade and dehumanise black South Africans. Racism and the dehumanising of any person, regardless of their race, has no place in South Africa, 'which is why we have also lodged a complaint against Minister [of Public Works and Infrastructure] Dean Macpherson for his deeply offensive and racially charged attacks on ActionSA supporters, referring to them as amaphara [petty thieves addicted to heroin] and hobos', Beesley said. 'While we hold reservations about the effectiveness of the HRC, it remains the constitutionally empowered institution mandated to address such matters. 'Accordingly, we will follow the prescribed process, but are fully prepared to independently institute proceedings at the Equality Court in terms of Section 20 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act.' ALSO READ: Malema's EFF calls for 'removal' of McKenzie over K-word slurs ANC SG also in the firing line ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula was also in hot water after AfriForum head of public relations Ernst van Zyl strongly condemned his 'racist outburst' against white South Africans during a recent media conference in Johannesburg. 'Mbalula lashed out at white South Africans and Afrikaner refugees in the US. He smeared the refugees as car guards and murderers. 'AfriForum labels this outburst as unacceptable and considers Mbalula's stereotyping of white South Africans as bloodthirsty murderers who target each other and black South Africans to be blatant racism.' Political analyst Piet Croucamp said AfriForum and Solidarity are race-obsessed. 'They keep perpetuating the abnormalities of society and then in their rant about Mbalula, they tribalise it.' It doesn't mean Mbalula didn't behave despicably, but the wrong institution is now criticising him, Croucamp said. Social division 'As far as McKenzie is concerned, I would like to see how the HRC solve this difficult conundrum because I have been told by [EFF leader] Julius Malema that black people can't be racist,' he added. Oosthuizen said it was very clear that these recent incidents, including inflammatory rhetoric from political leaders and offensive public discourse, underscore the persistent social tensions in our country. 'My fear is that these incidents risk exacerbating social divisions. 'I firmly believe the way forward requires responsible leadership that prioritises sustained and constructive dialogue that promotes understanding across racial and cultural lines,' she said. Benjamin Rapanyane, senior political lecturer at North-West University, said South Africa has not healed from racism. 'We are still in a deep crisis in respect of handling this sensitive issue. 'Perhaps the National Dialogue will help us to delve into this issue and heal the deeper wounds,' Rapanyane said. NOW READ: Political parties band together to condemn Open Chats Podcast's racist comments

ANC and DA trade barbs over City of Tshwane's cleaning levy
ANC and DA trade barbs over City of Tshwane's cleaning levy

The Citizen

time3 days ago

  • The Citizen

ANC and DA trade barbs over City of Tshwane's cleaning levy

The DA accused the City of Tshwane of wasting taxpayers' money. The City of Tshwane (CoT) used three advocates and hundreds of papers to argue, and lose, the cleaning levy case in the Pretoria High Court last Thursday. The court ruled that the fee was illegal and invalid. AfriForum approached the court to set aside the metro's decision to impose a new mandatory monthly levy of R194.37 (excluding VAT) on approximately 260 000 households and businesses within the metro. AfriForum argued that the levy amounted to illegal and unfair double taxation, especially in cases where residents do not benefit from the metro's refuse removal service and are forced to use private service providers, she said. ALSO READ: Tshwane and Joburg squeeze residents for cash Tshwane MMC accuses DA of introducing cleaning levy However, the MMC for Environment and Agriculture Management, Obakeng Ramabodu, clapped back and said the City of Tshwane will appeal this judgment as it believes a cleaning levy, aimed at improving the maintenance of landfills, is necessary. He also accused the DA of introducing the levy while it was running the city. 'Much has been made of this cleansing levy, and it must be noted that a cleansing levy is not unique to the City of Tshwane. A cleansing levy was introduced in Tshwane between 2016 and 2021 by the erstwhile government, which now claims to take exception to it,' he said. DA accuses Tshwane of wasting taxpayers' money DA Tshwane caucus leader, Cilliers Brink, said his party will write to the city manager to investigate the handling of the cleaning fee. Brink said the judgment in the Pretoria High Court setting aside the cleaning levy revealed the extent to which Tshwane's ANC-led coalition is wasting taxpayers' money. 'AfriForum took the levy on review, and the judge was scoffing at the city's conduct of the case. Not only did the court point to the failure of the city to produce policy documents on which its defence was based, but [it] also criticised the overreach of the city in employing three advocates to argue the case and producing hundreds of pages of socially irrelevant documents,' he said. Brink stated that the cost of every page and billable hour for the advocates was at the expense of the residents of Tshwane. 'The irony is that this money is spent to justify a levy which the city cannot even explain. 'In the paragraph, the judge even issues a warning to the city's legal representatives of the professional, ethical implications of pulling up such a bad case,' he added. ALSO READ: Levy court battle far from over Brink said when the levy was debated in council, the DA rejected the idea of such a levy as a way of filling the city's coffers. 'The same budget which raised the levy did not increase the allocation for city cleanings. The ANC-coalition didn't actually plan to spend the money on city cleansing,' he said. Brink questioned the City of Tshwane's decision to appeal the court judgment on the cleaning levy. 'If the city's legal team could not even produce documents that the city relied on to defend the levy in court, it's unclear how they would sustain an appeal.'

ANC members no longer allowed to chant 'Kill the Boer', says Mbalula
ANC members no longer allowed to chant 'Kill the Boer', says Mbalula

The Herald

time4 days ago

  • The Herald

ANC members no longer allowed to chant 'Kill the Boer', says Mbalula

ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula says party members are no longer allowed to chant 'Kill the Boer'. Mbalula was briefing the media on Wednesday about the outcomes of the party's national executive committee (NEC) meeting. 'As the ANC, we sang that song, but no member of the ANC today will be allowed to sing 'Kill the Boer',' he said. 'Simple as that. 'Even if the Constitutional Court said you can sing it, why should we sing 'Kill the Boer' in a democratic dispensation?' The song dates back to the anti-apartheid movement and was used as a protest song against the Afrikaner-dominated government. The EFF continues to sing the song, while civil rights organisation AfriForum argues that the song incites harm and hatred towards Afrikaners. However, the courts have ruled that it does not constitute hate speech. 'We sang the song because we were fighting the commandos when we infiltrated the country from Limpopo. They deployed the Boers and commandos to kill the [MK] guerrillas as we infiltrated the country. From Angola and in the front-line states, we sang 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer' to infiltrate the country and come inside to fight,' said Mbalula.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store