The reason Donald Trump will not fire Mike Waltz
Looping a Pulitzer-prize winning journalist into a group chat designed to enable senior cabinet members to freely debate the merits of bombing Yemen could reasonably be deemed as grounds for dismissal.
But not for Mike Waltz.
Not only was Donald Trump not going to fire his national security aide, Mr Waltz didn't even need to apologise for the faux –pas, the US president declared as they sat together in front of the White House press corps on Tuesday.
'It's the equipment and technology that's not perfect,' he said, standing by his man.
Mr Waltz's use of the app Signal to discuss highly sensitive government information with colleagues may have violated the espionage act but the three-time Florida congressman survived, arguably because he had not broken the tacit agreement Mr Trump cares about most: unwavering loyalty.
Cornered about the major security breach by the press in the White House, Mr Waltz launched a frenzied verbal attack on the media for 'making up lies' about the US president and, glancing along the cabinet table at his boss, declared: 'The world owes President Trump a favour.'
With anonymous administration figures calling for his head and members of Congress lambasting his sloppiness, Mr Waltz may have erred spectacularly but his unwavering loyalty was cashed in for an endorsement from the commander-in-chief.
During his first term, Mr Trump did not hesitate to sack members of his administration for far less. Then, it was full of big political beasts, some of whom saw it as their duty to curb the impulses of the president.
HR McMaster, Mr Trump's first national security adviser, recalled spending months battling to impose Mr Trump's will on James Mattis, the then-defence secretary, and Rex Tillerson, the oil magnate turned secretary of state.
Mr Tillerson in particular showed himself unwilling to indulge Mr Trump's vanity, and was reported to have called his boss a 'f---ing moron' as he sought to seize control of foreign policy.
In the end, none of those men made it far into their term before they either fell on their swords or were abruptly sacked.
Even staff found the rapid turnover grimly comical.
Anthony Scarammuci served just 10 days as communications director before being sacked for making ill-advised comments about Steve Bannon, then the White House chief strategist.
His brief tenure became a unit of measurement for how long members of the administration survived, known as a 'Mooch'.
Mr Trump is a different political animal this time around and so is his cabinet, many of whom will have closely observed the president during his time in the White House and afterwards, for his four years of exile.
They have learnt that the US president will reward loyalty, just as he has learnt he can ride out media outrage armed with a compliant Congress.
Admittedly, Matt Gaetz was forced to withdraw his nomination as Mr Trump's attorney general last year, amid allegations – which he denied – of having a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old.
Mr Trump was able to ram through other contentious nominees including Pete Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard, both of whom are believed to have been members of the 'Houthi PC small group' Signal forum.
Mr Waltz was once seen as a relatively uncontroversial appointment, but the former Green Beret's much-vaunted competence has been dented by the leak of US war plans. Many are sharpening their knives – but in the end, it is only Mr Trump's opinion that matters.
The national security adviser has already spent 6.4 'Mooches' in office. As long as he abides by Mr Trump's demand for vociferous loyalty, he is likely to serve many more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump expected to waive Defense Production Act requirements to boost critical minerals, weapons
June 3 (Reuters) - Donald Trump is expected to waive statutory requirements under the Defense Production, including congressional approval for larger projects, to help boost domestic production of critical minerals and weapons, according to a document seen by Reuters. The document is expected to be published on the Federal Register on Wednesday, according to the government web site.


Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
China tells US envoy Washington must get ties back on 'right track'
BEIJING, June 3 (Reuters) - The U.S. should create the necessary conditions for bilateral relations to get back onto "the right track," China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the U.S. ambassador to Beijing on Tuesday, according to a ministry statement. After trade talks last month in Geneva, China has "conscientiously and strictly" implemented the consensus reached by both sides, but it is "regrettable that the U.S. recently introduced a series of 'negative' measures", which China firmly opposes, Wang told Ambassador David Perdue. Bilateral relations are at a critical juncture, and dialogue and cooperation are "the only correct choice," Wang said. Perdue said in an X post after the meeting that he had emphasized U.S. President Donald Trump's priorities on trade, fentanyl, and illegal immigration, adding that "communication is vital" to U.S.-China relations. Trump on Friday accused China of violating a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions,and the U.S. has ordered curbs on chip design software and other shipments to China. The Geneva truce to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Senior U.S. officials have said this week that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would speak soon to iron out trade issues, including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions on exports of certain minerals. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a regular news briefing on Tuesday the Trump administration "is actively monitoring China's compliance with the Geneva trade agreement," and added that "there will be a leader to leader talk very soon."


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Elon Musk calls Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill a ‘disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk, the billionaire tech entrepreneur, has opened a new rift with Donald Trump by denouncing the US president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk's online outburst could embolden fiscally conservative Republican senators – some of whom have already spoken out – to defy Trump as they continue crucial negotiations on Capitol Hill over the so-called 'one big, beautiful bill'. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk, who had previously voiced criticism of the proposed legislation, quipping that it could be big or beautiful but not both, added on X: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' He continued: 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' A top donor to Trump during last year's election campaign, Musk departed the White House last week after steering its 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, with the stated mission of slashing fraud and abuse within federal departments. He has argued that the Republican bill will undermine Doge's work and drive the US further into debt. On Tuesday, Musk drew immediate support from Thomas Massie, one of only two Republicans who last month voted against the bill in the House of Representatives. 'He's right,' Massie responded on X. Having narrowly passed the House of Representatives, the bill is now under consideration in the Senate, which is aiming to pass a revised version by 4 July. Some Republican fiscal conservatives, such as senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul, share Musk's concerns about the need for significant spending cuts. Johnson told CNN: 'We have enough [holdouts] to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit.' Trump has previously dismissed Republican dissenters as 'grandstanders' and urged them to get onboard. His influence proved decisive in quelling a potential rebellion in the House. On Monday he wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'.' The White House acknowledged Musk's stance but said it has not changed its position on the bill. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: 'Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion: this is one big, beautiful bill and he is sticking to it.' The bill extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and includes new spending for border security and the military. Republicans aimed to offset these costs with cuts to programmmes such as Medicaid, food stamps and green-energy tax credits. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Projections from the Congressional Budget Office and independent analysts indicate that the bill would add between $2.3 tn and $5tn to the deficit over the next 10 years. White House officials contend that the economic growth generated by tax cuts will offset the increased spending. Russ Vought, director of the office of management and budget, told CNN: 'This bill doesn't increase the deficit or hurt the debt. In fact, it lowers it by $1.4tn.' But Democrats have warned that the budget would raise the cost of healthcare for millions of people, and cause millions to lose coverage, in order to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. A new analysis by Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania found that it could lead to more than 51,000 preventable deaths. Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, said in a floor speech on Tuesday: 'Donald Trump and his so-called 'big, beautiful bill' is ugly to its very core. Behind the smoke and mirrors lies a cruel and draconian truth: tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy paid for by gutting healthcare for millions of Americans.' Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, added in a statement: 'Let's be clear. The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy. It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans.'