New defence plans could lead to ‘significant cuts' in other areas, MPs warn
John Healey said the Government has 'already committed the funds' for the 62 recommendations outlined in the review, as MPs scrutinised the proposals on Monday.
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge branded the review an 'empty wish list', telling MPs: 'They haven't got a plan to fund it.'
Meanwhile, Conservative MP Sir Bernard Jenkin said he was concerned 'significant cuts' would have to be made to increase defence spending to 3% of gross domestic product, in line with the Government's plans.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Cartlidge said: 'For the Treasury to approve a plan, it will have to feature billions of pounds of cuts to existing MoD (Ministry of Defence) programmes and so this SDR has dodged the big decisions on existing capabilities.
'Can the Secretary of State confirm that the so-called defence investment plan, to be published in the autumn, will set out the cuts needed for the Treasury to agree a plan to get to 3%? Details we should have had today in the SDR.'
In his reply, Mr Healey said: 'I have no doubt that we will meet our ambition to hit 3% of spending on defence in the next Parliament.'
'We're committed to spending what we need to deliver this review,' he added.
Sir Bernard, MP for Harwich and North Essex, said: 'The document says this will allow us to grow our nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet to up to 12. Isn't the truth, and let's speak the truth, that this is the ask to the Treasury?
'The spending review is yet to decide what the defence programme will actually be.
'I hear what he says when he says with his full force and sincerity that, quote 'we will fund this defence review', but how is he going to achieve that without very much more significant cuts in other budgets? Because this Government, and no government, can afford to spend much more and borrow much more if anything at all.'
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge (Jonathan Brady/PA)
Mr Healey replied: 'This is an investment that we're making now in the production capacity, so that we can build at a faster rate, we can have a double production line in Barrow, that will allow us to build new subs to meet the number of subs we'll need in the future to deter the threats that we'll face, meet our Nato commitments and I'm glad that he welcomes it.'
Conservative former chancellor Sir Jeremy Hunt asked: 'What is the difference between the Chancellor's black hole and the Defence Secretary accepting 62 recommendations from the SDR without committing the funds to pay for them?'
Mr Healey replied: 'Because the Prime Minister and the Government have committed the funds, we've committed the funds, we've built them into the terms of reference that allow this SDR over the next 10 years and beyond to be delivered.'
Conservative former minister Danny Kruger said: 'The Defence Secretary has just thrown into doubt the future of the new medium helicopter. I'm very concerned to hear that that programme, clearly, may not go ahead.
'Could he just tell the House whether he plans to reduce the number of RAF Chinooks? Which, as he knows, are very important, both to our special forces and to our army.'
Mr Healey urged the MP for East Wiltshire 'not to read what he has into my remarks', adding: 'I was simply stating the facts as they are, that there is a process underway that has got to conclude.'
He continued: 'This review is not about cuts. It's the first review since the end of the Cold War, which has not been taken in the context of cuts, but in the context of a decade of rising defence expenditure.
'It's about enhancing what we have for the future. It's about building out, not hollowing out. And I hope he'll take that as the signature for the Strategic Defence Review that we've published this afternoon.'
Conservative MP Sir Bernard Jenkin (David Woolfall/PA)
Conservative MP for North Cotswolds and chairman of the public accounts committee, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, pressed Mr Healey to publish the investment plan so the committee can 'examine whether the funds match the equipment that he's talked about today, so that this ambitious plan can be delivered and is affordable'.
Mr Healey confirmed it would be published 'in the autumn'.
Conservative former minister Dame Caroline Dinenage raised concerns about the future of the training estate.
The MP for Gosport said: 'Could he confirm that the outstanding training establishments at HMS Sultan and HMS Collingwood, which employ so many, will not be under threat?'
Mr Healey replied: 'We are doing further work on the nature and the needs for our defence estate, it's right that we do that, because we have a long-term view now we'll be able to take better, long-term decisions on that.'
Elsewhere in the session, Labour MP Richard Burgon argued proposals in the SDR could make the UK 'less safe'.
The Leeds East MP said: 'These 12 new nuclear-powered AUKUS submarines almost double the UK's fleet of such submarines. Given these submarines are to be shared with non-nuclear Australia, doesn't this go against the UK's obligations under the non-proliferation treaty?
'And as they are part of the AUKUS treaty, a treaty with the USA as well as Australia, and focused in the Asia-Pacific, doesn't this risk adding to the growing tensions developing between the USA and China and make us all less safe?'
Mr Healey replied: 'No and no. The AUKUS partnership is entirely consistent with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and our obligations. And no, because it reinforces the regional stability and security, it reinforces regional deterrence, makes conflict less likely, not more likely.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Rachel Reeves to announce £86bn for science and technology in spending review
The overall package, which will be announced as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sets out departmental spending plans on June 11, is expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by the end of the decade. DSIT said 'every corner of the country' would benefit as local leaders are given a say on how the money is spent on leveraging expertise specific to their communities. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery and in South Wales, which has Britain's largest semiconductor cluster, on designing the microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Chancellor said: 'Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the Plan for Change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off.' Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said: 'Incredible and ambitious research goes on in every corner of our country, from Liverpool to Inverness, Swansea to Belfast, which is why empowering regions to harness local expertise and skills for all of our benefit is at the heart of this new funding – helping to deliver the economic growth at the centre of our Plan for Change.' Local leaders including North East Mayor Kim McGuiness and West Midlands Mayor Richard Parker welcomed the package, but research backers warned more is needed to secure Britain's reputation for science. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Wellcome, Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder, said: 'The Government rightly acknowledges that investing in science and technology is a key way to boost the economy. 'But while it's positive under the financial circumstances, a flat real-terms science budget, along with continuing barriers such as high visa costs for talented scientists and the university funding crisis, won't be enough for the UK to make the advances it needs to secure its reputation for science in an increasingly competitive world. 'The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all. We look forward to seeing the full details at the spending review.' Meanwhile, the Institute of Physics called for a longer-term strategy for science, including a plan for teachers and other members of the skilled workforce needed to deliver advances. Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the institute, said: 'It's good to see the Government recognise the power of science and innovation to transform lives and grow prosperity in every part of the UK. 'But to fully harness the transformational potential of research and innovation – wherever it takes place – we need a decade-long strategic plan for science. This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy. 'We hope that the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday will set out such a vision.' Universities UK said the Government had made a 'smart investment' and academia would put its 'shoulder to the wheel' behind the plans. Vivienne Stern, chief executive of the group representing 142 higher education providers in Britain, said: 'The UK has a real opportunity to sow the seeds of long-term growth, benefiting all parts of the UK – with universities spread right across the country working with industry and public sector bodies to turn discoveries into economic success. 'They stand ready to double down with government, building stronger links with sectors of the economy where we have real room to grow. 'This creates good jobs and attracts investment everywhere from Swansea to Aberdeen, from Barrow to Plymouth.'
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Rachel Reeves to pump £86 billion into tech R&D - to research new drugs
The overall package, which will be announced as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sets out departmental spending plans on June 11, is expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by the end of the decade Rachel Reeves will pump cash into research to find new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries - as part of an £86 billion package of funding for science and technology this week. Local leaders will have the power to decide how up to £500 million per region is spent in their communities. And the overall package, which will be announced as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sets out departmental spending plans on June 11, is expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by the end of the decade. The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said "every corner of the country" would benefit as local leaders are given a say on how the money is spent on leveraging expertise specific to their communities. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery and in South Wales, which has Britain's largest semiconductor cluster, on designing the microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the Plan for Change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said: "Incredible and ambitious research goes on in every corner of our country, from Liverpool to Inverness, Swansea to Belfast, which is why empowering regions to harness local expertise and skills for all of our benefit is at the heart of this new funding - helping to deliver the economic growth at the centre of our Plan for Change." Local leaders including Labour North East Mayor Kim McGuiness and West Midlands Mayor Richard Parker welcomed the package, but the Institute of Physics warned a longer-term strategy for science was needed. Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the institute, said: "It's good to see the Government recognise the power of science and innovation to transform lives and grow prosperity in every part of the UK. "But to fully harness the transformational potential of research and innovation - wherever it takes place - we need a decade-long strategic plan for science. This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy. "We hope that the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday will set out such a vision." Universities UK said the Government had made a "smart investment" and academia would put its "shoulder to the wheel" behind the plans. Vivienne Stern, chief executive of the group representing 142 higher education providers in Britain, said: "The UK has a real opportunity to sow the seeds of long-term growth, benefiting all parts of the UK - with universities spread right across the country working with industry and public sector bodies to turn discoveries into economic success. "They stand ready to double down with government, building stronger links with sectors of the economy where we have real room to grow. "This creates good jobs and attracts investment everywhere from Swansea to Aberdeen, from Barrow to Plymouth."
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Reeves to splash billions of pounds on NHS and schools - but other cuts loom
Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that some vital public services will lose out on funding in next week's Spending Review - 'I'm not able to say yes to everything' Rachel Reeves will pour cash into the NHS, schools, security and firing up the economy as she hit back at fears of fresh austerity for cash-strapped public services. The health service is expected to be the big winner in Wednesday's Spending Review, with a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget - amounting to around £30billion in additional funding by 2028/29. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. But other vital services will feel the squeeze, with painful cuts expected in areas like local government and policing. On Wednesday, the Chancellor will spell out how much cash will be allocated for day-to-day budgets over the next three years. Speaking to the Sunday Mirror in her Leeds West and Pudsey constituency, she said: "This is a far cry from what you would have had if you'd had another five years of the Conservatives - £300billion above that. Under our plan, spending will increase every year in this Parliament. "I tell you what austerity is, it's what George Osborne did, where spending fell by 2% every year when he was Chancellor and [David] Cameron was Prime Minister. Spending will grow at close to 2% every year under the plans that I will lay out." There will be a £190billion increase in funding for day-to-day spending over the period, funded partly by tax hikes in the Budget in the autumn. A shake-up of borrowing rules has also freed up around £113billion for capital investment for big ticket items like homes, transport and energy projects. Security will be top of the agenda as "we live in a changed world, everyone can see that," the Chancellor said. "The first duty of any government is to keep its people safe." The Government has already promised to hike defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027/28, funded through a raid on the foreign aid budget. The NHS will get a big cash injection to help the Government meet its commitment to slash waiting lists currently around 7.4million. Her other focus will be growing the economy to drive up living standards for ordinary Brits. But Ms Reeves admitted some areas will lose out. "I'm not able to say yes to everything, and there are things that I would like to do, but we don't have the money to do them," she said. "But your readers will remember two and a half years ago when a Conservative Prime Minister and Chancellor crashed the economy. "As a result, they paid more for their mortgages and more in their rents, and readers who run their own business, particularly small businesses, found that the cost of running their business went up as inflation and borrowing rates went through the roof. "So we have to say no to some things, because we've got to make sure that that stability is returned to the economy." This week, the Chancellor confirmed plans to rip up Treasury rules blamed for favouring investment in prosperous areas in the South of England. Instead, some £15.6billion will be handed to mayors to improve trams, trains and buses outside of London. Ms Reeves said: "It means that people can be able to stay in the place where they grew up, the place they want to live, where their families are, but still be able to access some of those great jobs paying decent wages in the city, and they will be able to commute in easily and affordably in a way that isn't possible today. "That narrows down the options for lots of people about the jobs they do. Also for young people, it narrows down the options about where to go to college, what apprenticeship to take up. "And I don't want people's options to be narrowed. I want people's options and opportunities to be broadened and their aspirations to know no limits." But she acknowledged that voters are sceptical and said there was "no time to waste" in delivering for parts of the country betrayed by Boris Johnson's levelling up boasts. "We've got to get on with [it]", she said. "I don't want people waiting for another decade before they see improvements in their area. "We've spoken about a decade of national renewal, but there's no time to waste. We're getting started." Pressed on whether she would deliver where the Tories failed, she said: "Yes, and the reason that I can say that to Mirror readers is because I know that there's a lot of cynicism that things have been promised in the past." She added: "I'm as cynical as the next person when it comes to these promises, but we've set out five years worth of funding this week." Ms Reeves admitted she'd had to take tough decisions, including hiking national insurance contributions for businesses in the autumn Budget and plans to slash £5 billion from the welfare bill. Labour MPs are in revolt over the decision to make up most of the welfare savings from cuts to Personal Independence Payments (Pip), which help disabled people with the added costs of daily life. Ms Reeves said that difficult decision had allowed her to plough cash into public services and invest in the future. She said: "We are choosing investment rather than decline. The previous government chose decline. That is not the path that we're choosing. We're going to renew Britain and make working people better off in the process." Ms Reeves said she recognised the last few years had been tough for ordinary Brits but added: "We're beginning to turn the corner because of the choices that we've made." 'We will reduce child poverty' Rachel Reeves said driving down child poverty is a "moral mission" and insisted Labour would lift more kids out of hardship. The Chancellor said the decision this week to extend free school meals to more than 500,000 additional pupils next year was a statement of intent. From next September, all children in families receiving Universal Credit will get a free school lunch - in a major victory for the Mirror's campaign to end hunger in the classroom. But the Government is under intense pressure to commit to more drastic action to end the scourge of child poverty. A long-awaited strategy has been delayed to the autumn amid mounting calls from Labour MPs for an end to the Tory two-child benefit limit, which has been blamed for pushing families into poverty. Asked if she was listening to these calls, Ms Reeves told the Sunday Mirror: "I joined the Labour Party when I was 17 years old, because my experience at my local state school was that my sixth form was two prefab huts in the playground joined together. "Our school library was turned into a classroom because there were more students than space and never enough textbooks to go around." She added: "There were loads of girls that I was at school with who did not have the opportunities. They went to school every day and probably felt that the government didn't care very much about communities like ours and families like theirs. "When Tony Blair talked about 'education, education, education', that really resonated with me, because I strongly believe that whatever your parents do, whatever income your family's got coming in, whatever your background, you deserve a really good start in life. "And I know that kids who are going to school in empty bellies, who don't have a space at home to do their homework, who don't have the opportunities of books at home, and where the mums and dads don't have the security of a job that pays a decent wage, that they just don't have the opportunities that other kids do. And that's what I came into politics to do something about." She added: "We will lift more children out of poverty. We will reduce child poverty. That is a moral mission for all of us."
