logo
Is this the end of the debate over salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour?

Is this the end of the debate over salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour?

Tasmania has a long list of emotive, nation-shaping environmental debates.
From the Franklin Dam dispute that ultimately set a template for where responsibility sits for matters of national environmental significance, to the Gunns pulp mill battle that mobilised mass protest.
Salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour is another on the list — this time, resulting in federal environmental reform that decreased the ability of the public to challenge past decisions.
And, like the dam and the pulp mill, it's been coloured by protest and emotive argument.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had to speak over the sound of protest while visiting a Tassal facility in Tasmania's south.
On Thursday, federal Environment Minister Murray Watt — while guaranteeing the future of salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour — was met by a group of protesters in Devonport.
Macquarie Harbour has a blend of remoteness, uniqueness and natural beauty.
It's six times the size of Sydney Harbour, at the mouth of the Gordon River in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
Macquarie Harbour is also the only place in the world where the endangered Maugean skate is found, a ray-like species that relies on dissolved oxygen reaching the bottom of the harbour.
The skate needs a delicate and unique set of circumstances to survive.
Salmon farming started in the harbour in the 1980s. In 2012, it received federal environmental approval to expand.
By 2015, it had reached 20,000 tonnes of fish. When water quality issues became increasingly apparent, it was decided to wind back the stocking rates and set nitrogen limits.
But reduced dissolved oxygen levels had been having an impact on the Maugean skate — exacerbated by extreme weather events in 2019 that caused two mass die-off events.
In 2021, it was estimated that skate numbers had reduced by 47 per cent, and that the species could be one bad weather event away from potential extinction.
This brought intense scrutiny and attention onto salmon farming practices in the harbour, driven by environmental groups like the Bob Brown Foundation (BBF).
The federal Labor government promised no new extinctions — and environmental groups were driven to hold the government to this promise.
Three groups — the BBF, Environmental Defenders Office and the Australia Institute — lodged requests with the government to reconsider the 2012 expansion approval.
It resulted in the release of more information about the plight of the skate, including federal conservation advice that recommended further destocking of the salmon farms — which did not occur.
The reconsideration had been ongoing since November 2023, but created uncertainty for the aquaculture industry on Tasmania's west coast — and, thereby, political pressure on Labor.
In one of its last acts in parliament before the most recent federal election, Labor passed an amendment to environmental laws to effectively stop these kinds of reconsideration requests.
The law states that if industries have been operating for five years since receiving federal environmental approval, and are regulated by the state, then they cannot be reconsidered.
It applies to any industry — not just salmon farming.
The laws appear to have solved Labor's political problem, in a big way.
The party received a 15 per cent swing in Braddon — the largest of any seat at the federal election — under its staunchly pro-salmon candidate, Anne Urquhart.
It was easily enough to win the seat back from the Liberals.
In his letter to stakeholders, Mr Watt confirmed that the March law change was the basis for being able to reaffirm the 2012 salmon farming decision.
He said he had, therefore, followed the law.
"Every decision we make when it comes to environmental approvals is in compliance with the law," Mr Watt said.
"It's no secret that the government amended the legislation prior to the last election to outline a path to deal with reconsiderations, and we've now applied the law.
Industry body Salmon Tasmania said the decision provided "economic stability" for the west coast region, and pointed to research that suggested Maugean skate numbers had stabilised after a decade of decline.
An oxygenation trial — partly funded by the federal government — is continuing. It involves pumping dissolved oxygen into the harbour's depths, which the industry and government both believe can be a sustainable option.
The federal government is also helping to fund an insurance population of Maugean skate.
The decision came one week before a BBF legal challenge to the law change was due to be heard in the Federal Court.
The BBF is now considering its legal options, but believes the timing of the decision is intended to prevent departmental information from entering the public domain.
BBF campaigner Alistair Allan said the process had resulted in weakened environmental laws for all endangered species.
"We will be challenging this law, because we have to make sure that corporations are not the ones that get to decide what happens to Australia's environment," he said.
"Australia's laws are already atrociously weak.
"We have an animal here that was on the list, it was a priority species to be protected, and straight away it was condemned by the Albanese government."
There are 11 salmon licences in Macquarie Harbour that have been able to continue throughout the reconsideration process.
Fish biomass in the harbour is currently well below the peak from 2015, while the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has introduced new regulatory functions, such as nitrogen limits.
The law change effectively leaves regulation to the state-based EPA for the foreseeable future.
But it's unlikely to be the last Australians hear of the endangered Maugean skate, with studies continuing to point to a need for even further studies and data.
These would fully examine whether salmon farming can truly coexist with the skate, if oxygenation is a genuine long-term solution and if there is a stocking level or management options for fish farms that can ensure the skate avoids extinction — should severe weather events hit again.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese rejects Trump ‘disgust' over Palestine call
Albanese rejects Trump ‘disgust' over Palestine call

AU Financial Review

time21 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

Albanese rejects Trump ‘disgust' over Palestine call

Anthony Albanese's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood continues to create pressure from both sides, with the Trump administration disgusted by the move while Palestine's former top diplomat in Canberra warns it needs to be matched with sanctions against Israel. The prime minister on Friday dismissed US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee's criticism over the Labor government's decision to side with France, Canada and the United Kingdom to recognise Palestine next month, saying Australia was a sovereign country that made its own decisions.

Ex-Liberal MP Daryl Maguire fights to avoid jail
Ex-Liberal MP Daryl Maguire fights to avoid jail

News.com.au

time31 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Ex-Liberal MP Daryl Maguire fights to avoid jail

Prosecutors have called for former MP Daryl Maguire to be jailed after he was found guilty of giving misleading evidence to ICAC, a court has been told. Following a trial earlier this year, the former Liberal and Wagga Wagga MP was found guilty by a magistrate of one count of giving false or misleading evidence at a public inquiry. Maguire will learn his fate when he fronts a Sydney court next week, with his legal team arguing he should be allowed to serve his sentence in the community. Maguire pleaded not guilty, however Magistrate Clare Farnan found he gave knowingly misleading evidence to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in July 2018 about the potential sale of a property at Campsie in Sydney's south-west and whether he intended to be paid to broker the deal. In 2016, ICAC began a probe into the Canterbury City Council under Operation Dasha. During the ICAC hearing, Maguire was questioned whether he and former councillor Michael Hawatt were set to benefit financially if the site was sold to a Chinese developer. The court was previously told that Maguire had an association with the company, Country Gardens 'through his extensive activities with members of the Chinese community, and through his travel to China'. ICAC began lawfully tapping Mr Hawatt's phone in 2016. Ms Farnan said in her findings handed down earlier this year that it was 'clear' that Maguire was 'pursuing Mr Hawatt's assistance in identifying possible development sites on behalf of a 'big developer'.' The court was told that during a May 9, 2016 call, Maguire referred to a 'client' with 'mega money'. The Crown prosecution argued Maguire intended to receive a benefit by introducing the property's owner, through Mr Hawatt, to the Chinese developer. Maguire has claimed he was motivated by a friendship with an employee of Country Garden and did not expect a financial benefit. However Ms Farnan found beyond a reasonable doubt that 'if the sale of the Harrisons site to Country Garden went through, Mr Maguire expected to receive half of Mr Hawatt's commission on that sale'. His defence argued that some of the questions asked of him at the ICAC hearing were imprecise and open to interpretation. But he was found to have given misleading evidence, and Ms Farnan dismissed the possibility that he may have given incorrect answers because of carelessness or misunderstanding. 'I am satisfied that … at the time of giving evidence, Mr Maguire did know that he had expected to share commission with Mr Hawatt, but had determined not to give that evidence before ICAC,' Ms Farnan found. Maguire appeared before the Local Court on Friday, with Crown Prosecutor Phil Hogan arguing it was the 'will of the people' to 'eradicate corruption' and that there was an expectation of a 'significant period of fulltime custody for this type of offending'. Mr Hogan told the court there was an expectation that people holding public offence would 'behave with honesty and integrity'. The court heard Maguire never received a financial benefit, but Mr Hogan argued that didn't lessen the seriousness of the offending. He likened the case to that of former Federal Court judge Marcus Einfeld, who was jailed for two years for making a false statement under oath and attempting to pervert the course of justice. However, Maguire's barrister Rebecca Gall argued that his charges were not as serious as Einfeld's. The court was told that Maguire had tendered a character reference from former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack which referred to his strong 'work ethic'. Ms Gall also pointed to a report which assessed Maguire as being a low risk of reoffending as she argued that any sentence should be served in the community. Maguire faces a maximum penalty of two years in jail when he is sentenced next Wednesday. Maguire resigned from the Liberal Party as a result of the ICAC probe and later resigned from Parliament. In 2021, the ICAC found that Mr Hawatt 'engaged in serious corrupt conduct'. He was charged with two counts of giving false/misleading evidence at a public inquiry and is due to face court again in December. A separate ICAC investigation revealed that Maguire had been in a secret relationship with then Premier Gladys Berejiklian. In June 2023, the ICAC found that Maguire and Ms Berejiklian engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct.' No charges were brought against Ms Berejiklian.

Former immigration minister Alex Hawke calls for action on bridging visa backlog with thousands left in limbo
Former immigration minister Alex Hawke calls for action on bridging visa backlog with thousands left in limbo

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Former immigration minister Alex Hawke calls for action on bridging visa backlog with thousands left in limbo

Rathy Barthlote and her family are caught up in a tricky situation. Her 11-year-old daughter Lolitta, born in Australia, became a citizen with full rights at the age of 10. But Ms Barthlote, her husband and 16-year-old daughter Logitha are all asylum seekers with few rights. They've been living in Australia since 2014 while their refugee claims go through the system. "Their friendships, schooling and sense of belonging are all here," Ms Barthlote said. "One child has everything, the other child is worried about her future." Ms Barthlote said the prospect of deportation remained a daily fear for the family. "My older daughter has occasionally asked whether she would be separated from her younger sibling," she said. Soon after Ms Barthlote and her family came to Australia by boat in 2013, the then-Abbott government introduced the so-called 'Fast Track' system to process the claims of boat arrivals. This system limited their procedural rights compared to other asylum seekers. Labor criticised the system, labelling it unfair and when it came to power, abolished it. But the Albanese government didn't solve the problems the Fast track system created. Ms Barthlote is one of around 8,000 asylum seekers who arrived between 2012 and 2013 and whose claims the system rejected. Many asylum seekers are still appealing those decisions, arguing the process was unfair. Most live on bridging visas, and while some like Ms Barthlote and her family have work and school rights, others don't. Now, former Coalition immigration minister Alex Hawke is calling on the government to resolve their status. "People have been here a long time. And the reality of their condition is that they will be staying here," Mr Hawke said. "We now have to deal with the actual reality of the situation." While the previous Coalition government did not solve the issue when it was in power, Mr Hawke is now saying he supports action. "It's time the Labor Party committed to resolving the issues. Some of those are tricky, but a lot of them are now no longer tricky," Mr Hawke said. Perhaps the most high-profile member of this group is Priya Nadesalingam, the Tamil asylum seeker whose cause was championed by the Queensland town of Biloela. Ms Barthlote and Ms Nadesalingam arrived in Australia on the same boat in 2013. Both are members of Sri Lanka's Tamil minority, which fought a long and bloody civil war against the majority Sinhalese. Both fled their country to live in refugee camps in India. And both had their claims for asylum knocked back under the Fast Track system. After a four-year community campaign, the Nadesalingams were granted the right to live here permanently. But Ms Barthlote and thousands of others still face great uncertainty. Ms Barthlote's case has been working its way through the system for more than a decade. When her first claim for refugee status was rejected by the Fast Track system's Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA), she appealed that decision and won. The court sent her case back to be reassessed by the IAA which again rejected it. Ms Barthlote appealed this decision in mid-2019 and six years on, she's still waiting for a hearing. While they wait for a resolution, Ms Barthlote and her husband Barthlote Selvaraja have built a life in Melbourne's western suburbs. Her frustration with being left in limbo has led her to campaign publicly about the situation she and thousands of others find themselves in. Ms Barthlote has been employed for a number of years in aged and disability care and and works part-time at a union. Her husband holds down two jobs, as a forklift driver and as a worker in aged care. Logitha is in Year 11 and wants to study forensic science at university but Ms Barthlote fears they won't be able to afford the fees. If Logitha is still on a bridging visa in two years, she will have to enrol in university as a foreign student, and won't be able to access the student loans scheme, HECS. "She wants to have a dream but she can't get that dream," Ms Barthlote said. In contrast, Logitha's younger sister Lolitta will be able to enrol in university as a local student. There are other differences. Unlike her sister, it's difficult for Logitha to leave the country, as she doesn't have a passport. She doesn't have automatic access to Medicare but must reapply every year. Logitha won't be able to vote when she turns 18 and her long-term future in Australia is uncertain. Since coming to power in 2022, the Labor government has acted on its promise to resolve the status of about 20,000 people found to be refugees under the Fast Track system, but who were still living on temporary protection visas. That group is now on what the government calls a "permanent visa pathway". But those working in the sector say it isn't clear how the government plans to manage this remaining cohort of 8,000. The home affairs minister continues to use his powers of ministerial intervention to provide people in this group with a pathway to permanent residency but it is on a case-by-case basis. Sanmati Verma, legal director at the Human Rights Law Centre, said the criteria for these visas to be granted is largely unknown. "There is no clear rationale or consistency as to who is afforded this treatment and who is not", Ms Verma said. Ms Verma dubbed the current policy as "cruel", and said it divided families. "[The government should] recognise that people who have been here for a decade or more are now part of our community, and grant them permanent visas to reflect that reality," she said. In a statement to Australian Story, a spokesperson for the Home Affairs Department said the government was not offering permanent visas to people whose claims were rejected under the old system and which have failed on appeal. "People … who have exhausted all avenues to remain in Australia are expected to depart Australia voluntarily and may be provided assistance to depart," a department spokesperson said. "Those with new, credible protection claims relating to changes in their country of origin or personal circumstances may request Ministerial Intervention." Ms Barthlote and her family are desperate to secure a future in the country they've called home for more than a decade. "We are part and parcel of this community. We have no home to return to in Sri Lanka," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store