
Cupra's Terramar two-engined hybrid leaves us in two minds
Generally speaking, after a week spent testing a car, we can come to a conclusion. That is, after all, the job. Take new car, assess new car, rate new car, rinse and repeat. When it comes to the new Cupra Terramar, however, we're still very much in two minds...
It starts with a continuing difficulty for the Cupra brand. It is, by lineage, a sportier
Seat
, which is fine, but in the seven years since Cupra was spun off from Seat as a separate, stand-alone brand, it has become distinctly expensive and yet is still a brand without a solid, graspable identity.
Clearly, it's meant to fulfil the late Ferdinand Piech's desire for the VW Group to have a sporty, desirable, 'Spanish
Alfa Romeo
' within its ranks, but while Alfa has more than a century of glories and glorious failures behind it, Cupra just has some quick Seats in the back catalogue.
Then again, the brand is a success. Across Europe, Cupra is doing well, taking the same basic mechanical bits and pieces that would once have been sold as a sharply-priced Seat, but which can now be repackaged into a quasi-premium machine that can be sold with a higher purchase price and therefore a chunkier profit margin.
READ MORE
Then again, that higher price brings with it its own problems, as we shall see ...
This new Cupra Terramar is the brand's latest model, and it's effectively the replacement for the ageing Cupra Ateca. Based on the Seat Ateca, the Cupra model only ever came in 300hp turbo petrol four-wheel drive form and, to be honest, it wasn't a bundle of fun. Quick, yes, but actually, seriously good to drive? Not really.
The Terramar follows the Ateca's basic recipe by being based on the same mechanical package as a contemporary Volkswagen Tiguan, but this time there's a full breadth of engines on offer, from a basic 1.5-litre 150hp turbo to this 272hp plug-in high-performance hybrid.
The Terramar also gets off to a good start, with me at any rate, by being not very tall. In fact, compared with a current Tiguan, the Terramar's roof sits 100mm lower down, which is music to my SUV-hating ears. In fact, while Cupra will very definitely sell the Terramar – named after an old racetrack near Barcelona, if you're wondering – as a SUV, it's honestly closer to being a slightly taller estate.
Style-wise, it falls down a bit. The lizard-like face, which is now Cupra's corporate look, leaves me rather cold and I can't help but wish that the look of the first-generation
Formentor
– neat grille, sharp lights – had been carried over. It also doesn't help that our test car was finished in the same metallic dark grey that every other SUV on the road is painted right now. It takes what's not an unattractive shape and smothers it in monochrome camouflage. You'll lose it in a car park, so be brave and delve into Cupra's other colour options, which bring out the shape rather better.
Inside the Cupra Terramar
Inside, it's fine. There is an interest L-shaped section of the centre console, covered in an indented design that looks a bit like fish scales, but which punctures the Terramar's claim to be a premium product by feeling rather cheap to the touch. On the upside, storage space is generous, and the microfibre-clad front bucket seats are very comfortable.
Space is less impressive in the back, where there's not much more rear legroom than you'd find in the Cupra Leon hatchback. Equally, the boot measures just 400 litres up to the luggage cover. Now, in fairness, you can expand that significantly by picking the non-plug-in versions of the Terramar, but even so, that's not a lot of actual room.
The hybrid system itself is impressive, though. With 272hp and a combined petrol+electric total of 400Nm of torque, the Terramar is convincingly rapid, even if the on-paper 0-100km/h time of 7.3 seconds doesn't seem all that impressive.
There's the option of having a fake engine sound piped in through the stereo speakers, which sounds better than you'd think. Even overall efficiency isn't bad – unable to charge at home, I still managed to squeeze 6.2 litres per 100km out of the Terramar, which is considerably better than I managed in the smaller Formentor with the same hybrid system.
The
electric
bit is good too. Against a claimed range of 118km on a full charge of its 19kWh battery, we easily managed 90km, so this really can be an electric car for much of the time. Plus, you can fast-charge it when needed, at up to 50kW, which gives you more flexibility.
However, it's not perfect. There is an odd shunting sensation a times as the electric motor and the petrol engine jostle for pre-eminence, which detracts from the Terramar's refinement.
The Cupra Terramar really can be an electric car for much of the time
It's quite comfortable, though. Our test car came with the DCC adaptive dampers, which have a semi-secret 'ultra soft' setting that you can find if you go in and configure the individual driving mode.
Thus established, the Terramar has a pleasing blend of sharp steering and yet reasonably soft suspension. It's quite good to drive, if not quite what you'd call an out-and-out driver's machine.
That, perhaps, is Cupra's biggest problem. It's taking the same basic bits as every other mid-size Volkswagen Group car and trying to concoct a new recipe with them.
While it's true that, in Italian cooking, tomatoes, pasta, and garlic can be combined and recombined in multiple different variations, here in Cupra's Spanish pantry the results seem less distinct. Cupra, with the Terramar, has produced a tasty dish, but one that lacks the kind of piquancy you'd expect for true distinctiveness.
And then there's the price tag. Our test car, admittedly a range-topping version with optional 20-inch alloys, a brilliant Sennheiser stereo and an upgraded driver assistance pack, costs a fairly massive €63,578 all-in.
That's not only a lot for a brand that, still, few people recognise, but it's also about €5,000 more than the Skoda Octavia RS Combi estate which is sharper to drive, more fun overall and more practical, and everyone knows you've bought something cool. For that matter, the same cash would put a 280hp Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint on your driveway, and that comes with no need to explain to passersby what the brand is about.
So the Terramar, impressive though it is in its overall performance, and in its laudable dedication to being lower-slung than other SUVs, still leaves us with a split decision. It's a perfectly good car, but one that just doesn't quite stick the landing.
Lowdown: Cupra Terramar VZ eHybrid 272hp.
Power:
1.5-litre turbo petrol engine plus 85kW e-motor developing 150hp and 250Nm of torque, powering the front wheels via a single-seed automatic transmission.
CO2 emissions (annual motor tax)
10g/km (€140).
Fuel consumption:
0.5-l/100km (WLTP); 6.2-l/100km (observed)
Electric range:
118km (WLTP)
0-100km/h:
8.3 sec.
Price:
€63,578 as tested, Terramar starts from €44,100.
Our rating:
3/5.
Verdict:
A mixed result – the Terramar has a good hybrid system and it's decent to drive, but it lacks a touch of magic.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Central Bank's role in approving Israeli bonds can be traced back to Brexit
It is something else that can be blamed on Brexit. When Britain decided to leave the EU in 2016 it no longer belonged to the European bond market. The market allows sovereign states to raise finance by issuing bonds that they pay back over time. The European Prospectus Regulation for bonds deemed that one European state would be the 'home state' that would determine if a non- EU state selling bonds had the financial wherewithal to trade the bonds in EU markets. The state would be chosen not by the EU but by the country selling the bonds. Until 2016 Britain was the country which decided if a bond prospectus offered by Israel could be approved for sale in the EU. When Brexit happened, Israel decided that Ireland should fulfil that role. It wasn't the only one to do so in recent years. At an interesting meeting of the Oireachtas finance committee yesterday, Gerry Cross of the Central Bank told Shay Brennan (Fianna Fáil) that seven other countries had also done so in recent years: Georgia; Turkey; The Maldives; Côte d'Ivoire; Armenia, Benin and Ukraine. To quote Macbeth: what's done is done and cannot be undone. Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf told the committee that only Israel can decide to use another state to be the home country unless the EU at political level does what it did with Russia and imposes sanctions against Israel. Given the ties between some EU states and Israel, that's very unlikely to happen. Mr Makhlouf, Mr Cross and deputy governor Mary-Elizabeth McMunn told the committee that the EU regulation was strict; they could only make the approval determination based on financial stability criteria and not on wider geopolitical considerations. Effectively their hands were tied. READ MORE This issue was a dominant one in political discourse again this week, with a second Dáil vote in as many sitting weeks over the bonds last night. This time the vote was on a Social Democrats motion and again it was defeated. As Marie O'Halloran reports, two Independent TDs who support the Government – Gillian Toole and Barry Heneghan – voted against the Coalition. The debate last night revolved around the same issues. Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe both took exception in the Dáil and other forums to the accusation from the Opposition that the Government was somehow complicit in the genocide because the Central Bank approves the bonds. Martin completely rejected the assertion at the Fianna Fáil parliamentary party meeting last night. He has argued that the Central Bank was independent in its role, and that its determination was a technical one based solely on financial criteria. Still, Ireland's unwanted status has made everybody uncomfortable. Meeting offers further details on bonds The three-hour meeting of the finance committee was interesting in that we learned that for all the trouble they have caused the returns from the bonds in Europe are relatively modest. Israel has raised between €100 and €130 million from the bonds, Mr Makhlouf said. He said the Israeli government website marketing its 'war bonds' had stated it had sold bonds worth €5 billion. He said the EU accounted for only a fraction of that, with the US accounting for the bulk of it. On what the bank can and can't do, he said: 'The Central Bank cannot decide to impose sanctions for breaches or alleged breaches of international law. It is for international bodies such as the UN or the EU to determine how to respond to breaches or alleged breaches of international law.' Mr Cross, director for capital markets at the bank, confirmed that the Central Bank fees for the approval of Israeli bonds between October 2023 and May this year was €13,300. The EU prospectus is due for renewal in September. When asked by Ged Nash (Labour) if there were new issues to be considered, Mr Makhlouf said the 'intensity of the conflict in Gaza probably does put a question mark [on] whether the financial viability of the state still remains secure'. He added: 'The European Union has indicated that it's going to look at its co-operation agreement with Israel, and I think that's a factor, the fact that the finance minister [Bezalel Smotrich] has just been sanctioned by a number of countries.' However, he said it should not be taken as granted that the prospectus would not be renewed. Asked by Mr Nash about how employees of the Central Bank have reacted to its role approving Israeli bonds, Mr Makhlouf said that the views in the bank were a reflection of the view across society. 'They range [from] people who are very sympathetic to one side of the debate, but also people who are sympathetic to the other side of the debate,' he said. Fallout of Arts Council ICT project continues The Oireachtas committee on media and arts returned for a second time in recent weeks to its examination of the implications of a partially abandoned ICT project that cost the Arts Council €7 million and also cost its director Maureen Kennelly her job – Minister for Arts Patrick O'Donovan made the decision that her contract was not to be renewed. The Arts Council has become the fall guy taking most of the blame for the failure. But yesterday the committee, chaired by Labour TD Alan Kelly, honed in on the action, or lack of action, by the then Department of Arts in the matter. Ms Kennelly told the committee that the council had written to the department some 60 times in relation to difficulties with the project. It was disclosed that the department never escalated the issue to senior management beyond principal officer level. Jack Horgan-Jones has the details of how the department's shortcomings were discussed during the meeting. Pepper sprays Paul Gogarty with shouting Jack Horgan-Jones reports on a stand-off between Independent TD Paul Gogarty and two anti-immigrant Dublin city councillors, Malachy Steenson and Gavin Pepper. Both shouted him down when he tried to speak. Mr Gogarty had been addressing a group of protesters objecting to the prospective State purchase of the Citywest Hotel, which is being used to accommodate people seeking international protection. He did not get very far in his contribution. He opened his remarks with a 'preamble', saying that he did not condone any form of racism or abuse. 'I wasn't allowed to finish my preamble,' he said. Best Reads Miriam Lord gives a peerless example of how an unmissable 900-word column can be constructed from a single line . No smokers without fire, that should be her motto. Emmet Malone has a comprehensive Q&A piece on how errors were made in calculating the pensions of certain politicians and civil servants. Seanín Graham reports that after weeks of speculation, a £50 million (€59 million) investment was offered by the British government to redevelop the derelict Casement Park GAA stadium in Belfast. It's good news but there is still a £90 million shortfall of the estimated £260 million cost to transform the dilapidated site. Playbook Dáil 08.47: Parliamentary Questions: Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris 10.23: Parliamentary Questions: Minister for Education and Youth Helen McEntee 12.00: Leaders' Questions 12.34: Other Members' Questions 12.42: Questions on Policy or Legislation 13.52: Government Business: Statements on Fisheries 16.17: Government Business: Statements on Nursing Homes and Care for Older Persons 18.17: Topical Issues 19.17: Private Members' Bill: Criminal Law (Prohibition of the Disclosure of Counselling Records) Bill, 2025 – Second Stage 21.17: Dáil adjourns Seanad 09.30: Commencement Matters 10.30: Order of Business 13.00: Government Business: Statements on delivering a world class education system, which breaks down barriers and ensures every child can achieve their full potential 14.30: Seanad adjourns Committees Defence and National Security 09.30: Pre-legislative scrutiny of a general scheme: Defence Amendment Bill, 2025 Fisheries and Maritime Affairs 09.30: Extension of EU-UK trade agreement and the implications for the Irish fishing and seafood industry Children and Equality 10.00: Insight into the priority topics and issues facing the department


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tesco's sales growth continues in first quarter
Food retailer Tesco said it continued to grow its market share in the Republic of Ireland, supported by a 20 per cent rise in online sales. That came following Tesco's launch of its same day click and collect service here. The retailer said its market share rose 22bps to 23.3 per cent. The group said its like-for-like sales in the Republic rose 5.5 per cent in the 13 weeks to May 24th. Food sales were up 5.8 per cent, supported by continued investment in its fresh food range. READ MORE Tesco said it still expected to report adjusted operating profit of between £2.7 billion and £3.0 billion pounds (€3.17-€3.53 billion) in the year ending February 2026, down from the £3.13 billion achieved in 2024/25. The group had said in April it expected profit to fall in its 2025/26 year as it set aside cash to deal with a step up in the 'competitive intensity' of the UK grocery market - a reference to a pledge of sustained price cuts from Asda, Britain's third biggest supermarket group, which has been losing market share. 'The market remains intensely competitive,' Tesco chief executive Ken Murphy said on Thursday. - Additional reporting: Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Sky Television ‘seems happy to take advantage' of my trusting, elderly aunt
The idea that a television service provider would be taking well over €100 a month off people who can perhaps ill afford it without being able to adequately explain what is going on is pretty awful. But it enters the realm of appalling if those people are older, and might be struggling to get on top of their day-to-day finances. We have two stories connected to Sky Television that are strikingly similar, and involve family members seeking help for older people. 'I am writing on behalf of my elderly father-in-law,' begins a mail from a reader called Jacinta. READ MORE On October 30th last year, he had contacted Sky, as he was concerned about being charged a monthly fee of €120, she explains. 'He verbally agreed to a new monthly contract of €84.50 for six months and was told he should contact the company when that timeframe had elapsed to agree the next charges.' She says that on February 19th the charge was €85.14, and on March 18th the charge was €87.50. She says there was 'no notification of an increase'. [ Sky broadband blues: 'During the day, it stayed working. After 8pm, zilch' Opens in new window ] Then on April 16th 'the new charges were €105.80. This was within the six months period and there was absolutely no notification. On May 16th charges were €121 – an almost 50 per cent increase inside a few weeks with absolutely no notification." 'My father-in-law is in his 70s, and suffers chronic health, and talking at times on the phone can greatly exacerbate his breathing [problems]. It's not possible to email Sky, though you can call and be left usually up to 45 mins before you get to talk with someone and all that, apart from their charges. Sky can charge whatever they wish whenever they wish. Neither Comreg nor CCPC want to know as it's not their area.' Then there is the story about a woman in her 80s who appears to be paying an awful lot for very little. The story was shared with us by her nephew. 'I've an aunt in her late 80s who spent her life giving of herself to others,' begins the mail. 'She doesn't ask for much and uses TV to watch the news in her kitchen, and one other channel that's free on the internet. For quite some time she couldn't get Sky to work on the TV in the kitchen. I assumed it was because the TV was old, so I bought her a new one. The problem persists.' Our reader asked her aunt how much she pays, and whether she had the account details. 'The only information she could find was on her bank account, and she became upset as she realised how much they were taking from her account every month (average €150-plus). 'I work abroad, so rarely get the opportunity to resolve problems for her, but the week before last, after a lot of searching, managed to get through to Sky by phone. They went through security with my aunt and, after a few minutes, the call disconnected.' He says that he tried four times 'going through the same process, getting various levels of sympathy and assurances, but each time the calls eventually disconnected. This weekend I checked with my aunt. She'd received no mail or follow up of any sort,' he writes. 'My aunt's a trusting and generous person, and it seems as if Sky are happy to take advantage, deliberately make it incredibly difficult to contact them, and apparently impossible to get support.' It seems to Pricewatch that both of these people are is paying way over the odds for their television service but it also seems like they have both struggled to find out exactly what they are paying for. We contacted Sky. In connection with our first story a spokeswoman said Sky is 'committed to supporting all of its customers. In our efforts to provide fast and efficient customer support, our billing teams have maintained an average call response time of just 58 seconds year-to-date.' 'The customer in question regularly availed of promotional offers as a long-time customer with Sky. However, now that we are aware of the customer's health condition, we believe he would benefit from Sky's dedicated accessibility service, which provides tailored care and alternative contact methods to support customers who may need additional assistance. We have since outreached to the customer to support with this.' And when it came to the second story she said the company was 'sorry to hear about this customer's experience, which was unfortunately due to an initial miscommunication while resolving a technical issue. We have since spoken with the customer to apply the due credit on their account and ensure they are set up correctly.'