logo
Central Bank's role in approving Israeli bonds can be traced back to Brexit

Central Bank's role in approving Israeli bonds can be traced back to Brexit

Irish Timesa day ago

It is something else that can be blamed on Brexit. When
Britain
decided to leave the EU in 2016 it no longer belonged to the European bond market. The market allows sovereign states to raise finance by issuing bonds that they pay back over time.
The European Prospectus Regulation for bonds deemed that one European state would be the 'home state' that would determine if a non-
EU
state selling bonds had the financial wherewithal to trade the bonds in EU markets. The state would be chosen not by the EU but by the country selling the bonds.
Until 2016 Britain was the country which decided if a bond prospectus offered by
Israel
could be approved for sale in the EU. When Brexit happened, Israel decided that Ireland should fulfil that role. It wasn't the only one to do so in recent years. At an interesting meeting of the Oireachtas finance committee yesterday, Gerry Cross of the
Central Bank
told Shay Brennan (Fianna Fáil) that seven other countries had also done so in recent years: Georgia; Turkey; The Maldives; Côte d'Ivoire; Armenia, Benin and Ukraine.
To quote Macbeth: what's done is done and cannot be undone. Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf told the committee that only Israel can decide to use another state to be the home country unless the EU at political level does what it did with Russia and imposes sanctions against Israel. Given the ties between some EU states and Israel, that's very unlikely to happen. Mr Makhlouf, Mr Cross and deputy governor Mary-Elizabeth McMunn told the committee that the EU regulation was strict; they could only make the approval determination based on financial stability criteria and not on wider geopolitical considerations. Effectively their hands were tied.
READ MORE
This issue was a dominant one in political discourse again this week, with a second Dáil vote in as many sitting weeks over the bonds last night. This time the vote was on a Social Democrats motion and again it was defeated. As Marie O'Halloran reports,
two Independent TDs who support the Government
– Gillian Toole and Barry Heneghan – voted against the Coalition.
The debate last night revolved around the same issues. Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe both took exception in the Dáil and other forums to the accusation from the Opposition that the Government was somehow complicit in the genocide because the Central Bank approves the bonds.
Martin completely rejected the assertion at the Fianna Fáil parliamentary party meeting last night. He has argued that the Central Bank was independent in its role, and that its determination was a technical one based solely on financial criteria.
Still, Ireland's unwanted status has made everybody uncomfortable.
Meeting offers further details on bonds
The three-hour meeting of the finance committee was interesting in that we learned that for all the trouble they have caused the returns from the bonds in Europe are relatively modest.
Israel has raised between €100 and €130 million from the bonds, Mr Makhlouf said. He said the Israeli government website marketing its 'war bonds' had stated it had sold bonds worth €5 billion. He said the EU accounted for only a fraction of that, with the US accounting for the bulk of it.
On what the bank can and can't do, he said: 'The Central Bank cannot decide to impose sanctions for breaches or alleged breaches of international law. It is for international bodies such as the UN or the EU to determine how to respond to breaches or alleged breaches of international law.'
Mr Cross, director for capital markets at the bank, confirmed that the Central Bank fees for the approval of Israeli bonds between October 2023 and May this year was €13,300.
The EU prospectus is due for renewal in September. When asked by Ged Nash (Labour) if there were new issues to be considered, Mr Makhlouf said the 'intensity of the conflict in Gaza probably does put a question mark [on] whether the financial viability of the state still remains secure'.
He added: 'The European Union has indicated that it's going to look at its co-operation agreement with Israel, and I think that's a factor, the fact that the finance minister [Bezalel Smotrich] has just been sanctioned by a number of countries.'
However, he said it should not be taken as granted that the prospectus would not be renewed.
Asked by Mr Nash about how employees of the Central Bank have reacted to its role approving Israeli bonds, Mr Makhlouf said that the views in the bank were a reflection of the view across society.
'They range [from] people who are very sympathetic to one side of the debate, but also people who are sympathetic to the other side of the debate,' he said.
Fallout of Arts Council ICT project continues
The Oireachtas committee on media and arts returned for a second time in recent weeks to its examination of the implications of a partially abandoned ICT project that cost the Arts Council €7 million and also cost its director Maureen Kennelly her job –
Minister for Arts Patrick O'Donovan made the decision
that her contract was not to be renewed.
The Arts Council has become the fall guy taking most of the blame for the failure. But yesterday the committee, chaired by Labour TD Alan Kelly, honed in on the action, or lack of action, by the then Department of Arts in the matter.
Ms Kennelly told the committee that the council had written to the department some 60 times in relation to difficulties with the project. It was disclosed that the department never escalated the issue to senior management beyond principal officer level.
Jack Horgan-Jones
has the details of how the department's shortcomings
were discussed during the meeting.
Pepper sprays Paul Gogarty with shouting
Jack Horgan-Jones
reports on a stand-off
between Independent TD Paul Gogarty and two anti-immigrant Dublin city councillors, Malachy Steenson and Gavin Pepper.
Both shouted him down when he tried to speak.
Mr Gogarty had been addressing a group of protesters objecting to the prospective State purchase of the Citywest Hotel, which is being used to accommodate people seeking international protection.
He did not get very far in his contribution. He opened his remarks with a 'preamble', saying that he did not condone any form of racism or abuse. 'I wasn't allowed to finish my preamble,' he said.
Best Reads
Miriam Lord gives a peerless example of how an
unmissable 900-word column can be constructed from a single line
. No smokers without fire, that should be her motto.
Emmet Malone
has a comprehensive Q&A piece
on how errors were made in calculating the pensions of certain politicians and civil servants.
Seanín Graham reports that after weeks of speculation,
a £50 million (€59 million) investment was offered by the British government to redevelop the derelict Casement Park GAA stadium
in Belfast. It's good news but there is still a £90 million shortfall
of the estimated £260 million cost to transform the dilapidated site.
Playbook
Dáil
08.47: Parliamentary Questions: Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris
10.23: Parliamentary Questions: Minister for Education and Youth Helen McEntee
12.00: Leaders' Questions
12.34: Other Members' Questions
12.42: Questions on Policy or Legislation
13.52: Government Business: Statements on Fisheries
16.17: Government Business: Statements on Nursing Homes and Care for Older Persons
18.17: Topical Issues
19.17: Private Members' Bill:
Criminal Law (Prohibition of the Disclosure of Counselling Records) Bill, 2025
– Second Stage
21.17: Dáil adjourns
Seanad
09.30: Commencement Matters
10.30: Order of Business
13.00: Government Business: Statements on delivering a world class education system, which breaks down barriers and ensures every child can achieve their full potential
14.30: Seanad adjourns
Committees
Defence and National Security
09.30: Pre-legislative scrutiny of a general scheme: Defence Amendment Bill, 2025
Fisheries and Maritime Affairs
09.30: Extension of EU-UK trade agreement and the implications for the Irish fishing and seafood industry
Children and Equality
10.00: Insight into the priority topics and issues facing the department

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The great transfer gamble: Why League of Ireland clubs must not rely on add-ons for value
The great transfer gamble: Why League of Ireland clubs must not rely on add-ons for value

The 42

timean hour ago

  • The 42

The great transfer gamble: Why League of Ireland clubs must not rely on add-ons for value

IT LOOKS LIKE Ringmahon Rangers have already won this summer's transfer window. The 20% sell-on clause that was included in the Cork club's deal that sent Caoimhín Kelleher to Liverpool in 2015 paid off when his transfer to Brentford was completed just after the Republic of Ireland goalkeeper linked up for international duty at the start of the month. Brentford paid an initial €15 million, which could rise to just over €21m depending on add-ons being triggered. Regardless, Ringmahon will receive a guaranteed €3m from Liverpool and, as per Fifa solidarity payments, an additional amount in the region of 2% of the transfer fee will be forthcoming from Brentford. Not only that, unlike the training compensation mechanism that ensures clubs who develop players from the age of 12 to 23 are properly remunerated, the solidarity payments are attached for every transfer a player makes throughout their professional career. So, should Kelleher's star rise in the Premier League and a club decides he is the first €50m Irish goalkeeper, Ringmahon and Rockmount (he spent half a year there) will be divvying up another 2% that is calculated by the recently-established Fifa Clearing House system. In November, the world governing body confirmed that just shy of €110m had been distributed to grassroots and professional clubs over the last two years, and around €200m more is pending. Advertisement A decade after Kelleher left for Anfield, Ringmahon finally hit the jackpot financially. That's because Liverpool's initial outlay for the teenager was only in the region of €50,000. And therein lies the great add-on gamble for clubs when players are moving on. In hindsight, Ringmahon's 20% sell-on clause with Kelleher was astute. In reality, it was a price the Premier League giants were more than willing to pay given the odds of it ever being triggered are stacked against any youngster leaving in their mid-teens. It was a win-win scenario for them. That's another element of this deal that seems like it's part of a bygone era for Irish football. A year after Kelleher left home for Merseyside, the United Kingdom voted for Brexit. That means no Irish youngster can join a club there until the age of 18. On the whole, League of Ireland clubs will be the ones creating the market for the most talented youngsters here. No longer will a Kelleher or a Nathan Collins leave these shores without being in the national league set-up. And, increasingly, grassroots clubs will likely be cut out of any major deals going forward as training compensation is due from the age of 12, and that is now the point at which many players are joining League of Ireland academies. The compensation system is currently as follows. Clubs are benchmarked into four different categories, with the big five leagues in Europe (England, Spain, Germany, France, Italy) and those top tier clubs in Argentina and Brazil in Category 1. League of Ireland Premier Division clubs fall into Category 2, First Division clubs here are in Category 3, and Category 4 are grassroots clubs. If a transfer is being worked out solely on compensation terms, then as it currently stands, a club receives €10,000, regardless of category, for each year a player spent with them from the ages of 12 to 15. It's once a player turns 16 that the categorisation comes into effect. For every year a player is there between the ages of 16 and 23, Category 1 clubs get €90,000, €60,000 for Category 2, €30,000 for Category 3, and €10,000 for Category 4. One major difference now when it comes to arranging compensation if an English, Scottish or Welsh club come calling is the fact they are no longer in the European Union. That means the category of the buying club determines the compensation. So, if Arsenal decide to sign a player who has been with Shamrock Rovers from 12 to 15, Rovers will receive €10,000 per year for those three years, but Arsenal will then have to shell out the maximum €90,000 per year for each year beyond that. The caveat, of course, is that League of Ireland clubs won't want to be relying on compensation figures for their best players. That is why it's vital to ensure professional contracts are in place so the transfer market can determine a player's value, and building up the marketplace over time here is pivotal. Take this summer, for example. With four Premier League clubs among those keen to sign Cathal O'Sullivan, the Republic of Ireland U21 international will most likely leave Cork City for a transfer fee that should be in the high six figures, potentially even seven. That's despite the fact his current contract runs out at the end of this season. If such a market didn't exist and the 18-year-old wasn't already a professional, were he to join a Premier League club, under the current training compensation system Cork would be entitled to €10,000 per season he was at the club from 12 until 15. After that, as England is outside the EU and he would be joining a Category One club, the compensation from ages 16 to 18 would be worth €90,000 per season. Cork, you can be sure, will insist on a sell-on and if O'Sullivan hits the heights like some expect, that should be a welcome bonus rather than relying on it so as not to feel short-changed. Further add-ons for senior international appearances will be built in too, and in the most recent case of Killian Phillips, who was capped twice for Ireland by Heimir Hallgrímsson, Drogheda United will still benefit despite St Mirren triggering the option to buy the midfielder last month after an impressive loan spell from Crystal Palace. The Premier League club signed Phillips from Drogheda but even though the Scottish side took up the option, his registration won't officially sign over until 1 July, which means he was technically still a Palace player and thus the original add-ons are valid as per the first transfer. That, again, shows the gamble that comes with such aspirational add-ons. It's why, for example, clubs here will make sure there are add-ons of varying value for any first-team appearances a former player makes while sent on loan – the cost depending on whether it's a Championship, League One or League Two they are sent to. Related Reads 'He was awful, that's the worst I've seen Josh' - Shamrock Rovers star heads for Ireland duty on a low Grounds for change in League of Ireland shines a light on anguish and joy in equal measure 'I'm not one bit mortified for myself, I'm mortified for the league': Damien Duff on that viral photo Mason Melia is a prime example of a standard-setting deal, the €2 million transfer to Tottenham Hotspur coming to fruition as a result of competing clubs in the marketplace, in this instance Everton and Celtic. Melia did also play for St Joseph's Boys and Bray Wanderers between the age of 12 to 14 so they will be due training compensation. But nothing like what St Pat's will rake in, and the Premier Division club also have not one but two sell-on clauses to ensure they maximise the earning potential from the deal. If that sounds cold and cynical, that's because it's how the business of the game works and it will be vital for League of Ireland clubs to build on this for a sustainable and profitable industry. Rovers, of course, have already shown their capabilities by earning the guts of €3m on Gavin Bazunu – because of various add-ons and a sell-ons – and the earlier reference to Arsenal is not completely plucked from thin air either as they are likely to confirm a deal with Rovers for 16-year-old Victor Ozhianvuna. It's expected that the guaranteed upfront amount for Ozhianvuna will set a new League of Ireland transfer record, and could potentially even rival what Ringmahon's speculative clause for Kelleher delivered. That is no slight on the Cork club, of course, as they were simply trying to get the best deal possible in the system they were operating in. But, in the 10 years since, the market has changed and so have the demands on League of Ireland clubs.

Stocks fall and oil prices hit three year high after Israel strikes Iran
Stocks fall and oil prices hit three year high after Israel strikes Iran

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Stocks fall and oil prices hit three year high after Israel strikes Iran

Stocks fell along with equity-index futures and investors rushed to the safety of haven assets after Israel attacked Iran's nuclear program sites in a major escalation of tensions in the Middle East. Crude oil jumped 9 per cent, the biggest move in more than three years. Contracts for the S&P 500 index retreated 1.6 per cent, and a gauge of Asian stocks dropped 1.1 per cent. Treasuries advanced, with the 10-year yield falling one basis point to 4.34 per cent. Gold rose and cryptocurrencies tumbled. A gauge of the dollar rose 0.4 per cent after initially falling, buoyed by the shift to safer currencies even amid recent doubts about the reliability of dollar. The currency had hit a three-year low on Thursday. The airstrikes against Iran's nuclear program and ballistic-missile sites renewed a standoff between the two adversaries that risks spiralling into a wider conflict. READ MORE While the market reaction was strongest in crude oil, moves in other pockets of the market suggested that investors are watching how long the tensions will last and whether the situation escalates. 'We are seeing classical risk-off moves,' said Matthew Haupt, portfolio manager at Wilson Asset Management. 'What we are watching now for is the speed and scale of the response from Tehran. That will shape the duration of the current moves. Quite often these moves fade after the initial shocks.' Israel said the operation will continue for 'as many days' as it takes to remove the threat and Iran vowed to respond 'harshly.' The move came after repeated warnings by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu about striking Iran and crippling its nuclear program. Iran had previously said it would inaugurate a new uranium-enrichment facility in response to censure by the UN atomic watchdog over its nuclear program. The oil futures curve strengthened on concerns that Israel's latest strike on Iran could have severe and long-lasting repercussions. The most obvious market impact was in oil as Iran is a major exporter of crude to countries such as China and India. Moves in other sectors were more measured as investors braced themselves for the possibility of a steeper selloff. 'This is very serious,' said US-based Kim Forrest, chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners. 'It's surprising the market isn't down more. Do I expect things to get lower in the coming hours? Heck yeah I expect it to be lower by the time I wake up but it'll also depend who's talking and what's happening. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the US is not involved in the air strikes and that Israel took unilateral action against Iran. The attack is coming at a time when global financial markets had recovered from a slump in April caused by Trump's tariffs. An index of global stocks touched a record Thursday, gaining more than 20 per cent from a low hit in April. The attack is 'poised to echo through global markets — not just as a geopolitical flashpoint, but more as a stark wake-up call,' said Hebe Chen, an analyst at Vantage Markets in Melbourne. 'Investors now have to face the mounting threat of multi-front tensions, where potential new hot wars and intensifying trade wars collide, reshaping risk sentiment in real time.' Separately, officials at the Bank of Japan see prices rising a little stronger than they expected earlier in the year, a factor that may open the door to discussions over whether to raise interest rates if global trade tensions ease, according to people familiar with the matter. The officials expect the central bank's benchmark interest rate to be left at 0.5 per cent at the end of a two-day gathering next week as they need to monitor developments in tariff talks globally and their economic implications, the people said. – Bloomberg

Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites in major attack
Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites in major attack

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites in major attack

Israel attacked Iran 's capital Tehran early on Friday in strikes that targeted the country's nuclear programme and raised the potential for an all-out war between the two bitter Middle East adversaries. It appeared to be the most significant attack Iran has faced since its 1980s war with Iraq, with multiple sites around the country hit. The leader of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard was killed, Iranian state television reported. Another top Guard official, as well as two nuclear scientists, were also feared dead. The chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces, Gen Mohammad Bagheri, was also confirmed dead by Iranian state television. READ MORE Israeli leaders said the attack was necessary to head off what they described as an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs and they warned of a reprisal which could target civilians in Israel. [ UN nuclear watchdog says Iran is in breach of negotiations ] [ Where are Iran's nuclear sites and does it have nuclear weapons? Opens in new window ] Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned 'severe punishment' would be directed at Israel. In a statement carried by the state-run IRNA news agency, he said Israel had 'opened its wicked and bloodstained hand to a crime in our beloved country, revealing its malicious nature more than ever by striking residential centres'. In Washington, the Trump administration, which earlier cautioned Israel against an attack amid continuing negotiations, said it had not been involved in the attack and warned Iran against retaliations against US interests or personnel. Multiple sites in the capital were hit in the attack, which Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu said targeted both nuclear and military sites. Also targeted were officials leading Iran's nuclear programme and its ballistic missile arsenal. A partial view of a destroyed apartment in a building targeted by an Israeli strike on the Iranian capital Tehran early on Friday morning. The assault came amid warnings from Israel that it would not permit Tehran to build a nuclear weapon, although it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that. Mr Netanyahu said in an address on YouTube that the attacks will continue 'for as many days at it takes to remove this threat'. 'It could be a year. It could be within a few months,' he said as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival.' The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed an Israeli strike hit Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz and said it was closely monitoring radiation levels. Iranian authorities later informed the IAEA that the Bushehr nuclear power plant had not been targeted. The attack followed increasing tensions that led the US to pull some diplomats from Iraq's capital and to offer voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' and that Israel advised the US that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defence. Debris from an apartment building is seen on top of parked cars after a strike in Tehran, Iran, early on Friday. Photograph: AP 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Mr Rubio said in a statement released by the White House that warned Iran against targeting US interests or personnel. The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme. The board of governors at the IAEA censured Iran on Thursday for the first time in 20 years over its refusal to work with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said his country carried out the attack, without saying what it targeted. 'In the wake of the state of Israel's preventive attack against Iran, missile and drone attacks against Israel and its civilian population are expected immediately,' he said in a statement. The statement added that Mr Katz 'signed a special order declaring an emergency situation in the home front'. 'It is essential to listen to instructions from the home front command and authorities to stay in protected areas,' it said Both Iran and Israel closed their airspace. – AP and Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store