Don't shoot the messenger: Appellate Court says ‘offensive' online remarks to ‘annoy' can't be a crime in Malaysia
The judges said the law gave no objective standard for what is offensive, warning it could criminalise truth and stifle free speech under the Federal Constitution.
The decision only applies to ongoing and future cases, with activist Heidy Quah's legal challenge succeeding, while the government may still appeal to the Federal Court.
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 19 — The Court of Appeal today unanimously ruled that it is no longer a crime in Malaysia to make 'offensive' online comments with the intention to 'annoy', and struck down parts of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998's Section 233 that had criminalised 'offensive' and annoying online speech.
Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng, chairing a three-judge panel, said the court found these words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 to be unconstitutional, as they go against the Federal Constitution's Article 10(2)(a).
'We find the impugned words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 constituting an offence to be violative of Article 10(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution read with Article 8.
'It is not a permissible restriction to freedom of speech under our Federal Constitution,' he said, before striking down or making these two words in Section 233 invalid.
'We declare this decision to have prospective effect, so as not to resurrect the past,' he added.
The Court of Appeal's decision's prospective effect means it will only affect ongoing or future court cases involving the crime of 'offensive' online speech intended to 'annoy' under Section 233, and will not affect past cases where the court had decided on whether those charged are guilty or not of such crimes.
In reading the broad grounds of his judgment, judge Lee pointed out that there may be some people who feel offended and annoyed even when what is spoken is the truth, and cautioned against making it a crime to speak the truth.
'A premium should be given to truth, and the fact that some truths may be unpalatable does not justify criminalising the messenger merely because some masses of the people do not like the message,' the judge said.
Among other things, the judge said that there is no uniform standard in society on what is 'offensive', and what a person finds offensive may not be offensive to another person in a diverse society.
The judge said Section 233 does not give any standards on what would be 'offensive' or what would be an 'intent to annoy', and said freedom of speech becomes illusory and enforcement becomes arbitrary when all types of speech could potentially be 'offensive' if a single person feels it is offensive.
The judge cautioned that this would result in every speech having to be 'sanitised' — whether it is true or not — to avoid committing a crime under Section 233.
Without an objective standard on what is 'offensive', the judge said regulating online civil discourse would become a 'euphemism' for the authorities to police and censor undesirable speeches, which he said would result in a 'chilling effect' over the right to freedom of speech and expression which is protected under the Federal Constitution's Article 10(1)(a).
The judge pointed out that if online remarks are found to be untrue, a person can still be charged under the CMA's Section 233(1) for making comments that are false with intent to abuse, threaten or harass another person.
The two other judges on the panel today are Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah.
When asked by reporters if the Malaysian government will be appealing today's decision, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin said he would be seeking instructions on whether to file an appeal at the Federal Court.
Lawyers Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, Surendra Ananth, New Sin Yew and Nur Izni Syazwani represented activist Heidy Quah in her successful constitutional challenge today against the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233.
Lawyer Kee Hui Yee held a watching brief for the Malaysian Bar, while lawyers Lim Wei Jiet and Nevyn Vinosh Venudran represented Clooney Foundation for Justice and Suara Rakyat Malaysia in assisting the Court of Appeal as amicus curiae.
While the Court of Appeal's decision today has effectively removed the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' from Section 233, there is now a newer version of Section 233 that uses the words 'grossly offensive'.
MORE TO COME
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
4 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Gov't to take 'offensive', 'annoys' ruling to Federal Court
PARLIAMENT | Putrajaya intends to appeal a Court of Appeal ruling declaring two words under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998 - 'offensive' and 'annoys' - as unconstitutional. Confirming that he was informed of the Attorney-General's Chambers' (AGC) plan to appeal the ruling, Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil (Harapan-Lembah Pantai) clarified that the words have been refined under amendments brought under his leadership. 'Regarding the Court of Appeal's decision, I was informed that...
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Charges against Zara's alleged bullies could change with new evidence, says minister
Home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said the inquest is to establish the cause of Form 1 student Zara Qairina Mahathir's death and not to find fault. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Charges against the five teenage girls for allegedly verbally bullying Form 1 student Zara Qairina Mahathir may be amended if new evidence emerges, home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said today. He said it was not unusual for charges to be amended during the course of proceedings. 'Of course, the charges can be amended. It's a normal part of the legal process. Sometimes the accused is initially charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code (for murder), which is later reduced to Section 304 (for culpable homicide not amounting to murder). 'That's how the process works,' he said when winding up the debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan in the Dewan Rakyat for his ministry. He was responding to a question from Afnan Hamimi Taib Azamudden (PN-Alor Setar) on whether the charges could be revised should new evidence surface during the inquest into Zara's death. Saifuddin said the inquest was intended to establish the cause of Zara's death and that it was not an exercise in finding fault. Earlier today, the five teenagers were charged in the children's court in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, with verbally abusing Zara, who died last month. They were charged with uttering abusive words against the victim which could have caused her distress. They are accused of committing the offence at Block A-3-6 of SMK Agama Tun Datu Mustapha in Limauan, Papar, between 10pm and 11pm on July 15. Zara was found unconscious at 4am on July 16 after allegedly falling from the third floor of her school's hostel in Papar, Sabah. She died at Queen Elizabeth I Hospital in Kota Kinabalu the following day. Her body was exhumed on Aug 9 to allow for a post-mortem amid allegations of bullying. The Attorney-General's Chambers yesterday defended its decision to charge the five teenagers, clarifying that the charges under Section 507C(1) of the Penal Code related specifically to acts of bullying and were not connected to Zara's death. The AGC also dismissed a suggestion by lawyers representing Zara's family that further investigations or an inquest could later justify a more serious charge under Section 507D(2), saying this was 'speculative and not supported by accurate facts'. The lawyers had urged the AGC to postpone the charges against the five minors.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
71 rat trails in Sarawak bordering Kalimantan found, says home minister
Home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said the government has approved RM28 million to develop seven more security posts along the Sarawak-Kalimantan border, including in hotspots in Lubok Antu and Ba'kelalan. (Bernama pic) KUALA LUMPUR : The home ministry has identified 71 illegal routes and smuggling trails along Sarawak's border with Kalimantan, said its minister, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. Saifuddin said the government has approved RM28 million to develop seven additional security posts, including in hotspots in Lubok Antu and Ba'kelalan. Winding up the debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan for his ministry in the Dewan Rakyat today, he said an additional RM64 million had been allocated for 22 projects along the border, covering both physical and non-physical projects involving the police, the immigration department and border agencies. He also said another 390 senior and lower-ranking police officers would be stationed to protect the border. Illegal gambling centres disguised as coffee shops Saifuddin also addressed the increase in illegal gambling operations, often disguised as coffee shops, in Sarawak. He said the authorities carried out 509 raids across Sarawak, resulting in 535 arrests, from January to July. 'We will continue to take action including under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, and the Prevention of Crime Act 1959. 'We also cooperate with the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission and Sarawak Energy Bhd when we cut power and water supply to them. We will review the laws to see if they need to be strengthened. 'We can take down their websites in split seconds, but they can immediately create mirror websites,' he said.
