Nevada man pleads guilty to extorting Instagram users, influencers
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A man has pleaded guilty to extorting and threatening Instagram users and influencers, according to court documents.
Idriss Qibaa, 28, pleaded guilty on Feb. 21 to charges including extortion, money laundering and stalking, records said.
The FBI arrested Qibaa last summer and said he extorted and threatened customers and Instagram influencers as part of an online business to block and unlock social media accounts. Qibaa ran the website Unlocked4life.com and uses the names 'Dani' and 'Unlocked,' documents said.
Will Demi Moore be the first Best Actress from a horror film in 14 years?
Qibaa 'outlined an extortion scheme' during a podcast in 2024 where he also said he made more than $600,000 a month through his website, Unlocked4life.com, and its subscribers, the FBI said after his arrest. During the 'No Jumper' podcast, Qibaa described 'locking victims' and then 'charging the victims to unlock the account,' documents said.
Unlocked4life.com, which state records said was based in Henderson, advertised it could ban or unban social media accounts on Instagram, Snapchat, Telegram and TikTok, investigators said. Qibaa also offered a service to purchase digital tracking and personal information.
Qibaa faces decades in prison, officials said. A judge will sentence him in May.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Conservative outlet says WNBA denied them press passes to games
Anti-trans 'activist' Riley Gaines and the Fox-owned sports news outlet OutKick claim they are being unfairly targeted by the WNBA. Gaines and OutKick insist they were denied press credentials for two recent Atlanta Dream games and allege that the WNBA is trying to suppress their reporting. Advertisement Gaines, who never became a professional swimmer after leaving college, rose to fame among Republicans after publicly targeting trans former NCAA swimmer Lia Thomas and now has an OutKick podcast where she frequently talks about trans athletes in women's sports. Recently, she has been laser-focused on the WNBA's Brittney Griner, claiming that the Atlanta Dream star center called Indiana Fever point guard Caitlin Clark 'trash' and a 'f*cking white girl' based on Gaines' lip-reading from footage of the game where Griner's statements couldn't be heard. Gaines also implied that Griner didn't deserve to be rescued from a Russian prison back in 2022, Them reported. It's this allegation that Gaines says the WNBA is trying to cover up by keeping her from attending games as press. In an Instagram post over the weekend, Gaines claimed that the WNBA was 'self-imploding' and was attempting to 'suppress any uncomfortable inquiries.' Advertisement Sports writer Jemele Hill disputed Gaines' version of the game, writing on X that Clark wasn't even part of the play Griner was seemingly frustrated by, and that she was actually talking about the referee and said 'trash' and 'f*cking wack call.' 'I get that your whole personality is caught up in stuff like this, so you don't care about spreading misinformation,' she wrote. Gaines and OutKick, which is owned by the Fox Corporation that also owns Fox News, claim that the WNBA is targeting them because they are the only ones reporting on the supposed things Griner said about Clark. The meritless claims about Griner made by Gaines and OutKick have fueled the flames of hate that Black players like Griner and Angel Reese have experienced from right-wing commentators, social media, and even WNBA fans who have been heard making racist comments at a game . Advertisement OutKick attempted to gain press credentials for the Dream's game against the Los Angeles Sparks on May 27 and a second game against the Connecticut Sun. The outlet told Fox News that they were denied access in an email from the Sun, where they were told, "Unfortunately, we cannot accommodate your request for a media credential for Connecticut Sun vs. Atlanta Dream on Friday, June 6. Due to very limited space, priority is given to those that are associated with outlets that have consistently covered the organization for previous seasons." Gaines has turned her ultra-conservative views into a career, becoming a paid 'culture war' speaker. According to GLAAD , Gaines' anti-trans hate is well-documented. She has declared a 'Real Women's Day' holiday, was part of a lawsuit to challenge trans eligibility in college sports, launched the Project BOYcott campaign to 'celebrate' female athletes who refuse to compete against trans women and girls, and travels nationwide speaking at panels advocating against trans people. She is also currently embroiled in a controversy with Simon Biles, after Biles defended trans athletes in the face of Gaines' misgendering and criticizing a trans high school athlete.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Video of football fans misleadingly linked to Los Angeles demonstrations
US President Donald Trump deployed hundreds of US Marines to Los Angeles following a weekend of anti-deportation demonstrations in June 2025 that saw sporadic but violent clashes between police and protesters. One video of a large crowd chanting "We are Los Angeles" circulated widely online in posts claiming it was related to the recent protests, but it was actually filmed weeks earlier as fans of the Los Angeles Football Club (LAFC) gathered ahead of a match. "This is definitely an insurrection and threats against democracy," says a June 7, 2025 post on X with thousands of interactions. Advertisement The post shares a video showing a packed crowd of people, dressed mainly in black, marching and chanting slogans including: "We are Los Angeles." Some are carrying black flags and scarves emblazoned with golden writing. Text overlaid on the video dates the clip to June 7 and asks: "Should we view this as AN INSURRECTION Firing up?" Screenshot from X taken June 10, 2025 Additional posts linking the clip to the demonstrations against Trump's immigration policies also circulated on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and Threads. The video spread as Trump ordered the deployment of 700 Marines to Los Angeles to quell what he called "professional agitators and insurrectionists," despite the objections of state and local officials. Thousands of members of the National Guard -- a reserve military force usually controlled by the governor of a state -- have also been mobilized to the city. Advertisement The protests began June 6 after residents attempted to confront federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers who were conducting workplace raids in the city as part of the Trump administration's efforts to deport undocumented migrants. The clip shared in the post, however, is unrelated to the demonstrations. Keyword searches for the words "Empire Boys" -- a phrase seen written on some scarves and flags in the video -- led to Instagram and Facebook pages for an LAFC supporter club by the same name. Screenshot from a video posted by the LAFC supporter club "Empire Boys," with elements outlined by AFP The "Empire Boys" Instagram page posted a video of the same scene from a different angle May 18, nearly three weeks before the protests (archived here). Further research uncovered an exact match to the video circulating online that LAFC's official X account posted May 18 as fans gathered ahead of a game against crosstown rivals Los Angeles Galaxy (archived here). The teams played to a 2-2 tie. The game took place at Dignity Health Sports Park in Carson, California. AFP has fact-checked other misinformation about the demonstrations in Los Angeles here.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Las Vegas restaurant operator ordered to pay more than $215K for alleged racial slurs against Black line cook
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. Olives, Inc., must pay $215,688 after a Black line cook at its Las Vegas restaurant, The Beast, was allegedly racially harassed, and it allegedly took no disciplinary or remedial action in response, according to a June 3 default judgment against the company. Per a federal court order in Scott v. Olives, Inc., over an extended time and for the majority of the line cook's shifts, two co-workers allegedly called him racial slurs and made racially offensive jokes in front of other employees and the supervisor. At the company's Christmas party, they made similarly insulting racist jokes in front of the cook's family, according to the allegations. Based on emails between the line cook and HR, the court found the cook reported the harassment to an HR manager and filled out a written complaint form detailing the co-workers' behavior. The court said the emails showed the HR manager conducted a 'cursory' investigation and, despite clear evidence to the contrary, determined there was no 'malicious intent' in the racially derogatory conduct. Olives allegedly took no other action. In his allegations, the line cook asserted that the harassment got worse after the investigation. When he complained again, Olives allegedly did nothing, and he felt compelled to resign. The line cook sued Olives on a number of grounds, including for subjecting him to a racially hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A federal court in Nevada ruled that default judgment was proper because Olives did not respond to any documents filed in the case — including the cook's motion for default judgment and the court's motion for a hearing on damages — or make any other attempt to defend the action, and there was no evidence this was due to excusable neglect, the court said. Also, because Olives failed to defend the action, the line cook's 'well-pleaded' allegations could be taken as true, and they showed the co-workers' actions rose to the level of an unlawful hostile work environment under Title VII, the court held. That is, the line cook established his work environment was subjectively hostile — he reported the slurs and jokes to Olives and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, according to the court. The line cook also established his work environment was objectively hostile. In this regard, although harassment violates the law when it is either sufficiently severe or sufficiently pervasive, the record indicated the co-workers' alleged actions were both, the court pointed out. The court held that Olives could be held liable for their conduct because it failed to take remedial actions 'proportionate to the seriousness of the crime.' In this case, the email exchange between the line cook and HR established that Olives knew of the harassment but decided not to intervene based on the 'spurious conclusion' the co-workers' slurs and jokes were made without malicious intent, the court pointed out. The inadequacy of this response was especially clear given the allegations that the co-workers 'seemed more emboldened after the conclusion of the investigation, and the harassment not only continued but intensified,' the court noted. It awarded the line cook $100,000 in compensatory damages, $100,000 in punitive damages, and the remaining amount for attorneys' fees and costs. Recommended Reading Muslim officer allegedly forced to remove hijab in front of male boss has Title VII claim, 2nd Circuit says Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
