Scottish councillor joins Reform UK after quitting 'autocratic' Labour
MacDougall, who represents the Kinghorn and Burntisland area, quit the Labour Party last year after she claimed she was blocked from becoming a general election candidate in favour of the London-based Melanie Ward to contest the Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath constituency.
The now Reform councillor is the daughter of the late John MacDougall, who was an ally of Gordon Brown and served as a Labour MP for Glenrothes from 2001 until his death in 2008.
READ MORE: Budding Scottish Labour candidate defends anti-Gaelic school stance
Announcing that she had joined Reform, MacDougall said she wanted a more 'grown up' and 'authentic' politics.
She said: 'I will always do my best to help and improve people's lives. That's where my passion has always lay, with you, my community.
(Image: Fife Council)
'After thoughtful consultation I am delighted to join Reform UK to become part of a team who want to deliver real change for our communities.
'I want more grown up, authentic politics and an opportunity to work together to offer better. I look forward to this exciting new chapter and I remain fully committed to serving the people of Fife as always with my full commitment, honesty and integrity.'
MacDougall previously blasted her former colleagues in the Labour Party for selecting Ward, who ultimately won the Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath seat, for 'imposing' parachut candidates on voters.
At the time she said: 'It is no secret that candidates are being imposed on members and constituents in a non-democratic, autocratic manner which I simply cannot support.
'Our local area is being denied the opportunity to have a local candidate and in my opinion this is not acceptable.'
MacDougall was elected to represent the Burntisland, Kinghorn and Western Kirkcaldy ward in May 2022.
Her father was the former leader of Fife Council along with being an MP for Labour and was also a Rosyth Dockyard worker.
'I know he would have been thoroughly disappointed at what has been happening, particularly here in Fife,' MacDougall said.
'I have lost faith in the Labour Party and do not believe it is practising what it preaches while upholding its core values.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Hostage: 'Playing the Prime Minister 'changes your perception' of politics' says Suranne Jones
Actress Suranne Jones has taken on the role of many women under immense pressure. In Doctor Foster she suspects her husband of having an affair, in Vigil she investigates a death on board a submarine, and in Gentleman Jack she develops a dangerous lesbian romance. But none of the roles are quite as pressured as her latest - playing a British prime minister whose husband is kidnapped. Hostage, Netflix's new political thriller, sees Jones' character, Abigail Dalton, build an uneasy alliance with French President Vivienne Toussaint - played by Julie Delpy - who is being blackmailed during a London two leaders work together in order to rescue the PM's husband, unmask the kidnapper and blackmailer, and bring those responsible to justice. 'Political with a small p' Given its themes of immigration, the funding of the NHS and public trust, audiences may be tempted to connect Hostage to today's headlines. But, both stars insist the show is less about mirroring today's politics and more about creating a thrilling story set in the political world. "We're entertaining and we're in the political world, but it's in no way a reflection of the world we live in," Jones tells the BBC."It's political with a small p - there's enough that roots us in the real world but the world is too complicated to link it directly and I think it would be inappropriate." Delpy agrees and says: "Things change every day. It's impossible to be in the political moment because tomorrow is something else."The show's writer, Matt Charman, explains that there are some connections to the real world as it's "impossible to write a show that exists in the climate we live in that doesn't end up feeling that it's in dialogue with it". "If you wrote a show that isn't connected to our world it would feel weird," he says, "but I hope the show does have the ability to exist in its own oxygen." It is rare to see two female world leaders sharing the spotlight in a political thriller, but, for Charman, making sure Dalton and Toussaint were women was integral to the way the series was conceived and it was both a creative and political choice. "What was exciting was the idea of women in power and how we explore that," he says, explaining that he tried to explore how each situation the characters face would be different for a woman. "There's a double standard for women, so giving full dramatic freedom to that was very important." Charman and Jones have shared an agent for the past 10 years and Hostage came about because Charman really wanted to work with Jones and the pair settled on creating a political thriller. Jones says she particularly enjoyed exploring "how these two women have to dance around each other"."A female politician is used to dealing with men so it's interesting to see how it plays out when it's two women." While viewers quickly learn about Jones' character - a loving wife and mother who is idealistic about bettering the country - Delpy's character is more drawn out and our opinion of her changes throughout the show."We made sure not to play into the female politician stereotypes," Delpy say. "What I like is that these women actually have some things in common like they both want change and came into office hopeful." The Guardian describe Hostage as "quite unusual" in that it doesn't remind you of any other political thrillers. "It's a little biting but it's not House of Cards cynical, it has a breakneck pace but it's not 24, the dialogue is sharp but never played for laughs," Zoe Williams writes. 'Cost of being in power' To play Dalton convincingly, Jones, who also served as an executive producer on the show, says she really immersed herself in the reality of political life. She visited the House of Commons, spoke to the Speaker of the House and devoured books, podcasts and documentaries. "I'm a bit of a geek when it comes to research," she admits. "I was fascinated by not emulating anyone but by understanding a life I knew nothing about. And it's the cost of being in a powerful position in that way that really struck me."Charman also talks about the extraordinary amount of research that went into creating the show. I ask him whether Dalton or Toussaint were inspired by any real life politicians and he confesses that they are, but he won't say who. "We interviewed a lot of people and Suranne had incredible access to people who had been prime minister who talked about their time in office and the pressure on their family. But it was all agreed that they would speak about this as long as it could remain confidential," he says. Jones won't say which politicians inspired her character but says all of her previous characters are a part of her and she has "a boardroom of personalities" which feed into who she plays. She says all the research into what it's like to be a politician "changes your perception for sure" and makes you realise "the cost of being in a powerful position". One question the show raises is whether or not it's possible for a politician today to stick to their ideals once they come into office and while Jones is unsure, Charman is an optimist. "I wanted to explore how there can be decent people in politics who are fundamentally good but get pushed around," he says. He adds that it's not "inevitable" that people give up their ideals once in office, but "it's definitely tough to keep your morals". Above the thrills and drama of Hostage, Charman says the show explores "what it takes to be a good person in a system that doesn't always reward good people."Delpy is slightly more pessimistic and explains that given "politicians have to be heard, if you're too reasonable you won't be listened to as there's so much noise of both extremes"."If you have a moderate view you get lost in the noise as people are only listening to the loudest."
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
How The Spectator shaped John Buchan
Amid the hullabaloo attending the 150th anniversary of the birth of John Buchan on 26 August – the walks and talks, the screenings of The 39 Steps, the think pieces in elevated publications, the new collection of essays – one facet of his extraordinary life is unlikely to get much of an airing. I am thinking of his work for The Spectator, little known now, yet crucial to his development as a writer. In early 1900, The Spectator was enjoying success as a readable Liberal Unionist, free trade, anti-Home Rule, political and literary magazine, popular with educated opinion-formers of a mildly conservative bent. It was owned and edited by John St Loe Strachey, and it was run on a shoestring out of a tall house in Wellington Street, Covent Garden, with Meredith Townsend, the previous owner, continuing to write leaders into his old age, and Charles L. Graves, the assistant editor (and uncle of Robert), sharing the donkey work with Strachey. My grandfather was 24 when his first article, 'The Russian Imperial Ideal', appeared in January 1900. But he was already the author of three published novels, an increasingly accomplished essayist, had seen three short stories published in the Yellow Book and was working on The Half-Hearted, a novel which featured the Great Game between Russia and Britain. He was reading for the Bar at the same time, so he kept quiet about his freelance journalism, which was easy enough to do since the articles were not signed. (Buchan devotees and scholars owe a great debt to Charles Seaton, the former librarian at The Spectator, for identifying his work, and to Dr Roger Clarke for setting the articles in their proper context.) Buchan's value to Strachey, apart from a long friendship, was that he could write about almost anything: from mountaineering to philosophy, from religion to poetry, from foreign affairs to history. His experience as a publisher's reader for John Lane, which had begun when he was at Oxford, meant that he was also invaluable as a wide-ranging book reviewer. In return, he benefited hugely from collaborating with Strachey and Graves, developing an easier, more attractive prose style than was evident in his often rather mannered and self-consciously learned early essays. As he wrote in an article for the centenary issue of The Spectator in November 1928: 'The kindly admonitions of Charles Graves suppled the joints of my style, which was rapidly becoming a dreadful compost of legal and philosophical jargon.' He also learned to work extremely fast. He soon began both to write his articles at Wellington Street and help to put the magazine together. He deputised for Strachey when he was away and, in early 1906, when Townsend retired, he abandoned the Bar and was taken on as 'second assistant editor', a post which he held for a year until his desire to be married and enjoy better-paid employment prompted him to join the publishing company Thomas Nelson and Sons. But he continued to contribute to The Spectator up until the first world war and occasionally thereafter, including a three-month stint writing 'A Spectator's Notebook' in 1933, under the pseudonym 'Auspex'. By this time he was famous and fêted as a novelist, public intellectual, politician and celebrity journalist. In all, he wrote 805 articles for the magazine. (I have managed only 350 over four decades.) Charles Graves, who possessed a kind of genius for light verse, included a poem, 'To John Buchan', in a published collection of 1912: … Ev'ry Tuesday morn, careering Up the stairs with flying feet, You would burst upon us, cheering Wellington's funereal street, Fresh as paint, though you'd been 'railing' Up from Scotland all the night, Or had just returned from scaling Some appalling Dolomite… Pundit, publicist and jurist; Statistician and divine; Mystic, mountaineer and purist In the high financial line; Prince of journalistic sprinters – Swiftest that I ever knew – Never did you keep the printers Longer than an hour or two. Then, too, when the final stages Of our weekly task drew nigh, You would come and pass the pages, With a magisterial eye: Seldom pausing, save to smoke a Cigarette at half-past one, When you quaffed a cup of mocha And devoured a penny bun… And devoured a penny bun…One of the advantages to Buchan of his association with The Spectator was that he developed an individual, attractive but literate style, disguising but not abandoning his excellent classical education. That and learning to marshal innumerable facts into a readable narrative, which augured well for his work as Director of Information and author of the 24-volume Nelson's History of the War during the Great War. And the subjects he covered sometimes found echoes in his fiction, notably the 1906 Zulu uprising in Natal province, which was led by a charismatic chief – not unlike the magnificent, doomed Reverend John Laputa of his novel Prester John, published four years later. In 1906, towards the end of his time working at The Spectator, he reviewed a book, The King's English, which gave him an opportunity to reflect on the journalist's craft: 'We do not expect to find lyrical prose in a Report or a Blue-book, nor do we seek in a leading article, written to edify the man in the train, the polished, jewel-like form of an essay composed for the delight of the man of leisure… But there is also a working model, consciously imperfect, a kind of compromise between colloquial speech and a more formal statement, which is, or should be, the standard for journalism… Good journalism ought to have many points of kinship with good talk, and some of the looseness and colloquialism of our common speech is not out of place.' Almost 120 years later, those words still resonate.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Ukraine's 'Iron General' refutes rumours he is 'quietly preparing to run for president' to replace Zelensky
Ukraine 's ambassador to the UK on Wednesday denied rumours he 'is quietly preparing a run for President' from his London HQ should peace break out. General Valerii Zaluzhnyi's team were forced to play down the claims stating that 'there is no talk of any campaign headquarters'. It followed posts by a journalist that 'his HQ is already active in London and recruitment is underway'. They claimed sources had told them his campaign had 'effectively begun' after Volodymyr Zelensky told Donald Trump that elections may be coming soon. Zaluzhnyi, known affectionately as the Iron General, would be a front-runner to defeat Mr Zelensky as he is remembered fondly for marshalling the heroic defence of Kyiv in 2022. He was then replaced by Oleksandr Syrskyi as Commander-in-Chief and sidelined as Ukrainian Ambassador to the UK in July last year. Freelance journalist Katie Livingstone said sources had told her the Ukrainian opposition MP Viktoria Siumar would run any campaign with former BBC Ukraine reporter Oksana Torop handling his press. Kyiv Post Correspondent Jason Jay Smart said he had confirmed the claims, adding: 'Sources indicate that he gave the go-ahead to his team, over a month ago, to start planning his campaign.' But Ms Torop last night denied the rumours. She told the New Voice of Ukraine: 'There is no talk of any campaign headquarters. 'Valerii Zaluzhnyi has stated his position more than once, and as far as I know, it has not changed: while the war continues, we need to work to preserve the country, not think about elections.' Zaluzhnyi is Ukraine's most trusted public figure with recent polling finding 73 per cent of Ukrainians trust him compared with 67 per cent for Zelensky.
