Hamas Agrees to Mediators' Proposal to Hand over US-Israeli Hostage
The response came after the group's negotiating delegation received a proposal from mediators on Thursday.
Hamas official Husam Badran confirmed earlier the group's determination to implement the terms of the ceasefire agreement in its various stages, warning that the 'occupation's departure from what was agreed will take us back to zero.'
A new round of indirect talks started on Tuesday, focusing on how to proceed to the second phase of the three-phase deal brokered by the US, Qatar, and Egypt, which came to an end on March 1.
Hamas's response to the mediators' proposal indicates its willingness to uphold the objective of the ceasefire and respect its terms.
Israel estimates that among the remaining 59 hostages in Gaza, five are Americans, with 24 believed to be alive.
Read also: Egypt's Reconstruction Plan: What Would it Take to Revive Gaza?
Meanwhile, over 9,500 Palestinians remain detained in Israeli prisons, many without legitimate charges. Human rights organizations have been sounding the alarm on Israel's gruesome violations that have led to multiple deaths in detention.
As the indirect talks take place, Israel continues to block entry of humanitarian aid shipments and cut electricity as a means of genocidal war on the devastated Gaza.
Not only that, Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) continues its assaults targeting civilians using drones, and snipers, killing two Palestinian children in the past 24 hours.
The first phase of the six-week ceasefire has enabled a growing flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza and relieved some of the Palestinians' pain.
Progress towards the second phase paused when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delayed talks until he met with US President Donald Trump.
The delay in progressing to the next phase of the ceasefire deal is heightening fear and uncertainty, splintering hopes of Gazans to rejoin their peace and rebuild the devastated Gaza. Tags: Gaza ceasefireGaza ceasefire negotiationsHamas and Israel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
What if the Real Winner of a Strait of Hormuz Blockade… Is Washington?
At first glance, it sounds utterly reckless, almost suicidal for global stability: blocking the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world's oil supply flows, would deal a devastating blow to the global economy. Iran, under continuous pressure, even after a shaky ceasefire, seems to favor shutting down this vital passage. The Iranian parliament, a vocal mouthpiece of the regime, just voted a few weeks ago in favor of its closure while small but repetitive irruptions of violence occur each week around this bottleneck. In that particular scenario, oil prices would skyrocket, market chaos would ensue and a recession would be all but guaranteed. And yet… if we dig deeper into the geopolitical calculus, we find that in this catastrophic scenario, one side might actually emerge stronger: the United States. This is not a crude oversimplification of global power plays, but rather a cold-eyed reading of 21st-century energy realities and economic interdependencies. Should Iran ever decide, finally, to close the Strait of Hormuz as its ultimate act of defiance, it would not be the Americans who pay the highest price. Far from it. Europe: The Energy Noose Tightens Even More Let's start with Europe. Already weakened by the war in Ukraine and severed from Russian gas supplies, the EuropeanUnion has been in a frantic scramble to diversify its energy sources since 2022. The Middle East, especially Gulf exports, has become a critical safety valve. Close the Strait of Hormuz tomorrow, and all of that unravels. The result? Setbacks on climate ambitions, soaring energy costs, slower growth, and above all, a deeper dependence on, guess who… the United States. Washington would inevitably become Europe's main supplier of liquefied fossil fuels. The Old Continent's structural energy independence would weaken further. China: Energy Vulnerability Under the Spotlight The real geopolitical shockwave would hit Beijing. China depends on the Middle East for more than 40% of its oil imports, a large portion of which transits the Strait of Hormuz. Any disruption there could be catastrophic for China's energy security and internal stability. To date, China has no comparable alternatives. Its efforts to reduce dependence, through the China-Pakistan EnergyCorridor or Russian supplies, remain structurally insufficient. A crisis at Hormuz would painfully expose the limits of its rise, reminding Beijing that its growth still heavily depends on global flows it cannot fully control. And while the Strait of Malacca represents an even more critical vulnerability, a true Achilles' heel for the Chinese economy, that topic deserves its own analysis in due time. Washington watches all this with a blend of suspicion and opportunism. A temporary slowdown in the Chinese economy would, after all, bolster America's position, especially in value chains, financial markets, and advanced technologies. The United States: Energy Resilience and Strategic Windfall So, what about the U.S. in this tumultuous context? Since the shale oil and gas revolution, America has taken a giant leaptoward energy autonomy. Where once Washington heavilyrelied on imports, it now stands as a net exporter of hydrocarbons, especially liquefied natural gas (LNG). This structural shift has sharply reduced its vulnerability to Middle Eastern disruptions, a historically volatile yet crucial region for the global energy market. The U.S. also holds vast strategic petroleum reserves, able to temporarily absorb supply shocks. Its energy infrastructure, from pipelines to liquefaction terminals, is modern and expanding, enabling flexible, secure supply. This resilience gives Washington a unique leverage: in a crisis, it can not only meet domestic needs but also strengthen its role as a key global supplier. Better yet, a global energy crisis would send oil prices soaring, fattening the profits of major American oil companies, and by extension, the federal treasury. This financial windfall would grant Washington considerable political and economic maneuverability. Through what could be called 'energy aid' disguised as strategic support, the U.S. could sell its oil and gas at premium prices, imposing its standards of quality, security, and environmental norms. This dynamic would also reinforce the Atlantic Alliance, as European nations facing supply disruptions would be forced to depend more on American LNG. Washington would thus reclaim ground on the global energy agenda, imposing its standards and cementing alliances in exchange for vital resources. A Risky Bet… But Tempting Of course, it's not without risks for Washington. Uncontrolled price spikes could also cripple the American economy, fuel inflation, and send shockwaves through the stock market. But in the arsenal of geostrategic consequences, gains often outweigh losses. Such is the paradox of today's international system: what appears as an absolute threat to world order can, from another perspective, be transformed into a power lever for those able to anticipate, absorb, and even capitalize on crises. So yes, it sounds crazy. But in real geopolitics, the illusion of madness often masks cold power logic, and Trump has mastered the cynical game of 'Dynamic Disruption'. Tags: Strait of HormuzUS and IranWashington
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
Norway Reviews $2 Trillion Fund's Israeli Investments Linked to Gaza Genocide
Norway's government has ordered its $2 trillion sovereign wealth fund, the largest in the world, to reassess every investment it holds in Israeli companies after revelations that some of them are directly tied to their genocidal campaign in Gaza. The decision follows reports in Norwegian daily Aftenposten that Bet Shemesh Engines, an Israeli manufacturer of aircraft components, supports fighter jets used in the relentless bombardment of Gaza. For months, those airstrikes have reduced entire neighborhoods to rubble and claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives. Public outrage matters Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide, who oversees the management of the sovereign wealth fund, said the government cannot ignore public outrage over the possibility that Norwegian money finances war crimes. 'Our guidelines forbid investment in companies that take part in serious violations of human rights,' he told reporters in Oslo. 'When allegations point to direct involvement in ongoing military aggression, people have every right to demand answers.' Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre voiced alarm over the revelations, describing himself as 'deeply concerned' about the fund's stake in Bet Shemesh Engines. Investigations show the company plays a role in maintaining and supplying key parts for Israeli fighter jets that have been central to the genocidal air campaign against Gaza. This would not mark the first time Norway cuts financial ties with Israeli firms over their role in the genocide. Last May, the fund pulled out of Baz, an Israeli energy company, after determining it operated inside Palestinian land under Israeli control. The move was described as a refusal to bankroll activities in territories seized in violation of international law. Norway's latest step comes amid a broader shift in Europe, where pressure grows to sever economic links to Israel's war machine. The situation in Palestine worsens daily. Gaza's Health Ministry reports that Israeli attacks in the past 24 hours have killed 68 people and injured 326. Tags: Gazagaza genocidenorwayWar on Gaza
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
Australia to Recognize Palestinian State at UN in September
Casablanca – Australia will officially recognize the State of Palestine during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in September, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced on Monday, describing a two-state solution as 'humanity's best hope' to end the 'cycle of violence' in the Middle East. The decision comes amid mounting international pressure on Israel to end its genocide on Gaza and follows similar symbolic announcements from Canada, France, and the United Kingdom. Read also: Trump Fumes as Canada Joins France and UK in Push to Recognize Palestinian State Albanese said the move is conditional on commitments from the Palestinian Authority (PA), including demilitarization, the holding of general elections, and continued recognition of 'Israel's right to exist'. 'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that isolates Hamas, disarms it, and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Albanese told reporters, adding that the commitments from PA President Mahmoud Abbas were 'detailed and significant.' Israel condemned the decision, warning that recognizing a Palestinian state allegedly 'rewards terrorism.' Australia's opposition Liberal Party accused the government of making the announcement while Hamas remains in control of Gaza and hostages from the October 7 attacks remain captive. The Australian Greens welcomed the recognition but criticized the government for failing to take stronger action, including imposing sanctions on Israel and ending arms trade. The Australian Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN) called the move a 'political fig leaf,' arguing it distracts from Australia's 'complicity in Israeli war crimes.' Read also: Global Condemnation After Israel Approves Plan to Occupy Gaza City Tags: AustraliaGazaPalestineWar on Gaza
