THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Director Confirms Comic Run That Heavily Influenced the Marvel Movie — GeekTyrant
According to Fantastic Four: First Steps director Matt Shakman, the Marvel movie draws directly from one of the most beloved comic book runs in the team's history… Jonathan Hickman's.
In a foreword written for Fantastic Four: Solve Everything , Shakman revealed that he dove deep into the source material to prepare for the film, saying:
'In preparation for Marvel Studios' The Fantastic Four: First Steps, I delved into the 60-plus years of comics history. Marvel's First Family has been continuously cared for by the best and brightest the company had to offer. None shone so bright as Jonathan Hickman.'
Hickman's run on Fantastic Four kicked off in 2009 and helped redefine the team's tone and scope. His stories embraced science, wonder, family dysfunction, and massive cosmic ideas. it's all the stuff that makes the Fantastic Four fantastic, and clearly, that tone stuck with Shakman.
'The humor and heart I loved as a kid? It's there and better than ever. The messy family dynamics? Made even more interesting as Val and Franklin take center stage.
'And that sense of optimism and wonder? I don't think the Fantastic Four have been quite as fantastic as they are in the pages of this book.'
Among the many concepts Hickman introduced during his run were the Council of Reeds (a multiversal think tank of Reed Richards variants), the Future Foundation (a team of brilliant young minds started by Reed), and the Bridge (a machine that allows glimpses into alternate realities).
These may or may not show up in First Steps , but Shakman certainly seems to be planting seeds.
'Having absorbed six decades of F4 publishing, many of Hickman's magical moments and unique character dynamics stick with me. And they made it into our film in small and large ways.
'From Sue as a diplomat to Reed trying to solve everything even at the risk of imperiling his family. Johnny's need to be taken seriously.
'Ben's gentle nature, forever at odds with his appearance. The Future Foundation. The Bridge. The mystery of children and the anxiety we have as parents about their future.'
It's cool to see a director have respect the comics enough to dive into their emotional and philosophical core. Hickman's run wasn't just about big ideas, it was about family, and it looks like First Steps is embracing that. It's exciting to know the DNA of this movie is deeply connected to the comics.
'Set against the vibrant backdrop of a 1960s-inspired, retro-futuristic world, Marvel Studios' The Fantastic Four: First Steps introduces Marvel's First Family—Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic, Sue Storm/Invisible Woman, Johnny Storm/Human Torch and Ben Grimm/The Thing—as they face their most daunting challenge yet.'
The film stars Pedro Pascal as Mister Fantastic, Vanessa Kirby as Invisible Woman, Joseph Quinn as Human Torch, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach as The Thing.
Paul Walter Hauser, John Malkovich, and Natasha Lyonne also appear in the film in undisclosed roles. Then there's Julia Garner as Silver Surfer, and Michael Giacchino is scoring the film, so expect the soundtrack to match the retro-future vibe.
The Fantastic Four: First Steps lands in theaters July 25th
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commonly used household item savagely exposed cheating husband: ‘It's timestamped and often location-based'
A woman caught her husband cheating in one of the most bizarre ways — and it involved an item everyone is guilty of using. There are some obvious signs that someone isn't being faithful in a relationship — being sneaky with their phone, suddenly having to work late. But rarely do people think to pay attention to their partner's mouth hygiene habits. Paul Jones, a private investigator at ARF Investigators, helped a woman figure out her husband was cheating, thanks to a log of his tooth brushing. It's not as weird as it sounds. One of Jones' clients downloaded an electric toothbrush app to get her kids to properly brush their pearly whites. Well, little did she — or her conniving husband — realize that the app tracked every family member's brushing routine. 'Over time, the client noticed their partner's brushing history was being logged at odd times, times when they were supposedly at work,' Jones said, according to the Mirror. Eventually, the wife noticed a bizarre pattern when her husband was sudsing his mouth — especially when it was happening at times he was supposed to be at work, the outlet explained. '… in that time he had started an affair with a work colleague and used to have her over the family home on a Friday when the wife and kids were out of the house,' the investigator said. 'It's timestamped, often location-based, and emotionless. When a device says someone brushed their teeth at 10:48 a.m. when they were supposed to start work at 9 a.m., that's very hard to explain away.' Another very unexpected way technology can help expose dirty cheaters is by checking the person's supermarket loyalty apps, the ones that help shoppers save money and earn rewards, according to London-based private investigator Aaron Bond. He said a supermarket loyalty member app can reveal a lot. 'Clubcard data is limited, but it does tell you a date and location, which is easily accessible if you log into your account,' Bond told the Mirror. 'If your partner claims they were working or out with friends but the account shows they made a purchase in a completely different area, then it's a clear red flag.'
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman dies of brain-eating amoeba after using tap water in nasal rinse device
A woman in Texas has died after contracting a fatal brain amoeba from contaminated water. The patient, 71, had used a nasal irrigation device filled with unboiled tap water from an RV's water faucet, according to an alert from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The "previously healthy" woman was staying at a local campground at the time, the agency stated. Dangerous Fungus Could Spread To Parts Of Us, Researchers Claim Within four days of using the nasal rinse, the woman developed "severe neurologic symptoms," including fever, headache and altered mental status. The patient was treated for a potential infection of primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), a rare, deadly brain infection caused by Naegleria fowleri, also known as the brain-eating amoeba. Read On The Fox News App Despite treatment, the woman began having seizures and died eight days after symptoms began. Testing of the patient's cerebrospinal fluid confirmed she had contracted N. fowleri, according to the CDC. "This case reinforces the potential for serious health risks associated with improper use of nasal irrigation devices, as well as the importance of maintaining RV water quality and ensuring that municipal water systems adhere to regulatory standards," the health agency stated. Naegleria fowleri can also be a risk when swimming in fresh water. It is more prevalent during hotter months, as the amoeba grows best in high air and water temperatures. Fox News Digital previously spoke with Tammy Lundstrom, chief medical officer and infectious disease specialist for Trinity Health in Michigan, about the risks of infection. "The risk of brain-eating amoeba is very low," she said. "Fewer than 10 people in the U.S. every year get infected — but unfortunately, most cases are fatal. There are only a handful of survivors of known cases." The death rate for Naegleria fowleri exceeds 97%, per the CDC. The initial symptoms of PAM usually begin about five days after exposure, but they can be noticed sooner. Early signs usually include headache, nausea, fever and/or vomiting, the CDC's website states. As the infection progresses, people may experience confusion, stiff neck, disorientation, hallucinations, seizures and coma. Dangerous Fungus Spreading In Us Hospitals Has 'Rapidly Increased' "People usually start to feel ill one to 12 days after water exposure," Lundstrom said. "Early symptoms should prompt a medical evaluation, as they are also signs of bacterial meningitis." Death can occur anywhere between one and 18 days of infection, at an average of five days. To prevent contracting the fatal infection, the CDC recommends using "distilled, sterile or boiled and cooled tap water for nasal irrigation," as "improperly maintained" municipal water and RV water systems carry the risk of disease. It is also best to avoid immersing your head in the water when swimming in summer, Lundstrom told Fox News Digital. "Infection occurs when water harboring the amoeba goes up a person's nose, usually during swimming," she said. "It is not known why some people get infected and others, even swimming companions, do not." Drinking contaminated water does not present a risk, and the infection does not spread from one person to another, Lundstrom added. Because the amoeba is found in soil, the CDC also recommends avoiding stirring up the sediment at the bottom of lakes, ponds and rivers. When a patient has been diagnosed with a brain-eating amoeba, treatment usually includes a variety of antifungal medications, as well as antibiotics like rifampin and azithromycin, according to Lundstrom. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter Miltefosine, a newer antifungal drug, has been shown to kill Nagleria fowleri in laboratory tests and was used to treat some surviving patients, the CDC states on its website. "However, the effect of all of these drugs on actual infected people is unknown due to the high fatality rate," Lundstrom noted. Those who experience sudden headache, fever, stiff neck or vomiting — especially if they have recently been swimming in warm freshwater — should seek immediate medical attention, the CDC recommends. For more Health articles, visit Despite the infection's high fatality rate, Lundstrom emphasized the rarity of cases. "Millions of people enjoy swimming every summer, but only a few become infected," she article source: Woman dies of brain-eating amoeba after using tap water in nasal rinse device
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican lawmakers stand firm against Musk's 'Kill the Bill' assault on Trump's agenda
The Big, Beautiful Bill became the big, throbbing migraine for Congressional Republicans this week. That's thanks to the big, ugly brawl between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. It started Tuesday with a hangup between Congressional Republicans and Musk over the Big, Beautiful Bill. Musk characterized it as a "disgusting abomination." He then turned on all 215 House Republicans who voted yes on the bill last month. "You know you did wrong," declared Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., tried to call Musk to foam the political flames. Musk Says Trump Would Have Lost 2024 Election Without Him As 'Big Beautiful Bill' Feud Continues Read On The Fox News App "I called Elon last night. He didn't answer. "But I hope to talk to him today," said Johnson. Surely the world's richest man would have the bandwidth for the Speaker of the House. But the hangup was only starting. Rather than returning the Speaker's call, Musk returned political fire. Not by phone. But on his own communication platform. Elon Musk Warpath Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Rattles House Gop On X, Musk posted an iconic picture of Uma Thurman in a yellow jumpsuit, wielding a sword from a Quentin Tarantino movie poster. "KILL the Bill," read Musk's caption. Reach out and touch someone? How about reach out and call your senator or representative? Musk's influence – and rapid pivot – frightened Congressional Republicans. "To say that it's a problem or that it has created a bigger challenge for us, is true," said House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington," R-Tex. "He's got a big voice. He's got a big audience. And more importantly, it's a credible voice. But he's wrong on this issue." Still, Republicans weren't budging as Musk demanded lawmakers craft a new piece of legislation. "Elon, look," said an exasperated Johnson. "We don't have time for a brand new bill." Elon Musk Posts 'Kill Bill' Meme In Latest Push To Nix Trump's Big Beautiful Bill The Speaker added that Congressional Republicans "can't go back to the drawing board and we shouldn't." The political contretemps started simmering as Republicans quickly became incensed with Musk. "Give us some productive feedback that we can operate on. I can't operate on platitudes," said Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., of Musk's vague criticism about the size of the legislation and deficit spending. Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, is one of the two House Republicans who voted no on the Big, Beautiful Bill last month. "Part of the goal with Musk and conservatives like me that have had reservations about the bill is make it better," said Davidson. "The disappointing thing is this bill does grow deficits in this Congress." Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., was the other House GOPer who voted nay. He says Musk learned how Congress operates the hard way. David Marcus: Musk Vs. Maga On Big, Beautiful Bill, But Gop Needs Both "Trust was misplaced. And so I think he has a right to be upset with our leadership," said Massie. But Democrats suddenly made strange bedfellows with Musk. They viewed Musk's opposition as an opportunity to help them sidetrack the legislation. "He's not my cup of tea, to put it mildly. But Republicans are already listening to him," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of Musk. But at least one Democrat called out his colleagues for their inconsistency with Musk. "We've been dumping all over Musk and vandalizing Teslas," said Sen. John Fetterman, D-Penn. "And now suddenly, now we might be more back into him." This all came as the Trump Administration asked Congress to chip away at spending. Budget Director Russ Vought sent lawmakers a $9.4 billion "rescissions" request. This measure asks that lawmakers claw back money it already allocated. "$9.4 billion is a teardrop in the ocean," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. "If we can't get this now, then God help us on getting the true deficit numbers down." The rescissions plan targeted foreign aid and public broadcasting. "You've sent us a rescission package worth $9 billion that goes after Big Bird and Cookie Monster," lamented Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wisc., at a hearing with Vought. White House Stands By Tax Bill After Musk Calls It A 'Disgusting Abomination' The Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Big, Beautiful Bill found that it adds $2.3 trillion to the deficit over a decade. But Republicans say those figures are wrong. The CBO also issued an analysis – specific to President Trump's tariffs. The CBO projects a $3 trillion decrease in deficits over the next decade because of the tariffs. The CBO cannot evaluate the tariffs under the One Big, Beautiful Bill – because, well, they're not part of the legislation. But, proponents of the One Big Beautiful Bill say that measure, coupled with the tariffs, decreases deficits by $500 billion over the next decade. Some Republicans believe that the CBO estimate about the deficit is what set off Musk. "I think their assumptions are wrong. We have long complained about it," said Johnson. But remember, this is the CONGRESSIONAL Budget Office. And REPUBLICANS run Congress. "Why are you not getting the numbers that you want?" asked yours truly of the Speaker. "They use a different scoring," replied Johnson. "Would you consider a rescission for the CBO in the legislative branch appropriations bill?" I followed up. "I would," answered Johnson. But the CBO is the least of Johnson's worries as the battle between the president and Musk went supernova on Thursday. "What is the message you need to hear from him to make sure you are on the same page?" I asked Johnson of Musk – who still hadn't connected. "I just want to answer any questions Elon has and make sure he fully understands this is not a spending program," said Johnson. "Do you think he just misperceives this?" I inquired. "I do," said Johnson. Senate Republicans who are noes on the bill applauded Musk's staunch opposition to the One Big, Beautiful Bill. "We both seem to be on the same wavelength and that we're very, very skeptical," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. On Thursday afternoon, Musk argued that President Trump would have lost the White House and Democrats would control the House and Senate were it not for the $280 million he poured into the 2024 campaign. "He obviously played a positive role," said Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., another no on the bill. "He helped spend that much money. He attracted a lot of people." But Democrats weren't so sure of Musk's political rainmaking. "It's just crocodile tears that are being shed by Elon Musk," said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass. Democrats saw the breakup coming between the president and Musk. "It's a divorce that was predictable, if not inevitable," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. Some Senate Republicans claimed they weren't worried about Musk torching the bill – and even President Trump – on X. They believed the president wielded an inherent advantage over Musk in the ultimate "Twitter" cage match. "President Trump has the biggest platform on Earth," said Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio. It's too early to tell if Musk's incineration of the One Big, Beautiful Bill will hamper efforts to pass the legislation – especially with tight vote margins in the House and Senate. "It's not helpful," conceded Mike Johnson. "But I don't think it's changed the trajectory in any way." But Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said Republicans stand at an unenviable crossroads. "They have a choice of going against Trump or Musk," said article source: Republican lawmakers stand firm against Musk's 'Kill the Bill' assault on Trump's agenda
