Bad news for the Chesapeake Bay: It's getting hot
Global warming is increasing ocean temperatures at a rate that could have dire consequences for the largest estuary in the United States, according to a new study from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science.
The study estimates the Chesapeake Bay area could have marine heat wave conditions for about a third of the year by the end of the century. That's an increase from the 22 days a year the bay now sees long periods of unusually high water temperatures.
Specifically, the study focuses on estuaries — areas where freshwater meets salt water, such as the lower Chesapeake Bay. Researchers looked at estuaries across the U.S. to analyze trends in marine heat waves.
These extended heat waves can have negative effects on local wildlife, especially if prolonged. That couild include mass mortality of local species, habitat loss, species migration and increased ocean stressors such as low pH and dissolved oxygen. Heat waves can critically disrupt essential processes in an ecosystem, according to VIMS.
Piero Mazzini, a professor at VIMS and coauthor of the study, said the research should 'serve as a warning' for local leaders in charge of taking care of environmental assets.
Environment | 'I've got fish on my roof': Fierce weather brings more than rain for Hampton man
Environment | First national analysis finds America's butterflies are disappearing at 'catastrophic' rate
Environment | Help could be on the way for Chincoteague water wells contaminated by PFAS
Environment | Scientists raise concerns as the US stops sharing air quality data from embassies worldwide
Environment | Trump wants to use the 'God Squad' to increase logging, but it must follow strict rules
'The Chesapeake Bay, for example, currently experiences marine heat wave conditions approximately 6% of the year — 22 days per year — and that is already placing stress on the ecosystem,' Mazzini said. 'Our study shows that estuaries across the East Coast could experience these conditions for more than 100 days of the year by 2100.'
Estuaries serve as important nursery habitats for nearly 75% of all fish species and support more than 54 million jobs, according to the study. East Coast areas also were found to fare worse than the West Coast, where winds can churn cooler water toward the surface.
A previous study from VIMS found the bay has warmed by about 2 degrees Fahrenheit, or about .07 degrees each year, since the mid-1980s. Hot summer days already bring problems with low oxygen, and heat excites oxygen molecules so they leave the liquid more easily. This results in 'dead zones,' areas where oxygen is removed faster than it can be replenished. Animals need healthy levels of oxygen in the water to survive.
In 2024, environmental groups reported that the Chesapeake Bay dead zone was at a near-average size, but despite progress, officials still warn that the bay will not meet 2025 goals for restoration.
If actions do not change, the study found that warming trends in climate are expected to persist throughout the 21st century, and some projections suggest that much of the open ocean could be in a 'near-permanent' marine heat wave toward the end of the century. The rise of sea-surface temperatures is a main driver of issues for estuaries, and environmental scientists are looking to reducing greenhouse gases and increasing tree canopy as potential solutions.
Ricardo Nardi, lead author on the study, said open ocean temperatures have a long history of being studied, but estuaries are often overlooked. Longer heat wave conditions could have 'disastrous ecosystem consequences,' so more research is needed to understand how conditions in the ocean and estuaries affect each other.
'These are critical ecosystems, and future conservation efforts will depend on our understanding of the factors influencing them,' Nardi said.
Eliza Noe, eliza.noe@virginiamedia.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wastewater helping track spread of measles in GA
As measles cases continue to rise across the US, researchers are now using sewage wastewater to track the virus. It's testing similar to what scientists did during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sewage was tested for virus particles that helped identify early signs of increasing transmission. Measles cases could potentially be identified days before people show symptoms or have to go to a doctor. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The new program is available for use at dozens of wastewater treatment plants in 40 states. In Georgia, they'll be testing in College Park and Columbus. In Fulton County, they'll be testing at Big Creek, Johns Creek, and Little River facilities. And in Atlanta, they'll be testing at R.M. Clayton, South River, and Utoy Creek facilities. As of Wednesday, nearly 1,100 measles cases have been reported in the US, with three deaths confirmed. In Georgia, there have not been any confirmed cases since May 19, and up until that date, there were four cases so far this year in Georgia. TRENDING STORIES: Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries set to go into effect Monday Case of mistaken identity ends with young mother killed in alleged Atlanta gang shooting Doorbell camera captures man dragging dog down street in Fulton County [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas Woman Dies From Brain-Eating Amoeba After Flushing Sinuses
A woman in Texas has died from a rare brain infection after flushing her nose with water stored in the tank of a recreational vehicle. Lab tests on the 71-year-old woman's cerebrospinal fluid confirmed she was infected with Naegleria fowleri, a tiny, free-swimming protozoan also dubbed 'the brain-eating amoeba,' which causes the highly lethal disease primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM). This killer bug hangs out in warm bodies of fresh water like ponds, lakes, and even neglected swimming pools. Most infections occur while swimming or engaging in water sports in these places. "The patient had no recreational exposure to fresh water; however, she had reportedly performed nasal irrigation on several occasions using non-boiled water from the RV potable water faucet during the four days before illness onset," a CDC case report details. "Despite medical treatment for a suspected PAM infection, the patient developed seizures and subsequently died eight days after symptom onset." Authorities were unable to detect the amoeba in samples from the RV tank or the campground water supply, which may be because they took samples 23 days after the possible exposure took place. But testing did indicate the water had inadequate levels of disinfectant to prevent microbes from building biofilm communities that can protect pathogens like N. fowleri. The water was more cloudy than what is recommended for drinking water, another sign that disinfectant levels may have been inadequate. This is why you really shouldn't flush tap (or RV tank) water up your nose for nasal irrigation: the CDC recommends only distilled or sterilized water be used. Because while N. fowleri likes things lukewarm, it really loves hotter liquids: the kinds sloshing around inside our bodies, for instance. When it enters a human body, N. fowleri passes a temperature threshold – about 25 degrees Celsius or 77 degrees Fahrenheit – that transforms the bug from its flagellate state into an insatiable trophozoite, a form in which the microbe is actively feeding and reproducing. Any other entryway to the body, and N. fowleri will be politely escorted out by our immune system or burned up by stomach acids. But via the nose, it has an alarmingly straightforward route to the brain. This ravenous pathogen chews through the membrane we use to smell with, the olfactory epithelium, and follows the nerve fibers that carry scent signals back to our brains, nibbling at astrocytes and neurons along the way until it reaches its cerebral target. Most people infected with N. fowleri die within 1 to 18 days after symptoms start. Warning signs include headache, fever, nausea, and vomiting, which can progress to a stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance, and hallucinations. While this disease is very rare, the prognosis is dire: of the 164 cases reported in the US between 1962 and 2023, only 4 people have survived. "This case reinforces the potential for serious health risks associated with improper use of nasal irrigation devices, as well as the importance of maintaining RV water quality and ensuring that municipal water systems adhere to regulatory standards," the report states. The full CDC report is available here. Menopause Drug Reduces Breast Cancer Growth In Clinical Trial Bowel Cancer in Young People Is Rising – Here's How to Reduce Your Risk Why Do Some People Need Less Sleep? The Answer Lies in Our Genes.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: ‘Major blunder'
The aerospace community was caught off guard this week by President Trump's withdrawal of tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination. Announced days before the Senate's likely confirmation of Isaacman, the withdrawal sparked a swirl of rumors and concerns, as budget cuts loom and NASA stretches into its sixth month without a leader. Trump, in a social media post over the weekend, offered few details but said his decision was made after a 'thorough review of prior associations.' One space policy executive called the reasoning 'complete bulls—.' 'That's like the worst excuse in the world,' said the executive, who was granted anonymity to speak freely about the withdrawal. Isaacman's nomination had already advanced through the Senate Commerce Committee in a 19-9 vote and was expected to hit the full floor this week. When reached for comment Wednesday, he told The Hill he is 'grateful' for the support from the space community. The White House also did not offer specifics, stirring further frustration. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt briefly addressed the decision in a briefing Tuesday, telling reporters Trump 'wants to ensure all of his nominees are aligned fully with the America first mission of this administration.' 'I was frankly gobsmacked,' Mark Whittington, an author who studies space, politics and policy, told The Hill. 'Jared Isaacman is well regarded by just about everybody.' While Isaacman — a billionaire entrepreneur and commercial astronaut — was not originally considered a contender for the role, observers said the aerospace community was largely open to his new perspective at the agency. 'People who follow the space program think he would be perfect for NASA administrator, and I can see no reason why this is happening,' Whittington said. Rumors quickly circulated over the weekend that the decision might have something to do with Isaacman's ally, Elon Musk, who stepped down from his role leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last week. Two sources close to the White House suggested Isaacman's ties to Musk may have also contributed to his removal as the pick to lead NASA. Musk, the sources said, rubbed many people in the administration the wrong way. And with his official departure from government, Isaacman lost a strong ally in the White House. Isaacman worked alongside Musk at SpaceX to fund the company's first private spacewalk, and he was one of four astronauts aboard the Polaris Dawn flight last year. 'Now, six months of hard work later, just days short of a confirmation vote, and it's all thrown away because he bought two flights to space from Elon Musk? Are you f—ing kidding me?' said one Republican space policy expert. 'It looks like the Waste, Fraud and Abuse Caucus was bigger than we thought.' Isaacman acknowledged the timing of the decision this week, telling the 'All In' podcast he received a phone call Friday informing him the president decided to 'go in a different direction.' Friday marked Musk's last day as a special government employee leading DOGE for the White House. 'It was a real bummer,' Isaacman said. 'It was certainly disappointing. But the president needs to have his person that he counts on to fulfill the agenda.' 'I'm not … [playing] dumb on this. I had a pretty good idea,' he added. 'I don't think the timing was much of a coincidence that there were other changes going on the same day, and it was obviously a little bit of a disappointment.' Pressed on whether he was referring to Musk, Isaacman said, 'Obviously there was more than one departure that was covered on that day.' 'There were some people that had some axes to grind, I guess, and I was a good visible target,' he continued. 'I just want to be overwhelmingly clear — I don't fault the president at all.' 'I don't blame an influential adviser coming in and saying, 'Look, here's the facts, and I think we should kill this guy and the president's got to make a call and move on,'' he said. 'I think that's exactly kind of how it went.' Isaacman sidestepped questions over whether his nomination withdrawal was a 'shot at Elon,' telling the 'All In' podcast that people 'can draw their own conclusions, but I think the direction people are thinking on this seems to check out to me.' Isaacman has given to Democrats during recent campaign cycles, including Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired astronaut. But he has also donated to a few Republicans. A White House official pointed The Hill to Isaacman's donations in recent years to PACs linked to Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), along with the hundreds of thousands of dollars he donated to other Democratic campaigns since 2010. But various space observers emphasized that reports of these donations first circulated in January. Six months later, they are frustrated the donations are abruptly being used against the tech entrepreneur. 'It was well known that, like a lot of businessmen, he [Isaacman] donated to both parties and that came up in the vetting process. … I'm sure that Trump knows about it, or he should have known about,' Whittington told The Hill. 'All of a sudden, six months later, he says, 'I'm shocked, shocked, that Jared Isaacman gave money to Democrats,'' he added. Isaacman echoed this, stating his donations were 'not a new development.' He described himself as a moderate who is 'right-leaning' and supportive of Trump's agenda. The space industry now anxiously awaits a new nominee; no name has emerged as a clear front-runner. The need to pass the 'Trump loyalty test' could eliminate several good candidates, the first space policy executive suggested. 'I know you got to have partisan people in a lot of these agencies, but for space, the community is generally bipartisan and more scientific or technical,' they told The Hill. The process to push a new nominee through the Senate could take months, stoking alarm among observers over the steep potential NASA budget cuts. Under Trump's proposed 2026 budget, NASA's funding would be cut by nearly 25 percent in what would be the largest single-year cut at the agency. Musk expressed concerns over proposed funding cuts to NASA in April but said he could not participate in those conversations, as SpaceX is a major federal contractor. Space observers are concerned the cuts will pass through Congress with little opposition. 'When the budget needs to be mulled over and chewed over by Congress, they really need somebody at NASA to explain things to them,' Whittington explained. 'Otherwise, Congress is just going to do what it wants, and I think [it] really goes against the White House's interest if they want to control space policy. This is a major blunder, whatever way you look at it.' A spokesperson for NASA said the agency will 'continue to relentlessly pursue' Trump's 'America First' agenda under acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro. 'The @NASA workforce is committed to serve and eagerly awaits President Trump's new nominee to head the agency, leading us toward our 'manifest destiny in the stars,'' NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens wrote on the social platform X. It comes amid an already tumultuous time at NASA as it faces workforce and infrastructure challenges as a result of both DOGE cuts and years-long budget declines. 'NASA lost its mojo, they don't know how to solve complex, interdisciplinary problems efficiently, they don't know how to put together the right teams to solve those problems, they lost the ability to do that,' said Charles Camarda, a retired NASA astronaut. Camarda, who recently released a book on NASA's culture challenges, explained NASA has lost its 'research culture' over the years as funding continues to be cut for applied research. 'Right now, we are technically drained. We don't have the expertise, and we're not raising new researchers and engineering researchers,' he said. Brett Samuels contributed reporting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
