logo
Mumbai 7/11 blasts: How the prosecution's pressure cooker theory blew up in court

Mumbai 7/11 blasts: How the prosecution's pressure cooker theory blew up in court

Indian Express2 days ago
The prosecution in the July 11, 2006 Mumbai serial train blasts case had relied on a key finding in the Maharashtra police's investigation – that the bombs that ripped through the train coaches were packed in pressure cookers that the accused allegedly placed on the luggage racks.
While acquitting the 12 accused on July 21, the Bombay High Court, however, raised doubts over the reliability of accounts of certain witnesses who claimed to have seen some of the accused placing 'black rexine bags' with the bomb-filled pressure cookers.
Police claimed that during their investigation, one of the accused led them to a marshy location near the tracks on Mira Road from where they recovered 'a brown plastic bag in mud, containing several items, including 7 rubber gaskets, 5 whistles, broken electric wires…' They also seized a five-litre 'Kanchan' brand pressure cooker from the house of another accused, Faisal Ataur Rahman Sheikh. Further, an eye witness, shopkeeper Mohanlal Kumawat, claimed that 'some Kashmiri-looking persons purchased eight cookers' from him in May 2006. The police then went on to join these dots to allege that pressure cookers were used in the blasts.
However, the court records that a forensic report indicated that the rubber gaskets and whistles recovered from the spot were 'duplicates, as they did not match the original products from the Kanchan company in terms of markings and physical characteristics'.
The bench of Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak said that to examine the Anti-Terrorism Squad's theory, the court needed to ascertain the possible size of the bags allegedly containing the pressure cookers – and whether it would be big enough to attract the witnesses' attention.
The court noted that the 'typical dimensions of a five-litre pressure cooker, irrespective of manufacturer, is approximately 41 centimetres in width and 20 cm in height (16.14 x 7.87 inches).' Comparing this to an A4-size sheet, the court said that the 'bag required to put a 5-litre cooker loaded with a bomb will be of a normal size and not an abnormal one that would attract anybody's attention, including that of Prosecution Witness, one Subhash Kamlakar Nagarsekar, and give cue for triggering memory.'
The court also said that while the statement of shopkeeper Kumawat is 'relevant for the prosecution's story that the bombs were packed in cookers by the accused', he was not examined or called for Test Identification Parade (TIP). The court notes that five other witnesses who claimed to have seen the 'suspected passengers planting bombs' on the trains were also not examined or called for TIP.
Instead, on November 2, 2006, over a 100 days after the blast, the ATS called taxi drivers Santosh Kedar Singh and Rajesh Satpute, who said they transported two accused Asif Khan Bashir Khan and Mohd. Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh, respectively, to Churchgate station – a delay that the court took note of.
The HC said that one of the taxi drivers 'did not give any special reason' for remembering the face of the accused even after about 100 days since 'there is hardly any chance for any taxi driver to have long interaction and to have sufficient and ample opportunity to notice and observe the passengers and their faces, unless there is some special reason.'
The court went on to point out how in Mumbai, passengers and taxi drivers have minimal interaction and that 'there is no opportunity or practice of bargaining, as the fare is calculated strictly in accordance with the fare meter installed in the taxi'.
The court notes that taxi driver Santosh Kedar Singh had during his cross-examination admitted that it was difficult to 'remember a passenger after a week and it becomes more difficult after a month.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maharashtra cop faces court ire over false evidence in complaint against TV serial
Maharashtra cop faces court ire over false evidence in complaint against TV serial

India Today

time3 hours ago

  • India Today

Maharashtra cop faces court ire over false evidence in complaint against TV serial

The Bombay High Court came down heavily on a Maharashtra police officer for allegedly providing false evidence during a hearing involving a media conglomerate that had received a notice over a TV serial that "giving false evidence in any manner is to be dealt with legally," the Bombay High Court observed that any person who intentionally makes a false statement in a legal proceeding, knowing or believing it to be false, commits an division bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad was hearing an urgent plea moved by a media conglomerate, which had received a notice from a police inspector from Nodal Cyber Police Station, Maharashtra Cyber, which asked it to 'refrain from making objectionable or controversial statements' over a 'complaint received against 'Tum Se Tum Tak' TV serial'. The division bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad, said, "This deepens the controversy since, prima facie, it appears that the Police Inspector acted high-handedly while issuing the notice." The court instructed Inspector Prafull Wagh to present the supposed complainant with media house submitted that they checked the address of the 'complainant', Sunil Mahendra Sharma, but no such person resided at the address specified in the bench said that "this deepens the controversy since, prima facie, it appears that the inspector acted high-handedly while issuing the notice" to the media conglomerate. The bench directed the inspector, Prafull Wagh, to bring Sunil Mahendra Sharma to court along with his aadhar card, voter card, and proof of his permanent brought a person who he claimed was Sunil Mahendra Sharma. However, when the court examined his identity card, the bench realised that it was of Mahendra Sanjay Sharma and not get further clarity, the bench handed over paper to the man to sign on the page to compare his signature with those appearing on the man signed on paper thrice, each time giving different going through the same, the bench said, "Prima facie, we find that this man, Mahendra Sanjay Sharma, has been produced by Police Officer Wagh as a proxy in the court. He is not the complainant... His three signatures do not match the signature on the complaint."The addresses on two of the man's identity cards were of different addresses, but none matched with the address on the this while, the man in court claimed that he had prepared the complaint and signed on it. "This is yet another lie," said the court, adding,"This matter not only needs investigation, but also an inquiry as to the behavior and conduct of the Police Officer Wagh."The bench further observed, "It is very disturbing for the Court to record the conduct and behaviour of the cop. "Any attempt to hoodwink the Court and produce an impostor before the Court with the object of snatching an order, based on misinformation or wrong information, cannot be countenanced," the bench bench directed the police officer as well as the complainant to file affidavits and will hear the case again on July 28.- EndsMust Watch

Delay in probe into allegation of cop killing dogs in Kanker, AWBI demands action
Delay in probe into allegation of cop killing dogs in Kanker, AWBI demands action

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Delay in probe into allegation of cop killing dogs in Kanker, AWBI demands action

Raipur: Almost two weeks after a probe was ordered into allegations of a police inspector "killing 10 stray dogs and getting the carcasses packed in gunnysacks" in Chhattisgarh's Kanker district, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) on Thursday urged Chhattisgarh police to take immediate action the police officer. PETA-India has also requested Kanker SP Indira Kalyan Elesela to register a suo moto FIR, calling for an independent departmental inquiry and his dismissal if found guilty. After a video of Pawan Thakur, inspector at Orchha police station, packing the carcasses in gunny sacks surfaced and went viral on July 10, the SP took suo moto cognizance of the video and constituted a three-member probe team headed by a DSP rank officer on July 12. While Elesela said the inspector could be seen in the video, no formal complaint was launched. The AWBI demand came after the probe team did not submit its report within the stipulated period of one week. Elesela said that the inspector under scrutiny is posted in Narayanpur district and involved in anti-Naxal operations, which has delayed the process. "An inquiry is already in place and till now, there is no evidence that indicates the inspector killed the dogs. The inspector was seen transporting the gunny sacks in the video. We will speed up the probe," Elesela told TOI. AWBI, a statutory body, has asked the SP and member-secretary of the Chhattisgarh State Animal Welfare Board, who is also the director of the stage livestock development department, to take immediate action against Thakur. It is alleged that Thakur, who was visiting his family in Kanker police line, had allegedly used an air gun to shoot about 10 stray dogs in the area and then got the carcasses packed in gunny sacks by his associates for disposal. A resident of the area had made a video of the carcasses being packed. "During the probe, we found that two carcasses of dogs were disposed, which was also seen in the video recorded. But it's not clear if they were killed by the inspector. We have asked for more footage from the resident who recorded it," the SP said. AWBI, however, has called for a thorough enquiry and stringent action under applicable laws, including Section 11(1)(l) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act, and Section 325 of the BNS, which entails imprisonment of up to five years, or fine, or both, for maiming or killing any animal.

Udanti and Sunabeda's anti-poaching team targets five illegal grazing camps
Udanti and Sunabeda's anti-poaching team targets five illegal grazing camps

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Udanti and Sunabeda's anti-poaching team targets five illegal grazing camps

Raipur: The Anti-Poaching Team of Udanti-Sitanadi Tiger Reserve and Sunabeda Sanctuary dismantled five illegal grazing camps operated by shepherds from Rajasthan, Gujarat, Odisha, and parts of Chhattisgarh. Thousands of unauthorised sheep and goats were found damaging grasslands and accelerating the spread of invasive weeds like Lantana, Eupatorium, and Parthenium, leading to fodder shortages for native cattle and wild herbivores. Authorities estimate that around 5,000–10,000 livestock grazed illegally in the Raipur-Dhamtari-Gariaband region and were being moved into the protected areas. Villagers from Amamora and Odh supported the forest department in the operation. Protecting these grasslands is vital to sustain herbivores like deer, sambar, and nilgai, which are prey for over 100 leopards in the region and help prevent human-wildlife conflict. Acting on intelligence, forest teams raided the Kulhadighat forest area near Beats Nagarar and Amamora, bordering the sanctuary, said Udanti Sitanadi Tiger Reserve Deputy Director Varun Jain. Around 3,000–4,000 livestock were found. Two arrests included Laduram (61) and Ramnivas (53), both from Nagaur, Rajasthan, along with their herds and accomplices. Eight accused were produced before the Judicial Magistrate in Gariaband and sent to jail under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, and Indian Forest Act, 1927. Two forest offence cases were registered. Authorities are pursuing the absconding accused and working to recover Rs 4 lakh as surety. The Deputy Director said that shepherds from Rajasthan and Gujarat used to pass through Madhya Pradesh and enter Chhattisgarh via the bordering Kawardha district. About ten years ago, they camped in MP to graze their sheep and goats, but after the MP Forest Department implemented strict measures, they began moving into Chhattisgarh instead. Their grazing season begins in mid-June and continues for four months. They typically sell a sheep or goat for approximately Rs 10,000 and earn crores before returning to their respective states, he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store