logo
Elbows Up! Saskatchewan village in the heart of the Prairies lives up to its name

Elbows Up! Saskatchewan village in the heart of the Prairies lives up to its name

Yahoo15-03-2025

The sign at the village's entrance says "Elbow Welcomes You" and, indeed, Joan Soggie wants every Canadian to visit her hometown to throw some elbows.
On Friday, Soggie and small but patriotic contingent of Elbow locals held an "Elbows Up" rally to support and inspire the newfound national unity sweeping the country as it tangles with U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and threats to make Canada the 51st state.
About 350 people live in the Village of Elbow, near the community's namesake bend in the South Saskatchewan River and about 135 kilometres south of Saskatoon.
Event organizer Joan Soggie, right, made sure to bill the rally as a non-partisan, family-friendly event. (Jeremy Warren/CBC News)
"The situation right now in the world with the United States and with Trump, it feels like it's a time that we all have to really pull together and we need something like this to give us some symbols to use," Soggie said after the rally.
"I think everybody in Canada should come and have their picture taken here."
About 15 people — mostly decked in red-and-white winter gear and other Maple Leaf swag — braved the open prairie's cold wind to take photos of each other throwing elbows in front of the village's welcome sign.
Soggie says she was inspired to organize the event after her daughter told her about attending a large "Elbows Up, Canada!" rally in Ottawa.
The movement launched after Canadian actor Mike Myers after he mouthed the words "elbows up" and tapped his left elbow on while credits rolled on a recent episode of Saturday Night Live. The slogan is likely inspired by Saskatoon hockey legend Gordie Howe, nicknamed Mr. Elbows for his habit of punishing opponents with his sharp elbows.
Blue fingers on a cold, windy day at the Elbows Up rally on Friday. (Jeremy Warren/CBC News)
Gordie Howe, 50 at the time this photo was taken in 1978, delivers one of his well-known elbows to the head of Quebec Nordiques forward Curt Brakenbury. An oft-repeated, but incorrect, explanation of a 'Gordie Howe hat-trick' is a fight, a goal and an assist. (The Canadian Press)
Soggie, who has lived in Elbow for 61 years, fears tariffs and an extended trade war will hurt farmers and small businesses in Elbow and other nearby communities in the centre of province's grain belt.
"I don't think there's any sector that's not going to be touched," Soggie said. "It affects everybody. And besides that, we all have close associations with people in the United States. Many of us have family there and it's very worrisome."
Elbows Up demonstrators stand beside the village's welcome sign on Friday. (Jeremy Warren/CBC News)
Soggie made sure to bill the rally as a non-partisan, family-friendly event so it didn't exclude anyone. She says it's about more than politics.
"We thought Elbow, Saskatchewan is a perfect place to be the epicentre of Elbows Up," she said.
The village office in Elbow, Sask. (Jeremy Warren/CBC News)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Adults' star Jack Innanen breaks down the Charlie Cox moment that made him gag on set
'Adults' star Jack Innanen breaks down the Charlie Cox moment that made him gag on set

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Adults' star Jack Innanen breaks down the Charlie Cox moment that made him gag on set

While Adults (on Disney+ in Canada, Hulu in the U.S.) has already been making us laugh every week, Episode 6 of the show is absolutely outrageous, in the best way. Speaking to Yahoo Canada in Toronto, one of the show's stars, Canadian Jack Innanen, talked about all the entertaining chaos in that episode, featuring Charlie Cox and Julia Fox. The core story for Episode 6 is that Billie (Lucy Freyer) wants to host a dinner party, with the hopes of showing a mature side of herself and her friends to her boyfriend, her former high school teacher, played by Cox. As Billie says, it's their "roast chicken" era. While everyone seems to at least be trying their best to be mature, things take a turn when Billie's boyfriend shows up and tells Samir (Malik Elassal) that he's high on a "pony dose" of ketamin, stressing that Samir can't tell anyone. But Samir can't help but tell his friends, but not Billie, as her boyfriend starts acting more and more bizarre. To add to the chaos, Paul Baker (Innanen) invites a friend to dinner, and it happens to be Julia Fox (playing herself), who makes his girlfriend Issa (Amita Rao) jealous. "I think the episode pretty much captured what it was like in real life," Innanen said. "I had a couple moments where I was just looking around like, 'What are we doing? This is awesome.'" "It was chaotic. Charlie, [he does this] dance and that was all him. And I remember he was just really into it and killing it. And I was standing off to the side just to watch. ... And then Julia, ... I'm pretty sure she just improvised every one of her lines, and it's so perfect. And it's so her that it was just like a master class. ... A bunch of takes my mouth is just open because I'm just like, 'Wow.!" It all leads to Billie serving a raw chicken, not knowing that it needed to be thawed before going in the oven. But in Mr. Teacher's high, he just keeps cutting this raw meat, with blood splattering, and it looks absolutely revolting. And then Cox's character starts eating the raw meat. For Innanen, that made him feel queasy on set. "I gagged. For real," Innanen said. "I don't do well with raw meat." "Someone else gagged too, which made me gag. ... What he ate, obviously, was like a gelatin thing. ... But it was real raw chicken on my plate. ... The best part was that we went to lunch right after that, and they were serving chicken, and it stayed absolutely untouched. Not a single person, like all 100 of the cast and crew, no one touched the chicken." And after that, Cox's character has a completely breakdown, with his ex-wife having to come get him out of Samir's parents home. With Episode 6 already being a highlight, looking ahead in the season, Innanen teased that Episode 8 includes a particularly shocking moment. "The last like 20 seconds of Episode 8, I've heard ... a lot of people go, 'Whoa. I wasn't expecting that,'" Innanen teased. "And so there's a little bit of a bomb drop, mic drop, at the end of eight that I think throws a little bit of a wrench in the group." We can't wait to watch more Adults for the rest of the season, but maybe with less raw chicken.

Ford's new energy plan for Ontario increases reliance on nuclear, fossil fuels
Ford's new energy plan for Ontario increases reliance on nuclear, fossil fuels

Hamilton Spectator

time30 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Ford's new energy plan for Ontario increases reliance on nuclear, fossil fuels

The Ford government is projecting a major shift toward nuclear power to meet rising electricity demand and support Ontario's transition to net-zero emissions by mid-century. Its newly released long-term Energy for Generations plan — billed as the province's first-ever integrated energy strategy — also shows an increased reliance on fossil fuels over the next decade, with emissions expected to rise before declining after 2030. The province describes the plan as 'a comprehensive roadmap to meet future energy needs, support new housing, and power the most competitive economy in the G7.' 'As energy demand soars, our plan leverages 'Made-In-Ontario' to build affordable, clean, and always reliable power, built by and for Canadians,' Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce said in a statement. The plan will help the province meet growing electricity demand while achieving over 99 per cent zero-emissions electricity by 2050, he added. Critics say the plan misses key opportunities to scale-up renewables, puts energy affordability at risk and increases Ontario's dependence on foreign energy supplies. The plan projects total electricity production in 2050 to be just under 275 terawatt-hours (TWh), with nuclear making up the largest share at over 200 TWh. That means nuclear plants could supply more than 70 per cent of Ontario's electricity by 2050, up from about 50 per cent today. Currently, Ontario's nuclear fleet — Bruce, Darlington, and Pickering — provides 12,000 MW of capacity. The plan projects the province could need up to 17,800 MW of new nuclear power by 2050, equivalent to building five new Darlington stations. To support this buildout, the province says it is preparing new nuclear sites and has already begun early engagement with First Nation and local communities. A new nuclear technology panel will guide technology choices and project timelines, with input from Ontario Power Generation, Bruce Power, the Independent Electricity System Operator and government officials. The province says nuclear projects are complex and costly, and it plans to explore new ownership models and equity partnerships to attract private capital and help finance the expansion. It aims to attract investment from Canadian pension funds and institutional investors to 'keep more Canadian energy dollars working here at home,' the province said. Mark Winfield, professor at York University and co-chair of its Sustainable Energy Initiative, said the plan lacks a clear decision-making framework and basic accountability mechanisms. He said there is no process in place to evaluate whether the government's chosen energy path is the most affordable or lowest-risk for the province. 'There is no oversight or review process to assess whether this represents the least-cost or lowest-risk option for Ontario,' Winfield said. By 'review,' Winfield refers to independent assessments — such as those typically conducted by regulatory bodies or outside experts — that evaluate costs, risks, and alternatives before major infrastructure decisions are finalized. Winfield also questioned the long-term focus on nuclear. 'All of the proposed reactor technologies rely on enriched fuel that comes from the United States,' he said. 'This exposes Ontario to new energy security risks.' In recent months, the Ford government has committed billions to nuclear energy, announcing new builds and refurbishments it says will create tens of thousands of jobs. Earlier this year, it unveiled plans for a massive nuclear plant near Port Hope , projected to generate 10,000 megawatts — enough to power 10 million homes — though key details like costs and timelines remain undisclosed. Last week, the province introduced legislation to expand access to Ontario's public clean energy fund for nuclear projects. Industry groups welcomed Ontario's new energy plan, with major players praising the government's commitment to both nuclear power and natural gas. Enbridge Gas called the plan a 'clear affirmation' of the essential role natural gas will continue to play, citing its importance for affordability, grid stability and economic growth. The company said investments in gas infrastructure are foundational to Ontario's prosperity. The Organization of Canadian Nuclear Industries also applauded the plan, calling it a bold step toward clean energy leadership. The group highlighted Ontario's strong nuclear track record and said the proposed expansion — including large reactors and SMRs — positions the province to secure long-term clean energy supply. Aliénor Rougeot, climate and energy program manager at Environmental Defence, said Ontario's new energy plan could lead to higher household bills, more air pollution and increased reliance on the US fossil gas. While she welcomed the idea of a long-term, integrated approach, she argued that the plan should be replaced with one built on publicly shared modelling. To Rougeot, the most glaring problem is the plan's failure to prioritize wind and solar — Ontario's cheapest and cleanest energy sources. 'I kept flipping through the document, asking: Where are the renewables?' Rougeot said. The supply forecast is particularly troubling to her, as it shows Ontario having less wind and solar in 2050 than in 2030. She believes the refusal to give renewable energy a central role in the province's future grid will come at a high cost — both economically and environmentally. Wind and solar make up approximately nine per cent and two per cent of Ontario's current electricity generation, respectively. In its plan, the government says their role is expected to grow over time. Starting in 2025, nearly 3,000 megawatts of energy storage will be added to the grid. However, the plan argues that nuclear is more cost-effective and land-efficient than wind and solar. It claims that to generate the same amount of energy as a proposed 10,000 MW nuclear station at Wesleyville, Ontario would need roughly 100 times more land for solar and 500 times more land for wind. But new analysis suggests solar doesn't require large tracts of land — for example, more than half of Toronto's electricity needs could be met through rooftop and parking lot solar alone. A new report from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance argues that wind and solar could meet the same energy needs as the proposed Wesleyville nuclear station much faster and at far lower cost — potentially saving the province up to $19 billion annually. It highlights Ontario's untapped potential for offshore wind in the Great Lakes and large-scale solar at the Port Hope site. Another report warns that electricity from new nuclear could cost up to 3.6 times more than onshore wind, three times more than solar, and 1.7 times more than offshore wind. Lia Codrington, a senior analyst at the Pembina Institute, said the province's new energy plan represents a positive step toward long-term planning, noting that many jurisdictions around the world are already moving quickly toward clean energy and decarbonization. She viewed it as important for Ontario to follow that trend — and even potentially lead — by modernizing its electricity system. Codrington questioned the government's argument that land use limits renewable energy expansion. She said wind turbines allow for shared land use — such as farming — and solar panels can be installed on rooftops, parking lots, and other built environments. In her view, decisions about land use should reflect what Ontarians want in their communities when it comes to energy sources, not just technical comparisons in megawatts per square kilometre. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

40+ Canadian Human Rights Groups Condemn Modi G7 Invite, Cite Transnational Repression
40+ Canadian Human Rights Groups Condemn Modi G7 Invite, Cite Transnational Repression

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

40+ Canadian Human Rights Groups Condemn Modi G7 Invite, Cite Transnational Repression

TORONTO, June 13, 2025 /CNW/ - A group of Canadian human rights, civil society and faith organizations has issued a joint letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney condemning the official invitation of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the upcoming G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, from June 15 to 17, 2025. The letter calls on the Canadian government to confront Prime Minister Modi's escalating record of human rights abuses and extraterritorial repression, rather than normalize impunity through diplomatic engagement. Endorsed by over 40 local and national organizations, the joint statement outlines grave concerns over India's documented treatment of religious minorities, misuse of anti-terror laws against dissidents, as well as targeted violence enabled or orchestrated by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) state actors. Signatories also highlight the RCMP investigation credibly linking Indian agents to the killing of Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nijjar, including a related U.S. Justice Department case charging an Indian government employee in a foiled assassination plot against a Sikh American. "Engaging with India as a G7 outreach partner must not come at the expense of Canada's legal obligations or its moral credibility," the letter states. "The invitation extended to Prime Minister Modi in the absence of clear conditions normalizes impunity for state violence and signals to the international community that economic and geopolitical interests take precedence over human rights." Among the 6 calls to action, the organizations call on the Canadian government to: Publicly raise India's human rights record at the G7 Demand accountability for transnational repression on Canadian soil Condition all bilateral engagement with India on clear benchmarks for rights protections The letter references recent alerts from Genocide Watch and the Lemkin Institute flagging India as a country at risk of mass atrocity crimes, including calls by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom to sanction Indian officials. The full joint letter and source references can be accessed here. Justice For All Canada is a nonprofit human rights organization with UN consultative status. We advocate for the protection of religious, ethnic, and Indigenous minorities globally. Through campaigning, policy research, education and lobbying, we challenge genocide, mass atrocity crimes, and state-led repression. SOURCE Justice For All Canada View original content: Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store