Israel-Iran war: A political lifeline for Netanyahu? – DW – 06/26/2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has gained credit for his actions against Iran. However, his political future will depend on what happens next in the Gaza war.
After a ceasefire between Israel and Iran took hold on Tuesday morning, albeit a fragile one, streets and coffee shops in Jerusalem were busy again. By evening, Israel's Home Front Command had lifted all public restrictions.
At an open-air market, people were back shopping. Some were simply relieved that the 12-day war, which had frequently sent Israelis to bomb shelters was over.
"I feel a little relieved that we are not at war anymore. But it could also be tricky because we never know whom to trust. One day we are in a ceasefire, the next day there won't be a ceasefire anymore," Liba Farkish told DW.
Many here said that they were satisfied with the attack on Iran and praised Prime Minister Netanyahu.
"I think we attacked them at a perfect time, exactly what we needed to do. I think Netanyahu did the best he could. They were really close to having a weapon against us, and honestly, we were saved at the last minute," Adina Bier, a high school student, told DW.
Shopowner Avraham Levy said that what "Netanyahu did is not just for Israel, it's for the whole world. Iran is a radical religious regime whose aim is to eradicate Israel," Levy, a veteran supporter of Netanyahu's Likud party, told DW.
About 82% of Jewish Israelis supported Israel's attack on Iran and the timing of the attack, according to a recent flash survey by the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research at the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI).
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Just a month ago, Netanyahu's political fortunes seemed to have taken a hit. Israel's longest-serving prime minister, often referred to as "the magician" because of his ability to maneuver political crises, had faced mounting domestic and international criticism over his handling of the war in Gaza and his apparent refusal to agree to a deal with Hamas to secure the release of the remaining hostages.
Netanyahu can argue that he has delivered on his threat to attack Israel's archenemy and its nuclear program. Iran has long insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have concluded that Tehran is not currently seeking to develop nuclear weapons. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran was close to assembling a nuclear weapon.
The attack on Iran has helped to restore Netanyahu's image as a strongman after the massive security failures that led to the Hamas-led terror attacks on October 7, 2023.
"Regarding the Iran attack, there are many unknowns, and we don't know all the details. But all the things that we've seen here since October 7, it's basically a master plan by the Iranians. And everybody understood that this needed to be taken care of. Nobody really trusted the diplomatic solution with them, only a military solution," Tal Schneider, a political correspondent for online outlet , told DW.
While recent polls suggested that Netanyahu's Likud party gained more support in the wake of the perceived success of its military operation, the picture is more complicated. A closer look reveals that parties in Netanyahu's current coalition government are projected to fall far short of the 61-seat majority they would need to retain power.
"Those polls suggested the situation for Netanyahu remains the same. He may have gotten some seats for his own party, but this came on the account of a close ally of his, the extreme right-wing Jewish Power Party of [Itamar] Ben-Gvir. It means that for Netanyahu, it doesn't give him much leeway for a new coalition after the next election," said Schneider.
"He [Netanyahu] was not able to bring in voters from the center. So, people who oppose Netanyahu remained opposed to him. Even with the big military success and the big strategic success that no one is denying."
Iranian missile strikes killed 28 people and injured over 1,000, according to Israel's Public Diplomacy Directorate. In Iran, according to official numbers, 606 were killed, with 5,332 people wounded, although those figures are believed to be higher.
While Israeli commentators praised the military's performance in Iran, many questions remain as to whether the operation against the Iranian nuclear sites and its ballistic missile program was as successful as Netanyahu claimed. In a statement on Tuesday evening, he said that Israel had "achieved a historic victory, which will stand for generations."
Attention in Israel has now turned again to the war with Hamas in Gaza. On Wednesday morning, Israelis woke up to the news that seven soldiers were killed in southern Gaza. Israel's national broadcaster Kan reported that they were inside an armored personnel carrier that caught fire because of an explosive device that was attached to it.
"Sometimes you simply need to do the right thing. Trump did it. If Trump could do it, so can you. You need to put an end, here and now, to the needless war in Gaza," Ben Caspit, a veteran Israeli journalist, wrote in the daily newspaper, addressing Netanyahu in his article. "The best of our sons are dying there now, and for what? The destruction of more 'terrorist infrastructure'? Are you for real? Do you hear yourself?"
Polls have consistently shown large support for a hostage deal with Hamas in Gaza to return the remaining 50 hostages — alive and dead — and which would also include the cessation of hostilities.
"It's important for Netanyahu to get to some solution here because what we found out is a majority of his supporters think that the hostages should be brought home, even if this means a cessation of the war, not termination of the war," Tamar Herman, a senior research fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) and the academic director of the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research, told DW. "So if he wants to increase his support, he should do something in this regard."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
This was echoed by some people on the streets of Jerusalem.
"We lost just seven soldiers in Gaza. We are past that state with Hamas. We should try to make a deal, but on Israel's terms, we should not let them mess with us anymore. We own this land, it's our people, we need to get them back, we just need to find the right terms," Adina Bier said.
Netanyahu's critics have long accused him of not wanting to end the war, claiming that he was unwilling to agree to a new deal with Hamas that would secure the release of the remaining hostages. His far-right coalition partners threatened to leave the coalition if he ended the war without toppling Hamas, which would have triggered early elections in Israel.
"He needs to solve the problem in Gaza before he solves our problems in Iran. The most important thing: Gaza and the hostages," Inbal Leibovitch told DW.To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
‘Double standards': Spain slams EU inaction on Israel deal – DW – 06/26/2025
An EU report concluded Israel might be breaching human rights in Gaza. The bloc could suspend a major trade deal, but it won't. A brief hardening towards Israel appears to have dissipated after recent tensions with Iran. In the wake of a damning EU review of Israel's human rights record in Gaza, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez slammed his colleagues for not moving to suspend a trade deal with Israel despite what he called "the catastrophic situation of genocide." More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed in the enclave over more than 18 months of Israeli bombardment, according to Hamas-run Gazan authorities. Israel vehemently denies accusations of genocide, maintaining that it is at war with the ruling militant Islamist group Hamas following a massive terror attack on Israeli territory in 2023. In a report distributed to the member states last week based on the findings and allegations of major international bodies, the European External Action Service found "indications" that Israel was breaching its duty to respect to human rights. The document, not public but made available to DW, highlighted possible indiscriminate attacks affecting the civilian population, Israel's blockade on food and medicine plus attacks on medical facilities as potential breaches. "There are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations," the report concluded. Arriving at an EU summit in Brussels on Thursday, Sanchez said it was "more than obvious that Israel is violating Article 2 of the EU-Israel agreement." "We have had 18 sanctions packages against Russia for its aggression [in Ukraine], and Europe, with its double standards, is not capable of suspending an association agreement," Sanchez said. Spain and Ireland are isolated among the 27 EU states in openly calling for the suspension of the deal in full, a move that would require unanimity and has therefore never been a serious prospect. Greece, Germany, Hungary, Austria, and Bulgaria remain close allies of Israel. Berlin in particular has made its views clear, with Chancellor Friedrich Merz describing the move as "out of the question with the federal [German] government." Doing so would be a major commercial disruption, particularly for Israel, which buys a third of its goods from the EU. The accord, in force since 2000, covers everything from the two sides trading relationship – worth $50 billion each year for goods alone – up to political dialogue, and cooperation on research and technology. Another possibility, requiring only a qualified majority of 15 out of 27, would be the partial suspension of the deal, for example, its provisions on free trade or shutting Israel out of EU research funding programme Horizon. But multiple diplomatic sources told DW that the numbers weren't there either. Earlier in the week, EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas officially presented the document to the member states for a first debate, already making clear there would be no immediate moves. "It is not intended to punish Israel, but to trigger concrete improvements for the people and the lives of people in Gaza," she said on Monday. "If the situation does not improve, then we can also discuss further measures and come back to this in July." On Thursday, EU leaders at the summit only "took note" of the report in their joint statement, making no reference to potential rights breaches, and said ministers should revisit the topic next month. At the same time, the 27 leaders deplored the "dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the unacceptable number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation." Spain has also been calling for an EU embargo on the sale of arms to Israel, with Germany one of the country's major suppliers, as well as more sanctions. However, Berlin recently reaffirmed it would keep selling Israel weapons, and without Germany on board, the move wouldn't have much impact. A few other countries, including Belgium, France and Sweden, have supported imposing additional EU sanctions on Israel, but these too require unanimity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Echoing Sanchez, Irish leader Michael Martin said he would tell his colleagues at the summit that "the people of Europe find it incomprehensible that Europe does not seem to be in a position to put pressure on Israel." According to Lisa Musiol of conflict resolution think tank Crisis Group, maximum pressure would entail an arms embargo, large-scale sanctions against members of the government or a full suspension of the Association Agreement. "But almost no European leader speaks about such measures," Musiol told DW in a written statement. "There is probably no foreign policy topic within the EU where member states are so divided." Last month, it looked for a brief moment like the EU was indeed collectively hardening its stance. The Dutch proposed the review of the Association Agreement, and the move was greenlit by a majority of EU states on May 20. This came shortly after France, Britain and Canada issued a rare joint statement condemning Israel's latest offensive in Gaza and described its restrictions on aid as being "wholly disproportionate," and possibly in breach of international humanitarian law. There was a distinctive feeling that policy could be shifting. Musiol of Crisis Group said that that window seemed now to have closed. "It seems that after the recent escalation between Israel and Iran, many member states have fallen into their old positions," she said. "Even those member states that have traditionally been strong supporters of Israel but had started to be more outspoken or critical, such as Germany or Italy, have changed their tone."
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Belarus: Tsikhanouski says his release gives people hope – DW – 06/26/2025
In his first big interview after his release, Belarussian opposition leader Siarhei Tsikhanouski tells DW about the conditions in prison, his wife's transformation and hope for the people of Belarus. One of the most well-known Belarusian political prisoners, blogger Siarhei Tsikhanouski, was released on June 21 following a visit to Belarus by Keith Kellogg, President Trump's special envoy for Ukraine. Tsikhanouski gave his first big interview since being freed to DW's Alexandra Boguslawskaja, who had also interviewed him five years ago in Belarus, shortly before his arrest. Tsikhanouski was detained in May 2020, after being denied registration as a presidential candidate challenging Alexander Lukashenko and later convicted to 18 years in prison. His wife Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya assumed the candidacy and ran for presidency in his stead. She was forced to flee Belarus after Lukashenko claimed victory in an election which observers label as rigged. Tsikhaniuskaya has been living in Vilnius ever since and became the leader of Belarussion democratic opposition in Tsikhanouski: I couldn't believe it. I spent five years in a solitary confinement cell, sometimes it was three square meters, sometimes six, and sometimes even 18. And then, when you finally see open space around you, you're overwhelmed by emotions. The doors of the bus opened and I saw Svetlana. I couldn't believe it and had tears in my eyes. I hugged her and said, "Let's go somewhere.' We found a quiet spot to talk in private. Honestly, even now, I still can't believe it. The emotions were so intense, the tears just kept coming. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 videoThe regime used to imprison people on supposedly non-political charges, things like alleged economic crimes. Since I'm a businessman, I thought they'd give me three or four years on some fake economic charges, and only after the elections. But I never expected to scare them so much by pushing for real change. Once they realized that, they decided to lock me up preemptively, silence and bad-mouth me, and keep me behind not being able to talk to anyone — literally no one. Not hearing a single kind word from anyone because all you ever hear are insults, threats, and negativity from the guards. They try to convince you that you're nobody, that you've been forgotten, that everyone has given up, and no one is fighting for you anymore. But I didn't believe them. I knew that many Belarusians supported me — I had seen that support on the streets with my own eyes. Thinking about my family was hard because I had no information about them. I had the chance to read books, and I read constantly. It helped me take my mind off everything as I waited for the day I'd be freed. I knew that day would of course, it's a metaphor. The US administration has been preparing for the release of Belarusian political prisoners for a few years. The groundwork has been laid — I've heard this partly from diplomats involved in our release and from other sources. The prosecutor visited me in prison last year, during the Biden administration. So the preparations were already underway, but under Donald Trump, this effort really picked up pace. The thing is, Trump was planning to resolve the Ukraine issue quickly, which would lead to lifting sanctions on Russia. Since Belarus and Russia are part of a Union State, if the sanctions on Russia were lifted, the Lukashenko regime would automatically gain full access to all opportunities — so sanctions on Belarus would have to be lifted too. And if that happens, the political prisoners would have to be released as not about Trump personally. It's about the big politics where everything is connected and you can't just solve the issue of Belarussian political prisoners alone. It's definitely an important issue, but it's not as big as the war in Ukraine. That's a nightmare, a tragedy for all of Europe. And I think European officials and diplomats are doing the right thing by ignoring the regime. As long as political prisoners remain behind bars, there should be no dialogue with that time, I was still in pre-trial detention. My lawyers were visiting me, and I had newspaper subscriptions, so I found out right away. I couldn't believe it. I still don't understand how Putin, how the Russians could invade another country under the pretext that some Russians in Ukraine or the Russian language were under threat. If you really believe Russians are being mistreated, then bring them to your country. Build homes for them, give them pensions. Why kill so many people? After that, I stopped receiving any information at all, so I really don't know what's been going on. Now, I'm just beginning to take it all in and try to understand it. But one thing is clear to me: I fully support President Zelenskyy. He's facing an incredibly difficult situation, and we all need to stand behind him — even if he makes a mistake here and I didn't have to get to know her all over again. But honestly, I was surprised at how much she changed. She became such a businesslike woman — she wasn't a business lady before. But now she's so professional and driven. But at home, nothing has really changed. With the kids and with me, it's the same. The only difference is she's just completely exhausted all the not just that it could — it will. Absolutely, it will. And I think very soon you'll see us in many cities in Germany and in other European capitals as well. As for me personally — you'll definitely see me on at all. I asked my wife the same question — and despite everything we've been through, she said she doesn't regret anything either. We couldn't have done it any other way. She had to submit documents as a presidential candidate in my stead. And then she couldn't but fight for me, once her husband was thrown in prison for nothing. She knew I wasn't a criminal — and not fighting wasn't an option.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Iran Strikes Damage Hard To Assess Under Israeli Military Censorship
Israel has acknowledged being hit by more than 50 missiles during the 12-day war with Iran, but the true extent of the damage may never be known due to stringent press restrictions. Such regulations are nothing new in Israel, where any written or visual publication deemed potentially harmful to the loosely defined concept of "national security" can be banned by law. Censorship predates the creation of Israel in 1948, when the territory was under a British mandate. But with the recent missile barrages from Iran that managed to breach Israel's vaunted air defences and kill 28 people, the restrictions were further tightened. Any broadcast from a "combat zone or missile impact site" requires written authorisation from the military censor, according to the Israeli Government Press Office, which is responsible for government communications and for accrediting journalists. This requirement is particularly stringent when strikes land near military bases, oil refineries, or other facilities deemed strategic. "There is, of course, a very real national security dimension. You don't want to tell the enemy exactly where its bombs landed, or help them improve targeting," said Jerome Bourdon, professor of media sociology at Tel Aviv University. "But this also maintains uncertainty around the country's vulnerability to external threats. We probably will never know the full extent of the damage," he added. Most of the government's communication during the war focused on its military successes, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday praising a "historic victory" over Iran. For Bourdon, the tightening of media coverage also reflects "a very clear desire to reverse the narrative", at a time when Israel faces harsh international criticism over its war in Gaza, which has killed tens of thousands and triggered dire humanitarian conditions. On June 19, Defence Minister Israel Katz accused Tehran of "deliberately targeting hospitals and residential buildings" after a hospital in the southern Israeli city of Beersheba was hit, injuring around 40 people. Katz accused Iran of "the most serious war crimes", while Iran denied intentionally targeting the health centre. Meanwhile, human rights defenders regularly condemn Israel's destruction of the healthcare system in Gaza and the targeting of hospitals under the claim that they are used by Palestinian militants. During the war with Iran, media coverage near sites of missile strikes in Israel's civilian areas was occasionally hindered, as foreign reporters were prevented from filming wide shots or specifying the exact location of the impacts. In the central Israeli city of Ramat Gan, police interrupted the live broadcast of two Western news agencies filming a gutted building, suspecting them of providing the footage to Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera. Israel banned the outlet in May 2024, alleging it has ties with Palestinian militant group Hamas, which Al Jazeera has denied. In a statement, police said they had acted to stop the broadcast of "illegal content" in accordance with the "policy" of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. The far-right cabinet member, known for his incendiary rhetoric against critics, vowed on June 16 to take tough action against anyone who "undermines the security of the state". "Zero tolerance for those who help the enemy," echoed Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi. The two ministers "make claims that exceed the legal framework of their powers, and also are very, very extreme," said Tehilla Shwartz Altshuler, a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute. "Usually, they make a lot of noise" in order to "get political gain from this publicity," she told AFP. Beyond political calculations, "these officials show a deep mistrust, a real hostility toward the liberal Israeli media, and especially toward the foreign media," said professor Bourdon. The Government Press Office on Thursday reaffirmed its commitment to "freedom of the press... as a fundamental right" and insisted it makes "no distinction between Israeli and non-Israeli journalists".
